It's broken. There's a supposed fix, but many people say the fix
doesn't work for them. Upstream has been gone forever.
Anyway, I'm removing it December 10th unless someone else wants to fix
the problems with it *and* port it to the games-mods eclass.
--
Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 01:10 +0100, Marien Zwart wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 04:37:39PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Well, we specifically didn't allow a "*" setting because of this.
>
> Ah, I missed that. Thanks.
>
> > Perhaps we should make it
accept it. It'll simply
> tell the package manager whether it can consider certain packages or not.
> Once the package manager can do so, it can go ahead and actually display
> the license for agreement if the package is actually merged.
Nope. The goal is for check_license to go awa
an go ahead and actually display
> > the license for agreement if the package is actually merged.
> >
>
> Maybe it should be called ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES.
How about ACCEPTABLE_KEYWORDS, too? *roll eyes*
Seriously folks, the variable is to indicate that you accept a license.
> > Now, I ask everyone to go read the bug before posting any more
> > comments, since most of this has been discussed quite a bit there,
> > and doesn't need to be rehashed.
>
> I didn't realise there was a bug (#152593) - I was responding to the
> posting of
ound.
So, to answer your question, no. There is no way defined in the GLEP to
completely ignore all licensing, which matches what is currently in the
tree.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trust
ses (could automate that with a postsync hook I guess) and use that in
> > ACCEPT_LICENSE.
>
> in other words, your only proposed solution is a hack ?
No, the only proposed solution is one that *we* don't provide.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD
it take to maintain such a tree and how much use would
"normal" users get out of it, as opposed to "enterprise" users?
I'm thinking of releasing a tarball for a "release tree" next time
around, just to see how it flies. The main question I have is whether
we&#
est in the idea, I'll start
working on it some more.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
eing stable, and the
current tree becoming test/release candidate. Anything marked stable in
the current tree would be a candidate for stable in the next release
tree.
Users who want to use the current portage tree get what they want.
Users who want a more stable tree get what they want. Basically,
everyone (hopefully) is happy, or at least as happy as we can feasibly
make them.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ially only those
interested in supporting the tree are required to work on it. The tree
is created entirely by scripts and is tested *before* it's released on
the public.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Fou
updating.)
What were you expecting that we would do?
> Would that help in terms of having say, up to date GUI packages, or is it
> just easier to use overlays?
I have no desire to support any packages that weren't in the original
tree. If you want something we aren't providing,
l give
you an idea, based only on what we release, though.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
care. As I said, I am working on this concept as an experiment. It is
being done by Release Engineering. We aren't really *asking* anyone for
their opinion. We're simply stating what we plan on working on and will
be asking people who *want* to participate to do so. Anyone not
intere
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 16:01 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 11/29/06, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As of this release, I kept a copy of all of the distfiles for the entire
> > release, and can make a DVD of it, on request. This fulfills our
> >
d like to shoot for a meeting on the 17th sometime. Please RSVP via
> the [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias if that works for you.
Just curious, but why?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 18:30 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Please mention this in the next GWN.
Will do.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: T
ate meant the dependencies needed updating too. Again,
> that'd need automating, so we're talking about checking the tree in both
> directions (dependencies and dependants in my terms, sorry if I'm using the
> words wrongly.)
Why does it need automating? We generally don&
rity updates from GLSAs :P
Actually, we would have to review the process, since not everything that
gets a security bug ends up with a GLSA. My current loose rule is that
if it deserves a GLSA, then it deserves and update, but I don't know the
exact criteria the security team uses to decide if s
detect and load modules? Basically, is there a way to
emulate the old behavior of the "coldplug" init script? This would be
very useful for our LiveCD builds, since we've lost the ability to do
"nohotplug" on the command line to disable cold plugging.
--
Chris Gianellon
times where coldplug tried to load a driver that
caused problems for the user, and being able to disable that driver
being loaded has allowed them to continue to boot. With a coldplug that
cannot be disabled arbitrarily, we cannot do this.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
l ideally go out around 01h00 every Monday morning, in
> time for each week's GWN.)
Exactly how does it work? Does it just look for new ChangeLog files?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Found
om the list are correct, so what is
the attachment?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 08:47 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> > from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
>
> So what is rig
dy sys-apps/pcsc-ase-iiie-drv which handles both the USB
and Serial versions of this hardware. Is there something else I am
missing?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signatu
11 Dec 06
Donnie Berkholz
Package:
Removal date:
Contact:
games-fps/ut2004-domain2049
12 Dec 06
Chris Gianelloni
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
si
ith HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION is that they are version specific
> and there is no way to choose which version to pick in the case where
> more than one version was added at the same time.
As a compromise, how about having the package names link to their
packages.gentoo.org page?
--
Chris
re, it might be a bad idea to remove them just yet.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
't necessarily optimal, but it is the current best solution that we
have and it'll match up with our other packages.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
at profiles/default-linux/amd64/ChangeLog. You can
use echangelog, which works perfectly fine. Being unable to easily
track changes in profiles makes Release Engineering (and arch teams)
cry, so please add a ChangeLog entry, or we'll sick Jeff and the goats
on you.
Thanks,
--
Chris Giane
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:27:50AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > Most of the profiles under default-linux have a ChangeLog at the
> > architecture level. If you make *any* changes to a profile, you should
>
hon, feel free. I'd *love* to have a single script
that worked for the whole thing.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 17:40 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Just wondering, any objections if we add ChangeLogs at the rest of the
> > levels in profiles? Would esp. be useful for some of the more global
> > cha
# Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (09 Jan 2007)
# This has been dead upstream for close to eternity and is broken with GCC 4.x.
# Use games-action/d1x-rebirth instead. This will be removed on (09 Feb 2007).
games-action/d1x
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha
ike
> thirdpartymirrors, use{,.local}.desc, updates/, desc/ would benefit from
> ChangeLogs, for people that have them from rsync, instead of CVS.
Well, I've added a ChangeLog to profiles... If there's any objections
from anyone, they can feel free to remove it, or something.
-
re not keyworded for all arches?
Yes. After all, they *may* be keyworded on any arch. It isn't like the
hardware/software *can't* run on those arches.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundatio
not completely
asinine? Besides, if I want to maintain some nasty application that
doesn't work with sandbox, who are you (or anyone, for that matter) to
tell me that I cannot?
Hell, we could even *not* have sandbox/userpriv in the default
ACCEPT_RESTRICT, since they have possible security impli
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 19:06 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni napsal(a):
> > Uhh... you missed RESTRICT=userpriv and the upcoming RESTRICT=unattended
> > when calling for no "ACCEPT_RESTRICT"...
>
> Don't see how's userpriv related here; also
"Always do what I say. I'd rather not
install the package if it doesn't work with $FEATURE." which could be
solved with ACCEPT_RESTRICT. It gives the power back to the user, not
the ebuild writer.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 16:47 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Please mention this in the next GWN.
I don't always read every post of every thread. In the future, send
such requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be sure I'll actually see it
before making up the GWN.
Thanks,
--
Chris Giane
't have the patience to continue discussing this without
getting quite hostile. The only thing I can possibly gather from this
is you're intentionally being fucking dense, so it's not worth my time.
How is it that you can ignore half an email and only respond to
something out of conte
the user
does. Adding ACCEPT_RESTRICT allows the user to not list userpriv (or
-userpriv if userpriv is on by default) and the ebuild WILL NOT RUN if
it requires userpriv be disabled.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Fou
t we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
Council-driven projects.
Thanks in advance!
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a
gt; From: Simon Stelling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:24 PM
> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for projects...
>
> I like the idea. Something really useful I could think of is *drums*
>
> the implementation
Well, we've replaced this with catalyst, there's been no movement on it
for 4 years now, "upstream" has abandoned it, and Release Engineering
wants no part in it. It's been maintainer-needed for who knows how
long.
If someone doesn't step up in 30 days, it
There's a ChangeLog file in profiles/ChangeLog now. Please use it when
making changes to things in profiles/*...
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signatur
es-fps/quakeforge
> games-rpg/wastesedge
No clue.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ther
suggestions or ideas. I just think this is probably the easiest for the
time being.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
quakeforge
> > > games-rpg/wastesedge
> >
> > They have to be able to read /usr/games/lib.
>
> Wouldn't it be more sensible, then, to add /usr/games/lib to
> SANDBOX_READ or whatever is the appropriate variable?
It has nothing to do with the sandbox. It'
h case adding the portage user to the games group seems overall
> to be a better solution than requiring root privileges to build.
Sure, and it means getting every single user that merges games to change
their systems. It's possible, but something that would take a very long
time to
sn't cause extra dependencies to
be pulled into the other projects (which is sounds like it won't) then
base should be fine.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 01:06 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Reply-to
I've already completed this, I just haven't figured out exactly where it
needs to be committed. I'm guessing somewhere in the developer
handbook. Anyway, where should I send this so it'll be done? File a
bug
y, Roy can work on whatever he wants how he wants, just like any
of the rest of us. Anyone who doesn't like it can simply fork the
project, or even create a new project to replace the functionality
provided by this package. It happens all the time. I seem to remember
it happening with this
to try to convince Roy to not do it. I'm sure he takes
large monetary bribes. Otherwise, shut your pie hole or fork the
current baselayout yourself. Anything else is just you trying to
control what Roy does with his completely volunteer time, which is about
as likely as me flying a cheese
lasses and functions into something more static.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 02:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 08 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > He's not "screwing up" anything. He's making changes he wishes as the
> > author and maintainer of the package. If someone doesn't like it,
is mdadm.conf 100% compatible with /etc/raidtab? I've only
minimal familiarity with mdadm on Red Hat, and Anaconda/Kickstart does
all the heavy lifting for me, so I've not used it much.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 08:58 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 12 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > If we're going to do this, should we do it before the 2007.0 snapshot,
> > so people don't have raidtools disappear out from under them on their
> > ne
h changes to their profiles
shoot me a .diff for it? I'd like to include this in the release
snapshot so it's already done on new installs.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Truste
most of the commits. Go back
and look at who those people are, they're the same people that work on
*multiple* architectures.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
even though portage/pkgcore may not?
Isn't the *point* of this spec to try to bring everyone on the same
page?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Descri
everything support it. The contents itself I leave
to more capable hands. I'll be reviewing it when it is released, but
that's only just to assist in the process.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member
ld try our best to make it as close to perfect as we can
before we try forcing the differing implementations to use it.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
who to add, if you
require the help. The point being that manpower should not be the
limiting factor here in getting this done when there are numerous people
who are familiar enough with portage and want to to help.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 A
rkless installs
Essentially, as you go to the right down the stack, things get more
specific and adds more USE flags.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ailure using
-ffast-math instead, then I'd say go for it. Patches are always a
better solution than workarounds.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Des
se them
for the release itself. They should be quite simple, at least for
"default-linux" and its children. I'm putting in everything that is
currently in the tree into my multi-parent profile group. Since I don't
have to make any changes to the current profiles, it can live
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:09 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Something is wrong with this list (there are some other removals I know
> took place that do not seem to be listed).
>
> Please ignore while I trace why.
DAMN YOU!!!
Heh... just kidding.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release
small set of themes, they should be included
#2. The themes are made by Gentoo
For anything else, let the user download what they want and use it as
they see fit. There's not much reason to track them in the package
manager. That being said, I'm not opposed to the themes staying
asked for it, we're going to pursue other options. We can't control
PMS< but we also don't have to sit around and do nothing to reach the
Council's goal of an approved specification for EAPI=0, a goal which I
believe some people lost sight of some time ago.
--
Chris Gianello
out 5 actually helping
*at all*), the chances of a project such as nightly builds ever taking
off is well beyond our means at this time.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
y much dropped by the previous trustees.
The current trustees are working on a better solution to this, but are
currently focused more on reincorporation in a friendlier state for our
project.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 16:56 +, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 02:20:48 -0500
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The EAPI=0 document was supposed to be a QA project. What it is now,
> > I have no idea.
>
> A QA subproject wh
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 17:49 +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > I have no plans on releasing *any* kind of nightly *anything* so
> > long as Release Engineering still gets minimal testi
me to produce the "Last Rites" (which is done
by hand). Perhaps when I get more help and more time, we can switch,
but for now, I'm sticking with chronological order.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Memb
use your reply button on an existing
thread, even if you change the topic, it still appears under the old
thread. When starting a new thread, use a new mail, not a reply mail.
That's all he meant.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 15:32 +0530, Anant Narayanan wrote:
> redistribution which means we would need RESTRICT="nomirror".
RESTRICT="mirror" please... "nomirror" is deprecated and will go away at
some point in the future.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineeri
ntil
that time, we should really be building both client and server for *all*
packages. The *only* reason one should not be doing this is if they're
following the definition of minimal, or it is not possible to build both
the client and the server at the same time.
--
Chris Gianelloni
ith no complaints.
I wouldn't have too much of a problem with only a "server" USE flag, but
I'd still prefer things were held off until USE-based dependencies. If
we did decide on a USE=server flag, then it should also likely have
USE=dedicated merged with it so there'
that does what I want and also helps me track when I
experience bugs that might be portage-related.
Great job guys!
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
uild:43:
> games-strategy/boson/boson-0.13.ebuild:44:
Done.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the mails, right?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 09:34 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:28:50 -0400
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 07:30 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> > > banning/suspending a user from a mailing list. They w
;]
> As for -dev you're right. But again the proposal is so vague it only mentions
> "Gentoo's official communication infrastructure". I take this to mean all
> mailing lists, forums, IRC. So in my eyes it will affect general users as
> well.
I look at anything
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 14:38 +, Duncan wrote:
> Perhaps if infra doesn't want to hassle read-only mode and prefers a full
> mail ban, mention could be made of gmane for those who wish to continue
> read-only access.
I think we'd point people to http://archives.gentoo.org
about
this, then?
EVERYTHING with gentoo.org or #gentoo-* in it? Is that good enough?
(Looking forward to the day when we don't have to be so damned pedantic
in everything that we write.)
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Develope
should be rather
well-behaved in that aspect.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
o continually
rectify my shortcomings, will leave the responses for others who are
more eloquent than myself to write.
Have a good day everyone.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
back to
its core of being a *development* list, that many of the flames would
die down to an acceptable level.
Thank you for your insight, Daniel!
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gento
eived benefit we would gain.
> http://www.pkgcore.org/ if you want to see the other other package manager,
> written by one of the (core?) portage devs. Apparently it's where a
ex-portage devs (just to clarify)
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 A
ised the code to read differently. You should check
it out at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/coc.xml to see how it
has changed. Also, we are planning on reviewing it again prior to the
next meeting. I suggest that people take suggestions/comments on the
current incarnation on the gentoo-counc
moderator/operator). Since the next
Council elections aren't before the next Council meeting, this should
work out just fine. ;]
Basically, the chain goes like this:
local moderators/operators -> proctors -> Council
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/
a
are "staff" and eligible for the Council.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
nly
Gentoo must be the most popular distribution on the planet!
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
as a joke. It shows
that the distrowatch "ranking" means absolutely nothing but the number
of times somebody(s) clicked on a link.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
si
had in 2006.1, as there comes a time when we simply can't wait for bugs
to get fixed anymore if we ever plan on releasing, and we're already
*way* behind the schedule that we wanted to release under.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architec
nd exclude this icons sounds from tarball? Or
> may be RESTRICT fetch it enough to solve the problem?
RESTRICT=fetch would cover it for you.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Fo
e're discussing here. What is being discussed is
the actual development support infrastructure, such as our repositories,
bug tracker, etc.
That being said, I don't know our current mirror needs, but
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/source_mirrors.xml probably has the answers
you are seeking.
lf and two staff I can use to assist
> with this, but someone needs to point us in the right direction.
- a back-ported fix needs to be made and marked stable
- a newer (working) headers needs to go stable
And it needs to happen *yesterday* since it means we have to go back and
redo a bunch
uld try teaching people GuideXML,
I'm not sure if it would be a valuable expenditure of time. That is,
unless you're volunteering to teach it.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gento
501 - 600 of 1155 matches
Mail list logo
