/releng/kconfig/2006.1/x86
The installcd has actually been i486 since 2004.3 was released.
Actually, that was probably accidental and likely my fault, but it's
been i486 since then (except for a short time as i586, which caused
problems for some i586-class machines... go figure).
--
Chris Gianelloni
an OS.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to start building
a fleet.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
it in the oven for a few
hours.
Speak now, or forever hold your peace.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
In my updating of all of the quake3 mods, I realized that quake3-osp was
the predecessor to quake3-cpma. Well, quake3-cpma has all of the
features of quake3-osp, so I see no point in keeping both. If nobody
steps up with a good reason, it's getting the axe on November 23rd.
--
Chris Gianelloni
to publish a new GLEP to superceed it, rather than revise the existing
GLEP?)
For something like this, I think that merely noting that it was changed
via an amendment from the Council should be sufficient. I do agree that
changing it inline without such a note would be bad.
--
Chris Gianelloni
the leaders of
Gentoo that so many seem to want, yet also have to balance not
overstepping the bounds some people think we need. We honestly do need
everyone's opinions on these things, so thank you for posing yours.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 13:17 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 10/25/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I'd like to know what you would propose we do if we were to follow
something like this. Would we post something like GLEP 39a, as an
amendment to GLEP 39, or would we have
for the GWN. There's nothing automatic about it.
Someone else already suggested this to us, but I explained to him that
unless someone had some way to automate it that it simply wasn't
feasible to do by hand.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture
packages) than try to keep track of
what everyone else is doing. The GWN takes a significant amount of time
as it is to put together. Any process that isn't automated is pretty
much out of the question due to time constraints.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86
?
Thank you,
Peter.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#NonFreeDocumentationLicenses
[7] http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 17:03 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
In my updating of all of the quake3 mods, I realized that quake3-osp was
the predecessor to quake3-cpma. Well, quake3-cpma has all of the
features of quake3-osp, so I see no point in keeping both. If nobody
steps up with a good
. Not being grouped with other
packages doesn't mean it is unmaintained.
So this bears the question, what is the proper solution?
Make herd optional?
Force the maintainer's email into herd for packages without a herd?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture
the maintainer tag if herd is no-herd. Then, we only
allow valid devs, and maintainer-needed in maintainer. That should
resolve the problem.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
.
Set S globally (not in src_unpack).
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 17:02 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
3) ??
Get your hands on some of the minority arch hardware and help out?
Remember that some of the teams in question are sometimes only one or
two people. In this case, a single developer does make a dramatic
difference.
--
Chris
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 20:06 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 19:51, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Remember that some of the teams in question are sometimes only one or
two people.
Like x86? :P
With Opfer on the team, I think we're at 5 active.
--
Chris
. Using the stage4
catalyst target will save you a good amount of time, since it doesn't go
through the unmerge/rsync/emerge cycle on each package. Just FYI.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
filing a bug like all other infra requests?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the people responsible for
this, you'd rather go over their heads and try to bring this up to the
council, so we can override their decisions? Not bloody likely.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
jobs that allow them to work on Gentoo on the job, the Foundation
pays nobody.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
of the failed message for him.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
probably blog before the
fact as well).
Thanks,
GWN, #gentoo, etcwhere is our pr team?
Waiting for someone to request something of them. The PR team is
currently passive. If you don't ask, we won't do it.
I've put this in the GWN for this week, which should be going out $soon.
--
Chris
It's broken. There's a supposed fix, but many people say the fix
doesn't work for them. Upstream has been gone forever.
Anyway, I'm removing it December 10th unless someone else wants to fix
the problems with it *and* port it to the games-mods eclass.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 01:10 +0100, Marien Zwart wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 04:37:39PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Well, we specifically didn't allow a * setting because of this.
Ah, I missed that. Thanks.
Perhaps we should make it simple and specify that no interactive license
display
the license for agreement if the package is actually merged.
Nope. The goal is for check_license to go away. Please read bug
#152593 to see the discussion that's been going on with this.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer
, ACCEPT_LICENSE, just like how ACCEPT_KEYWORDS means you accept
that KEYWORD.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
when the original posting
from Marius was done, but it might not have been. Anyway, I'm glad that
I've now pointed people there so they can see the discussion that took
place to get us to where we are now.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
ignore all licensing, which matches what is currently in the
tree.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is a hack ?
No, the only proposed solution is one that *we* don't provide.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
make them.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is created entirely by scripts and is tested *before* it's released on
the public.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
. If you want something we aren't providing, use an overlay.
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
No version changes on any packages, except those which are necessary due
to a security violation, or a vulnerable package's dependencies.
I could imagine a situation where a dependant package (ie one
we release, though.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Engineering-driven project
is welcome to completely ignore us, as we will them.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 16:01 +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 11/29/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As of this release, I kept a copy of all of the distfiles for the entire
release, and can make a DVD of it, on request. This fulfills our
requirements with the GPL.
What
sometime. Please RSVP via
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias if that works for you.
Just curious, but why?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 18:30 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
Please mention this in the next GWN.
Will do.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description
get more than 10 or so
GLSA a week. Even doing everything by hand, this would be a very
minimal workload to keep updated.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
is that
if it deserves a GLSA, then it deserves and update, but I don't know the
exact criteria the security team uses to decide if something warrants a
GLSA or not.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation
of the coldplug init script? This would be
very useful for our LiveCD builds, since we've lost the ability to do
nohotplug on the command line to disable cold plugging.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation
to boot. With a coldplug that
cannot be disabled arbitrarily, we cannot do this.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
around 01h00 every Monday morning, in
time for each week's GWN.)
Exactly how does it work? Does it just look for new ChangeLog files?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
are correct, so what is
the attachment?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 08:47 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
So what is right, the attachment or the list
/pcsc-ase-iiie-drv which handles both the USB
and Serial versions of this hardware. Is there something else I am
missing?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
/amap/ti
ti11 Dec 06/ti
timail link=[EMAIL PROTECTED]Donnie Berkholz/mail/ti
/tr
/table
table
tr
thPackage:/th
thRemoval date:/th
thContact:/th
/tr
tr
tigames-fps/ut2004-domain2049/ti
ti12 Dec 06/ti
timail link=[EMAIL PROTECTED]Chris Gianelloni/mail/ti
/tr
/table
--
Chris
or DESCRIPTION is that they are version specific
and there is no way to choose which version to pick in the case where
more than one version was added at the same time.
As a compromise, how about having the package names link to their
packages.gentoo.org page?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release
be a bad idea to remove them just yet.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
solution that we
have and it'll match up with our other packages.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
at profiles/default-linux/amd64/ChangeLog. You can
use echangelog, which works perfectly fine. Being unable to easily
track changes in profiles makes Release Engineering (and arch teams)
cry, so please add a ChangeLog entry, or we'll sick Jeff and the goats
on you.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:27:50AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Most of the profiles under default-linux have a ChangeLog at the
architecture level. If you make *any* changes to a profile, you should
be putting your changes
* to have a single script
that worked for the whole thing.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 17:40 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 12:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Just wondering, any objections if we add ChangeLogs at the rest of the
levels in profiles? Would esp. be useful for some of the more global
changes.
Not really
# Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09 Jan 2007)
# This has been dead upstream for close to eternity and is broken with GCC 4.x.
# Use games-action/d1x-rebirth instead. This will be removed on (09 Feb 2007).
games-action/d1x
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64
{,.local}.desc, updates/, desc/ would benefit from
ChangeLogs, for people that have them from rsync, instead of CVS.
Well, I've added a ChangeLog to profiles... If there's any objections
from anyone, they can feel free to remove it, or something.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic
, they *may* be keyworded on any arch. It isn't like the
hardware/software *can't* run on those arches.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description
nasty application that
doesn't work with sandbox, who are you (or anyone, for that matter) to
tell me that I cannot?
Hell, we could even *not* have sandbox/userpriv in the default
ACCEPT_RESTRICT, since they have possible security implications.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 19:06 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
Chris Gianelloni napsal(a):
Uhh... you missed RESTRICT=userpriv and the upcoming RESTRICT=unattended
when calling for no ACCEPT_RESTRICT...
Don't see how's userpriv related here; also the original idea was to
stick FEATURES=unattended
and do it our way, no matter what. There's no
mechanism for the user to say Always do what I say. I'd rather not
install the package if it doesn't work with $FEATURE. which could be
solved with ACCEPT_RESTRICT. It gives the power back to the user, not
the ebuild writer.
--
Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 16:47 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote:
Please mention this in the next GWN.
I don't always read every post of every thread. In the future, send
such requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be sure I'll actually see it
before making up the GWN.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release
. The only thing I can possibly gather from this
is you're intentionally being fucking dense, so it's not worth my time.
How is it that you can ignore half an email and only respond to
something out of context and then still fuck *that* up?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha
allows the user to not list userpriv (or
-userpriv if userpriv is on by default) and the ebuild WILL NOT RUN if
it requires userpriv be disabled.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo
we can accomplish to test out the idea of
Council-driven projects.
Thanks in advance!
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
] [RFC] Ideas for projects...
I like the idea. Something really useful I could think of is *drums*
the implementation of GLEP 42.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Well, we've replaced this with catalyst, there's been no movement on it
for 4 years now, upstream has abandoned it, and Release Engineering
wants no part in it. It's been maintainer-needed for who knows how
long.
If someone doesn't step up in 30 days, it's getting the axe.
--
Chris Gianelloni
There's a ChangeLog file in profiles/ChangeLog now. Please use it when
making changes to things in profiles/*...
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
appreciated
games-board/ggz-txt-client
games-board/ggz-sdl-games
games-board/ggz-gtk-games
games-board/ggz-kde-games
games-board/gnuchess-book
games-board/ggz-kde-client
games-board/ggz-gtk-client
games-util/emilia-pinedit
games-fps/quakeforge
games-rpg/wastesedge
No clue.
--
Chris Gianelloni
this is probably the easiest for the
time being.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
group seems overall
to be a better solution than requiring root privileges to build.
Sure, and it means getting every single user that merges games to change
their systems. It's possible, but something that would take a very long
time to accomplish.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering
be fine.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
it can simply fork the
project, or even create a new project to replace the functionality
provided by this package. It happens all the time. I seem to remember
it happening with this package manager we all are familiar with...
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86
baselayout yourself. Anything else is just you trying to
control what Roy does with his completely volunteer time, which is about
as likely as me flying a cheese grater to the moon.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council
static.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 02:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 08 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
He's not screwing up anything. He's making changes he wishes as the
author and maintainer of the package. If someone doesn't like it, they
can fork it and maintain their own
with mdadm on Red Hat, and Anaconda/Kickstart does
all the heavy lifting for me, so I've not used it much.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 08:58 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
If we're going to do this, should we do it before the 2007.0 snapshot,
so people don't have raidtools disappear out from under them on their
newly-installed system?
it's already
to their profiles
shoot me a .diff for it? I'd like to include this in the release
snapshot so it's already done on new installs.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
that work on
*multiple* architectures.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the *point* of this spec to try to bring everyone on the same
page?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
it. The contents itself I leave
to more capable hands. I'll be reviewing it when it is released, but
that's only just to assist in the process.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
it.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
that manpower should not be the
limiting factor here in getting this done when there are numerous people
who are familiar enough with portage and want to to help.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
the stages aren't built against these, they can have
more stuff added to them without as harsh consequences... LiveCD-based
installs use the desktop profile for networkless installs
Essentially, as you go to the right down the stack, things get more
specific and adds more USE flags.
--
Chris
instead, then I'd say go for it. Patches are always a
better solution than workarounds.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
profile group. Since I don't
have to make any changes to the current profiles, it can live
side-by-side in the tree with no adverse consequences, other than people
having make certain commits in two places until we phase out the old
profiles.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:09 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Something is wrong with this list (there are some other removals I know
took place that do not seem to be listed).
Please ignore while I trace why.
DAMN YOU!!!
Heh... just kidding.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic
and use it as
they see fit. There's not much reason to track them in the package
manager. That being said, I'm not opposed to the themes staying in the
tree, either. I'm just trying to find out people's motivations for
either keeping them/removing them.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering
can't control
PMS but we also don't have to sit around and do nothing to reach the
Council's goal of an approved specification for EAPI=0, a goal which I
believe some people lost sight of some time ago.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games
taking
off is well beyond our means at this time.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
by the previous trustees.
The current trustees are working on a better solution to this, but are
currently focused more on reincorporation in a friendlier state for our
project.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 16:56 +, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 02:20:48 -0500
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The EAPI=0 document was supposed to be a QA project. What it is now,
I have no idea.
A QA subproject which has not yet released a public draft.
Now
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 17:49 +0100, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I have no plans on releasing *any* kind of nightly *anything* so
long as Release Engineering still gets minimal testing from only a
*tiny* subset
to produce the Last Rites (which is done
by hand). Perhaps when I get more help and more time, we can switch,
but for now, I'm sticking with chronological order.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
, it still appears under the old
thread. When starting a new thread, use a new mail, not a reply mail.
That's all he meant.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 15:32 +0530, Anant Narayanan wrote:
redistribution which means we would need RESTRICT=nomirror.
RESTRICT=mirror please... nomirror is deprecated and will go away at
some point in the future.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86
should really be building both client and server for *all*
packages. The *only* reason one should not be doing this is if they're
following the definition of minimal, or it is not possible to build both
the client and the server at the same time.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic
. If
we did decide on a USE=server flag, then it should also likely have
USE=dedicated merged with it so there's only one flag for enabling
server builds.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo
701 - 800 of 995 matches
Mail list logo
