On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
I haven't heard back from them, maybe you can ask them what's up.
This has been setup (with Donnie's help):
https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hey people, what are we going to do with bugs like:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421839
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445848
I'd like to help with things. Is the process of building livecd
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers
that are still interested in the distro, that maintain low activity
packages for herds that are stretched way too thin, and are still
contributing to the
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Do you realize that you just wrote a two-and-a-half page single-spaced
thousand-word email? Seriously, this is way too much. This mailing
list is way too much.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
My point is that you consistently write long essays that I, and
apparently most others, don't bother to read. I'm not sure if you're
aware of this.
Someone said on IRC this morning in response to this thread
the tragic thing
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Alexander Berntsen
alexan...@plaimi.net wrote:
All packages should have local descriptions of what the bindist
USE-flag specifically does. This should be a policy when writing
ebuilds that include it.
Agreed.
media-libs/mesa
Fixed. (bug 448932)
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the default
implementation from freedesktop.org.
pkg-config is now lighter and has less dependencies than before as the
switch from bundled glib1 to glib2
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017
be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally.
That's what he's doing... asking maintainers if it's okay to open
stabilization bugs for their packages.
honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually
missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a
lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails
that I have to search through.
So ignore it and he'll open bugs just the
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
So you want to re-implement multilib-portage in an eclass without the
additional benefits a package-manager level implementation has?
I really wish you'd just make the PMS diff and get your stuff
implemented. How long has it
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
5. Solutions to specific problems
-
1. x11-proto packages
Those packages install headers to /usr/include and pkg-config files
to /usr/lib64. This supposedly means that the headers could be
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear Everyone,
Does anyone have root access to Linux systems on any of the following
architectures that is willing to help ZFS development?
Alpha
HPPA
IA-64
MIPS/MIPS64
PPC/PPC64
SH
SPARC/SPARC64
I want to port
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 00:02:33 + (UTC)
Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
+ 07 Jan 2013; Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org profiles.desc:
+ Mark s390 profiles stable.
+
06 Jan 2013; Justin
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
This makes reading them a bit easier, especially with phases run
in parallel.
---
gx86/eclass/multilib-build.eclass | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:03:01 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open
bugs
blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
In terms of 'following Gentoo policy.' We encourage packages to be as
close to upstream as possible. I cannot fathom why when you basically
find a performance bug in malloc, you start a thread on the list about
replacing
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 26 of February 2013 11:44:31 Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
I see a *HUGE* reason. glibc ships with ptmalloc. If you think they
should use
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same
discussion again?
Can't this be restated as Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it
could have bugs in the future?? Tree cleaning packages over
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with
the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
Interesting
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Steven, I think you can behave a lot better on the internet. kthx.
Amazing. I came to the exact opposite conclusion.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:00:29 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so
bad with
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:59:57 +0200
yac y...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
I was recently investigating what cpu flags do I have and how does it
work. I have put what I have so far at [1].
So I thought I let you know in case
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
[...]
...shouldn't mmxext be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
Perhaps this was covered already, but how exactly did this one file,
added by your co-maintainer, hurt you? Did it cause additional bugs?
Did it break a working ebuild? Did it kill your cat?
It would seem to
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
When we then move onto stage 2, it uses just the packages built during
stage1 (/tmp/stage1root becomes /). This means, if seed stage has
mpc.so.0.1 but portage has since included mpc.so.2 that the gcc in
stage2
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
Yes, it does need to be rebuilt if key deps are updated. The gcc
produced in the stage1 is broken, so won't run to rebuild itself during
the stage2 run.
But we keep the old libs around via preserve_libs, and once stage1 is
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
You are misremembering that we are using preserve_libs to save our butts
when mpc is updated and gcc is still linked to the old mpc. I feel very
uncomfortable as the recommendation of preserve-libs is to remerge
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/10/2013 10:03 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:27:46PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
The other thing we needed to do was completely remove the use of
or building of binpkgs during the
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Diego,
hasufell wrote:
I would object... 10 games are wa too few for a new category and
especially pkg moves..
1 app-antivirus/
3 net-zope/
5 x11-base/
7 gpe-utils/
8 app-officeext/
11
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Then there is a question whether toolchain packages should use EAPI 5,
EAPI=5 would be useful for both the mips team (for bug 477956) and for
catalyst builders (for subslot dependencies when dealing with binary
(I sent this to gentoo-releng@. Resending to gentoo-dev@ for a wider audience)
Can we make autobuilds go to /experimental and then only move them to
/releases when someone actually tests them?
Looking at bugzilla and listening in #gentoo-releng, it's kind of
embarrassing how often someone
Hi,
Any objections to me adding an ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND variable so that I
can take advantage of the multilib work on mips?
Thanks,
Matt
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:28 PM, yac y...@gentoo.org wrote:
I have fully encrypted systems, including /, which requires an
initramfs with cryptsetup built staticaly.
Doesn't it actually require them built statically, or simply that the
necessary libraries are also in the initramfs?
I think
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
go ahead -- note that some packages have broken multilib deps though
Thanks!
ah, and it wont work if you dont add support to multilib-build.eclass
also.
Of course :)
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2013-07-29, o godz. 17:21:15
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Any objections to me adding an ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND variable so that I
can take advantage of the multilib work on mips?
But please sent
All versions of xmltv in the tree are EAPI=0.
It needs a version bump (bug 288927), an updated home page (bug
325437), and to be ported to EAPI=5 and stabilized (bug 479056).
Anyone use it and want to handle these bugs?
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:04:56 -0700
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
I committed it last night before your email.
# Keep it sorted. Please do not add anything without prior
discussion # on
gentoo-dev.
n32
n64
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
It doesn't help to keep so aggressively pushing it.
Neither does so aggressively pushing against it.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
...so, allowing for the ability of 32bit userland with 64bit toolchain
(via, say, setting ABI_X86=32 in make.conf) using the eclasses is just
outright not ever going to happen? Never mind not supporting it, but
essentially
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Le dimanche 11 août 2013 à 22:09 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/15/2013 04:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 14 August 2013 21:17, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
It's time of year again to consider moving a few arches to dev-only status.
I propose the following arches to lose their stable keywords
- s390
- sh
- ia64
- alpha
- m68k
- sparc
I want some level between
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
The proposal is to drop stable keywords on arches that cannot keep up.
Do you feel this is not the case on alpha?
I'm not sure if that's my claim. I'm worried because I think it might
be a disaster for alpha (and perhaps
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there an alternative? afaik a profile can be either stable,dev or
exp. I can't see how we can implement something between
stable and dev. And what would that represent? It may or may not be
stable? If this is the
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
The license contains nasty clauses like this:
If you are a European Consumer you must not export Software outside
the country in which you download it without our prior written
permission.
I.e., if you install the
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013, Rich Freeman wrote:
I didn't really get any response to this one way or another. At the
last council meeting a majority of the votes were in favor of
delaying taking action, so this is back on the
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Justin (jlec) j...@gentoo.org wrote:
what is your opinion to set
FEATURES=binchecks strip
for all those packages which purely install files. For example python
package only installing scripts, or perl packages or latex. There might
be more.
It may help to
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Martin Vaeth
va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
I was not suggesting inlining the list into the dependency but
only inlining the USE-flag into the (single) perl ebuild.
Currently if I have a package which needs e.g. Term-ANSI-Color,
but not in a
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:03:41 +0200 as excerpted:
i'll add USE=neon to use.desc and punt the local descriptions if nobody
objects
media-libs/libpng: support ARM NEON cpu instruction set
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Dmitrij K kdi...@live.ru wrote:
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Tuesday 10 of January 2012 03:34:06 Dmitrij K wrote:
Dear developers of crossdev.
Can you realize --target mingw64 (for creating windows app 64 bit) (like
mingw-w64.sourceforge.net)?
And can
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:00:52 -0500 as excerpted:
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 21:42:14 Michael Weber wrote:
Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds?
take a chill pill phil
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (21 Jan 2012)
# Package renamed to media-sound/musique
# http://flavio.tordini.org/minitunes-renamed-to-musique
# Removal in 30 days
media-sound/minitunes
Is it normal to wipe
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ross smith gaur...@gmail.com wrote:
The line above is not prompting you to turn on the nettle use flag, which
appears to already be on. It's prompting you to add the gmp use flag for
dev-libs/nettle.
Which looks like it's on as well.
In either case -- this
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote:
some mips profiles are scary too:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~slyfox/profiles_mips.png
Weird. I'll take a look at that.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
stabilization)?
I have
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote:
slep noticed and reported an odd thing:
$ euse -i kate
...
ls: cannot access /gentoo/portage/metadata/cache/kde-base/kdebindings-perl-*:
No such file or directory
ls: cannot access
So you run set FEATURES=test to run a package's test suite during
keywording. Later, you emerge -vuNDa ... and portage wants to reemerge
that package with USE=-test.
Can't we avoid this somehow? I presume in the vast majority of cases
emerging with FEATURES/USE=test doesn't actually affect what's
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
On 03/28/12 03:16, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 19:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
But that's ok, because extensive studies have shown that the only possible
reasons for putting /usr/portage on its own
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
On 03/30/12 17:15, Joshua Kinard wrote:
Maybe it's time for Gentoo-2.0?
I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we
declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I think
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:14 PM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear All,
I have just emerged ocaml-3.12.0[ocamlopt] on arm and used it to compile
mldonkey[ocamlopt]. It seems to work well.
it was masked on Apr 18, 2010,
,
| /usr/portage/profiles$ grep -n -B3 ocamlopt ./arch/arm/use.mask
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
What is the plan for platforms that are not supported by libturbo?
It's not that they're not supported, just that libjpeg-turbo doesn't
have optimized routines for them. It'll still run fine. (Check the
keywords, you'll
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a USE flag for
SSE2? We already have SSE2 flags, even global..
That's not it. The flash binary uses SSE2 instructions without
checking for their presence,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
wouldnt adding a sse2 useflag and putting it in REQUIRED_USE solve the
problem ?
afaik portage wont even try to upgrade if people have -sse2
If that works, which I think it will, that does sound like the best thing to
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/26/12 at 06:00PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:04:08 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Arg, no. Please just print the warning if the host doesn't do SSE2.
There's no reason to
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (05 May 2012)
# Broken with unrar-4.2.1 wrt upstream ticket of:
# http://code.google.com/p/rar2fs/issues/detail?id=10
# Either waiting for fixed release, or the package will
# be
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
I got into the habbit of using repoman commit -[Mm] to do that, but for
some
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
2. Arches were Git repos are too heavy (Kumba wanted this for MIPS)
Please don't go to this trouble for the ability to commit to portage
on *really* slow systems.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git
Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems
and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's
good enough
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul-
packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips.
If a package has dependencies, then those dependencies are required to have
at least the
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Matt Turner schrieb:
I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to
special-case packages that don't install binaries.
I dont follow. Did you think about only having additional ABI flags for
certain cases
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Several packages are using it with the same sense (support connman),
maybe we should move it from local to global USEs, what do you think?
Off-topic question, but how is connman related to NetworkManager? Is
it an alternative,
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Since DEPENDENCIES hasn't been written up in a Gentoo-friendly manner,
and since the Exherbo documentation doesn't seem to suffice to explain
the idea here, here's some more details on the DEPENDENCIES
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
1) 746 hits in the tree for COMMON_DEPEND; that's 2%, and the usages
I'm aware of have been for literally, what it sounds like- depends
that are both DEPEND and RDEPEND.
CDEPEND is pretty common as well. I could 466 files
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 19 September 2012 03:18, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Readability is more important, and there I still don't buy the
argument that the new
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Matt Turner wrote:
From the other thread (example conversion of gentoo-x86 current
deps to unified dependencies):
[Sorry, I've missed this one in the other thread, so replying here.]
4
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 19 September 2012 14:01, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 19 September 2012 03:18, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
Thanks a lot, Michał! This looks good to me.
Use case: xorg packages, ask Matt.
So the idea is
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 22/09/2012 18:54, Matt Turner wrote:
I'd like to add multilib USE flags to Mesa and thus its dependencies.
I realized that almost everything in x11-libs/ could be converted very
easily, which would allow us
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 22/09/2012 20:42, Matt Turner wrote:
I think this means make 32-bit binary packages' dependencies on amd64
not use the emul- packages? If so, that'd certainly be a component of
getting rid of emul-linux-x86
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:02 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I prefer the stronger solution. This is just a quick workaround.
And I'd prefer if people who aren't involved with what I'm working on
don't try to block my progress.
I appreciate your opinion, and truthfully I'd just rather
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Matt Turner schrieb:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
One problem that I remembered now:
If every ebuild inheritting this eclass (either this one or similar)
will add a multilib USE, people running multilib profiles will get it
enabled for ALL packages inheritting it, causing
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:10:21 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
Michał Górny
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
media be replaced with
pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
involve changing what's kept in @system, and that had to be
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
As I posted elsewhere, working on a project based on hate only lasts
so long. I should know, that's the reason I started udev in the first
place over 9 years ago.
The Xfree86 people generated a lot of hate, just
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Richard Yao posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:35:22 -0500 as excerpted:
Having a builtin is a good idea, but the implementation as a mandatory
dependency on kmod is not. The plan is to reintroduce it as an
optional dependency,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/18/2012 11:59 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
All I'm asking is some kind of coherent mission statement.
How can we define a mission statement when we are still in the process
of understanding the codebase, what it does
Hi,
I'd like to begin stabilizing packages on MIPS. I've gotten acks from
Redhatter, leio, and r0bertz, and Kumba doesn't really care.
What's the best method to go about doing this? Stabilize the system
packages, then remove ~mips from ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in the profiles?
Should we target package
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 06:00:00PM -0500, Matt Turner wrote:
I'd like to begin stabilizing packages on MIPS. I've gotten acks from
Redhatter, leio, and r0bertz, and Kumba doesn't really care.
Out of interest, what MIPS
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:00:00 -0500
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
Should we target package versions that aren't stabilized on other
architectures yet, so that we'll have an extended testing period
before they'll
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Stuart Longland redhat...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 05:40:03PM +0800, David Nelson wrote:
A number of Linux distributions have announced their intention to ship
LibreOffice with their future releases. We know that they frequently
do re-branding
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Stuart Longland redhat...@gentoo.org wrote:
STMicroelectronics MIPS systems (Lemote, Gdium, etc) are becoming more
common, and we should definitely do a better job supporting them. (I
should mention that I've been loaned a Yeelong by Daniel Clark, of
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:37:51 -0500
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:00:00 -0500
Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Panagiotis Christopoulos
pchr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11:20 Mon 15 Nov , Christian Faulhammer wrote:
I don't want to stop you, but you are relatively new to the real
keywording business. amd64 at a point had over 30 members and could
not work on the
matts...@sempron /usr/portage $ egrep -l 'IUSE=.*minimal' `find -name
'*.ebuild'`
^ shows lots of ebuilds with IUSE=minimal. Instead of having a
minimal use flag for these packages, shouldn't we have, possibly
local, use flags for whatever feature(s) the minimal flag turns off?
Thanks,
Matt
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if we have space already, or if others would feel
strongly about making space for, maintainer notes in packages'
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
[snip]
I agree that this could be better. To me, most of the problems with
this are due to users not knowing which of these should be set for
their particular CPU.
Instead of having defaults set by a profile, I'd like to
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
By the way, we have a nice team of arch and herd testers - how about
encouraging them to wrangle some bugs?
Yeah, I just came here to say this. One certainly doesn't need to have
completed the developer quizzes to
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno mer, 19/01/2011 alle 21.44 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto:
you really need to start off discussions as here is the problem i
perceive
and here is a solution i think will address it. shooting off
1 - 100 of 734 matches
Mail list logo
