Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New QA policy: Packages must not disable installing manpages via USE flags

2019-07-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 1:22 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 23:04 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 20:28:39 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 20:50 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:25:10 +0200 Michał Górny wro

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2019-07-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:20 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 01:49 +, Matt Turner wrote: > > commit: 6f680e4fe73925ae130343e02adb416cb799ce7d > > Author: Chris Mayo gmail com> > > AuthorDate: Fri Jul 26 18:48:13 2019 + > > Com

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: x11-libs/guile-gtk

2019-08-02 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (2019-08-02) # Unmaintained. Incompatible with guile-2 # Masked for removal in 30 days, Bugs #641864, #647536, #688244 x11-libs/guile-gtk signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sci-mathematics/drgeo

2019-08-02 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (2019-08-02) # Incompatible with guile-2 # Masked for removal in 30 days, Bugs #592188 sci-mathematics/drgeo signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: mail-filter/anubis

2019-08-02 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (2019-08-02) # Incompatible with guile-2. No longer a use case # Masked for removal in 30 days, Bugs #617792 mail-filter/anubis signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sci-physics/meep, sci-physics/harminv, sci-libs/libctl

2019-08-02 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (2019-08-02) # Unmaintained in Gentoo. Incompatible with guile-2 # Masked for removal in 30 days, Bugs #685540, #629058 sci-libs/libctl sci-physics/harminv sci-physics/meep signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving UID/GID assignments to api.gentoo.org

2019-08-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 1:49 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:29:50PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Some time ago William asked me to move UID/GID assignments from wiki [1] > > to something more accessible. I've finally gotten around to draft > > something, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving UID/GID assignments to api.gentoo.org

2019-08-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:48 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 05:41:56PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 1:49 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:29:50PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving UID/GID assignments to api.gentoo.org

2019-08-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 3:54 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 03:04:02PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 12:48 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > > If we are going to require a modeline, shouldn't we consider allowing > > > th

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xorg-3.eclass: Add XORG_TARBALL_SUFFIX

2019-08-12 Thread Matt Turner
To allow overriding the tarball type. Signed-off-by: Matt Turner --- eclass/xorg-3.eclass | 18 +- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/xorg-3.eclass b/eclass/xorg-3.eclass index f135058fba6..bd857e1cca2 100644 --- a/eclass/xorg-3.eclass +++ b

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xorg-3.eclass: Add XORG_TARBALL_SUFFIX

2019-08-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:29 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Matt Turner wrote: > > > +# Even though xz-utils are in @system, they must still be added to DEPEND; > > see > > +# > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-de

Re: [gentoo-dev] mark ppc64le profiles stable

2019-08-15 Thread Matt Turner
Looks great!

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] package.deprecated to mark packages deprecated and report dependencies

2019-08-17 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:10 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > leio asked me yesterday for the possibility of marking packages > as deprecated, so that CI would issue warnings when other packages > depend on them. I think that's quite a good idea, so I'd like to > propose a simple implementatio

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 1:04 AM Michał Górny wrote: > sys-fs/hfsplusutils Your script should probably check for other keywords as well. This package is almost entirely for use on ppc/ppc64 machines. For whatever reason it has an x86 keyword as well, so the lack of an amd64 keyword doesn't indicat

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sci-chemistry/burrow-owl and dependencies

2019-09-01 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (2019-09-01) # dev-scheme/guile-gnome-platform depends on dev-scheme/guile:12. Its only # reverse dependency is sci-chemistry/burrow-owl, so include it. The others are # dependencies of sci-chemistry/burrow-owl as well, and it is their only # reverse dependency. # Bug #693290. dev

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: games-strategy/liquidwar6

2019-09-01 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (2019-09-01) # Depends on dev-scheme/guile:12. Unpackaged versions from 2015. # Removal in 30 days. # Bug #654654. games-strategy/liquidwar6 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: games-strategy/liquidwar6

2019-09-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 1:05 PM Matt Turner wrote: > > # Matt Turner (2019-09-01) > # Depends on dev-scheme/guile:12. Unpackaged versions from 2015. I made a mistake here (that I corrected in commit 7ca64f844e18). The mask now reads: # Matt Turner (2019-09-01) -# Depends on dev-sch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: sci-chemistry/burrow-owl and dependencies

2019-09-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 1:04 PM Matt Turner wrote: > > # Matt Turner (2019-09-01) > # dev-scheme/guile-gnome-platform depends on dev-scheme/guile:12. Its only > # reverse dependency is sci-chemistry/burrow-owl, so include it. The others > are > # dependencies of sci-chemistry/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Home directory for the 'portage' user

2019-09-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 10:05 AM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I would like to create an acct-user package for the 'portage' user, > but I'm having trouble deciding on a home directory. > > baselayout currently sets it to /var/tmp/portage, and this just seems > like a bad idea to me. I'm pretty sure we h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Need ARM/AArch64 test data for cpuid2cpuflags

2019-09-11 Thread Matt Turner
>From my original generation SolidRun Cubox: $ ./hwcap-dump hwcap:0004ead6 hwcap2: mattst88@cubox ~/cpuid2cpuflags-7-dev $ uname -a Linux cubox 5.2.7 #11 Wed Aug 7 17:50:03 PDT 2019 armv7l ARMv7 Processor rev 5 (v7l) Marvell Dove GNU/Linux cpuid2cflags says CPU_FLAGS_ARM:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] use.desc: Make lz4 a global flag

2019-09-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 7:12 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > The 'lz4' flag is used consistently for the LZ4 compression algorithm > in 23 packages. Make it a global flag. Good idea. Ack for both this and snappy.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:09 AM Michał Górny wrote: > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. I think that's a good idea.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 1:58 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > > > I'd like to propose to employ a more systematic method of resolving this > > problem. I would like to add additional explicit 'GPL-n-only' licenses, > > and discourage using short 'GPL-n

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:57 AM Matt Turner wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 9:09 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it&

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019, Matt Turner wrote: > > > An idea to consider: use SPDX license identifiers (see > > https://spdx.org/licenses/) > > > For GPL 2 they are "GPL-2.0-only"

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:42 PM Jason Zaman wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:17:53PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having > > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev t

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019, Matt Turner wrote: > > > An idea to consider: use SPDX license identifiers (see > > https://spdx.org/licenses/) > > > For GPL 2 they are "GPL-2.0-only"

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:13 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Matt Turner wrote: > > > Just responding because the absurdity of this angers me, to be honest. > > See if you notice anything funny about the URL: > > > http

[gentoo-dev] RFC: GID/UID assignment for mosquitto (482)

2019-09-26 Thread Matt Turner
I don't see this being defined in other distros' lists, so I've selected the highest ID available (after Bitcoin gets 483).

Re: [gentoo-dev] stable-bot is down. Temporary? Forever? Can we have a contacts page for it?

2019-10-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:29 AM Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > I noticed that stable-bot stopped marking bugs as verified for stbilization. > Example: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/695252 > > 1. Is it gone forever and arch teams should stop relying on it's presence? > 2. If not can the owner tweak

Re: [gentoo-dev] The demotivating process of contributing to devmanual

2019-10-17 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:38 PM desultory wrote: > Since the thread seemed to have already wrapped up with a positive resolution, I question why you responded in the way you did.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New distfile mirror layout

2019-10-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 1:25 AM Joshua Kinard wrote: > In any event, I still think using devspace is a bad idea. A centralized > distfiles repo is what most other distros use, and it's what we should use. I agree, but let's discuss that in a separate topic.

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: dev-python/gnome-keyring-python

2019-10-21 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (2019-10-21) # Replaced by introspection bindings. Bug #628938 # Removal in 30 days dev-python/gnome-keyring-python signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New distfile mirror layout

2019-10-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:42 AM Richard Yao wrote: > Also, another idea is to use a cheap hash function (e.g. fletcher) and just > have the mirrors do the hashing behind the scenes. Then we would have the > best of both worlds. It probably would have been better to make these suggestions when t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: change to default policy of doing changes to packages that are maintained by other developers

2019-10-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:37 AM Piotr Karbowski wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to bring the topic of defining default policy to do changes to > packages within ::gentoo that one does not maintain. > > This topic goes back from time to time on #gentoo-dev, and as I was > told, it was originally sent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: change to default policy of doing changes to packages that are maintained by other developers

2019-10-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:37 PM Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:37:28 +0200 > Piotr Karbowski wrote: > > > This is a bit unhealthy, especially when some developers that maintain > > packages are out of reach, or the patches to update ebuild just rot on > > the bugzilla and are not

Re: [gentoo-dev] separate /usr without initramfs

2019-10-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 3:06 AM James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 05:38:48 -0400 > Joshua Kinard wrote: > > > Why do I not like an initramfs, though? Well, for one, it complicates the > > kernel compiles (and it makes them bigger, something which is an issue on > > the old SGI syste

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Require full $P not just $PN on stable/keyword commit messages

2019-11-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 12:59 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > Hello, > > I've noticed a lot of stabilisation commit messages (and a few keywording > ones too) simply state the package atom and not the relevant > release/version. I find this a little meaningless, as unless this is the > fir

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware > installs the same files. (Same for all other sys-firmware/iwl*-ucode > packages.) Should last-rite all of them, IMO.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-16 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware > >> installs the same fil

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

2019-11-16 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 9:08 AM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > On 16/11/19 16:59, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > >>> On F

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:32 PM Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > > Hello gentoo-dev, > > First proposition on this list so hopefully not missing some kind of > netiquette/policy. > > I noticed for some time that there seems to be two use cases for the > gles[123] family of USE flags in gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:54 PM Dennis Schridde wrote: > > On Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 09:11:46 CET Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > See also this related old thread: > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/e04f6d321e424a237af62721d1d09 > > 211 > > I think tackling the triad of opengl/gles

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:09 PM Matt Turner wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:54 PM Dennis Schridde wrote: > > > > On Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 09:11:46 CET Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > See also this related old thread: > > > https://ar

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: dev-go/logrus and dev-go/zglob

2019-12-01 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (2019-12-01) # browserpass ebuild ported to go-modules, so these modules now have no reverse # dependencies. # Removal in 30 days. Bugs #683286, #683310, #687462, #700792 =www-plugins/browserpass-3.0.6 dev-go/zglob dev-go/logrus signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] package.deprecated: Create initial template

2019-12-05 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:10 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > profiles/package.deprecated | 17 + > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 profiles/package.deprecated > > diff --git a/profiles/package.deprecated b/profiles/package.dep

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] package.deprecated: Create initial template

2019-12-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:33:36 -0500 > Tim Harder wrote: > > > On 2019-12-06 Fri 04:03, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > it's not just like repoman and cvs since repoman commit did push ;) > > > it will never be perfect but i really like repoman co

Re: [gentoo-dev] stable-bot is down. Temporary? Forever? Can we have a contacts page for it?

2019-12-06 Thread Matt Turner
stable-bot appears to be down again. I've been unsuccessful in reaching kensington on IRC. I think stable-bot has become an integral part of the workflow and as such (1) we should have the code available and (2) we should run it on some hardware that others are able to administer. Can we please?

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Introducing VIDEO_CARDS=iris to virtual/opencl

2019-12-17 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:26 AM Marek Szuba wrote: > What do you think, guys? I don't love it. I don't like the mess that has become VIDEO_CARDS=... either. radeon vs radeonsi vs amdgpu. Different names for different bits of the stack, even for the same hardware. I would like to come up with so

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Dropping alpha keywords to unstable

2020-01-15 Thread Matt Turner
Hello, It makes me a bit sad to say, having helped maintain Gentoo's DEC Alpha port for more than 10 years, that I think it is time to drop our stable keywords to ~alpha. Stable testing is a valuable service we provide to users. Time invested by developers during stabilization has the potential

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-astronomy/celestia

2020-01-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 3:57 PM David Seifert wrote: > > # David Seifert (2020-01-21) > # All released versions depend on EOL gtkglext, no revdeps. > # Bug #644334, #694834. Removal in 30 days. > sci-astronomy/celestia This is actually a really cool piece of software (give it a try!), and the bu

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] News item: Stable alpha keywords removed

2020-01-21 Thread Matt Turner
Title: Stable alpha keywords removed Author: Matt Turner Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2020-01-22 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Keyword: alpha The Gentoo/Alpha team no longer thinks that the time invested in package stabilization is warranted for the small number of users on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode

2020-02-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:10 AM Mike Pagano wrote: > > # Mike Pagano (2020-02-07) > # The standalone ebuild for this driver is made > # unnecessary as it is included in the package: > # sys-kernel/linux-firmware > sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode How about all the others as well? sys-firmware/iwl1000-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode

2020-02-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:39 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Fri, 07 Feb 2020, Matt Turner wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:10 AM Mike Pagano wrote: > >> > >> # Mike Pagano (2020-02-07) > >> # The standalone ebuild for this d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode

2020-02-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:03 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > On 07/02/20 19:50, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:39 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Feb 2020, Matt Turner wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 7

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode

2020-02-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:44 PM Alexander Tsoy wrote: > > 7 февраля 2020 г. 22:50:13 GMT+03:00, Matt Turner пишет: > >On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:39 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> > >> >>>>> On Fri, 07 Feb 2020, Matt Turner wrote: > >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:16 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > On 09/02/20 20:59, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > On 09/02/20 20:57, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > >> On 09/02/20 20:55, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:59 AM William Hubbs wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 06:54:19PM +1100, Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > > On Monday, 10 February 2020 7:55:01 AM AEDT Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > > > Hrm, pardon my ignoran

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-13 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:12 AM Mike Pagano wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 06:46:43PM +1100, Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > > On Thursday, 13 February 2020 5:40:46 AM AEDT Matt Turner wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:59 AM William Hubbs wrote: > > > > O

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-14 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:31 AM Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > In this instance, at least two people (myself included) have drawn an > impression that led them to voice their concern in some way (I'm unsure if > mpagano was voicing concern or just agreeing with the general concept). Maybe > we're th

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-17 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:47 PM desultory wrote: > You've got a particular knack for this kind of argumentative nonsense.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/sphinxcontrib-issuetracker

2020-02-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:34 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > # Michał Górny (2020-02-21) > # Last bumped in 2013. Homepage gone. No reverse dependencies left. > # Removal in 30 days. Bug #527188. > dev-python/sphinxcontrib-issuetracker I committed a pull request adding pydocstyle-5.0.2 last week

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/sphinxcontrib-issuetracker

2020-02-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:36 PM Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2020-02-21 at 16:45 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:34 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > > # Michał Górny (2020-02-21) > > > # Last bumped in 2013. Homepage gone. No reverse dependenci

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] meson.eclass: Set needs_exe_wrapper in cross file

2020-03-04 Thread Matt Turner
build machine can run the binaries directly. This allows dev-libs/wayland to execute the wayland-scanner binary it builds rather than relying on the system's. Signed-off-by: Matt Turner --- eclass/meson.eclass | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/meson.eclass b/e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/*, python-maintained, py3.6-only, no-revdep

2020-03-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 10:27 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > > >> Just the ebuild being outdated doesn't sound like a sufficient reason > >> for removal of a package, at least not for those packages that install > >> applications for the end user. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/*, python-maintained, py3.6-only, no-revdep

2020-03-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 11:21 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Matt Turner wrote: > > >> > The list is almost exclusively about dev-python/, i.e. packages that > >> > do not install end-user applications but Python modu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/*, python-maintained, py3.6-only, no-revdep

2020-03-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:17 PM Jonas Stein wrote: > > On 07/03/2020 19.27, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > > > >>> Just the ebuild being outdated doesn't sound like a sufficient reason > >>> for removal of a package, at least not for those packages that i

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Removing ABI_X86_32 support from virtual/opencl

2020-03-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:49 AM Marek Szuba wrote: > > This will be shown as relevant to everyone who has installed > virtual/opencl, i.e. also to people on amd64 who have NOT enabled > abi_x86_32 for this package - but there is no way to filter news items > by use flags, is there? Anyway, comments

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles: Enable USE=user-session on systemd profiles

2020-03-18 Thread Matt Turner
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner --- .../linux/amd64/17.0/desktop/plasma/systemd/package.use| 7 --- .../linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/plasma/systemd/package.use| 7 --- .../linux/arm/17.0/desktop/plasma/systemd/package.use | 7 --- .../linux/arm64/17.0/desktop/plasma/systemd

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > 0) This reduces code reusability. The eclass is used by sys-devel/kgcc64 in > the tree and (at least) the hardened-dev::musl overlay outside. Yes, but while your claim that it reduces reusability is true, I think that's potentially a goo

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: glibc versions prior to 2.19-r1

2014-12-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 12/22/14 16:37, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> >> Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, 18:24:32 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: >> Well the side effect of this is that arcane and unmaintainable bandworms like toolchain.eclass are generated

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites -- long list

2015-01-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:57 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:49:56AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote: >> 150106 William Hubbs wrote: >> This one is perfectly safe on a single-user system : please leave it there. > > I'm not opposed to it staying in the tree under one of these conditi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-17 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:00 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 01:44:21PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: >> > * Stage3 archives are too fat >> > See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531632 >> > We're now shi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x86_desc. > The list combines global USE flags with some local USE flags I've been > able to find. > > > 3dnow - Use the 3DNow! instruction set > 3dnowext - Use the Enhanced 3

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: desc/cpu_flags_x86.desc

2015-01-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-01-18, o godz. 15:15:22 > Matt Turner napisał(a): > >> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I would like to commit the following flags as cpu_flags_x

Re: [gentoo-dev] CPU_FLAGS_X86 gentoo repository migration complete

2015-02-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > 2. app-emulation/bochs got local USE=3dnow and USE=avx since the flag > control support of emulating the two instruction sets rather than using > host CPU instruction sets. Wouldn't it be simpler to use CPU_FLAGS_X86 for these and simply disab

Re: [gentoo-dev] CPU_FLAGS_X86 gentoo repository migration complete

2015-02-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 02/01/2015 02:39 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> 2. app-emulation/bochs got local USE=3dnow and USE=avx since the flag >>> control support of emulating the two i

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Make "seccomp" USE flag global

2015-02-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 02:44:54 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> Hello, >> >> at this moment 8 packages uses "seccomp" flag: >> >> app-admin/clsync >> app-emulation/qemu >> app-emulation/lxc >> net-dns/bind >> net-misc/tlsdate >> net-misc/tor

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted

2015-03-14 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> > 0. What names for the tree/repository. >> >> "gentoo" > > IMO this is the only really accurate name. I completely agree (with everything else in this email as well).

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib and different CFLAGS for 32 and 64bit ABIs

2015-03-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > Hi there! > > I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160). > Since then valgrind did no longer work for 32bit programs because > "-march=native" did choose instructions that valgrind does not support > in 3

Re: [gentoo-dev] (semi) last rites: several unused perl-core packages

2015-06-13 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > # Andreas K. Huettel (13 June 2016) s/2016/2015/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: kde-base/kdepim-icons/

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 20:42:00 +0200 hasufell wrote: >> On 08/09/2015 08:25 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: >> > commit: 3fd6580a947db519cb60a4c2a05ec380ceb681d8 >> > Author: Agostino Sarubbo gentoo org> >> > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 18:23

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git

2015-08-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell wrote: > So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I > missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is > pretty clear: > > reference the bug only in the summary: 1 > don't make any of this mandatory: 1 > "Gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is the $Id$ line in our ebuilds still useful?

2015-08-13 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Tyler Pohl wrote: > Can someone please tell me how to get off this mailing list? Please please > please Well first you don't reply to an unrelated topic... But the instructions are here: https://www.gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/instructions.html (the t

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-base/nouveau-drm

2015-08-22 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (22 Aug 2015) # nouveau has been in the kernel since 2.6.33 # Masked for removal in 30 days. x11-base/nouveau-drm

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: x11-libs/libXevie

2015-08-28 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner (28 Aug 2015) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 482304 x11-libs/libXevie

[gentoo-dev] Better way to direct upstream bugs upstream?

2015-08-29 Thread Matt Turner
In April I closed out ~100 bugs assigned to x11@ that the X11 team never had any realistic ability to fix ourselves (see most bugs about x11-drivers/ati-drivers). Most of these were fleeting driver bugs affecting a particular piece of hardware and a (often now old) particular version of the driver

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 83 bugs

2015-09-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Alex Alexander wrote: > Our bug queue has 83 bugs! > > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. > > To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 I suspect you used bit.ly to shorten a long bugzilla link, but it doesn't need to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sys-fs/zfs-kmod/

2015-10-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 06:20:58PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2015-10-09, o godz. 15:40:32 >> "Richard Yao" napisał(a): >> >> > commit: 050bf38afc93a98c5176c95b3c4ffc01212bf46b >> > Author: Richard Yao gentoo org> >> > Author

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

2015-10-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:17 AM, wraeth wrote: > I am one of the users who spoke to idella4 about this, but I wanted to > repeat this publicly in order to highlight the point of view of > contributing user as opposed to a developer. > > Firstly I would like to say that I appreciate feedback on my

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

2015-10-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: > On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:56:28 -0700 > Matt Turner wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:17 AM, wraeth wrote: > >> > >> > I feel that it is inappropriate for criticisms of contributor's >> > w

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

2015-10-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:44 PM, wraeth wrote: > I'm not trying to escalate the argument but you seem to have > misinterpreted my initial message. > > On 12/10/15 03:56, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:17 AM, wraeth wrote: >>> I am one of the users

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

2015-10-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:49 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: > I'm not sure if this is what Ian is referring to, but between the sheer > quantity (flooding) and the way I perceived some of the messages to be > formulated, it all seemed rather abrasive in nature. Of course this > was my own viewpoint on how

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

2015-10-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:23 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 10/12/2015 04:12 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:47:19 +0200 >> hasufell wrote: >> >>> On 10/12/2015 03:29 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: Not sure how to read this. The whole idea is for provider / client to communicate

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: die if ninja is enabled but not installed

2015-10-17 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:22:48 +1100 > Michael Palimaka wrote: > >> On 16/10/15 03:04, Michał Górny wrote: >> > >> > >> > Dnia 15 października 2015 17:44:47 CEST, Michael Palimaka >> > napisał(a): >> >> This could happen if ninja is manually

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

2015-11-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Dale wrote: > hasufell wrote: >> On 11/02/2015 10:54 PM, Dale wrote: >>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 Dale wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale wrote: >>> Then perhaps all this shoul

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-emulation/runc/

2015-12-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:16:01AM +, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> commit: 37c1ec7ef31a51206421f03a2df489ec7d7ca244 >> Author: Doug Goldstein gentoo org> >> AuthorDate: Mon Dec 7 05:14:50 2015 + >> Commit: Doug Goldstein

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-emulation/runc/

2015-12-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:16:01AM +, Doug Goldstein wrote: >>>> commit: 37c1ec7ef3

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: noarch keyword

2020-03-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 9:55 PM Kent Fredric wrote: > If X is "noarch" and its dependency Y is "amd64", then a user on "sparc" > will be able to install "X", but not its dependency "Y". Thank you. This is a good explanation of the problem. How do other distributions handle this? Arch, Fedora, an

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-libs/libav

2020-03-25 Thread Matt Turner
Acked by lu_zero on IRC. # Matt Turner (2020-03-25) # No releases in two years. No commits in upstream git in last six months. # Many open security bugs. Masked for removal in 30 days. media-video/libav media-libs/libpostproc signature.asc Description: PGP signature

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >