[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/systemd-tmpfiles, sys-boot/systemd-boot, sys-fs/udev

2023-07-24 Thread Mike Gilbert
# Mike Gilbert (2023-07-24) # Migrated to sys-apps/systemd-utils. # Removal on 2023-08-24. sys-apps/systemd-tmpfiles sys-boot/systemd-boot sys-fs/udev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Massive Github PR Queue

2023-08-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 21:18 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 10:35 -0700, orbea wrote: > > > > Perhaps the correct answer would be neither Bugzilla or Github? > > A mailing list (whose archives work :o) with git-send-email threads > would be an improvement over both. > > > I don’

Re: [gentoo-dev] games-emulation/jgemu keywording request

2023-09-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:11 PM orbea wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 20:38:48 +0100 > Sam James wrote: > > > orbea writes: > > > > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:18:45 +0100 > > > Sam James wrote: > > > > > >> orbea writes: > > >> > > >> > Hi, > > >> > > > >> > Several months ago I made this issue f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites: sys-fs/eudev

2023-09-14 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:25 AM Arsen Arsenović wrote: > Madhu writes: > > systemd-udev cannot be built as a static binary again presumably a > > carefully thought out design decision behind its design and > > philosophy. > > Since static linking is seldom a good idea, it is more likely that > s

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Up for grabs: packages from sultan's retirement

2023-09-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 5:49 AM Sam James wrote: > > Packages up for grabs: > acct-group/croc > acct-user/croc > app-misc/liquidctl > dev-libs/hidapi > dev-python/hidapi > net-misc/croc > Also, sultan leaving means we are down to 1 person proxy maintaining www-client/chromium. If you have any in

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain-funcs.eclass: tc-ld-force-bfd: unset LD before calling tc-getLD

2023-11-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
se the default value given by tc-getLD. If the user doesn't have binutils installed, the "type -P" check will still fail and LD will be unaltered. Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/33650 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass | 7 +++ 1 fi

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2024-02-01-grub-upgrades: add news item

2024-01-28 Thread Mike Gilbert
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- .../2024-02-01-grub-upgrades.en.txt | 40 +++ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) create mode 100644 2024-02-01-grub-upgrades/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades.en.txt diff --git a/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades.en.txt b/2024-02

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Block ebuilds installing tests to ${D} by default

2024-02-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:15 AM Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > TL;DR: > I'd like to propose a change where packages should NOT install their > tests to ${D} by default. Such an install may optionally enabled with > USE=test, which should be decoupled from FEATURES=test. Or depending on > the color of

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Block ebuilds installing tests to ${D} by default

2024-02-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 4:38 PM Eli Schwartz wrote: > > On 2/1/24 4:03 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > I suppose you are referring to dev-lang/python here. Unfortunately, > > removing tests from it is a non-trivial problem. As I've mentioned to > > you before, there are packages that actually import

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2024-02-01-grub-upgrades: add news item

2024-02-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:44 AM Christian Bricart wrote: > > Am 28.01.24 um 17:25 schrieb Mike Gilbert: > > […] > > +On upgrades, it is common for users to mismatch the grub-install options > > +they used for the current and previous versions of grub. This will cause &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] special small-files USE flag without effect on dependencies: [ unicode ]

2024-02-09 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 10:23 AM Andrey Grozin wrote: > > Hello *, > > pkgcheck complains about each new version of dev-lisp/sbcl: > > UseFlagWithoutDeps: version 2.4.1: special small-files USE flag without > effect on dependencies: [ unicode ] > > The USE flag "unicode" in the sbcl ebuild has noth

Re: [gentoo-dev] special small-files USE flag without effect on dependencies: [ unicode ]

2024-02-09 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:07 AM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 10:54 -0500, Ionen Wolkens wrote: > > > > Is there even any reason to ever disable unicode support? Point is that > > why have USE for it? Or does it introduce additional dependencies? > > Being able to disable thing

Re: [gentoo-dev] special small-files USE flag without effect on dependencies: [ unicode ]

2024-02-09 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 12:17 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 11:57 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > Based on this pkgcheck issue, this originates from a decision from by > > Gentoo QA team. > > > > https://github.com/pkgcore/pkgchec

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] meson.eclass: wire up LTO support directly into the meson options

2024-02-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:26 PM Eli Schwartz wrote: > > meson's builtin LTO support allows meson to introspect whether LTO is > enabled and do some fancy things, such as forcing LTO off for a single > target that is known to be special(ly bad) and not support LTO. Please make sure to test this c

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] meson.eclass: wire up LTO support directly into the meson options

2024-02-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 1:09 AM Eli Schwartz wrote: > > On 2/20/24 12:58 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:26 PM Eli Schwartz wrote: > >> > >> meson's builtin LTO support allows meson to introspect whether LTO is > >> enabled and d

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] distutils-r1.eclass: Make vars local before calling filter-lto

2024-03-09 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 12:16 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > Make LTO filtering local to the compilation code. This avoids disabling > LTO for non-Python parts of an ebuild. > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] meson.eclass: call die -n in phase helpers

2024-03-26 Thread Mike Gilbert
This allows the ebuild author to treat some errors as nonfatal. Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/meson.eclass | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/meson.eclass b/eclass/meson.eclass index 3240fddf7e86..3074fcb09fb0 100644 --- a/eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] sys-apps/systemd-utils: add workaround for no-multilib

2024-03-26 Thread Mike Gilbert
the failure to the install phase instead. Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- sys-apps/systemd-utils/systemd-utils-255.4.ebuild | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys-apps/systemd-utils/systemd-utils-255.4.ebuild b/sys-apps/systemd-utils/systemd-utils

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] sys-apps/systemd-utils: add workaround for no-multilib

2024-03-26 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 12:51 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 11:01 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > meson.build has some logic to build ia32 EFI binaries on x86_64 if the > > toolchain is compatible. Rather than trying to reproduce this logic in > > the e

Re: [gentoo-dev] netmount and glusterfs (fuse) dependency management

2024-04-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 5:51 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > Hi All, > > I was hoping for some advise regarding how I could improve the glusterfs > package for users (and myself). At least those using openrc, but I > suspect similar may be applicable to systemd, but I have no idea how > systemd handles n

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] meson.eclass: preserve exit status in phase funcs

2024-04-16 Thread Mike Gilbert
When the functions are called with nonfatal, we need to ensure 'popd' does not clobber the exit status of the called command. Update meson_src_configure as well just for consistency. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/930119 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/meson.e

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain-funcs.eclass: tc-env_build: override (E)SYSROOT

2024-04-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
When using the CBUILD toolchain, it makes no sense to look for headers and libraries in the CHOST-based SYSROOT. Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass | 8 +++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass b/eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] toolchain-funcs.eclass: tc-env_build: override (E)SYSROOT

2024-04-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 1:56 PM James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 12:14 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > When using the CBUILD toolchain, it makes no sense to look for headers > > and libraries in the CHOST-based SYSROOT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mik

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/gnu-efi (nt)

2024-04-23 Thread Mike Gilbert

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 6/7] linux-info.eclass: respect eselect kernel setting in binpkgs

2024-05-15 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 7:59 AM Andrew Ammerlaan wrote: > Commit f51cd5b64c14ddfb83488a12d538c66a4a309376 resets kernel environment > variables when binpkgs are merged, this makes sense since we care about the > system that the binpkg will be installed on, not the system the binpkg was > built on.

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] verify-sig.eclass: avoid calling unpack on sig files

2024-05-21 Thread Mike Gilbert
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/verify-sig.eclass | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/verify-sig.eclass b/eclass/verify-sig.eclass index b74ed78290aa..b0f180fdb3ac 100644 --- a/eclass/verify-sig.eclass +++ b/eclass/verify-sig.eclass @@ -429,7

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] verify-sig.eclass: avoid calling unpack on sig files

2024-05-21 Thread Mike Gilbert
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/verify-sig.eclass | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/verify-sig.eclass b/eclass/verify-sig.eclass index b74ed78290aa..4d48c9ed8503 100644 --- a/eclass/verify-sig.eclass +++ b/eclass/verify-sig.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] verify-sig.eclass: avoid calling unpack on sig files

2024-05-22 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 1:53 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Please provide an explanation what problem this patch fixes. > > Why is calling unpack on sig files bad? It should silently skip files > with unknown extensions. The main reason is that Portage does not *silently* skip unknown extensions in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] verify-sig.eclass: avoid calling unpack on sig files

2024-05-22 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:38 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-05-21 at 22:05 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert > > --- > > eclass/verify-sig.eclass | 10 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-fs/reiser4progs and sys-libs/libaal

2024-06-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
# Mike Gilbert (2024-06-01) # Abandoned upstream. No Gentoo maintainer since 2021. # Plugin system seems quite broken (bug 887119). # Removal on 2024-07-01. sys-fs/reiser4progs sys-libs/libaal

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] profiles/base: make.defaults: add CURL_QUIC

2024-06-21 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 9:15 AM wrote: I would combine this with the previous commit which adds the values to curl_quic.desc, and has a much better commit message. For the summary, something like "profiles: add CURL_QUIC USE_EXPAND" should do the trick.

Re: [gentoo-dev] questions about wxwidgets.eclass

2024-07-05 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 8:33 AM Andrey Grozin wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, Eli Schwartz wrote: > > On 7/3/24 12:19 AM, Andrey Grozin wrote: > >> 1. From which phase function should setup-wxwidgets be called? > >> The current statistics of the packages in the tree is: > >> src_configure 66 > >> sr

Re: [gentoo-dev] questions about wxwidgets.eclass

2024-07-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 9:45 AM Andrey Grozin wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Jul 2024, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > It looks like you mass-filed a couple dozen bugs, but left them > > assigned to bug-wranglers. > > > > Please assign your own bug reports, especially when files en-m

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2024-08-09-dracut-crypt.en.txt: add news item

2024-08-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- .../2024-08-09-dracut-crypt.en.txt| 26 +++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) create mode 100644 2024-08-09-dracut-crypt/2024-08-09-dracut-crypt.en.txt diff --git a/2024-08-09-dracut-crypt/2024-08-09-dracut-crypt.en.txt b/2024-08-09

[gentoo-dev] Re: profiles/base/make.defaults: add XDG_DATA_DIRS & XDG_CONFIG_DIRS to ENV_UNSET

2024-08-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 2:57 PM Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Hello, > > This is a follow up from an older thread by leio in the mailing list: > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/bf36c4c50f9c15db222faa6a66b0c6c9 > > The problem is that, at present time, we are getting more and more bugs > co

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-auth/pam_ldap

2024-08-08 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 12:07 PM Eli Schwartz wrote: > > # Eli Schwartz (2024-05-26) > # Unmaintained, website gone. Last released in 2010. Fails to build > # with GCC 14, detects and builds against nonexisting dependencies. > # Fails to authenticate users anyway. Obsoleted and replaced by > # nss

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] lua-utils.eclass: use BROOT or ESYSROOT where appropriate

2024-08-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
The LUA variable points to a lua binary that is likely to be executed by the build system. Use BROOT for this. Use ESYSROOT for the pkg-config symlink, since this is likely used for linking a library. Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/lua-utils.eclass | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cleaning tree of outdated packages

2012-12-13 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 12/13/2012 12:48 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> >> But there is one big ass but. We have some packages that were >> stabilised last time few year back and they provide multiple testing >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cleaning tree of outdated packages

2012-12-13 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:07 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:57:16PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> I am sure that some people find it very handy to have old gcc ebuilds >> around. It might come in handy for testing. > > Testhing what? > Maybe to s

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: change of the default value for EHG_REVISION (mercurial.eclass)

2012-12-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote: > With nelchael's retirement I (with backup from djc) will take over the > maintenance of mercurial.eclass. As one of the first things I would > like to change the default value of EHG_REVISION. > > EHG_REVISION defines the revision/branch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 12/19/2012 02:01 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:56:44 +0100 >> Diego Elio Pettenņ wrote: >> >>> Just mv /usr/portage /var/portage ? FFS no. Among other things, as >>> many said before, we should really take distfiles out

Re: [gentoo-dev] Drop the Perl Modules Guideline?

2012-12-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Torsten Veller wrote: > Let's discuss the "specific guideline" for Perl modules. It's as follows: > > ,- > http://devrel.gentoo.org/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=1#doc_chap2_sect2 > | Perl > | > | New Perl modules are to be added to portage only when one of th

Re: [gentoo-dev] gen_usr_ldscript & --libdir=/lib

2012-12-27 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon >> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: >> >> Actually, since ulm pointed out in another

Re: [gentoo-dev] Local bindist descriptions

2012-12-29 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > All packages should have local descriptions of what the bindist > USE-flag specifically does. This should be a policy when writing > ebuilds that include it. > ... > I have filed bug

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/pypy:1.8

2013-01-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
# Mike Gilbert (03 Jan 2013) # No longer maintained upstream. # Please upgrade to PyPy 1.9 or 2.0. # Removal in 30 days. dev-python/pypy:1.8 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 1/2/2013 6:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > What is the purpose of this stuff: > if [[ ${___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS} != "recur -_+^+_- spank" ]] ; then > ___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS="recur -_+^+_- spank" > > and similar in some eclasses (like eutils, multilib) but not others > (like python-single-r1 that I was

Re: [gentoo-dev] About *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff at top of some eclasses but not others

2013-01-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 1/2/2013 6:54 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On 1/2/2013 6:41 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> What is the purpose of this stuff: >> if [[ ${___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS} != "recur -_+^+_- spank" ]] ; then >> ___ECLASS_ONCE_EUTILS="recur -_+^+_- spank" >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names

2013-01-16 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Greg KH wrote: >> So anyone who relies on network names right now to be deterministic, and >> you have more than one network device in your system, should seriously >> reconsider how they are naming their devi

Re: [gentoo-dev] removing the server profiles...

2013-01-16 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> 2 - the only difference between server profiles and the base profile >> is USE="+snmp" and maybe one other flag > > USE="-perl -python snmp truetype xml" > As has been pointed out

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2013-01-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 01/20/2013 05:30 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due swegener focusing in less packages until he has more time: > x11-misc/x11vnc -> maybe net-libs/libvncserver could be interested in > this > Yeah, I picked it up. As always, anyone is free to co-maintain if they like. signature.asc Description: O

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-21 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 01/21/2013 10:38 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > I'm raising this patch because of the recent spate of bugs with the > latest udev that now fails to boot your system if CONFIG_DEVTMPFS is > not available in your kernel. > > Bugs: 408947, 409393, 437320, 453074 > > CONFIG_CHECK has not been fa

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default

2013-01-21 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 01/21/2013 10:38 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > CONFIG_CHECK has not been fatal for some years now, because there turned > out to be some cases where it cannot detect what the system really has > [1], or what is returned is wrong [2]. > > However, while this is has been superb in helping those c

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late)

2013-01-23 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Felix Kuperjans wrote: > Samuli Suominen wrote: >> please review this news item, seems we need one after all > > Hello Samuli, > > /dev/root is no longer available in this udev version, so people who put > this in their /etc/fstab might end up with an unbootable sy

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late)

2013-01-23 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> fstab is not consulted for mounting the root filesystem, so it doesn't >> really matter what you have in there. Either the kernel mounts it >> based on the ke

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-doc/abs-guide: metadata.xml ChangeLog

2013-01-27 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:27:20 + (UTC) > "Tim Harder (radhermit)" wrote: > >> radhermit13/01/27 22:27:20 >> >> Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog >> Log: >> Remove redundant maintainer from metadata. >> >> (Portage versio

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-doc/abs-guide: metadata.xml ChangeLog

2013-01-27 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:16:56 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> > If you have some kind of problem with this, I suggest you change the >> > default >> > output of metagen. >> > >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] The /run migration

2013-02-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 06/02/13 09:53 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 6 February 2013 14:18, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >>> >>> So, *my* systems do have /var/run -> /run , which means at some >>> point the

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-wireless/irda-utils: irda-utils-0.9.18-r3.ebuild irda-utils-0.9.18-r4.ebuild ChangeLog

2013-02-10 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 10/02/13 05:08, Mike Gilbert (floppym) wrote: >> >> floppym 13/02/10 03:08:22 >> - insinto /etc/udev/rules.d >> + insinto /lib/udev/rules.d > > > The udevdir is dynamic, not stat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-16 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \"Zero Chaos\" Farina wrote: > >>> Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. > >> If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not >> install those firmware packages. > > Yes, bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

2013-02-16 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Look into the WHENCE file and be horrified. Taking just the first ten > items (of a total 114): > >Unknown license (3 times) >GPL, but without source (3 times) >"All rights reserved" >BSD, without source >Right for redis

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building against /usr/src/linux and linux-info.eclass

2013-02-21 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This issue has come up in a few bugs so I want to bounce it off the > community. When building packages that need a configured kernel source > tree, many ebuilds inherit linux-info to find configuration info about the >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Evaluating a new malloc()

2013-02-26 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > Unless a significant issue is found in jemalloc itself, I do not see any > reason to continue using glibc's ptmalloc over jemalloc. As far as I > know, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Facebook and others are using jemalloc, so I > expect that no significant i

Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted: x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers

2013-03-03 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: > One of the reasons people volunteer in open source projects is to > scratch their personal itch. When that itch develops into a festering, > gangrenous limb it becomes time to amputate it. That is what I am > doing with my involvement in x11-

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: patch systemd.eclass to use pkg-config if available

2013-03-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:18 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > systemd, like udev, stores directory paths in a way that they can be > queried from pkg-config. However, the systemd.eclass currently does not > use this ability. > > The following patch models the systemd eclass after the udev eclas

[gentoo-dev] sgml herd has no maintainers (again)

2013-03-17 Thread Mike Gilbert
I just dropped myself due to lack of interest. If anyone cares for any of the packages please take them over.

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpng 1.6 upgrade and subslotting (and misuse of subslotting when there is also normal slotting)

2013-04-05 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > libpng 1.6 is in portage, but temporarily without KEYWORDS, pending on > testign and this conversion, help would be much appericiated with converting > the tree to use automatic rebuilds for the upgrade > > Because there is binary-only SLOT=

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpng 1.6 upgrade and subslotting (and misuse of subslotting when there is also normal slotting)

2013-04-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:18:22 -0400 > Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> >> Revbump -- very important in this case, as the slot-operator dep >> (iirc) does not take effect to allow sub-slot-triggered until after a >> version with the slot-operator

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpng 1.6 upgrade and subslotting (and misuse of subslotting when there is also normal slotting)

2013-04-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 11:02:14 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Alexis Ballier >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:18:22 -0400 >> > Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >&g

[gentoo-dev] Python 2.7.4, 3.2.4, 3.3.1 updates

2013-04-07 Thread Mike Gilbert
I will be adding these versions to the tree over the next few days, initially masked. The 2.7 and 3.2 bumps should be nothing major, but better safe then sorry. Please give them a try if you have time. We should be able to unmask these pretty quickly. One question for the community: Does anyone ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic pax-mark

2013-04-07 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Hello All, > > After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no > longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX, > XATTR_PAX, both or neither markings depending on kerne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 2.7.4, 3.2.4, 3.3.1 updates

2013-04-07 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:14 PM, heroxbd wrote: > Dear Mike, > > Mike Gilbert writes: > >> This seems like a good opportunity to add slot operator deps and >> remove some prefix workarounds. We can keep an old ebuild around to >> facilitate upgrades if we ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic pax-mark

2013-04-08 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > Actually I've wondered if it would make more sense to default to > PAX_MARKINGS="none", > and have the hardened profiles (or the user in make.conf) set a different > value. That makes some sense to me. The downside is that that swi

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc: pt_chown setuid going away by default

2013-04-12 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> i don't know what you mean. if the ebuild detects devpts being mounted and >> the mount is incorrect, it will die. if you don't have devpts mounted at >> all, >> then it assumes y

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Support recursive operation in edos2unix.

2013-04-13 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > The edos2unix is quite useful when handling DOS-sourced packages. > But since it's a bash function, you can't reasonably use it from within > find invocation. And often you hit packages which are all flooded with > CRLFs that you need to conv

Re: [gentoo-dev] RANT: Upgrade icu and KDE at once

2013-05-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> The most annoying fact is, that none of this would have been necessary with >> portage 2.2, but maybe we have to wait for 2.1.11.500 before 2.2 gets >> stable... > > Since portage-2.1.11.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RANT: Upgrade icu and KDE at once

2013-05-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 05/01/2013 07:46 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jörg Schaible >>> wrote: >>>> The most annoying fact is, that none

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 04:26:06PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: >> bootloader configuration under grub1 for instance, was quite >> straight-forward. Now with grub-2, its quite convoluted, for me at least. > > I haven't looked at grub2 yet, but I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> >> If you manually write your own configuration for GRUB2, it is no more >> convoluted than for GRUB Legacy. >> >> If you use grub-mkconfig to gener

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND is not an IUSE replacement [was: New USE_EXPAND: CLAWS_MAIL_PLUGINS]

2013-05-03 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:08 PM, René Neumann wrote: > Am 03.05.2013 22:20, schrieb Zac Medico: >> Is it worth changing? > > Nope. What's worth changing is the excessive use of USE_EXPAND for no > reason (your described usecase makes sense for reasonable USE_EXPAND > stuff like VIDEO_CARDS). But se

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-08 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: > On 8 May 2013 23:39, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: >>> On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani wrote: It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making systemd more accessib

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-08 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Fabio Erculiani schrieb: >> Or perhaps all these man pages, I don't need man pages locally but >> still most ebuilds do install them. What do we do? > > Users who don't want them set FEATURES="noman". > >> Let's be serious here

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH FIXED] Introduce edefault() as a friendly default sub-phase wrapper.

2013-05-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Fixed naming the proper default sub-phase and declaring 'edefault' > in python_prepare_all(). > --- I think I prefer to explicitly name the function I want to call, so I don't really see any great benefit here. I'm not strongly opposed to it,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: devmanual moved to github

2013-05-12 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> However, the write access removed because of potential conflicts >> between g.o.g.o and github. If you can guarantee me that people will >> not mess things up and not commit only to one of the to remotes, >> then we can enable write access

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users

2013-05-22 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 05/22/2013 08:21 AM, Luca Barbato wrote: >> >> check the FEATURES variable and be surprise =) (from man make.conf) >> >>nodoc Do not install doc files (/usr/share/doc). >> >>noinfo Do not install info pages. >

[gentoo-dev] Usage of dev-utils/ninja in ebuilds

2013-05-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
For those unaware, dev-util/ninja is a make-replacement created by one of the Chromium guys at Google. Its focus is on making incremental builds of large software faster. In the latest chromium ebuild (chromium-29.0.1516.3), we are using ninja instead of make. ninja auto-detects the number of jobs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of dev-utils/ninja in ebuilds

2013-05-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 05/25/2013 03:17 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > From an user perspective I was wondering if ninja in the Portage tree > makes use of this faster incremental builds feature. Should I expect > faster builds when trying this out? > No, you will not see any significant speed increase because we always s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)

2013-05-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting out? I > can't support this initiative without such a solution and I would be happy > to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test. > What about INSTALL_M

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Usage of dev-utils/ninja in ebuilds

2013-05-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sat, 25 May 2013 14:48:30 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> I'm wondering if we should create a more global function for calling >> ninja in a consistent way. Maybe we should introduce a NINJAOPTS >> variab

Re: [gentoo-dev] PSA: python-r1.eclass, python-single-r1.eclass, and REQUIRED_USE

2013-05-27 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > A quick reminder for anyone using python-r1.eclass or > python-single-r1.eclass: > > These eclasses provide a ${PYTHON_REQUIRED_USE} variable that should > be included in REQUIRED_USE u

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/dulwich: dulwich-0.9.0-r1.ebuild dulwich-0.8.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog dulwich-0.9.0.ebuild dulwich-0.8.7.ebuild

2013-06-08 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 06/08/2013 09:20 AM, Ian Delaney (idella4) wrote: > idella4 13/06/08 13:20:59 > > Modified: dulwich-0.8.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog > Added:dulwich-0.9.0-r1.ebuild > Removed: dulwich-0.9.0.ebuild dulwich-0.8.7.ebuild > Log: > revbump, migrate ->

[gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell

2013-06-15 Thread Mike Gilbert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The devmanual warns that calling die in a subshell does not work. http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/error-handling/index.html This warning has been obsolete for some time; modern versions of Portage handle die in a subshell just fine. In

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell

2013-06-15 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> Are there any objections to removing this warning from the >> devmanual? > > PMS doesn't guarantee that die works correctly in a subshell: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12800011.3.3 > > So the devmanual agrees with the spe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell

2013-06-15 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:24:13 +0200 > Tom Wijsman wrote: >> What does it take to change future specifications to guarantee this? > > You can have it from EAPI 6 onwards. > >> What's holding this from becoming guaranteed? Why not fix the sp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell

2013-06-15 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: >> If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have >> implemented a certain behavior, making a change to that version of PMS >> to properly doc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell

2013-06-17 Thread Mike Gilbert
On 6/17/2013 4:10 PM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: > On 06/15/13 19:02, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Ciaran McCreesh >> wrote: >>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400 >>> Mike Gilbert wrote: >>>> If we find that all known implemen

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Michael Weber wrote: > On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26 >> Michael Weber napisał(a): >> >>> - multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI} >> >> And why exactly do you need multilib for a web brows

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: > On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the >> multilib-build eclass usage to a minimum. > Sorry, I've missed that agreement, can you poi

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:56 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 06/20/2013 04:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: >>> On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>>> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to

Re: [gentoo-dev] vmware herd is empty

2013-06-21 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 14:20:38 schrieb Pacho Ramos: >> Will drop it in two weeks if nobody joins >> >> Thanks > > I've added myself to the vmware herd for now. > > However, I don't have much time and only really care about vmware-w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Hangouts

2013-06-23 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Pavlos Ratis wrote: > Except from a camera and a microphone requirement is a Google account and > www-client/google-talkplugin package which is already in the tree. > Or a modern smartphone with the relevant app. Personally, I have neither a camera nor mic attache

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >