-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michał Górny:
Dnia 2014-02-21, o godz. 21:07:54 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
napisał(a):
Many people found the current behavior of git-r3 eclass
unfortunate, lightly saying. Most importantly, I underestimated
how many packages actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Matt Turner:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:18 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Why do you send RFC out when you ignore comments?
I didn't see any comments suggesting any changes.
There were 2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Matt Turner:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Why do you send RFC out when you ignore comments?
I didn't see any comments suggesting any changes.
There were 2.
I don't think there were. But I'll play
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michał Górny:
Patch #1 removes shallow clone support completely, and uses full
mirroring instead. The new code would require even more
conditionals to keep the two different behaviors around, and
considering the negative reception it had I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Ciaran McCreesh:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:48:11 +0100 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org
wrote:
We don't want users having to solve a Zebra Puzzle [1] (or, for
the more theoretically inclined, a satisfiability problem [2]) to
find an acceptable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497532
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS/in3AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzEMIH/2SKfnSBDkl5k5ReodLf4iGF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/14/2014 04:06 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 02/15/2014 01:36 AM, hasufell wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497532
Is there a good reason to set CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo at
all? Changing the build type
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417383
reasons:
* cleaner
* easier to update/fix
* proper config protection
any reason this was not done as a separate package in the first place?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2014 01:21 PM, hasufell wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417383
reasons: * cleaner * easier to update/fix * proper config
protection
any reason this was not done as a separate package in the first
place?
On second
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2014 01:48 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014, hasufell wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417383
[gentoo-envd-0.ebuild]
EAPI=3
Why not newest EAPI?
I didn't feel comfortable about it since
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2014 01:48 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014, hasufell wrote:
SRC_URI=
Not needed.
Seems safer to me with in case games.eclass or any of those that it
inherits add stuff to SRC_URI in the future.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ebuild:
* use EAPI-5
* drop RDEPEND/DEPEND
* drop useless elog
* set homepage to games project page
eclass:
* use ${CATEGORY}/${PN} for the check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2014 02:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 14:36:54 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
* set homepage to games project page
Why? Eclasses setting a homepage was never a good idea...
The ebuild sets the homepage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2014 02:47 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 14:45:12 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 02/02/2014 02:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 14:36:54 +0100 hasufell
hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
* set
On 01/30/2014 11:02 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El jue, 30-01-2014 a las 13:47 +0100, Marc Schiffbauer escribió:
* Pacho Ramos schrieb am 29.01.14 um 07:58 Uhr:
Currently, there is no really working version of it in the tree:
I don't know of any reason they are exported, but I could be wrong.
I'm going to run the modified eclass for some time.
rm unnecessary export wrt #467374
--- eclass/games.eclass
+++ eclass/games.eclass
@@ -19,20 +19,20 @@
*) die no support for EAPI=${EAPI} yet ;;
esac
-export
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/2014 08:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
People already do that without revoking commit access, e.g. when the
recruitment project tells you they don't want to process your recruit
or when project leads don't respond to membership applications at
On 01/22/2014 11:36 AM, hasufell wrote:
People already do that without revoking commit access, e.g. when the
recruitment project tells you they don't want to process your recruit
or when project leads don't respond to membership applications at all
or when the ComRel lead is not interested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/22/2014 03:05 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
On 21/01/14 10:54 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
x11-misc/x11vnc
I can proxy this if nobody wants.
We can do that together, I use it as well.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2014 03:09 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 01/20/14 15:59, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org
wrote:
#gentoo-qa | @hwoarang: pretty sure diego had the powerzz to
suspend people
Whether this
either the QA lead or two members of the QA team can require the Infra team
to temporarily suspend commit access for the developer
-1 to that part
That sounds like you are able to make non-trivial decisions without the
approval of the lead.
bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494210
From: Julian Ospald hasuf...@gentoo.org
Date: Fri Dec 13 21:14:01 UTC 2013
Subject: respect ECONF_SOURCE
--- eclass/games.eclass
+++ eclass/games.eclass
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
}
games_src_configure() {
- [[ -x ./configure ]] egamesconf
+ [[ -x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
bug
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493954
from my own tinderbox run... nothing broke (or misplaced any files)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSzVqjAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzW8oH/292WLthspEMyage7H05+9h4
On 12/28/2013 04:44 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 12/28/2013 03:44 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
That's what I call ignoring the rest. You do not communicate,
you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff.
That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able
to address. You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
static-libs - Build static libraries
This can be ambiguous as some packages (like SDL2 - after I apply the
necessary patch) have libraries that are not supposed to be dynamic at
all.
An alternative description would be:
static-libs - Build static
On 12/25/2013 02:16 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
You are interfering with my workflow and I already told you why I kept
the useflag, so stop reverting my commits after I told you the reasons
in a private mail.
Eh, it's been two days, and the temporary issue is still there ...
Fix your
On 12/26/2013 02:27 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:25:04 +0100
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
That is funny that you mention cleaning up. I remember last time
when you broke 8 ebuilds at once because you just trusted your
outdated repoman warning to be correct. You
/media-sound/umurmur/ChangeLog,v 1.10
2013/12/23 12:15:40 hasufell Exp $ +# $Header:
/var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-sound/umurmur/ChangeLog,v 1.11
2013/12/25 09:50:20 patrick Exp $ + + 25 Dec 2013; Patrick Lauer
patr...@gentoo.org metadata.xml: + Remove unneeded useflag
description from
I'd actually consider to remove all *_all phases since you can achive
the same via:
src_install() {
multilib-minimal_src_install
generic install crap || die
}
and have more control over the call order.
But then again that will change behavior. So I am not sure about this
On 12/11/2013 10:18 PM, Greg Turner wrote:
this needs more explanation. Why do we want this?
It should be made clear who is the initial/original author. Maintainer
can be quite anyone.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
we will need to wait for @multilib to comment as well, because
multilib-minimal is used in autotools-multilib.eclass and netsurf.eclass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
On 12/11/2013 10:47 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, hasufell wrote:
I'd actually consider to remove all *_all phases since you can achive
the same via:
src_install() {
multilib-minimal_src_install
generic install crap || die
}
and have more control over
On 12/11/2013 10:18 PM, Greg Turner wrote:
I actually feel that some parts of this is not documentation, but rather
wiki. So maybe that's exactly where to put it?
The doc in the eclass should only describe the behavior of the eclass
and the main points you need to know in order to get it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2013 04:21 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, hasufell wrote:
For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project.
(There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of
another TLP, but so far this hasn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/2013 03:22 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hello all,
The licenses team exists since some time with an e-mail alias
only, and we think it's about time to upgrade to a project.
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Licenses
This is a small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/16/2013 11:57 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
El vie, 15-11-2013 a las 23:39 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
Dnia 2013-11-15, o godz. 14:53:00 Ben de Groot
yng...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
As I see it now, with respect to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2013 07:46 PM, Martin Vaeth wrote:
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
we may as well remove support for mixing stable and unstable
packages. In fact, this will more likely fix a few more bugs!
It was never officially supported. That
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/08/2013 04:18 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org mailto:phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Problem #1 is that sci-geosciences/osgearth-2.4 depends on
=dev-lang/v8-3.18.5.14
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
what does the games team think of an official games repository?
These are some arguments for such a repo:
* sunrise does not allow ebuilds when any version is already in the
tree (so no live or beta ebuilds for existing in-tree-games), so that
is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 02:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-10-20, o godz. 14:09:29 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
napisał(a):
what does the games team think of an official games repository?
$ layman -i games
* games * ~ * Source : svn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 02:19 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
Why not use gamerlay then? :D
* not related to the games team
* no review whatsoever from any dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
* low quality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After doing some tests we will probably apply this patch from bug 483304.
That means two things:
* DOCS variable/array is now handled by einstalldocs
* einstalldocs is _only_ carried out automatically if
multilib_src_install_all is not overwritten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
* not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any
dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
It is easy-fixable. It is enough to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 04:41 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 02:45 PM, hasufell wrote:
- gpg control packet After doing some tests we will probably
apply this patch from bug 483304.
probably? Then this does not belong to the announcement list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
* not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 05:00 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:09 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
what does the games team think of an official games repository?
... Yes, overlays suck. But bugzilla as a review platform sucks
more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in discussing here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 06:52 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2013, 18:12:39 schrieb hasufell:
This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in
discussing here.
Well maybe others do now?
http://cdn.meme.li/i/p77qn.jpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/16/2013 02:59 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
-- when in doubt -- ask the maintainer.
We should just require maintainers to document what their slots and
subslots are for in the ebuild.
4. You *can not* trust portage's --dynamic-deps anymore.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project
leaders/members and remove them from the projects in case there has
not been any activity for a while, regardless of the internal project
structure.
Authority does not only come with
On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project
leaders/members and remove them from the projects in case there
has not been any activity for a while, regardless of the internal
project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive
project leaders
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2013 11:00 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:53 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/30/2013 05:28 AM, Richard Farina (zerochaos) wrote:
zerochaos13/01/30 04:28:06
[...]
LICENSE=GPL-2 -SLOT=0 +SLOT=0/${PV} KEYWORDS=~alpha ~amd64
~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86 ~x86-fbsd IUSE= adns
+caps doc doc-pdf geoip gtk
On 10/11/2013 06:00 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 10/11/2013 11:42 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 01/30/2013 05:28 AM, Richard Farina (zerochaos) wrote:
zerochaos13/01/30 04:28:06
[...]
LICENSE=GPL-2 -SLOT=0 +SLOT=0/${PV} KEYWORDS=~alpha ~amd64
~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/2013 06:43 PM, yac wrote:
So if you're relying on the presence of filed bugs to give some
sort of coverage metric, you're going to be out of luck from time
to time. For instance, that fun bug where stabilising a version
of libraw broke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2013 09:22 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 09/29/2013 10:41 PM, hasufell wrote:
Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the
maintainer or the dev who requested stabilization.
That is definitely not true. We always
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/17/2013 09:05 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:58:20 -0400 Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 4/17/2013 2:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:33:29 -0400 Mike Frysinger
vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2013 01:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
hasufell schrieb:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464536
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554
for the first bug: net-libs/ortp media-libs/mediastreamer and
net-voip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to
remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a
library, especially when this is a non-maintainer stablereq.
Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2013 12:54 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 29. September 2013, 23:41:03 schrieb hasufell:
It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to
remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a
library
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I lost interest.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQttjAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzRXYIAIQKnHSRoChJ/gHd56KxaaW+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I wonder if it would make any sense to take the effort to convert
markdown docs to html format before installing them.
I see two possibilities:
1. Create one or two eutils functions like
domd: will go through all viable implementations like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/24/2013 10:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-24, o godz. 19:49:33 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
napisał(a):
I wonder if it would make any sense to take the effort to
convert markdown docs to html format before installing them.
What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2013 02:29 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
As a follow up to this discussion, I came with the attached patch.
It appears to work ok for regular merges and binpkg merges with
FEATURES=collision-protect.
Per my reading of PMS it does
On 09/01/2013 12:30 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
they dont search for recruits
why not?
On 08/28/2013 10:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
What are your thoughts?
Not interested in any of those suggestions. git-2.eclass works fine for
me and I will keep using it.
Since the project lead doesn't respond to private mails, is not present
in the projects IRC channel and does not comment on my bug reports I
want to ask here for review of the following packages, because those are
non-trivial libraries:
SDL2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480826
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/27/2013 02:34 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to let you know dotnet team is needed of help. I am
taking care of some of its packages but mostly banshee and whatever
it requires. I don't have much time to invest on their packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/2013 05:53 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
S=${WORKDIR}/SDL2_mixer-${PV}
Why no quotes? ()
S=${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}
Why no quotes? ()
S=${WORKDIR}/SDL2_ttf-${PV}
I suggest quotes ().
Those are variable assignments and don't
On 08/26/2013 09:19 AM, Devan Franchini (twitch153) wrote:
-src_prepare() {
+pkg_pretend() {
+
+ local ver=4.6.0
+ local msg=${PN} needs at least GCC ${ver} set to compile.
+
+ if ! version_is_at_least ${ver} $(gcc-fullversion); then
+ eerror ${msg}
+
On 08/20/2013 01:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Due to the widespread breakage in the tree noted in bug #480892 [1],
and mis-design of multilib-minimal.eclass, we'd like to put some more
work into getting einstalldocs() ready for EAPI 6.
What mis-design?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/20/2013 01:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
Due to the widespread breakage in the tree noted in bug #480892
[1], and mis-design of multilib-minimal.eclass, we'd like to put
some more work into getting einstalldocs() ready for EAPI 6.
Ok,
On 08/20/2013 01:54 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
For example, hasufell has suggested checking ${DOCS// /} to support
DOCS=' ' as well.
Looks like over-engineering to me. Are there any use cases for it?
No, just caution, so we don't have to realize that our default
src_install is broken
On 08/20/2013 08:19 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
My question is, how can we improve our stabilization procedures/policies
so we can convince people not to run production servers on ~arch and
keep the stable tree more up to date?
Why convince them? They have been warned and it's their own
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420493
gtk2 and gtk3 useflags are discouraged and should only be used in
special cases
file a bug for those if there is not one already
On 08/16/2013 07:12 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Hello,
gtk is a global
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please let the python herd review distutils-r1 conversions until you
feel safe about it.
On 08/16/2013 11:54 AM, Manuel Rueger (mrueg) wrote:
Index: synaptiks-0.8.1-r3.ebuild
===
On 08/14/2013 03:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:53:17
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Right now, however,
it might be useful if only
On 08/14/2013 09:51 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:34:51 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/14/2013 03:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-14, o godz. 16:53:17
Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
14.08.2013 16:05, Rich Freeman пишет:
On Wed, Aug
On 08/14/2013 10:07 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:59:37 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
You're fundamentally misunderstanding how PMS and Gentoo development
works.
I think you are fundamentally misunderstanding. I think gentoo should
stop supporting downstreams
On 08/14/2013 10:17 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, hasufell wrote:
And their lack of time (to be polite) should not block general
progress in gentoo.
Perhaps these basic notions of how Gentoo development works
You certainly are not an authority when it comes
On 08/14/2013 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true PM for
Gentoo, then it's probably something for the Council to decide.
I think that would make sense. We don't have enough resources for such
fun and overcoming PMS burdens has been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2013 01:23 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-15, o godz. 00:19:40 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
napisał(a):
On 08/14/2013 10:56 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
If you want PMS to go away, and call portage the one-and-true
PM for Gentoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/15/2013 02:48 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Multiple cases like mandating bash 3.2 that we don't even have in
tree anymore,
There is =app-shells/bash-3.2_p51 in the Portage tree.
Fun facts: It is in unstable branch.
So while I write ebuilds
On 08/15/2013 02:52 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:13:07 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I have no idea what that means. Global changes are _always_ discussed
in the community. PMS doesn't add anything to that process.
It puts the consensus and / or decisions
On 08/09/2013 09:36 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
It is not a regression if a new version of gnome mrequires systemd
and does not work with OpenRc; it is a design choice.
I could claim the design choice thing for anything as well.
Actually blender upstream does that for the brokenness of
On 08/09/2013 12:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:30 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 08/09/2013 09:36 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
It is not a regression if a new version of gnome mrequires systemd
and does not work with OpenRc; it is a design choice.
We
On 08/09/2013 04:57 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev schrieb:
I think there may be a misunderstanding here. He only said that if you
want to run Gnome 3.8, then switch to systemd. Because the Gnome team
will not support any other configuration.
He did not say that
On 08/08/2013 01:49 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 08/07/2013 09:14 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 14:45 +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
Greetings,
Gnome Herd decided to target stablilization of 3.8 [1] which requires
systemd.
What are the reasons to stable 3.8 and not 3.6,
On 08/08/2013 08:21 AM, Duncan wrote:
None-the-less, I do understand the problem of a gentoo project supporting
an option no devs on the project are actually interested in running.
I do not. If that is the policy, then the project is doing something wrong.
On 08/08/2013 04:34 PM, Ben Kohler wrote:
As for the stabilization issue-- it seems like most people against
stabilization just want ~arch as a barrier or whoa, wait up a sec warning
to stable users don't stumble upon systemd, which makes sense. But I think
there are better ways to
On 08/08/2013 05:23 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 16:56:16 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Gentoo supports systemd, fine. Still, OpenRC is our default
implementation and I don't think something should be called stable _on
gentoo_ that doesn't work with the system
On 08/08/2013 06:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 08-08-2013 a las 18:36 +0200, hasufell escribió:
[...]
I am only talking about stabilization here, maybe that wasn't clear enough?
The virtual is in @system and the default pre-installed implementation
is INCOMPATIBLE with gnome-3.8. Until
On 08/06/2013 11:46 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
23:37:25 willikins rej, you have notes! [21:13] mrueg Let me
rephrase this: Just a friendly notice to please refrain from rephrasing
bug summaries from Stabilize ${P} to ${P} stable req. This just
adds unneeded noise to the bug. I don't want this
On 08/07/2013 09:55 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:32:39AM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
AFAIK, the status is unimplemented, and nobody's working on it.
No, I did post implementation patches for much of it back when the GLEPs
were in process. The overwhelming message from other
It seems none of them (except the overview GLEP 57) are implemented yet,
although they are roughly 6-8 years old.
What is holding it back? Is it just that we don't have a PM
implementation yet or is it some political nonsense and PMS blocking
progress again?
I am not criticizing the portage team
On 08/05/2013 11:49 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-05, o godz. 12:33:45
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
This is a friendly reminder.
I've found the tree again to have dependencies like:
dev-libs/openssl:=
virtual/jpeg:=
Neither of which are correct, since
On 08/05/2013 01:10 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
On 08/05/2013 01:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
It isn't a bad idea to still post on -dev. Maintainers should be
removing the local definitions, and just because a decision seems like
the obviously-correct one doesn't mean that it is.
Follow-up
501 - 600 of 792 matches
Mail list logo
