Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 10/19/2013 12:10 PM, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote: On 10:43 Sat 19 Oct , Daniel Campbell wrote: On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: ... x11-wm/fluxbox I'm not a developer (but have a completed dev test that doesn't know where to go...). I'm interested in nabbing x11-wm/fluxbox

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 10:43 Sat 19 Oct , Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >... > > x11-wm/fluxbox > > I'm not a developer (but have a completed dev test that doesn't know > where to go...). I'm interested in nabbing x11-wm/fluxbox (and any > related projects that are still aliv

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 10/19/2013 04:43 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> x11-wm/fluxbox >> >> > > I'm not a developer (but have a completed dev test that doesn't know > where to go...). I'm interested in nabbing x11-wm/fluxbox (and any > related projects that are still alive). I use Fluxbox daily and keep an > eye on up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due afterstep and desktop-wm herds removal: > net-mail/asmail > x11-plugins/asapm > x11-plugins/asclock > x11-plugins/ascpu > x11-plugins/asmem > x11-plugins/asmon > x11-plugins/astime > x11-wm/afterstep -> looks that was proxy-maintained > sys-libs/libi

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due afterstep and desktop-wm herds removal: net-mail/asmail x11-plugins/asapm x11-plugins/asclock x11-plugins/ascpu x11-plugins/asmem x11-plugins/asmon x11-plugins/astime x11-wm/afterstep -> looks that was proxy-maintained sys-libs/libixp x11-misc/bbappconf x11-misc/bbcd x11-misc/bbdate x11-misc/bb

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

13.10.2013 11:46, Sven Eden пишет: > Am Samstag, 12. Oktober 2013, 08:45:15 schrieb Pacho Ramos: >> Due pebenito retirement: >> dev-libs/ustr > > I've never heard of that package before, but the description sounded > interesting. So I went to their site and read what it is about, and it looks >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Am Samstag, 12. Oktober 2013, 08:45:15 schrieb Pacho Ramos: > Due pebenito retirement: > dev-libs/ustr I've never heard of that package before, but the description sounded interesting. So I went to their site and read what it is about, and it looks like a project that seems to be ideal for my wo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 17:35:35 +0300 Pavlos Ratis wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Pacho Ramos > wrote: > > Due rajiv retirement: > > net-dns/dnstop > > I'll take net-dns/dnstop. > Please note that a proxied maintainer was assigned to this earlier today; so, you might want to contact

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due rajiv retirement: > net-dns/dnstop I'll take net-dns/dnstop.

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due rajiv retirement: net-dns/dnstop net-misc/ser2net

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due pebenito retirement: dev-libs/ustr

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due to voip lack of active maintainers: Not co-maintained with anyone else: dev-libs/jrtplib media-libs/libj2k media-libs/libmimic net-libs/iax net-libs/sofia-sip net-misc/asterisk-rate_engine net-misc/asterisk-spandsp_codec_g726 net-misc/astmanproxy net-misc/ser net-misc/sipsak net-misc/sjphone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 21/07/13 13:41, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013, 11:10:26 schrieb Pacho Ramos: Due sbriesen lack of time: (...) media-gfx/exiv2 kde team can take this, however we'd be happy about co-maintainers... gnomies? :) You can (or should) add graphics@ as a fallback there too.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-python/crcmod > dev-python/gmpy > dev-python/pycdio > dev-python/pydns > dev-python/pyyaml > dev-python/tagpy > dev-python/tlslite The Python team has taken these. I've updated metadata and reassigned bugs. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/21/2013 12:41 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013, 11:10:26 schrieb Pacho Ramos: >> Due sbriesen lack of time: (...) media-gfx/exiv2 > > kde team can take this, however we'd be happy about > co-maintainers... gnomies? :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 21/07/2013 10:10, Pacho Ramos wrote: > media-gfx/iscan-data > media-gfx/iscan I'll pick up these two (soon as my laptop gets back working).. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013, 11:10:26 schrieb Pacho Ramos: > Due sbriesen lack of time: > (...) > media-gfx/exiv2 kde team can take this, however we'd be happy about co-maintainers... gnomies? :) -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ signa

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due phosphan lack of time: app-admin/lcap app-admin/fetchlog app-misc/mepl app-text/epstool dev-db/vbisam dev-lang/tinycobol dev-util/cdecl media-gfx/sane-backends media-gfx/sane-frontends media-libs/libemf net-analyzer/prelude-nessus net-ftp/weex net-mail/libdbx net-mail/vacation

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due sbriesen lack of time: app-cdr/mkcdtoc app-text/sigil dev-db/lib_mysqludf_fPROJ4 dev-db/lib_mysqludf_json dev-db/lib_mysqludf_log dev-db/lib_mysqludf_preg dev-db/lib_mysqludf_stem dev-db/lib_mysqludf_stat dev-db/lib_mysqludf_str dev-db/lib_mysqludf_sys dev-db/lib_mysqludf_ta dev-db/lib_mysqlud

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs (ruby applications)

Over time a number of packages have ended up in the ruby herd due to maintainers leaving and being dropped from metadata. These packages really need dedicated maintainers who understand what these applications are meant to do and who can do proper testing for them. As such, I'll be adding maintaine

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

dev-libs/igraph

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/16/13 11:49, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs: > app-arch/tarsync * app-arch/tarsync Available versions: (~)0.2.1 (~)0.2.1-r1 Homepage:http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/tarsync/ Description: Delta co

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/16/2013 11:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due ramereth lack of time: > sys-block/megacli As a very unhappy owner of hardware that uses it, I'll take it. Cheers, Kacper signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

It's low maintenance; only thing needed is either to rebase to my libtransform work, or add proper xz support. Either way, any questions, let me know. ~brian On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Sergey Popov wrote: > 16.06.2013 13:49, Pacho Ramos пишет: > > Due ferringb retirement the following pa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

16.06.2013 13:49, Pacho Ramos пишет: > Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs:> > > dev-util/bsdiff I will take care of it... -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead signature.asc Description: OpenPGP d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs: > ... > dev-util/diffball > I'll take it. -- Rafael Goncalves Martins Gentoo Linux developer http://rafaelmartins.eng.br/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:57:32 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > It's actually not bad, since all of the subslot rebuilds are triggered > in a single backtracking run. Anyway, I welcome having people work on > competing package managers, trying to do all of this stuff more > efficiently. :-) I'm starting t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/16/2013 11:23 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > Ignoring that call graph, you could look at what has recently been > introduced to increase the amount of time needed to calculate the > dependency graph; you don't have to look far. > > http://blogs.gentoo.org/mgorny/2013/05/27/the-pointless-art-of-sub

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 2013-06-16 06:55, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > > Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs: > > > dev-python/snakeoil > > > sys-apps/pkgcore (likely to be treecleaned as it's no longer maintained > > > and neither has eapi5 support) > I'll take pkgcore (if somehow we can get ea

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:23:24 +0200 Tom Wijsman wrote: > Is it possible to reasonable enhance the Portage code to improve dep > calculations in a reasonable amount of time? Before you start looking at speed, you should make it do full, correct dependency enforcing. Get it right first, and fast lat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:27:12 +0200 hasufell wrote: > On 06/16/2013 07:21 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió: > > [...] > >> Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the > >> intricate details of package management in the past,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:21:38 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió: > [...] > > Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the > > intricate details of package management in the past, but I also do > > not like how long portage is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 19:21 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió: > [...] > > Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the > > intricate details of package management in the past, but I also do not > > like how long portage is ta

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/16/2013 07:21 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió: > [...] >> Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the >> intricate details of package management in the past, but I also do not >> like how long portage is taking now for d

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió: [...] > Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the > intricate details of package management in the past, but I also do not > like how long portage is taking now for dep calculations. And, cannot that efforts be put

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 16:44 +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:55:23 -0700 > Brian Dolbec wrote: > > > I'll take pkgcore (if somehow we can get eapi 5 finished.) > > Here's the catch: it's not only about finishing EAPI 5, but also about > implementing the upcoming EAPI 6 changes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/16/2013 08:27 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 05:19 -0700, g...@malth.us escribió: On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, at 02:31, Pacho Ramos thusly quipped: Due ramereth lack of time: net-misc/stunnel Pretty sure my (dead, eventually to be revived) server uses stunnel. I've never offi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:55:23 -0700 Brian Dolbec wrote: > I'll take pkgcore (if somehow we can get eapi 5 finished.) Here's the catch: it's not only about finishing EAPI 5, but also about implementing the upcoming EAPI 6 changes and fixing any bugs that arise. For it to be feasible to use it wou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 14:48 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs: > > dev-python/snakeoil > > sys-apps/pkgcore (likely to be treecleaned as it's no longer maintained > > and neither

RE: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, at 05:27, Pacho Ramos thusly quipped: > El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 05:19 -0700, g...@malth.us escribió: >> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, at 02:31, Pacho Ramos thusly quipped: >>> Due ramereth lack of time: >>> net-misc/stunnel >> >> Pretty sure my (dead, eventually to be revived) server

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs: > dev-python/snakeoil > sys-apps/pkgcore (likely to be treecleaned as it's no longer maintained > and neither has eapi5 support) Looks like these should go together, with pkgcor

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 05:19 -0700, g...@malth.us escribió: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, at 02:31, Pacho Ramos thusly quipped: > > Due ramereth lack of time: > > net-misc/stunnel > > Pretty sure my (dead, eventually to be revived) server uses stunnel. I've > never officially maintained anything, is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/16/2013 02:19 PM, g...@malth.us wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, at 02:31, Pacho Ramos thusly quipped: >> Due ramereth lack of time: >> net-misc/stunnel > > Pretty sure my (dead, eventually to be revived) server uses stunnel. I've > never officially maintained anything, is there some document

RE: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, at 02:31, Pacho Ramos thusly quipped: > Due ramereth lack of time: > net-misc/stunnel Pretty sure my (dead, eventually to be revived) server uses stunnel. I've never officially maintained anything, is there some documentation somewhere as to what exactly I'm agreeing to, if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 16/06/2013 11:03, Pacho Ramos wrote: > media-gfx/iscan-plugin-gt-f720 I'll clean it up so that it behaves like the other iscan-plugins but if somebody has hardware that would be nice to co-maintain (including users) -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flame

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due elvanor lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-office/openerp-server net-print/xerox-drivers media-gfx/iscan-plugin-gt-f720 net-libs/pjsip

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due ferringb retirement the following packages are up for grabs: app-arch/tarsync dev-python/snakeoil dev-util/bsdiff dev-util/diffball sys-apps/pkgcore (likely to be treecleaned as it's no longer maintained and neither has eapi5 support)

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due nixphoeni lack of time the following package is up for grabs: app-misc/gourmet

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due ramereth lack of time: sys-block/megacli net-misc/stunnel app-admin/mcollective

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-python/hachoir-core > dev-python/hachoir-parser > dev-python/hachoir-regex > dev-python/pycountry > dev-python/pywebdav I think the python herd will take these. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/02/2013 07:02 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due c1pher lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: > net-analyzer/ostinato > net-wireless/mdk I'll take these. - -Zero -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Co

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/02/2013 07:02 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due c1pher lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: app-benchmarks/ramspeed I'm the last person to have done some maintenance on ramspeed. I can take care of it. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due c1pher lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: app-benchmarks/ramspeed app-text/mht-rip net-analyzer/ostinato net-wireless/mdk

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due cedk lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: app-admin/eselect-audicle app-admin/eselect-chuck app-admin/eselect-miniaudicle app-admin/eselect-sndpeek app-misc/hachoir-metadata app-misc/hachoir-subfile app-misc/hachoir-urwid app-misc/lsx app-office/calcurse dev-db/pg_top dev-p

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due "Lack" lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: net-dns/openresolv x11-misc/etm x11-misc/ipager x11-misc/nts

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due peper lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: app-dicts/libydpdict app-dicts/ydpdict

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Due serkan lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: app-dicts/stardict-freedict-eng-tur app-dicts/stardict-freedict-tur-deu app-dicts/stardict-freedict-tur-eng app-text/zpspell Thanks for taking care of them

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:52:00 +0100 Martin Dummer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > If I manage one day to achieve the gentoo dev status then I am willing > to pick up maintainership of > > > app-laptop/nvidiabl > > but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:52:00 +0100 Martin Dummer wrote: > If I manage one day to achieve the gentoo dev status then I am willing > to pick up maintainership of > > > app-laptop/nvidiabl > > but until then? What about proxy-maintainership? Luis signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If I manage one day to achieve the gentoo dev status then I am willing to pick up maintainership of > app-laptop/nvidiabl but until then? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, The PHP herd currently contains a few packages that were added for historical reasons, but do not belong in the herd. dev-db/cdb dev-db/libiodbc dev-db/odbtp dev-libs/libxdiff cdb and odbtp will be dropped to maintainer-needed. libiodbc and libxdiff I can take on myself if no one else wants

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi all, since I don't own a Samsung laptop anymore and my new laptop has Intel graphics, I'd like to drop maintainership of the following packages: app-laptop/easy-slow-down-manager (belongs to samsung-tools) app-laptop/nvidiabl app-laptop/samsung-tools net-wireless/ndiswrapper They're all reall

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

After talking with serkan the following packages are now up for grabs: x11-libs/gtkhotkey gnome-extra/file-browser-applet app-mobilephone/ganyremote signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 02/16/2013 08:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: net-firewall/xtables-addons (proxy maintained) net-misc/ipv6calc I can take care of these two. I use both. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Am Samstag, 16. Februar 2013, 14:08:06 schrieb Pacho Ramos: > Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: > app-emulation/e-uae > app-emulation/uae AFAIK both are long dead. The current actively developed uae variant is PUAE, but I'd say it is not ready for a wider audience

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Peter Stuge schrieb: > linux-firmware is okey but not great. The high resolution is there, which was > my main concern, but it's not so easy to know how to create a savedconfig without installing the package. Just create a text file /etc/portage/savedconfig/sys-kernel/linux-firmware with the desi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb: > On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode >> sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode > > Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or > not? These are included in linux-firmware. And because Intel has EOL'ed the chipsets, it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:09:22 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 17/02/13 12:05, Michał Górny wrote: > > savedconfig is a cheap hack. It lacks all the features USE flags have. > > Really. We're talking here about replacing well-organized packages with > > one cheap hack for the laziness of a few de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 17/02/13 12:05, Michał Górny wrote: savedconfig is a cheap hack. It lacks all the features USE flags have. Really. We're talking here about replacing well-organized packages with one cheap hack for the laziness of a few developers. But that's how Gentoo worked for a long time. This is how yo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:06:19 -0500 "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/16/2013 10:11 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > Can we please stop removing individual firmware packages until > > sys-k

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 10:11 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Petten￲ wrote: > >> On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >>> >>> Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do >>> that now. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 2013-02-16 Sat 05:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: net-libs/libmnl Added to netmon herd. Tim pgpHn4U3M2RcW.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Look into the WHENCE file and be horrified. Taking just the first ten > items (of a total 114): > >Unknown license (3 times) >GPL, but without source (3 times) >"All rights reserved" >BSD, without source >Right for redis

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I'm sure I'm not the only one who really doesn't care about having > ACCEPT_LICENSE work properly for a package full of binary blobs. It > seems like a rather insignificant reason to split the package up. Nobody has suggested to split it up. But un

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \"Zero Chaos\" Farina wrote: > >>> Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. > >> If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not >> install those firmware packages. > > Yes, bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \"Zero Chaos\" Farina wrote: >> Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. > If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not > install those firmware packages. Yes, but ACCEPT_LICENSE wouldn't work. It would still be necessary to inc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. > > Use savedconfig linux-firmware is okey but not great. The high resolution is there, which was my main concern, but it's not so easy to know how to create a savedconfig without installing the packa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/2013 16:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. Which Peter's remark is not about. I do feel we need to fix the license issue, but I don't think this is compounding anything to clear up the tree first. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flame

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 10:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Petten￲ wrote: > >>> Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. > >> Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your >> persona

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: >> >> Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do >> that now. > Go for it. Please don't. Can we please stop removing individual firmware packages until sys-kerne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. > Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your > personal lazyness. Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/2013 15:41, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > Yup, we sure can remove them, and if no one beat me to it I will do that > now. Go for it. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/2013 08:44 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode >> sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode > > Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or > not? > ozzie firmw

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

El mié, 06-02-2013 a las 18:17 +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) escribió: > Hi ALL: > I'd like to help with following packages (will proxy via tomka) > > dev-libs/libev >which I see one open bug, but trivial to fix #429526 > > net-misc/ofono >need version bump (current 1.10, upstream release 1.1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/2013 14:59, Peter Stuge wrote: > Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. Use savedconfig and stop wasting our collective time for your personal lazyness. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Desc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/13 15:59, Peter Stuge wrote: Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode I want this installed on my system. sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode But not this. could we just remove them Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. Having separate ebuil

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode I want this installed on my system. > > sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode But not this. > could we just remove them Please don't. I think it would suck to lose the higher resolution. On the plus side it seems that these particular packages w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 16/02/2013 14:08, Pacho Ramos wrote: > sys-firmware/iwl3945-ucode > sys-firmware/iwl4965-ucode Are these included in linux-firmware (i.e. could we just remove them) or not? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Saturday 16 February 2013 14:08:06 Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: > app-dicts/stardict-freedict-eng-rus > app-doc/gimp-help > app-emulation/e-uae > app-emulation/uae > app-text/cuneiform (proxy maintained) > app-text/mathtex > app-text/yagf

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:08:06 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > dev-util/oprofile Took this one, bumped the version and did some small fixes. With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D signature.asc Description: PGP signatu

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Due pva lack of time the following packages are now up for grabs: app-dicts/stardict-freedict-eng-rus app-doc/gimp-help app-emulation/e-uae app-emulation/uae app-text/cuneiform (proxy maintained) app-text/mathtex app-text/yagf dev-db/gigabase dev-libs/guiloader-c++ dev-libs/guiloader dev-libs/judy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

Hi ALL: I'd like to help with following packages (will proxy via tomka) dev-libs/libev which I see one open bug, but trivial to fix #429526 net-misc/ofono need version bump (current 1.10, upstream release 1.12) If any developer willing to hel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:16:32 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 02/03/2013 09:45 PM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:46:52 +0100 > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > >> dev-libs/boehm-gc > > > > Will take this one in a few days if no one else grabs it first. > > > Since it's a depende

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 13:46 Sun 03 Feb 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > dev-cpp/gtest I'll take this one. Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/2013 02:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due leio lack of time the following packages are up for grabs: > app-benchmarks/gtkperf mine. just fixed https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428652 - -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

El mar, 05-02-2013 a las 19:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: [...] > media-sound/dbmeasure [...] Ford Prefect will still take care of this one signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

On 5 February 2013 23:58, Pacho Ramos wrote: [...] > media-sound/dbmeasure [...] I'll keep this one. Cheers, -- Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due lack of time

As Ford Prefect will focus on pulseaudio related packages: dev-python/python-gudev (now in proxy-maintainers herd) dev-util/mutrace dev-util/xesam-tools media-sound/dbmeasure media-video/arista signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs for dagger lack of time

On 5 February 2013 12:57, Pacho Ramos wrote: > sys-apps/paludis I'll take this one (paludis) (currently at work, can't edit metadata for ~7 hours)

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs for dagger lack of time

After talking with him we agreed he won't be able to continue maintaining this packages, feel free to get whatever package you prefer: gnome-extra/connman-gnome net-libs/libmapi net-misc/ofono sys-apps/paludis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >