On Monday 12 June 2006 08:23, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 19:56 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 10 June 2006 10:29, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 18:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:01:25 +0100
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 10 June 2006 01:33, Alec Warner wrote:
So we have two use flags - client and server. Here are the
possabilities
-client -server
+client -server
+client +server
-client +server
Do we
On Saturday 10 June 2006 09:32, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
Suggestion was:
net-misc/dhcp-client
net-misc/dhcp-server
net-misc/dhcp - RDEPEND on -client and -server
You would also need net-misc/dhcp-common then to stop client and server
installing the same required libraries and headers. In this
On Friday 09 June 2006 21:27, Ned Ludd wrote:
Maybe along the same lines as what you are pointing out here it should
also be noted that built_with_use is semi faulty and can return wrong
results when no /var/db/pkg/$CATEGORY/$PVR/USE exists.
this is done on purpose
-mike
pgpkeT3VMXksr.pgp
On Saturday 10 June 2006 04:32, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
I do think we should avoid built_with_use where we can, as it causes
emerge to abort.
no it doesnt ... the ebuild maintainer makes the package abort based upon the
results of built_with_use ...
-mike
pgpIaYYFHjNYa.pgp
Description: PGP
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 22:05 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 6/9/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentoo's standard operating procedure is to build packages as they were
intended and packaged from upstream.
+1
This means if the client
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 05:44:41 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 10 June 2006 04:32, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
I do think we should avoid built_with_use where we can, as it causes
emerge to abort.
no it doesnt ... the ebuild maintainer makes the package abort based
upon
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 18:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This is the official (hehe) request for comments on making a policy of
how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server and
how to allow for building client-only.
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:24 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
Do we read -client -server and +client +server to mean the same thing?
We could, yes.
If so the logic can read
if use client || ! use server ; then
# build client
fi
if use server || ! use client ; then
# build server
fi
On Saturday 10 June 2006 10:29, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 18:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This is the official (hehe) request for comments on making a policy
of how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either
This is the official (hehe) request for comments on making a policy of
how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server and
how to allow for building client-only.
The idea is quite simple.
Gentoo's standard operating procedure is to build packages as they were
intended and
On 6/9/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentoo's standard operating procedure is to build packages as they were
intended and packaged from upstream.
+1
This means if the client and the
server for a particular package is in a single package, we should build
both by default.
No
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 22:05 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 6/9/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentoo's standard operating procedure is to build packages as they were
intended and packaged from upstream.
+1
This means if the client and the
server for a particular
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:35 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This is the official (hehe) request for comments on making a policy of
how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server and
how to allow for building client-only.
The idea is quite simple.
Gentoo's standard
On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This is the official (hehe) request for comments on making a policy of
how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server and
how to allow for building client-only.
rather than moving to some sort of policy that satisfies no
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 06:19:53PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote:
Seems logical.
But for what you are proposing I'd suggest not making USE of minimal at
all for this. I'd rather see that flag reserved for mostly
embedded alike use.
Me too. A server/client set of USE flags seems more appropriate to
Mike Frysinger wrote:
rather than moving to some sort of policy that satisfies no one completely
and
we'll have to back out of later, why dont we wait until portage can give us
proper support for USE=client/server
-mike
+1
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
On Friday 09 June 2006 23:34, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This is the official (hehe) request for comments on making a policy of
how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server and
how to allow for building client-only.
Roy Marples wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 23:34, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 09 June 2006 16:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
This is the official (hehe) request for comments on making a policy of
how to handle ebuilds than can be used for either client or server and
how to allow for building
How does portage stop us from doing that now?
I don't think it does ... but you'll have to go back and clean it up
when USE-based DEPs support eventually arrives. But we can worry
about that nearer the time.
Best regards,
Stu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 10 June 2006 01:33, Alec Warner wrote:
So we have two use flags - client and server. Here are the possabilities
-client -server
+client -server
+client +server
-client +server
Do we read -client -server and +client +server to mean the same thing?
If so the logic can
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 02:01 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
On Saturday 10 June 2006 01:33, Alec Warner wrote:
So we have two use flags - client and server. Here are the possabilities
-client -server
+client -server
+client +server
-client +server
Do we read -client -server and
22 matches
Mail list logo
