On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:36:00 Richard Freeman wrote:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
> #SRC_URI="mirror://sourceforge/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz"
> # starting to hate sf.net ...
> SRC_URI="http://foremost.sourceforge.net/pkg/foremost-1.5.6.tar.gz";
> >
> > The filename that violates our policies
On Monday 09 November 2009 07:36:31 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Sunday 08 of November 2009 23:19:13 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > So, you didn't get my point. It must be true then, what they say about
> > > geeks and social skills...
> >
> > i dont think your point is relevant to this thread
>
> I
On Sunday 08 of November 2009 23:19:13 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > So, you didn't get my point. It must be true then, what they say about
> > geeks and social skills...
>
> i dont think your point is relevant to this thread
> -mike
Indeed it is - it's not about what's been said, but about the way
Ben de Groot wrote:
2009/11/8 Mark Loeser :
Also, please learn how to communicate in a manner that is constructive
instead of acting like a dick at every opportunity.
Looks to me this should be applied to some others in this thread first.
Really, aren't there more constructive ways to communic
Petteri Räty wrote:
#SRC_URI="mirror://sourceforge/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz"
# starting to hate sf.net ...
SRC_URI="http://foremost.sourceforge.net/pkg/foremost-1.5.6.tar.gz";
The filename that violates our policies hasn't changed between the new
and old SRC_URI.
Is this policy actually written dow
none of your points here are relevant to the original issue at hand. like
Mark said, if you cant be bothered to do it right in the first place, then
dont do it at all. if that means packages get removed from the tree, then so
be it. it isnt that hard to do it right in the first place, so stop
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:22:19 Ben de Groot wrote:
> 2009/11/8 Mark Loeser :
> > Ben de Groot said:
> >> Really, aren't there more constructive ways to communicate your (meaning
> >> all of you in this thread) concerns, without demotivating the person who
> >> does so much work for Gentoo?
>
On Sunday 08 November 2009 14:46:34 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> > On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >> On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
> >>> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
> And because I'm a lazy
> >>
2009/11/8 Mark Loeser :
> Ben de Groot said:
>> Really, aren't there more constructive ways to communicate your (meaning
>> all of you in this thread) concerns, without demotivating the person who
>> does so much work for Gentoo?
>
> If the person doing said work does not care about abiding by QA
Ben de Groot said:
> 2009/11/8 Mark Loeser :
> > Also, please learn how to communicate in a manner that is constructive
> > instead of acting like a dick at every opportunity.
>
> Looks to me this should be applied to some others in this thread first.
> Really, aren't there more constructive ways
2009/11/8 Mark Loeser :
> Also, please learn how to communicate in a manner that is constructive
> instead of acting like a dick at every opportunity.
Looks to me this should be applied to some others in this thread first.
Really, aren't there more constructive ways to communicate your (meaning
al
On Sunday 08 November 2009 20:27:23 Mark Loeser wrote:
> Patrick Lauer said:
> > If you feel you have too much time you could search on bugzilla for
> > "patch" and start fixing those bugs. "Bump" is also a funny search.
>
> If you are just bumping random packages and applying patches when you
>
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
>>> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
And because I'm a lazy
I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details
Patrick Lauer said:
> If you feel you have too much time you could search on bugzilla for "patch"
> and start fixing those bugs. "Bump" is also a funny search.
If you are just bumping random packages and applying patches when you
have no idea how the package works, we have a problem on our hand
On Sunday 08 November 2009 19:24:47 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
> > > В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
> > > > And because I'm a lazy
> > > >
> > > > I'd appreciate
On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
> > В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
> > > And because I'm a lazy
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just
> > > fix it in
On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
> > And because I'm a lazy
> >
> > I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix
> > it instead
>
> Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not yo
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
> And because I'm a lazy
> I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix
> it instead
Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not your
responsibility? Sorry but it's your job.
Also it's nice to see h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> At least I'm trying to keep these
> packages alive, which noone else seems to do.
If you spot that a new version is available, you're more than welcome to
post a version bump bug assigned to the appropriate herd and developer
On Sunday 08 November 2009 10:06:58 Patrick Lauer wrote:
> So I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just
> fix it instead of whining at me until my motivation takes a long walk on
> the beach and doesn't return for quite some time. At least I'm trying to
> keep these p
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> So I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix
> it instead of whining at me until my motivation takes a long walk on the
> beach
> and doesn't return for quite some time. At least I'm trying to keep these
> packages alive, which noone else
On 08-11-2009 16:06:58 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> So I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and
> just fix it instead of whining at me until my motivation takes a long
+1
> walk on the beach and don't return for quite some time. At least I'm
> trying to keep these package
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:56:24 Petteri Räty wrote:
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote:
> >> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
> >>> patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
> >>> Log:
> >>> Bump
> >>>
> >>> file :
> >>> http
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote:
>> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
>>> patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
>>> Log:
>>> Bump
>>>
>>> file :
>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/fo
>>>
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
> > patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
> > Log:
> > Bump
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/fo
> >remost-1.5.6.ebuild?rev=1
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
> patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
> Log:
> Bump
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/foremost-1.5.6.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> Index: foremost-1.5.6.ebuild
> =
26 matches
Mail list logo