Robert wrote:
Hey, for some reason I cannot seem to install arts (KDE).
Try asking that on the gentooo-user list, it has nothing to do with
portage development.
Marius
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi all,
I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for 2.0.53 so am
thinking that we should probably push _rc7 + docs out and let the arch teams
mark it stable when they're ready (or stick with 2.0.51.22-r3 if it pleaseth
them).
We should put out a 2.0.54_pre1 out soon after
On Saturday 26 November 2005 00:31, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:01 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Hi all,
I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for 2.0.53 so
am thinking that we should probably push _rc7 + docs out and let the arch
teams mark it stable
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:51 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2005 00:31, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:01 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Hi all,
I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for 2.0.53 so
am thinking that we should probably
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 21:00 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:05:57 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Programs such as revdep-rebuild, verify-rdepend would be able to make
| immediate use. A little bit of a longer term goal is to see portage
| gain the ability to
[ Apologies if two of these show up. I kinda, uh, broke Exim
slightly... ]
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:41:19 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 21:00 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| How will that work for packages that have a runtime dependency upon
| a text file
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 22:02 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:41:19 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 21:00 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| How will that work for packages that have a runtime dependency upon
| a text file supplied by a
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:49:50 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Yeah that's what we want, We intend to create tools that leave systems
| broken. You want to be the first tester? Please take your spin of
| things off of this and look at it for what it is. Your not going to
| use a feature
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:10 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:49:50 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Yeah that's what we want, We intend to create tools that leave systems
| broken. You want to be the first tester? Please take your spin of
| things off of this and
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:53 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:48:41 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What the hell are you talking about? No tools have even been
| created yet. Nobody builds tools before the framework is in place. The
| ability to make use of
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Why introduce a feature which is crippled? It would be almost as
| easy to allow ebuilds to mess with their 'real' runtime dependency
| value as appropriate rather than forcing an incorrect
| auto-generated list onto
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:30:15 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Gorecki wrote:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 23:12, Zac Medico wrote:
I wouldn't mind having a feature like this. I would provide a way
for
automatic unmasking tools to keep their changes separate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Why introduce a feature which is crippled? It would be almost as
| easy to allow ebuilds to mess with their 'real' runtime dependency
| value as
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:42:14 -0500 Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | Why introduce a feature which is crippled? It would be almost as
| | easy to allow ebuilds to mess with their 'real'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:42:14 -0500 Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | Why introduce a feature which is crippled?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:01:15 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for
2.0.53 so am thinking that we should probably push _rc7 + docs out
and let the arch teams mark it stable when they're ready (or stick
with
On Saturday 26 November 2005 11:07, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:01:15 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only other new thing in trunk that I know of is logging but
there's still a question mark over the ordering of messages... Can
that be resolved soon?
On Saturday 26 November 2005 02:05, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:51 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2005 00:31, Ned Ludd wrote:
* post_sync action hook (.53/.54 )
* VDB prevention of single byte NULL entries being created. ( .54 )
Doable for .54.
Yeah
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:15 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
[snip stuff]
Need to head to bed now. Will respond to other parts tomorrow.
A little bit of a longer term goal is to see portage gain
the ability to request to only use RRDEPEND entries to be used for
depgraph creation for use with
19 matches
Mail list logo
