Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-06-07 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)hk...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org wrote: Duncan wrote: Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-06-07 Thread Duncan
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org posted b41005390906070208t5d6b552aid928af4ef76f6...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted below, on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 02:08:30 -0700: I like sandwiches too, so perhaps we can have a --sudo_make_me_a_sandwich option to emerge? That'd make a great easter egg option (to go

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-06-03 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org wrote: Duncan wrote: Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009 22:17:41

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-06-03 Thread René 'Necoro' Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) schrieb: Why is a custom set less convenient? Well, instead of emerge --trialware package you would first have to edit your @trialware set and then emerge @trialware. The same goes for when you want to remove some

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-06-03 Thread René 'Necoro' Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan schrieb: Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009 22:17:41 +0200: Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a leaf package that is not depended on by

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-31 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009 22:17:41 +0200: Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a leaf package that is not depended on by

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-31 Thread Duncan
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org posted 4a22682a.1050...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 31 May 2009 13:21:14 +0200: Duncan wrote: For leaf packages [-1] serves as a sort of test install. Experimental installs and their deps typically sit in the --depclean list for anything

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-31 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009 22:17:41 +0200: Why

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-31 Thread Duncan
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org posted b41005390905312058p314e6e1bnda50488d56ba0...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted below, on Sun, 31 May 2009 20:58:27 -0700: On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org wrote: I think [trialware install] is an interesting use-case. It

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-30 Thread Duncan
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted 20090530115251.gc11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Sat, 30 May 2009 13:52:52 +0200: It's a weigh-off between having an easy time pruning your system and having emerge calculate a correct dependency graph for your entire system. As far as

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Conflicting RDEPENDS

2009-05-29 Thread Duncan
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted 20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009 22:17:41 +0200: Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a leaf package that is not depended on by any other package in the world set? If spam IS depended on by any