On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:40:01PM +0100, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hope someone has an idea...
You could try esmtp; Always seems to work for me when the others fail.
Haven't tried what you're pursuing, but surely it can be made to work
fairly easily...
--
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, LinuxIsOne [1]linuxis...@gmail.com wrote:
- 8 snip
I have come to conclusion that almost all Linux work almost in the
same way since they have the same kernel, however, this is what I
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:10:02AM +0100, James Broadhead wrote:
On 12 December 2011 23:52, Indi thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, LinuxIsOne [1]linuxis...@gmail.com wrote:
((No wonder NASDAQ
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:40:01PM +0100, Lavender wrote:
At 2011-12-09 19:38:06,Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
( I just want to read some documentations in HTML. )
I'm using lynx, I feel it is great ! Lynx is small but
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:00:02PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 08 Dec 2011 14:51:52 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:47:22AM +, Mick wrote:
rumble
To me it seems we Gentooians don’t care much about social sharing, semantic
desktops or data associations. We
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:00:03PM +0100, LinuxIsOne wrote:
However, Getoo could be great (I really don't know) but installing
Ubuntu is working like a charm (I still don't know anything in Linux!)
But I don't know why the creators of Gentoo made it so difficult for
beginners! It is typical
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:00:02PM +0100, LinuxIsOne wrote:
I guess, if Gentoo is required to be learned first and that's why it
is not so popular like Ubuntu and lag far behind than it. When I asked
a stranger do you know about Computers? He says, no but I know what it
is. Then I asked him
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:40:01AM +0100, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-12-06, ny6...@gmail.com ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:15:31AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 05:54:22 -0500, LinuxIsOne wrote:
But I don't know why the creators of Gentoo made it
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 03:40:01PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
For the OP, a few posters have mentioned that under gentoo, every
thing is compiled from scratch, but it was not made clear that it
happens again and again
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne linuxis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
What does low
Howdy y'all,
About a month or so ago I did an update which seems to have caused
portage to lose the ability to work verbosely.
Ever since it looks like this:
paste
idd@gh:[~]9:07:23 $ sudo emerge -vauND adobe-flash
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating
it, but really I just cannot justify the ratio
of 24k recieved emails to one sent, so I really have to use the usenet
group to read and reply. As long as it's broken, my posts will break
threads -- sorry! Got too much else to do to fiddle about with that.
indi
On 03.12.2011 15:23, Indi wrote
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 05:20:01PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:37:51 -0500, Indi wrote:
that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build.
Hmm, I always thought the -v was the verbose switch, and that it
should work properly regardless of what's in make.conf
the opposite for me. If only I could have a scriptable interface
for real life everything would be perfect -- just imagine...
indi@real_life$ feed cat make tea --serve in_bed
--
caveat utilitor
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 07:06:20AM -0400, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
Found the problem: setuid bit was missing; chmod 4711 did the trick
(verified via solid-hardware list).
Time to logout and login and see if that was all.
You're very courageous, posting that you found the solution before
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:44:06PM +, James wrote:
The kernel gyrations are all really about something much more important.
*MONEY*
...Commercial distros like Apple's offering are making
billions.
OS X is not a linux distribution.
It uses the xnu kernel, which fuses elements of BSD
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:56:20 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
On Mon 26 Sep 2011 08:51:17 PM IST, James Broadhead wrote:
On 26 September 2011 16:01, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if you have seen this. Given that we're moving into
UEFI boot what
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 07:08:05AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Not to belittle non-power users, most everything can be done by putting
some more intelligence into the init.d scripts.
Of course, this should be implemented by Gentoo itself. I'll spelunk in
the relevant scripts and
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 06:46:21PM -0400, Albert W. Hopkins wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 11:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
So buy a mobo without it or that can disable it. Got it. It'll be a
good while before I buy a new mobo tho. I'm sure they will have a
nice
fix by then but this is
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:47:18 -0400
cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
James Broadhead jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 September 2011 03:19, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
Or skip the net config/init scripts stuff and just use something
like wicd.
Getting a
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:18:56AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
My /home partition is 15GB, and the other day KDE warned me it was down
to 1% free. I found that
.kde4/share/apps/nepomuk/repository/main/data/virtuosobackend/soprano-v
irtuoso.db
was occupying
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:43:50 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Montag 19 September 2011, 19:25:28 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer:
On Monday, 19. September 2011 18:36:18 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Montag 19 September 2011, 16:41:08 schrieb Michael
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:55:01 +0200
pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
Xmms, I believe it's called. And it's been working fine for quite a
while (I've actually have never encountered a bug with Audacious), for
me. Now, when I upgraded to 2.4.x dbus was forced on me (well, that
and Xfce4)... I'm
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:50:19 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Monday 18 July 2011 14:30:28 Stroller wrote:
On 18 July 2011, at 12:18, Mick wrote:
Is it a matter of waiting a bit longer?
Yes, I think he'll be eligible for parole beginning 2023.
please
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:37:09 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 06:27:52 Indi wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:50:19 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Monday 18 July 2011 14:30:28 Stroller wrote:
On 18
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 07:13:24 Indi wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:37:09 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 06:27:52 Indi wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:50:19
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:47:54 Peter Humphrey did opine thusly:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 20:54:03 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I was seriously considering importing a single seater heli kit,
they are classed
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:06:09AM -0400, Todd Goodman wrote:
* Indi thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com [110622 18:59]:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Then again, I don't fly either. I have told people that if they
see me on a plane, close the lid on my coffin. That's
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:10:34PM -0500, Dale wrote:
I saw a guy on a TV interview once. He said the only way a helicopter
can fly is by brute force. A airplane wants to fly but a helicopter
just wants to crash. He said that can be proven by taking your hands
off the controls. Down
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 06:18:49AM -0500, Dale wrote:
To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add
stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell
off the reservation and needs to be removed. sighs Over the years,
it adds up.
I'm a
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 14:16:05 Alan McKinnon wrote:
A while ago I eventually got my contacts back. I forget the actual
cause now, but I strongly suspect it involved tinkering with mysql,
and this may have broken in turn my
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:37:49PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 11:23:15 Indi did opine thusly:
Ha, so it's true then: using my blackberry as a PDA (sync'd to
google calendar) and not bothering with that stuff on my computer
anymore may indeed have saved lives
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Then again, I don't fly either. I have told people that if they
see me on a plane, close the lid on my coffin. That's the only
way I would get on a plane.
You haven't lived until you've been up in a small, underpowered
ultralight or
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:28:05PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Indi thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
into 100 100MB
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
use cat to reassemble?
Is there some better way to do this?
Just using rsync by
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 06:25:00AM -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18 2011, David Abbott wrote:
If you open up wicd = Preferences = General Settings = Wired
interface the defaultis eth0.
That is what I have. Are you suggesting I should change it to usb0?
I did not have to
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:18:02AM +, JDM wrote:
Have only tried CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT but this did not help. Will give the others
a go.
Not quite sure why older kernels would recognise keyboard but .39 kernel does
not and .38 I have issues with when plugging in usb stick. Are the kernel
messages from news.eternal-september.org.
So I was off the air for about 3½ hours today.
I'm using Kmail with bog-standard threading and aggregation, and this
message is shown as a reply, not to Dale but to Indi; the message that
contains this:
Thanks for reporting on Thunderbird.
When
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
sys-apps/less
selected: 443
protected: none
omitted: none
Changelog doesn't say much about this. I have nano, vim, more and less
installed and vim is in world. I really don't feel like adding the other
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:27:48AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Believe it or not you are supposed to make invisible all the junk the app
created.
Well, once you get some of the amazingly bone-headed defaults corrected
tbird is pretty nice -- for people with eagle eyes who don't need an
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:01:47AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-06-05 11:44 PM, Indi wrote:
I see what you mean about the default config, LOL.
Been trying to change the font sizes used for the message list and
folder pane, but no success yet. Makes it a bit hard to see things but
other
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:56:25AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-06-06 6:34 AM, Indi wrote:
After much googling the conclusion is many many people are desperately
unhappy about the fonts in tbrd and incredibly, it ain't fixable!
Hard-coded font sizes -- isn't that, like, retardn00b
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:16:27PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:34 on Monday 06 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:27:48AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Believe it or not you are supposed to make invisible all the junk the
app
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:56:25AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Easily fixable... Tools Options Display Formatting
Oh wait a minute, *NOW* I see!
You're not using what I tested at all -- either you're in windows or
you're using something other than thunderbird 3.
Sorry, we don't do windows
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:22:34PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:56 on Monday 06 June 2011, Tanstaafl did
opine thusly:
On 2011-06-06 6:34 AM, Indi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:27:48AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Believe it or not you are supposed
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:13:31AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
As to your last - yes, I'm on Windows (as I stated before) - but nothing
says this hack only works on Windows...
It doesn't work in linux.
It was the first thing I tried.
***[Snip all the rest of the advice that doesn't work in
You need to realize you're giving advice about the windows version of
thunderbird. IOW you can stop now!
Thank you.
:)
--
klaatu virada nicto
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:38:17PM +0200, enno+gen...@groeper-berlin.de wrote:
As I'm not affected I don't know about any issues for the visually impaired.
Sadly, a lot of people (including developers) seem to think that people
either see or are blind and that's it. I see plenty well enough
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:32 on Monday 06 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
tbird is a Moz product. Rendering stuff on screen is almost everything
that they do ... everything else supporting just that one thing
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:47:33PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 06.06.2011 14:44, schrieb Indi:
You need to realize you're giving advice about the windows version of
thunderbird. IOW you can stop now!
I use Thunderbird here runnung on my beloved gentoo and all that
Tanstaafl wrote
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:37:26AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-06-06 8:44 AM, Indi wrote:
You need to realize you're giving advice about the windows version of
thunderbird. IOW you can stop now!
As I said, there is nothing indicating that userChrome.css hacks are not
cross-platform. I
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 06.06.2011 16:24, schrieb Indi:
If you (or if anyone using it *on* *linux*) manage(s) to double the
size of the default fonts in the folder list and message list I'll
listen,
You mean something like this?
http
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:58:55 +0200
Sebastian Beßler sebast...@darkmetatron.de wrote:
Am 06.06.2011 16:48, schrieb Indi:
Very first thing I tried after realizing they stupidly didn't allow
it in the config options was
/* Global UI font */
* { font-size: 32px !important;
font
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:13:39 +0200
Sebastian Beßler sebast...@darkmetatron.de wrote:
As an extension of my previous mail there is although the addon
stylish that can be used to set all that without the need to restart
thunderbird for every change.
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:07:28 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2011-06-06 10:48 AM, Indi wrote:
At one point it was far more specific with a number of individual
fonts listed, not one of them worked.
Did you make the change while Thunderbird was running?
No.
Also
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:28:14 +0200
Sebastian Beßler sebast...@darkmetatron.de wrote:
Am 06.06.2011 17:18, schrieb Indi:
Maybe we should also both remember that I *am* running ~x86?
:)
That should make now difference, my girlfriend uses ~x86 on her laptop
and there thunderbird reads
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:28:14PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 06.06.2011 17:18, schrieb Indi:
Maybe we should also both remember that I *am* running ~x86?
:)
That should make now difference, my girlfriend uses ~x86 on her laptop
and there thunderbird reads and applies
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:34:34PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 06.06.2011 17:55, schrieb Indi:
Uh, no. I will decide what's too big to be usable, not the software,
thank you.
It is not really the software that decides that. Thunderbird is a gui
application and all guis have
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:38:08PM -0400, Indi wrote:
xulrunner is 2.0.1-r1i
Should say 2.0.1-r1, sorry.
--
klaatu virada nicto
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:42:01AM -0700, kashani wrote:
I'd like to point out that the PEBCAK was on your end.
Sorry, no.
And you just used your one shot at trolling me.
Do it again and it's the bozo bin for you.
--
klaatu virada nicto
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:50:34PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Thunderbird doesn't use system xulrunner.
I use mail-client/thunderbird-3.1.10 and xulrunner-5.0_beta2 for firefox.
Thanks for the info.
What matters though is that it is very hard to configure properly
for people who
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:16:12AM -0700, Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/06/2011 09:52 AM, Indi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:42:01AM -0700, kashani wrote:
I'd like to point out that the PEBCAK was on your end.
Sorry, no.
And you just used your one shot at trolling me.
Do
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:19:40PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Not every tool is for every user or every need.
If there a better tool to use then why bother with something less.
I'm not a thunderbird fanboy so i can accept that t-bird has its
limitations and its problems and that it is
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:01:35 + (UTC)
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Indi thebeelzebubtrigger at gmail.com writes:
Sadly, a lot of people (including developers) seem to think that
people either see or are blind and that's it. I see plenty well
enough for most things that need
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:32:11PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo.
Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to being an Emacs
developer; the number of emails on both lists combined is just more than
I can
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 04:35:46PM -0700, walt wrote:
Thunderbird is my every-day news and email client and I don't switch because
it just works for me.
Oh that reminds me, one of the annoyances which seems to be common among
GUI MUAs is they create a fixed set of IMAP folders which one is
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:59 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
opine
thusly:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi:
Every single GUI MUA I ever
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:01:22PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sunday 05 June 2011 06:43:37 Indi wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:59 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
opine
thusly:
On Sat, Jun 04
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:40:29PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
So here's one thing that MacOS is very good at: text searches. I have to
archive old mails in off-line tbz2 to retain some sanity, my colleagues on
Macs don't. Their mail store goes somewhere (we don't know where, not having
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
A victim of release early, release often? :-)
Yes, definitely.
One of these days I'll switch back to stable, just haven't
been willing to bite that bullet quite yet. At least it's
helped me temper my obsessive tendencies a bit
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:41:42PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 12:17:08 Indi wrote:
If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4
might be my choices, as they can be extremely pleasant to look
at. Heh, reminds me of my ex -- he was very pleasant to look
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 02:23:50PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:17 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4
might be my choices, as they can be extremely pleasant to look
at. Heh
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 02:31:21PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:57 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
A victim of release early, release often? :-)
Yes, definitely
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 03:11:04PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:44 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
Yes, probably I'm unlikely to do it...
Never did actually switch from testing to stable, it's always the other
way around. Every now
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:20:01PM +0200, Mick wrote:
The Usenet headers do not show any X-Original-References: in your message, at
least not in my Knode.
They do, but apparently knode isn't showing you all headers.
The email headers also do not show any X-Original-References: at least in
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:17:53PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 19:35:52 Indi wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:20:01PM +0200, Mick wrote:
The Usenet headers do not show any X-Original-References: in your
message, at least not in my Knode.
They do, but apparently knode
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 10:16:01PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:36 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
This post was done that way, so let me know.
:)
This post only shows:
Message-ID: 20110605183552.ga23
So, following several suggestions I emerge thunderbird for
testing, and the first thing I noticed is it does what people
insist it doesn't do: creates redundant Trash and Drafts folders,
both locally and (cardinal sin) on the remote server!
So now in mutt there are all these redundant mail
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:07:24PM -0400, Indi wrote:
So, following several suggestions I emerge thunderbird for
testing, and the first thing I noticed is it does what people
insist it doesn't do: creates redundant Trash and Drafts folders,
both locally and (cardinal sin) on the remote
On 06/05/2011 11:51 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 06/04/2011 02:59 PM, Indi wrote:
Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on
thunderbird and see how they do with it...
I absolutely love Thunderbird, but with one caveat...
I love it because of its stability, how well it does
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:10:01AM +0200, Stroller wrote:
Part of my post that you chose not to quote was I'd be the first to admit
that Macs have flaws.
All desktops / UIs / operating-systems are a compromise. I don't believe any
of them are perfect.
Last time I used Linux on the
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:30:01AM +0200, Mick wrote:
On Friday 03 Jun 2011 21:10:29 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
When i start alsamixer and select with the soundcard-selector
the audio device of my usb cam ... alsamixer crashes with:
cannot load mixer controls: Invalid argument
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:10:01PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
most of the broken threads will seem to be broken by Indi. Now change it to
Standard Mailing List and threading mostly goes back to being normal.
I don't think the broken threads are anyone's mailer, I think it's kmail
doing
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 02:30:02PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 04.06.2011 14:03, schrieb Indi:
Could it have anything to do with the fact that I read this list from the
usenet group, rather than the list itself? Could that cause an
inconsistency
in headers that might break
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:05:24AM -0500, Dale wrote:
I'm using Seamonkey for my email. It does appear that it happens with
Indi to tho.
This thread is now broken up into a few discussions as well. No clue
what order things are supposed to be in so just replying as I get to
them
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:47:20AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok, finally took the plunge, and as everyone else said it was pretty
much anti-climactic...
However, I'm getting the following error when starting sntp that I
wasn't before in rc.log:
* Setting clock via the NTP client 'sntp' ...
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Dale wrote:
Indi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:05:24AM -0500, Dale wrote:
I'm using Seamonkey for my email. It does appear that it happens with
Indi to tho.
This thread is now broken up into a few discussions as well. No clue
what
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote:
I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top
posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using
won't let them reply any other way.
I just wonder if there is some setting that could be
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
I don't think that there is something that can be done, because the
server changes the headers of the mails.
That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet
References: gzhrq-5lz...@gated-at.bofh.it
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet
References: gzhrq-5lz...@gated-at.bofh.it
gzhlc-5n...@gated-at.bofh.it
gzj0b-84...@gated-at.bofh.it
gzvl7-3y...@gated-at.bofh.it
Can't believe I never
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:38:38AM -0400, Indi wrote:
Well I could be wrong but do believe the MUA wll write the Xref or
References headers according to what the server has on the original
message. If the original header info exists anywhere in the message sent
by the mail2news gateway
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:50:03PM +0200, Indi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
I don't think that there is something that can be done, because the
server changes the headers of the mails.
That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 06:47:34PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:35 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
opine
thusly:
You say OS X is good enough
I say you've got some mighty low standards.
My manager's predecessor's precedessor's precedessor had
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
opine
thusly:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote:
I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top
posting
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 02:37:32PM -0400, CJoeB wrote:
On 06/04/11 14:17, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/04/2011 08:54 PM, CJoeB wrote:
Hi all.
Okay, colour me so stupid, but I want to add some TrueType fonts to
KDE and I can't figure out how to do it. In my previous KDE install,
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:59:52AM -0700, kashani wrote:
On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
opine
thusly:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:38:52PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Saturday 04 June 2011 11:59:52 kashani wrote:
On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
diplomatic mode I have a slightly adverse general opinion about the mail
client called 'mutt'. I am not saying that this is the fault of its devs nor
do I suggesst that there is anything wrong with its users. /diplomatic
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi:
Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive
at times when dealing with IMAP.
I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in all that time became
TB never
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:09:28PM +0100, Stroller wrote:
You know, Finder is not as bad as you would imagine.
I don't have to imagine.
Bought my first Mac (an SE) in 1987, and my last in 2009.
The '87 SE still works, the 2009 mini no longer does and was a
buggy piece o' crap all its life.
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
