Re: [gentoo-user] hplip network scanning port

On 01/08/2020 03:03, Adam Carter wrote: I used to be able to scan on my gentoo box from an HP officejet pro on the network. This is now failing and i can see that the gentoo box is attempting to connect to TCP/6566 on the HP, but the HP is not listening on that port. Test command is; hp-scan

[gentoo-user] hplip network scanning port

I used to be able to scan on my gentoo box from an HP officejet pro on the network. This is now failing and i can see that the gentoo box is attempting to connect to TCP/6566 on the HP, but the HP is not listening on that port. Test command is; hp-scan -dhpaio:/net/HP_Officejet_Pro_8620?ip= Is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Network config problem

On Saturday, 30 November 2019 21:31:14 GMT Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2019-11-30, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I want to start playing with IPv6 (thanks, Ralph S.) but first I need > > to clean up something wrong with my existing IPv4. > > > > # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 restart > > [...] > > > * Bringing

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Network config problem

* Nuno Silva: > Which version of netifrc do you have? Could this be bug 642774[1]? Possibly. Similar issues have been reported for a while, see for example https://bugs.gentoo.org/609682 . Since I only stop network interfaces manually once in a blue moon, I have shrugged it off so far. -Ralph

[gentoo-user] Re: Network config problem

On 2019-11-30 14:34, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I want to start playing with IPv6 (thanks, Ralph S.) but first I need > to clean up something wrong with my existing IPv4. > * Bringing down interface eth0 > RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory > Error talking to the kernel Do you mean the

[gentoo-user] Re: Network config problem

On 2019-11-30, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I want to start playing with IPv6 (thanks, Ralph S.) but first I need > to clean up something wrong with my existing IPv4. > > # /etc/init.d/net.eth0 restart [...] > * Bringing down interface eth0 > RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory > Error

Re: [gentoo-user] New network cards default to "Y" with "make oldconfig"

Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 3:34 PM Dale wrote: >> Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:02 PM Dale wrote: Rich Freeman wrote: > Suppose you have an Acme model 1234 network card. You've previously > answered Yes to enabling its driver, and No to

Re: [gentoo-user] New network cards default to "Y" with "make oldconfig"

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 3:34 PM Dale wrote: > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:02 PM Dale wrote: > >> Rich Freeman wrote: > >>> Suppose you have an Acme model 1234 network card. You've previously > >>> answered Yes to enabling its driver, and No to enabling the Acme model >

Re: [gentoo-user] New network cards default to "Y" with "make oldconfig"

Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:02 PM Dale wrote: >> Rich Freeman wrote: >>> Suppose you have an Acme model 1234 network card. You've previously >>> answered Yes to enabling its driver, and No to enabling the Acme model >>> 2345 card. >>> >>> Now a new option comes along to

Re: [gentoo-user] New network cards default to "Y" with "make oldconfig"

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:02 PM Dale wrote: > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > > Suppose you have an Acme model 1234 network card. You've previously > > answered Yes to enabling its driver, and No to enabling the Acme model > > 2345 card. > > > > Now a new option comes along to show/hide all the Acme

Re: [gentoo-user] New network cards default to "Y" with "make oldconfig"

Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 3:46 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: >> On Sunday, 24 March 2019 01:03:23 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: >>> When setting up a new kernel with "make oldconfig", almost all new >>> device drivers default to "N". The glaring exception is network cards. >>> They all

Re: [gentoo-user] New network cards default to "Y" with "make oldconfig"

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 3:46 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Sunday, 24 March 2019 01:03:23 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > > When setting up a new kernel with "make oldconfig", almost all new > > device drivers default to "N". The glaring exception is network cards. > > They all seem to default to

Re: [gentoo-user] New network cards default to "Y" with "make oldconfig"

On Sunday, 24 March 2019 01:03:23 GMT Walter Dnes wrote: > When setting up a new kernel with "make oldconfig", almost all new > device drivers default to "N". The glaring exception is network cards. > They all seem to default to "Y". Is this a bug or a "feature"? It seems to be just to reveal

Re: [gentoo-user] New network cards default to "Y" with "make oldconfig"

> On Mar 23, 2019, at 21:03, Walter Dnes wrote: > > When setting up a new kernel with "make oldconfig", almost all new > device drivers default to "N". The glaring exception is network cards. > They all seem to default to "Y". Is this a bug or a "feature"? This has been a 'feature' for a

[gentoo-user] New network cards default to "Y" with "make oldconfig"

When setting up a new kernel with "make oldconfig", almost all new device drivers default to "N". The glaring exception is network cards. They all seem to default to "Y". Is this a bug or a "feature"? -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications

[gentoo-user] Multiple network interfaces and openrc

When I add multiple net.* services to a single runlevel (basic example: both a net.en* and a net.wl* service in default runlevel), it has a surprising and undesirable effect: when I bring one of them down by stopping the service, dnsmasq also gets stopped. It is as if openrc thinks dnsmasq

Re: [gentoo-user] losing network IP address

On 21/03/2017 14:59, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: One of my boxes (one with two network ports) is losing network IP address. The /etc/conf.d/net is empty and the system should obtain static IP via dhcp 10.10.0.7 Sometimes it does, the IP stays for a several days but sometimes it boots with

[gentoo-user] losing network IP address

One of my boxes (one with two network ports) is losing network IP address. The /etc/conf.d/net is empty and the system should obtain static IP via dhcp 10.10.0.7 Sometimes it does, the IP stays for a several days but sometimes it boots with correct IP and the IP changes after few hours to

Re: [gentoo-user] Borked network connections on KDE apps (ftp, fish)

On Thursday 16 March 2017 18:23:53 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 16/03/2017 10:38, Mick wrote: > > I updated one box with the latest stable KDE and discovered that > > Konqueror/Dolphin will no longer connect to ftp or sftp servers. > > > > depclean showed up and uninstalled a lot of packages, which

Re: [gentoo-user] Borked network connections on KDE apps (ftp, fish)

On 16/03/2017 10:38, Mick wrote: > I updated one box with the latest stable KDE and discovered that > Konqueror/Dolphin will no longer connect to ftp or sftp servers. > > depclean showed up and uninstalled a lot of packages, which I let it do > thinking they are no longer needed in the latest

[gentoo-user] Borked network connections on KDE apps (ftp, fish)

I updated one box with the latest stable KDE and discovered that Konqueror/Dolphin will no longer connect to ftp or sftp servers. depclean showed up and uninstalled a lot of packages, which I let it do thinking they are no longer needed in the latest version of KDE, probably because their

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Network scanner

On Saturday 25 Feb 2017 08:25:43 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 07:35:43 +, Mick wrote: > > Back on topic, I always held the view that one should not mix and match > > package managers on the same system, as they may end up stepping on > > each other's toes. So, I thought emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] create network by hand with devices are not present

On Friday 24 Feb 2017 12:04:52 Harry Putnam wrote: > Setup: VBox vm running gentoo(amd64) guest on a win-10 (64bit) host > Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz - 32 GB ram > > Having a problem getting a network up... I know the rudimentaries of > ifconfig and route enough to use

[gentoo-user] create network by hand with devices are not present

Setup: VBox vm running gentoo(amd64) guest on a win-10 (64bit) host Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz - 32 GB ram Having a problem getting a network up... I know the rudimentaries of ifconfig and route enough to use them to create one. However the error I get with trying that

[gentoo-user] Managing network interface in a namespace

Hi all, I would like to bring up and configure a network interface which exists in a (network) namespace. I would like to use standard OpenRC 'net.' init script to do so. Since the interface (veth1) exists only in a namespace (myns) I need that the init script would be executed within that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Network traffic analysis

On Monday 16 May 2016 20:12:07 James wrote: > Mick gmail.com> writes: > > > Is there anything around to do this and not need a web server > > > installed on the local machine? > > > > Have a look at iftop, iptraf-ng and if you want more graphics ntop is > > worth considering. > > > > Beyond

[gentoo-user] Re: Network traffic analysis

Mick gmail.com> writes: > > Is there anything around to do this and not need a web server installed on > > the local machine? > Have a look at iftop, iptraf-ng and if you want more graphics ntop is worth > considering. > Beyond those tools you could look at snmp, rrdtool and if you want a

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

Hello, Thelma. On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:10:58PM -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I just upgraded one of my systems and upon boot there is no network: > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start > * Mounting local filesystems ... > mount: mount point /proc/bus/usb does not exist > * Some local

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

On 12/19/2015 12:10 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I just upgraded one of my systems and upon boot there is no network: > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start > * Mounting local filesystems ... > mount: mount point /proc/bus/usb does not exist > * Some local filesystem failed to start > ERROR:

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

On 12/19/2015 02:04 PM, John Runyon wrote: > Not proc, but you should add nofail to scanner. > > John Runyon > Sent from my phone > > On Dec 19, 2015 2:59 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> >> On 12/19/2015 12:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> [snip] >> > It seems I'm not the only

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

On 12/19/2015 01:13 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hello, Thelma. > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:10:58PM -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> I just upgraded one of my systems and upon boot there is no network: > >> /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start >> * Mounting local filesystems ... >> mount: mount

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

Not proc, but you should add nofail to scanner. John Runyon Sent from my phone On Dec 19, 2015 2:59 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > On 12/19/2015 12:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > [snip] > > >>> > >> It seems I'm not the only one: > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk < alexander.kaps...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:24 PM, wrote: > >> >> On 12/19/2015 12:10 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> > I just upgraded one of my systems and upon boot there is no network: >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 12/19/2015 02:04 PM, John Runyon wrote: >> Not proc, but you should add nofail to scanner. >> >> John Runyon >> Sent from my phone >> >> On Dec 19, 2015 2:59 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >>> On 12/19/2015 12:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >>> [snip] >>>

[gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

I just upgraded one of my systems and upon boot there is no network: /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start * Mounting local filesystems ... mount: mount point /proc/bus/usb does not exist * Some local filesystem failed to start ERROR: localmount failed to start ERROR: cannot start net.eth0 as localmount

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:24 PM, wrote: > > On 12/19/2015 12:10 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > I just upgraded one of my systems and upon boot there is no network: > > > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 start > > * Mounting local filesystems ... > > mount: mount point

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

On 12/19/2015 12:57 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: [snip] >>> >> It seems I'm not the only one: >> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1034770-highlight-localmount.html >> >> "The problem was openrc-0.18.4. When I downgraded to openrc-0.16.4 the >> problem went away." >> >> Now, I can not

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

151219 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:59:38 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> This is my fstab: ... >> none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666 0 0 >> none /proc procdefaults0 0 > You're trying to mount

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 19:02:54 -0500, Philip Webb wrote: > >> none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults,devmode=0666 0 0 > >> none /proc proc > >> defaults 0 0 > > You're trying to mount /proc/bus/usb before mounting /proc. > > Systemd takes care of such

Re: [gentoo-user] no network "eth0" after upgrade.

On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 13:59:38 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > This is my fstab: > /dev/hda1 /boot ext2 > noauto,noatime1 > 1 /dev/hda3 / ext3 > noatime 0 1 /dev/hda2 > none swapsw

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails

On 05/03/15 09:46, Marc Joliet wrote: Hi all, at work I'm (well, *we* are) facing an interesting problem. Since we are sort of stabbing in the dark here, I thought I'd ask here. Also, since this is from work, I will not be able to diverge very many details (not to mention that as a

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails (WORKED AROUND)

First of all, thanks to everybody who responded so far. I wanted preface my reply to Alan by mentioning that the local sysadmin made changes to the DHCP server that appear to have worked around whatever the issue is. I don't fully understand the error analysis (something to do with the DHCP

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails (WORKED AROUND)

On 06/03/2015 20:45, Marc Joliet wrote: First of all, thanks to everybody who responded so far. I wanted preface my reply to Alan by mentioning that the local sysadmin made changes to the DHCP server that appear to have worked around whatever the issue is. I don't fully understand the

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails (WORKED AROUND)

Am Fri, 06 Mar 2015 21:35:45 +0200 schrieb Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: On 06/03/2015 20:45, Marc Joliet wrote: First of all, thanks to everybody who responded so far. I wanted preface my reply to Alan by mentioning that the local sysadmin made changes to the DHCP server that

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails (WORKED AROUND)

On 03/06/2015 11:57 AM, Marc Joliet wrote: I wasn't aware you had e1000e hardware - those are about as reliable as they come. I've used many of them and never had the slightest trouble at all. By all means study up on firmware and driver options - if you don;t know much about that area it's

Re: [gentoo-user] No network ( Solved, I am connected, thanks)

On Thursday 05 Mar 2015 10:12:33 German wrote: On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:36 + Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Wednesday 04 March 2015 21:26:53 German wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:25:07 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Now that you're connected, or

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails

On Thursday 05 Mar 2015 18:33:23 Todd Goodman wrote: * Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de [150305 04:47]: [..SNIP..] 1.) The NIC is brought up (some built-in Intel model). 2.) A DHCP client configures it. 3.) The network connection is lost at some point (the amount of time this takes

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails

Am Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:33:23 -0500 schrieb Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net: * Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de [150305 04:47]: [..SNIP..] 1.) The NIC is brought up (some built-in Intel model). 2.) A DHCP client configures it. 3.) The network connection is lost at some point (the amount of

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails

Am Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:19:46 + schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com: On Thursday 05 Mar 2015 18:33:23 Todd Goodman wrote: * Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de [150305 04:47]: [..SNIP..] 1.) The NIC is brought up (some built-in Intel model). 2.) A DHCP client configures it.

Re: [gentoo-user] No network ( Solved, I am connected, thanks)

On Wednesday 04 March 2015 21:26:53 German wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:25:07 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Now that you're connected, or should I say BEFORE you got connected, you should also consider configuring a firewall for your IPv4 (and/or IPv6) network. What

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails

* Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de [150305 04:47]: [..SNIP..] 1.) The NIC is brought up (some built-in Intel model). 2.) A DHCP client configures it. 3.) The network connection is lost at some point (the amount of time this takes varies, but it can be as little as 20 minutes). 4.)

Re: [gentoo-user] No network ( Solved, I am connected, thanks)

On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:36 + Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Wednesday 04 March 2015 21:26:53 German wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:25:07 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Now that you're connected, or should I say BEFORE you got connected, you should also

[gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails

Hi all, at work I'm (well, *we* are) facing an interesting problem. Since we are sort of stabbing in the dark here, I thought I'd ask here. Also, since this is from work, I will not be able to diverge very many details (not to mention that as a student worker I simply don't *know* many

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails

On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:33:23 -0500 Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote: * Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de [150305 04:47]: [..SNIP..] 1.) The NIC is brought up (some built-in Intel model). 2.) A DHCP client configures it. 3.) The network connection is lost at some point (the amount of

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange network behaviour: NIC goes down, DHCP lease renewal fails

On Thursday 05 Mar 2015 21:46:12 Marc Joliet wrote: Am Thu, 5 Mar 2015 21:19:46 + schrieb Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com: On Thursday 05 Mar 2015 18:33:23 Todd Goodman wrote: Is this a WiFi NIC? Is it possible the device is powering down? I've had lots of problems with

Re: [gentoo-user] No network ( Solved, I am connected, thanks)

On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:07:39 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 06:57:48 -0500, German wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:09:12 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 02:01:20 -0500, German wrote: So I rebuilt my kernel with

Re: [gentoo-user] No network ( Solved, I am connected, thanks)

On Wednesday 04 Mar 2015 15:40:12 German wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:07:39 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 06:57:48 -0500, German wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:09:12 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 02:01:20

Re: [gentoo-user] No network ( Solved, I am connected, thanks)

On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:25:07 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 04 Mar 2015 15:40:12 German wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:07:39 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 06:57:48 -0500, German wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:09:12 +

Re: [gentoo-user] No network

On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 02:01:20 -0500, German wrote: So I rebuilt my kernel with r8169 for network NIC and rtl8723be for Wi-fi NIC, however I can't connect to internet. I think the problem here with interfaces, but could be something else, have no clue. I remember when I installed openSuse, it

Re: [gentoo-user] No network

On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 06:57:48 -0500, German wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:09:12 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 02:01:20 -0500, German wrote: So I rebuilt my kernel with r8169 for network NIC and rtl8723be for Wi-fi NIC, however I can't connect to

Re: [gentoo-user] No network

On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:09:12 + Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 02:01:20 -0500, German wrote: So I rebuilt my kernel with r8169 for network NIC and rtl8723be for Wi-fi NIC, however I can't connect to internet. I think the problem here with interfaces, but

[gentoo-user] No network

So I rebuilt my kernel with r8169 for network NIC and rtl8723be for Wi-fi NIC, however I can't connect to internet. I think the problem here with interfaces, but could be something else, have no clue. I remember when I installed openSuse, it listed my interfaces like SP0_something instead of

[gentoo-user] automatic network connection between eth and wifi

I've noticed that on the newer distribution (binary, xubuntu fedora) the network connection is automatic whenever someone connects the cable or if cable is disconnected it switches to wife. Is it the function of the new systemd or it is a new program? I'm still using rc -- Joseph

Re: [gentoo-user] automatic network connection between eth and wifi

If I recall, several distros were using ifplugd ( http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/ifplugd/), or just network-manager out of the gnome project, but it's been a while since I've had to deal with hotplugging ethernet. On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote: I've

Re: [gentoo-user] automatic network connection between eth and wifi

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote: I've noticed that on the newer distribution (binary, xubuntu fedora) the network connection is automatic whenever someone connects the cable or if cable is disconnected it switches to wife. Is it the function of the new systemd

[gentoo-user] dummy0 network interface

After a recent world update I have a new network interface in addition to 'lo' and the real network interface ('eth0', now named 'enp1s4'): # ifconfig dummy0 dummy0: flags=195UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,NOARP mtu 1500 ether 2e:a2:4b:cb:f2:3f txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes

Re: [gentoo-user] dummy0 network interface

On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:28:09 +0100, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: After a recent world update I have a new network interface in addition to 'lo' and the real network interface ('eth0', now named 'enp1s4'): a recent world update means nothing to us, it coud have included anything. # ifconfig dummy0

Re: [gentoo-user] dummy0 network interface

On 05/03/2014 11:28, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: After a recent world update I have a new network interface in addition to 'lo' and the real network interface ('eth0', now named 'enp1s4'): # ifconfig dummy0 dummy0: flags=195UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,NOARP mtu 1500 ether 2e:a2:4b:cb:f2:3f

Re: [gentoo-user] dummy0 network interface

Alan McKinnon wrote: On 05/03/2014 11:28, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: After a recent world update I have a new network interface in addition to 'lo' and the real network interface ('eth0', now named 'enp1s4'): # ifconfig dummy0 dummy0: flags=195UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,NOARP mtu 1500 ether

[gentoo-user] Restart network interface with systemd

Hello all, I installed gnome3 few weeks ago, and had to migrate to systemd. The network init scripts are working fine. But I am not sure how to restart a specific interface. For example in the past I used to do: /etc/init.d/net.eth0 restart The wlan0 starts through wpa_supplicant under openrc.

Re: [gentoo-user] Restart network interface with systemd

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I installed gnome3 few weeks ago, and had to migrate to systemd. The network init scripts are working fine. But I am not sure how to restart a specific interface. For example in the past I used to

Re: [gentoo-user] Restart network interface with systemd

Canek, Thank you. The output is attached. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I installed gnome3 few weeks ago, and had to migrate to systemd. The network

Re: [gentoo-user] Restart network interface with systemd

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com wrote: Canek, Thank you. The output is attached. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Mansour Al Akeel mansour.alak...@gmail.com wrote: Hello

[gentoo-user] Another Network Management Utility: netctl

Heyo! I saw some of the recent threads about NetworkManager and other alternatives, and I wanted to share about one I tried and have liked so far: netctl[0]. It is specifically designed for systemd by ArchLinux, so if you are using a different init system, sorry for the noise in your inbox :) It

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

Am 30.09.2013 22:03, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: I will simply let the scp take its time over night ... and I hope the KVM-performance will be OK when I start the converted VM. I used split and tar to split the image-file into 100 MB parts and rsync them over right now. Maybe I have

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

Am 29.09.2013 16:37, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 27.09.2013 17:55, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: What direction to go? force or disable HPET? neither And what to do to avoid those lost interrupts? Is there no good suggestion for this?

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

Am 30.09.2013 11:54, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 29.09.2013 16:37, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 27.09.2013 17:55, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: What direction to go? force or disable HPET? neither And what to do to avoid those lost interrupts? Is there no good suggestion for

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

Am 30.09.2013 19:07, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: Am 30.09.2013 11:54, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 29.09.2013 16:37, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 27.09.2013 17:55, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: What direction to go? force or disable HPET? neither And what to do to avoid those

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 07:36:35PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: What is the best way to transfer multi-GB-files in LAN? I don't really need encryption here ... My choice is always rsync -av /source/ user@IP:~/destination/ because it won't copy a corrupt file. Make sure you understand

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 07:36:35PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: What is the best way to transfer multi-GB-files in LAN? I don't really need encryption here ... Did not mention rsync has: -n, --dry-run perform a trial run with no changes made as well as many other

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

Am 30.09.2013 19:46, schrieb Bruce Hill: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 07:36:35PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: What is the best way to transfer multi-GB-files in LAN? I don't really need encryption here ... Did not mention rsync has: -n, --dry-run perform a trial run with no

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

Am 30.09.2013 19:07, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: Am 30.09.2013 11:54, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 29.09.2013 16:37, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 27.09.2013 17:55, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: What direction to go? force or disable HPET? neither And what to do to avoid those

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

Am 30.09.2013 20:23, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: [ 1747.393960] hpet1: lost 2 rtc interrupts [ 1747.452994] hpet1: lost 1 rtc interrupts [ 1747.481786] hpet1: lost 1 rtc interrupts [ 1747.527556] hpet1: lost 1 rtc interrupts [ 1747.660527] hpet1: lost 1 rtc interrupts [ 1747.726264]

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

Am 27.09.2013 17:55, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: What direction to go? force or disable HPET? neither And what to do to avoid those lost interrupts?

[gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

I am back from my visit at a customer where I installed a new and shiny gentoo server for running VMs (KVM). Currently I don't have access as my VPN only works from my static IP at home (my router seems to be offline right now ... and I am still away from office for the weekend) so I can't check

Re: [gentoo-user] Slow network transfers ... lost interrupts because of clocksource?

Am 27.09.2013 12:33, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: I am back from my visit at a customer where I installed a new and shiny gentoo server for running VMs (KVM). Currently I don't have access as my VPN only works from my static IP at home (my router seems to be offline right now ... and I am

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc - network configuration fails - how to debug it

On 12/09/2012 05:50:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:18:49 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote: config_wlan0=192.168.1.3 netmsk 255.255.255.0 ^ If this is a direct paste from your config, there's the problem. Thanks Neil for spotting this. It was

[gentoo-user] openrc - network configuration fails - how to debug it

Hi, I have a problem with wlan without dhcpd. I have created the bug report below but didn't get any comments. Perhaps, some here on this list has an idea how to debug the problem. Here my bug report sys-apps/openrc (0.11.8 and earlier) doesn't play well with wlan without dhcp, i.e. This

Re: [gentoo-user] openrc - network configuration fails - how to debug it

On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:18:49 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote: config_wlan0=192.168.1.3 netmsk 255.255.255.0 ^ If this is a direct paste from your config, there's the problem. -- Neil Bothwick PC DOS Error #03: Windows not found: (C)heer (P)arty (D)ance

[gentoo-user] Re: Network perf tool

Petric Frank pfrank at gmx.de writes: Is there a tool for (Gentoo-)Linux to do network performance tests as defined in RFC 2544 ? This will run on an Gentoo host having at least 2 network interfaces to be connected to the device under test. Hello Petric, YES there is a wonderful tool to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems

On Sat, Jul 07 2012, Michael Mol wrote: Stupid question...might your firewall be dropping packets? Check your firewall logs. Similarly, is there a difference in network connectivity between the machine that works and the two that don't? Also similarly, is the mfp on the wireless network

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: On Sat, Jul 07 2012, Michael Mol wrote: Stupid question...might your firewall be dropping packets? Check your firewall logs. Similarly, is there a difference in network connectivity between the machine that works and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems (Solved)

On Sat, Jul 07 2012, walt wrote: On 07/07/2012 11:03 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: error: Unable to communicate with device (code=12): hp:/net/Officejet_7300_series?zc=HPCC9932 error: Unable to print to printer. Please check device and try again. Make me want to throw your laptop out of my

[gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems

On 07/06/2012 05:35 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: I have one network (a linksys) to which all my devices are attached. I have two laptops running ~amd64 and one desktop running amd64. I have one scanner, an hp officejet 7310 that is (wired) ethernet attached. When I try xsane from either

[gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems

On 07/07/2012 04:27 AM, walt wrote: Do you have the 'fax' device on your laptops? BTW, did you 'install' the printer devices with hp-setup?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems

On Sat, Jul 07 2012, walt wrote: On 07/06/2012 05:35 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: I have one network (a linksys) to which all my devices are attached. I have two laptops running ~amd64 and one desktop running amd64. I have one scanner, an hp officejet 7310 that is (wired) ethernet attached.

[gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems

On 07/07/2012 07:33 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: Moreover the new printer entry in cups fails to print a test page (the old, cups-installed, entry continues to work). sigh Once again I forgot my number-one fallback move: I always delete all the existing printer devices after upgrading cups (or

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems

On Sat, Jul 07 2012, walt wrote: On 07/07/2012 07:33 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: Moreover the new printer entry in cups fails to print a test page (the old, cups-installed, entry continues to work). sigh Once again I forgot my number-one fallback move: I always delete all the existing

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: On Sat, Jul 07 2012, walt wrote: On 07/07/2012 07:33 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: Moreover the new printer entry in cups fails to print a test page (the old, cups-installed, entry continues to work). sigh Once again I

[gentoo-user] Re: network scanner not seen by xsane on *some* systems

On 07/07/2012 11:03 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: error: Unable to communicate with device (code=12): hp:/net/Officejet_7300_series?zc=HPCC9932 error: Unable to print to printer. Please check device and try again. Make me want to throw your laptop out of my window :) You can ping your printer,

  1   2   3   4   >