On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:40:01PM +0100, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> Hope someone has an idea...
You could try esmtp; Always seems to work for me when the others fail.
Haven't tried what you're pursuing, but surely it can be made to work
fairly easily...
--
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:10:02AM +0100, James Broadhead wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 23:52, Indi wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >> On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:40:02PM +0100, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>On Dec 10, 2011 8:50 PM, "LinuxIsOne" <[1]linuxis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>
>- >8 snip
>
> >
> > I have come to conclusion that almost all Linux work almost in the
> > same way since they have the same kernel, however,
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:00:02PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 08 Dec 2011 14:51:52 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:47:22AM +, Mick wrote:
> >
> >
> > To me it seems we Gentooians don’t care much about social sharing, semantic
> > desktops or data associations. W
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:40:01PM +0100, Lavender wrote:
> At 2011-12-09 19:38:06,"Pandu Poluan" wrote:
> >As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend?
> >
> >( I just want to read some documentations in HTML. )
> >
> I'm using lynx, I feel it is great ! Lynx is small but efficient,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:40:01AM +0100, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-12-06, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:15:31AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 05:54:22 -0500, LinuxIsOne wrote:
> >>
> >> > But I don't know why the creators of Gentoo made it so d
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:00:02PM +0100, LinuxIsOne wrote:
>
> I guess, if Gentoo is required to be learned first and that's why it
> is not so popular like Ubuntu and lag far behind than it. When I asked
> a stranger do you know about Computers? He says, no but I know what it
> is. Then I asked
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:00:03PM +0100, LinuxIsOne wrote:
>
> However, Getoo could be great (I really don't know) but installing
> Ubuntu is working like a charm (I still don't know anything in Linux!)
> But I don't know why the creators of Gentoo made it so difficult for
> beginners! It is typi
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi wrote:
> >
> >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware.
> >
> > What does low-s
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 03:40:01PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> > For the OP, a few posters have mentioned that under gentoo, every
> > thing is compiled from scratch, but it was not made clear that it
> > happens again and again at most upda
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 05:20:01PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:37:51 -0500, Indi wrote:
>
> > > that is not the verbose flag, but silent-build.
> >
> > Hmm, I always thought the "-v" was the verbose switch, and that it
> > s
ted..
On an entirely other subject, I see the mail2news gateway still breaks
threads -- what, a year after I first pointed it out? *sigh*
Ok, my apologies for using it, but really I just cannot justify the ratio
of 24k recieved emails to one sent, so I really have to use the usenet
group to re
Howdy y'all,
About a month or so ago I did an update which seems to have caused
portage to lose the ability to work verbosely.
Ever since it looks like this:
idd@gh:[~]9:07:23 $ sudo emerge -vauND adobe-flash
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... d
he opposite for me. If only I could have a scriptable interface
for "real life" everything would be perfect -- just imagine...
indi@real_life$ feed cat && make tea --serve in_bed
--
caveat utilitor
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 07:06:20AM -0400, Andrey Moshbear wrote:
>
> Found the problem: setuid bit was missing; chmod 4711 did the trick
> (verified via solid-hardware list).
> Time to logout and login and see if that was all.
>
You're very courageous, posting that you found the solution before
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:44:06PM +, James wrote:
>
> The kernel gyrations are all really about something much more important.
> *MONEY*
>
> ...Commercial distros like Apple's offering are making
> billions.
OS X is not a linux distribution.
It uses the xnu kernel, which fuses elements of
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:18:56AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>Hello list,
>
>My /home partition is 15GB, and the other day KDE warned me it was down
>to 1% free. I found that
>.kde4/share/apps/nepomuk/repository/main/data/virtuosobackend/soprano-v
>irtuoso.db
>
>was occ
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:47:18 -0400
cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> James Broadhead wrote:
>
> > On 26 September 2011 03:19, Paul Hartman
> > wrote:
> > > Or skip the net config/init scripts stuff and just use something
> > > like wicd.
> >
> > Getting a manager to write your wpa_supplicant.c
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 06:46:21PM -0400, Albert W. Hopkins wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 11:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > So buy a mobo without it or that can disable it. Got it. It'll be a
> > good while before I buy a new mobo tho. I'm sure they will have a
> > nice
> > fix by then but this is
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 07:08:05AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>Not to belittle non-power users, most everything can be done by putting
>some more intelligence into the init.d scripts.
>
>Of course, this should be implemented by Gentoo itself. I'll spelunk in
>the relevant script
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:56:20 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On Mon 26 Sep 2011 08:51:17 PM IST, James Broadhead wrote:
> > On 26 September 2011 16:01, Mick wrote:
> >> I don't know if you have seen this. Given that we're moving into
> >> UEFI boot what are the workarounds to compensate for
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:43:50 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am Montag 19 September 2011, 19:25:28 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer:
> > On Monday, 19. September 2011 18:36:18 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > Am Montag 19 September 2011, 16:41:08 schrieb Michael
> > > Schreckenbauer:
> > > > O
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:55:01 +0200
pk wrote:
> Xmms, I believe it's called. And it's been working fine for quite a
> while (I've actually have never encountered a bug with Audacious), for
> me. Now, when I upgraded to 2.4.x dbus was forced on me (well, that
> and Xfce4)... I'm used to Audacious
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 July 2011 07:13:24 Indi wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:37:09 +0200
> >
> > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 19 July 2011 06:27:52 Indi wrote:
> > &g
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:37:09 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 July 2011 06:27:52 Indi wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:50:19 +0200
> >
> > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 18 July 2011 14:30:28 Stroller wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:50:19 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Monday 18 July 2011 14:30:28 Stroller wrote:
> > On 18 July 2011, at 12:18, Mick wrote:
> > > Is it a matter of waiting a bit longer?
> >
> > Yes, I think he'll be eligible for parole beginning 2023.
>
> please refrain yourself
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 23 June 2011 22:47:54 Peter Humphrey did opine thusly:
> > On Thursday 23 June 2011 20:54:03 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > I was seriously considering importing a single seater heli kit,
> > > they are classed as ultralights
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:10:34PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>
> I saw a guy on a TV interview once. He said the only way a helicopter
> can fly is by brute force. A airplane wants to fly but a helicopter
> just wants to crash. He said that can be proven by taking your hands
> off the controls. Do
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:06:09AM -0400, Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Indi [110622 18:59]:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> > > Then again, I don't fly either. I have told people that if they
> > > see me on a plane, close the lid on my cof
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Then again, I don't fly either. I have told people that if they
> see me on a plane, close the lid on my coffin. That's the only
> way I would get on a plane.
>
You haven't lived until you've been up in a small, underpowered
ultralight
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:37:49PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 June 2011 11:23:15 Indi did opine thusly:
> >
> > Ha, so it's true then: using my blackberry as a PDA (sync'd to
> > google calendar) and not bothering with that stuff on my compu
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 June 2011 14:16:05 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > A while ago I eventually got my contacts back. I forget the actual
> > cause now, but I strongly suspect it involved tinkering with mysql,
> > and this may have broken in t
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 06:18:49AM -0500, Dale wrote:
>
> To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add
> stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell
> off the reservation and needs to be removed. < sighs > Over the years,
> it adds up.
>
I
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 05:28:05PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Indi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
> >&
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:25:57AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
>Is split an appropriate program to use to break a single 10GB file
> into 100 100MB files to transfer over the net using rsync, and then
> use cat to reassemble?
>
>Is there some better way to do this?
>
Just using rsync
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 06:25:00AM -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18 2011, David Abbott wrote:
>
> > If you open up wicd => Preferences => General Settings => Wired
> > interface the defaultis eth0.
>
> That is what I have. Are you suggesting I should change it to usb0?
>
> > I did
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:18:02AM +, JDM wrote:
> Have only tried CONFIG_HID_ROCCAT but this did not help. Will give the others
> a go.
>
> Not quite sure why older kernels would recognise keyboard but .39 kernel does
> not and .38 I have issues with when plugging in usb stick. Are the kern
; > including the one that pulls messages from news.eternal-september.org.
> > So I was off the air for about 3½ hours today.
>
> I'm using Kmail with bog-standard threading and aggregation, and this
> message is shown as a reply, not to Dale but to Indi; the message that
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> sys-apps/less
> selected: 443
>protected: none
> omitted: none
>
>
> Changelog doesn't say much about this. I have nano, vim, more and less
> installed and vim is in world. I really don't feel like adding the oth
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:32:11PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> Just to say I'll be withdrawing from this list in a few days,
> unsubscribing actually, mainly so that I can go back to being an Emacs
> developer; the number of emails on both lists combined is just more than
> I ca
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:01:35 + (UTC)
James wrote:
> Indi gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > Sadly, a lot of people (including developers) seem to think that
> > people either see or are blind and that's it. I see plenty well
> > enough for most things that need
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:19:40PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
>
> Not every tool is for every user or every need.
> If there a better tool to use then why bother with something less.
> I'm not a thunderbird fanboy so i can accept that t-bird has its
> limitations and its problems and that it i
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:16:12AM -0700, Bill Longman wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 09:52 AM, Indi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:42:01AM -0700, kashani wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd like to point out that the PEBCAK was on your end.
> >>
> >
> &
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:50:34PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
>
>
> Thunderbird doesn't use system xulrunner.
> I use mail-client/thunderbird-3.1.10 and xulrunner-5.0_beta2 for firefox.
>
Thanks for the info.
What matters though is that it is very hard to configure properly
for people who
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:42:01AM -0700, kashani wrote:
>
> I'd like to point out that the PEBCAK was on your end.
>
Sorry, no.
And you just used your one shot at trolling me.
Do it again and it's the bozo bin for you.
--
klaatu virada nicto
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:38:08PM -0400, Indi wrote:
>
> xulrunner is 2.0.1-r1i
>
Should say "2.0.1-r1", sorry.
--
klaatu virada nicto
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:34:34PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 06.06.2011 17:55, schrieb Indi:
>
> > Uh, no. I will decide what's "too big to be usable", not the software,
> > thank you.
>
> It is not really the software that decides that. Thunderb
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:28:14PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 06.06.2011 17:18, schrieb Indi:
>
> > Maybe we should also both remember that I *am* running ~x86?
> > :)
>
> That should make now difference, my girlfriend uses ~x86 on her laptop
> and there th
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:28:14 +0200
Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 06.06.2011 17:18, schrieb Indi:
>
> > Maybe we should also both remember that I *am* running ~x86?
> > :)
>
> That should make now difference, my girlfriend uses ~x86 on her laptop
> and there thunde
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:07:28 -0400
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2011-06-06 10:48 AM, Indi wrote:
> > At one point it was far more specific with a number of individual
> > fonts listed, not one of them worked.
>
> Did you make the change while Thunderbird was running?
>
No.
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:13:39 +0200
Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> As an extension of my previous mail there is although the addon
> stylish that can be used to set all that without the need to restart
> thunderbird for every change.
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/addon/stylish/
>
Wow
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:58:55 +0200
Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 06.06.2011 16:48, schrieb Indi:
>
> > Very first thing I tried after realizing they stupidly didn't allow
> > it in the config options was
> >
> > /* Global UI font */
> > * { font
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 06.06.2011 16:24, schrieb Indi:
>
> > If you (or if anyone using it *on* *linux*) manage(s) to double the
> > size of the default fonts in the folder list and message list I'll
> > listen,
>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:37:26AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2011-06-06 8:44 AM, Indi wrote:
> > You need to realize you're giving advice about the windows version of
> > thunderbird. IOW you can stop now!
>
> As I said, there is nothing indicating that userChrome
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:47:33PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 06.06.2011 14:44, schrieb Indi:
> >
> > You need to realize you're giving advice about the windows version of
> > thunderbird. IOW you can stop now!
>
> I use Thunderbird here runnung o
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 13:32 on Monday 06 June 2011, Indi did opine
> thusly:
>
> > > tbird is a Moz product. Rendering stuff on screen is almost everything
> > > that they do ... everything el
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:38:17PM +0200, enno+gen...@groeper-berlin.de wrote:
>
> As I'm not affected I don't know about any issues for the visually impaired.
>
Sadly, a lot of people (including developers) seem to think that people
either see or are blind and that's it. I see plenty well enou
You need to realize you're giving advice about the windows version of
thunderbird. IOW you can stop now!
Thank you.
:)
--
klaatu virada nicto
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:13:31AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> As to your last - yes, I'm on Windows (as I stated before) - but nothing
> says this hack only works on Windows...
>
It doesn't work in linux.
It was the first thing I tried.
***[Snip all the rest of the advice that doesn't work in l
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:22:34PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 12:56 on Monday 06 June 2011, Tanstaafl did
> opine thusly:
>
> > On 2011-06-06 6:34 AM, Indi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:27:48AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:56:25AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> Easily fixable... Tools > Options > Display > Formatting
>
Oh wait a minute, *NOW* I see!
You're not using what I tested at all -- either you're in windows or
you're using something other than thunderbird 3.
Sorry, we don't do wind
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:16:27PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 12:34 on Monday 06 June 2011, Indi did opine
> thusly:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:27:48AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Believe it or not you are supposed to "
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:56:25AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2011-06-06 6:34 AM, Indi wrote:
> >
> > After much googling the conclusion is many many people are desperately
> > unhappy about the fonts in tbrd and incredibly, it ain't fixable!
> > Hard-code
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:01:47AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2011-06-05 11:44 PM, Indi wrote:
> > I see what you mean about the default config, LOL.
> > Been trying to change the font sizes used for the message list and
> > folder pane, but no success yet. Makes it a bit h
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:27:48AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> Believe it or not you are supposed to "make invisible" all the junk the app
> created.
>
>
Well, once you get some of the amazingly bone-headed defaults corrected
tbird is pretty nice -- for people with eagle eyes who don't ne
On 06/05/2011 11:51 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 02:59 PM, Indi wrote:
>> Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on
>> thunderbird and see how they do with it...
> I absolutely love Thunderbird, but with one caveat...
>
> I love it becau
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:07:24PM -0400, Indi wrote:
> So, following several suggestions I emerge thunderbird for
> testing, and the first thing I noticed is it does what people
> insist it doesn't do: creates redundant Trash and Drafts folders,
> both locally and (cardinal s
So, following several suggestions I emerge thunderbird for
testing, and the first thing I noticed is it does what people
insist it doesn't do: creates redundant Trash and Drafts folders,
both locally and (cardinal sin) on the remote server!
So now in mutt there are all these redundant mail folde
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 10:16:01PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 21:36 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
> thusly:
>
> > > > This post was done that way, so let me know.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:17:53PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 19:35:52 Indi wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:20:01PM +0200, Mick wrote:
> > > The Usenet headers do not show any X-Original-References: in your
> > > message, at least not in my K
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:20:01PM +0200, Mick wrote:
>
> The Usenet headers do not show any X-Original-References: in your message, at
> least not in my Knode.
>
They do, but apparently knode isn't showing you all headers.
> The email headers also do not show any X-Original-References: at leas
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 03:11:04PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 14:44 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
> thusly:
>
> > Yes, probably I'm unlikely to do it...
> > Never did actually switch from testing to stable, it's always
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 02:31:21PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 13:57 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
> thusly:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 02:23:50PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 13:17 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
> thusly:
>
> > If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4
> > might be my choices, as they can be extremely ple
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:41:42PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 12:17:08 Indi wrote:
> >
> > If I were driven strictly by aesthetic concerns qt and kde4
> > might be my choices, as they can be extremely pleasant to look
> > at. Heh, reminds me of my ex
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> A victim of "release early, release often"? :-)
>
Yes, definitely.
One of these days I'll switch back to stable, just haven't
been willing to bite that bullet quite yet. At least it's
helped me temper my obsessive tendencies a
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:40:29PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> So here's one thing that MacOS is very good at: text searches. I have to
> archive old mails in off-line tbz2 to retain some sanity, my colleagues on
> Macs don't. Their mail store goes somewhere (we don't know where, not having
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:01:22PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Sunday 05 June 2011 06:43:37 Indi wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Apparently, though unproven, at 23:59 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
> > >
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:46:49AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 23:59 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
> opine
> thusly:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> > > Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Ind
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 04:35:46PM -0700, walt wrote:
>
> Thunderbird is my every-day news and email client and I don't switch because
> it "just works" for me.
>
Oh that reminds me, one of the annoyances which seems to be common among
GUI MUAs is they create a fixed set of IMAP "folders" which
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:58:12AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Saturday 04 June 2011 23:53:50 Mick wrote:
>
> >
> > ... as mud!
> >
> > This reply of yours (unlike your previous) is shown as a new thread in
> > Knode, not as a threaded reply to Dale's message. :@
> >
> > PS. I'm re
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 06:37:31PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 Jun 2011 23:38:09 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 23:09:28 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> >>
> >>> My client wraps lines at a perfectly sensible length.
> >>>
> >>> http://linux.stroller.uk.e
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Mick wrote:
>
> I have looked at mutt some time ago, but then I would also need to install
> fetchmail and smtp and what not, instead of a single desktop application.
>
Actually you can build mutt with the smtp, imap, and pop flags and
use mutt's built-
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:57:44PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> David W Noon wrote:
> > Not a problem. In fact, it is not I (or Indi) who is causing the
> > breakage.
> >
> > A little further investigation has shown that the Message-ID: line of
> > all message posted
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:09:28PM +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
> You know, Finder is not as bad as you would imagine.
>
I don't have to imagine.
Bought my first Mac (an SE) in 1987, and my last in 2009.
The '87 SE still works, the 2009 mini no longer does and was a
buggy piece o' crap all its life
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi:
>
> > Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive
> > at times when dealing with IMAP.
>
> I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
> I have a slightly adverse general opinion about the mail
> client called 'mutt'. I am not saying that this is the fault of its devs nor
> do I suggesst that there is anything wrong with its users.
>
> Pine is slightly l
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:38:52PM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Saturday 04 June 2011 11:59:52 kashani wrote:
> > On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > >> Apparently, though unproven, at
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:59:52AM -0700, kashani wrote:
> On 6/4/2011 11:43 AM, Indi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
> >> opine
> >> thusly
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 02:37:32PM -0400, CJoeB wrote:
> On 06/04/11 14:17, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > On 06/04/2011 08:54 PM, CJoeB wrote:
> >> Hi all.
> >>
> >> Okay, colour me "so stupid", but I want to add some TrueType fonts to
> >> KDE and I can't figure out how to do it. In my previous KD
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:11:09PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 17:20 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
> opine
> thusly:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote:
> > > I suspected it was whatever device was be
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 06:47:34PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 13:35 on Saturday 04 June 2011, Indi did
> opine
> thusly:
>
> > You say OS X is "good enough"
> > I say you've got some mighty low standards.
>
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:50:03PM +0200, Indi wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> >
> > I don't think that there is something that can be done, because the
> > server changes the headers of the mails.
> >
> > That
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:38:38AM -0400, Indi wrote:
>
> Well I could be wrong but do believe the MUA wll write the Xref or
> References headers according to what the server has on the original
> message. If the original header info exists anywhere in the message sent
> by the ma
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
>
> That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet
>
> References:
>
>
>
>
Can't believe I never noticed that Bastard Operator From Hell
reference in those headers, lol...
--
caveat utilitor
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
>
> I don't think that there is something that can be done, because the
> server changes the headers of the mails.
>
> That is a example of Indi's headers when he was using usenet
>
> References:
>
>
>
>
> That is what his
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:54:11AM -0500, Dale wrote:
>
> I suspected it was whatever device was being used. Sort of like top
> posting. Some people have to top post because the device they are using
> won't let them reply any other way.
>
> I just wonder if there is some setting that could b
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Indi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:05:24AM -0500, Dale wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using Seamonkey for my email. It does appear that it happens with
> >> Indi to tho.
> >>
> >> Thi
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 09:47:20AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Ok, finally took the plunge, and as everyone else said it was pretty
> much anti-climactic...
>
> However, I'm getting the following error when starting sntp that I
> wasn't before in rc.log:
>
> * Setting clock via the NTP client 'snt
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 08:05:24AM -0500, Dale wrote:
>
> I'm using Seamonkey for my email. It does appear that it happens with
> Indi to tho.
>
> This thread is now broken up into a few discussions as well. No clue
> what order things are supposed to be in so ju
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
