On 7 Oct 2008, at 10:05, I wrote:
>> So, what are your plans for 2.8?
>
> we agreed at lgm on roadmapping:
>
> - geometry tool integration
> - layer groups
>
> and another one I can't remember >^}
I think I just did: improve floating selection handling.
--ps
founder + principal i
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 09:05 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> So that is quite a lot to do already, but we
> could probably add a few more items to this list if there are developers
> willing to work on them. So, what are your plans for 2.8?
An application is of course lots more than a binary...
I'd
Hi,
it would be nice if we could also try to get some work done on a new
widget for entering dimensions. Our current solution of a spinbutton
combined with a combo-box for the units takes too much space and is
uncomfortable to work with. If I remember correctly, Simon has some code
that implements
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 14:01 +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> Perhaps using .rcX versions before going public as OpenOffice
> or other big teams do could save from the exit of a buggy first version...
Did you perceive 2.6.0 as buggy? It seems to work fine for most users.
We had some bug reports,
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>>> * Making the toolbox (and the rest of the interface?) color neutral [1],
>>> probably through a color neutral theme
>>>
>>
>> That is the job for an artist, not a developer. You should try to get
>> Jimmac into the boat.
>>
>
> It would
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:05:26AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Moin,
>
> I just announced on gnome-i18n that we will be doing the 2.6.1 release
> in a few days, probably on Wednesday. There are a couple of bug-fixes in
> trunk that are worthwhile to release. After the release, I will
> immidiatel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sven wrote:
>
>
>> So, what are your plans for 2.8?
>>
>
>
> we agreed at lgm on roadmapping:
>
> - geometry tool integration
> - layer groups
>
> and another one I can't remember >^}
>
>
I really like the brush dynamics feature in this. Something I'd like to
Sven wrote:
> So, what are your plans for 2.8?
we agreed at lgm on roadmapping:
- geometry tool integration
- layer groups
and another one I can't remember >^}
Kamilla?
--ps
founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine interface works
http://m
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 21:59 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> It would of course be nice if the whole icon set was adapted by an
> artist to look good when color neutral, but I don't really see anyone
> doing that very soon. There are two approaches that I think will
> possible to get into 2.8
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
* Making the toolbox (and the rest of the interface?) color neutral [1],
probably through a color neutral theme
That is the job for an artist, not a developer. You should try to get
Jimmac into the boat.
It would of course be
Sven Neumann wrote:
>> * Making the toolbox (and the rest of the interface?) color neutral [1],
>> probably through a color neutral theme
>>
>
> That is the job for an artist, not a developer. You should try to get
> Jimmac into the boat.
>
It would of course be nice if the whole icon set
On Monday 06 October 2008 22:32:43 Sven Neumann wrote:
> > This is IMO a prerequisite for:
> >
> > * Supporting one-window layouts by allowing to dock the toolbox and
> > dialogs to image windows/the empty image window [1]
>
> IMO the most important prerequisite for this is the introduction of tabs
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 18:45 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> * Making the toolbox (and the rest of the interface?) color neutral [1],
> probably through a color neutral theme
That is the job for an artist, not a developer. You should try to get
Jimmac into the boat.
> * Getting rid of the G
Sven Neumann wrote:
> So, what are your plans for 2.8?
>
Hi
Currently I am interested in polishing the user interface, namely
* Fixing GtkNotebook somehow so that we can save horizontal space for
dialogs by getting rid of their title and have the Dialog menu as a
rightclick on the tab
* Maki
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, what are your plans for 2.8?
I think I'm going to focus mainly on integrating Skalle's on-canvas
text code, which
should be ready for merging into trunk immediately after the
branching, if you and
Mitch approve. I'd
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, what are your plans for 2.8?
>
For me there are 2 bugs I want to tackle for 2.8 in bugzilla.
First http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471344 - The interpolation
issue causing "polygonal" strokes when moving fast
Moin,
I just announced on gnome-i18n that we will be doing the 2.6.1 release
in a few days, probably on Wednesday. There are a couple of bug-fixes in
trunk that are worthwhile to release. After the release, I will
immidiately create a gimp-2-6 branch for further maintainance. At that
point trunk w
17 matches
Mail list logo
