On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:16:28AM -0400, Leonard Rosenthol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:38 AM 7/14/2003 -0400, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
What happens if in the future someone writes a gimp-java interface
(like gimp-perl)? Would there be any security issues there?
No.
I do not
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:18 +0200
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Menubar in fullscreen mode [Re: [Gimp-developer] the user
installer]
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should I file a request in bugzilla, asking for a Fullscreen with Menu
option or do you think it would not be worth adding?
I think it is not worth to clutter the menu with this since the menu
is always available as right-click menu anyway. The
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:42:49PM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
What happens if in the future someone writes a gimp-java interface
(like gimp-perl)? Would there be any security issues there?
No.
I do not believe people like you.
Sorry, but how can you so bluntly claim
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Alan Horkan wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:18 +0200
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Menubar in fullscreen mode [Re: [Gimp-developer] the user
This actually could be a serious usablity issue, since a user who has the
menubar on (which a distro might set as default) after going to fullscreen
mode might not be able to figure out how to get the menubar back, or even
how to return to windowed mode.
Hit Escape (Esc) should work. Also
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Go to the menu and toggle View Menubar. How did you miss this?
(Gimp 1.3.4) I had the menubar turned on I expected to still have the
menubar in fullscreen mode.
I don't understand your answer but just to clarify my sentence I will
describe the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
Well, ar's limitations with respect to name length etc. are in practise
not every severe (nobody will have 1 character file names (the ar
limit), and even antique ar implemnentations will support up to 255
characters).
Technically I don't know
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze) writes:
I think, the security argument against JAR is very far-fetched.
A JAR is basically a ZIP with a META-INF directory containing a
MANIFEST.MF file. That's it.
There is a lot of code around for creating / reading ZIP files - I'm a
bit worried
Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
(bah, watching actual real users in usablity tests at work stumble around
when using really fairly simple interfaces has caused me to loose all
faith in the intelligence of humanity. Then again, our users are actual
real users, too.)
Yes, quite so. :( Seeing such
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This actually could be a serious usablity issue, since a user who has the
menubar on (which a distro might set as default) after going to fullscreen
mode might not be able to figure out how to get the menubar back, or even
how to return to
Hi,
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HOWEVER, this might be a good time to think about whether we'd
prefer a compressed format that we can random-access de/compress
on the fly instead of going via a huge (and with image data we
can easily be talking HUGE) temporary intermediate file.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fullscreen mode was added to be able to view the image in a neutral
environment w/o being distracted by any user interface elements.
Adding a menubar would completely ruin this effort.
I'm sure any
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 05:35:42PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
I don't think we should use a compressed archive. Instead the binary
data in the archive should be compressed. That allows to choose the
best compression scheme for the data and to combine different
compression techniques in the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:39:25PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I file a request in bugzilla, asking for a Fullscreen with Menu
option or do you think it would not be worth adding?
I think it is not worth to clutter the menu with this since the menu
is always
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 18:28, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
Don't! Fullscreen mode is useful for more than that. It is nice when
working on a large image, or a smaller image with high magnification, to
get rid of superfluous stuff like the window decoration, but in that case
the user may still
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:28:18PM +0100, Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Technically I don't know if that's true. From my ar man page:
GNU ar can maintain archives whose members have names of
any length; however, depending on how ar is configured on
your system,
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
If we would design our own extremely simple wrapper format there would be
no need to work with the compatibility mess existing formats are (all of
them :). If we say that access by other tools than gimp is not important
we could get away
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-07-16 at 2223.29 +0200):
If we would design our own extremely simple wrapper format there would be
no need to work with the compatibility mess existing formats are (all of
them :). If we say that access by other tools than gimp is not important
Brainstorming, a dir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-07-16 at 2244.11 +0200):
Don't! Fullscreen mode is useful for more than that. It is nice when
working on a large image, or a smaller image with high magnification, to
get rid of superfluous stuff like the window decoration, but in that case
the user may still want
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:43:13PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
designed as a GIMP-only format. People already use XCF in other apps
simply because there is no reasonable format for layered images.
That is not true. MIFF was around for years, for example, was always
able to
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:12:37 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tino Schwarze)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:42:49PM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
What happens if in the future someone writes a gimp-java interface
(like gimp-perl)? Would there be any security issues there?
On 07/16/03 20:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
- maybe there is a need to have a gimp-specific file format, especially
when you want to store the image data in a non-trivial way to speed up
access.
- maybe there is a need to have a nicely defined exchange format for
23 matches
Mail list logo
