Re: [gwidion@mpc.com.br: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP]

2005-06-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd love it if Gimp used KDE's file dialogs. The new Gimp one is quite annoying, compared to both the older Gimp file dialogs and the latest KDE ones. Asking the GIMP developers to implement native file selection dialogs is just silly. The new

Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP

2005-06-18 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Leon Brooks wrote: Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:05:30 +0800 From: Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP This may seem like an oxymoron, given GIMP's heavy defacto

Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP

2005-06-18 Thread Leon Brooks
On Friday 17 June 2005 22:25, Carol Spears wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:05:30AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: This may seem like an oxymoron, given GIMP's heavy defacto relationship with GNOME-flavoured GTK, but is there any GIMP equivalent to OpenOffice's KDE integration

Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP

2005-06-18 Thread Leon Brooks
On Saturday 18 June 2005 09:08, Sven Neumann wrote: What aboout DND, the clipboard? Reporting on GIMP 2.2.7 under KDE 3.4.1. DND from GIMP does not work. The cursor changes but nothing happens if I drop onto (e.g.) KMail. Konqueror asks for a name, then turns a layer into a 2-byte file

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: artistic GIMP

2005-06-18 Thread Leon Brooks
On Saturday 18 June 2005 03:33, GSR - FR wrote: You missed an interesting page: http://www.levien.com/gimp/brush-arch.html True. A preliminary/general comment on that is that I think we do need all of the confusing bells and whistles spoken of, but also a much-simplified way of saying I want

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: artistic GIMP

2005-06-18 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Leon Brooks wrote: On Saturday 18 June 2005 03:33, GSR - FR wrote: You missed an interesting page: http://www.levien.com/gimp/brush-arch.html Curtis's watercolour simulations may no longer be too computationally intensive, now that eight years (!) have passed, or may

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ

2005-06-18 Thread jernej
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 15:23:02, Sven Neumann wrote: The file dialog is getting better and better with each release. It's usability will remain severely limited until you need to press Ctrl+L to actually be able to type-in a relative path (or any path on Windows). There also must be a

Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP

2005-06-18 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:13:26PM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: On Friday 17 June 2005 22:25, Carol Spears wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:05:30AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: This may seem like an oxymoron, given GIMP's heavy defacto relationship with GNOME-flavoured GTK, but is there any GIMP

Re: [gwidion@mpc.com.br: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ

2005-06-18 Thread Michael Schumacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 15:23:02, Sven Neumann wrote: The file dialog is getting better and better with each release. It's usability will remain severely limited until you need to press Ctrl+L to actually be able to type-in a relative path (or any path on

[Gimp-developer] GIMP is not a GNOME application

2005-06-18 Thread Alan Horkan
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Sven Neumann wrote: Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:11:25 +0200 From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP Hi, Leon

Re: [gwidion@mpc.com.br: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ

2005-06-18 Thread jernej
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 18:42:17, Michael Schumacher wrote: The file dialog is getting better and better with each release. It's usability will remain severely limited until you need to press Ctrl+L to actually be able to type-in a relative path (or any path on Windows). Oh, come on. You

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP is not a GNOME application

2005-06-18 Thread Carol Spears
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 06:25:54PM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: Following the Gnome Human Interface Guidelines is something by itself which many people consider enough for any application to consider itself a Gnome application. in my opinion, this is the best point you have made here. Some

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP is not a GNOME application

2005-06-18 Thread Nathan Summers
On 6/18/05, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Sven Neumann wrote: Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:11:25 +0200 From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ

2005-06-18 Thread Leon Brooks
On Sunday 19 June 2005 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are also other things that bother me about Ctrl+L dialog, namely the implementation of autocompletion and the fact that if you type the full path to a file, you still have to confirm the selection in the open dialog itself. Before I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ (-: sooner or later :-) KDEification of GIMP]

2005-06-18 Thread pcg
[This is a re-sent because my reent mails had been sent for moderation ut never appeared on-list: is the list still moderated?] On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 03:23:02PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And, you aren't seriously trying to argue that the new GtkFileChooser would be worse

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [Gimp-developer] FAQ

2005-06-18 Thread Manish Singh
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:48:33AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: On Sunday 19 June 2005 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to compile the list of things that bother me about the GTK+ file chooser and submit it to bugzilla someday. I know I'm not the only one being bothered with it's design.