On 2/6/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 22:38 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
I just noted this strange behaviour: when I see the the
Image menu-View-Display filters-Color Deficient Vision options
(Protanopia, Deuteranopia, Tritanopia) with the Italian
Hi,
On 2/6/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, does this plug-in use GimpPreview widgets? I would like to get some
feedback on features and API of GimpPreview and its derivatives.
It actually uses GtkDrawingArea. This is related to zoom cropping
functionality. If we dropped
Hi,
On 2/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 20:03:59, peter sikking wrote:
- that in-dialog cropping looks like a very uncomfortable way
to do that to me;
- simply display the Size in the fields that are now called
Resize now without the
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:29:57AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 09:12 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
[...]
Resolving this error I get another error:
Making all in po-libgimp
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/marco/svn-gnome/gimp/trunk/po-libgimp'
Makefile:159: ***
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:58:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite the idiot-user title of this feature (copied for PS it seems)
...
If the user is so lame that they are going to click on a feature called
save for the web
If a user wants to save images for use on the web,
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:32:04 +0100, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:58:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite the idiot-user title of this feature (copied for PS it seems)
...
If the user is so lame that they are going to click on a feature called
On 2/7/07, gg wrote:
I should probably have chosen a more precise and less emotive term than
lame. In chosing save for the web the use indicates he does not know
what is involved and is expecting gimp to magically do it for him, not
unreasonably since the program is offering that as an
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:59:43AM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 07:31, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 2/6/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 22:38 +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
I just noted this strange
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 08:57 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
As far as I understand the dialog doesn't show absolute values for
Saturation and Lightness but relative ones. Perhaps the Saturation
slider should also go from -100 to +100 then.
Saturation appears to be absolute. Lightness is relative.
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 10:23 -0700, Michael J. Hammel wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 08:57 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
As far as I understand the dialog doesn't show absolute values for
Saturation and Lightness but relative ones. Perhaps the Saturation
slider should also go from -100 to +100
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:08 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
I don't remember the actual math involved and didn't try to follow
your elaborate code path description. When I implemented this it
was pretty clear from the beginning that -100% 'L' would have to
make the image all black and +100% 'L'
On 2/7/07, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 05:39 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
While we are discussing it, is it possible to add a remark to the
current dialog that enabling preview also calculates size of resulted
file? I already heard several times from new users
Hello.
There's some time I wanted to contribute to a free software project and now
I am diving in the code of gimp. I find it quite difficult to know where to
start with.
One thing that surprised me is the lack of comments in the code. I am used
to have at least one comment per function and one
Hi Marco,
if I remember correctly this is fixed by removing the generated files
POTFILES in all po subdirectories. Try this command in the toplevel gimp
source directory:
find . -name POTFILES -exec rm {} \;
Then do a rebuild. The problem here is that the Makefile rules to
generate the files
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 01:28 +0100, Mu wrote:
I thought in putting comments in the code as I achieve to
understanding functions and files, and submitting them as patche. I
want to know if you think it is a good idea or it would be a useless
task, or if there is some reason for leaving
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 02:36 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
As of 2.3.14 there is not such tooltip. DIsplay of tooltips is enabled
in preferences.
There is. I just checked once more (and I had already checked
yesterday).
Sven
___
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 10:41 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
What I was trying to tell you is that that message exists, but doesn't
show up. Which means that something is broken ;-)
It does show up. So the brokeness seems to be on your setup.
Sven
17 matches
Mail list logo
