Hi,
Douglas Lewan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have more than a handful of PNGs that should all be cropped and
saved in the same way, i.e. the same rectangle cut from the left side.
Sounds a lot like a job for convert from ImageMagick.
(file-save-png) either (1) wants to complain about
Hi Sven,
On Saturday 19 July 2003 7:48 am,
I'm working on it; I've got 1.3.16 installed and working, and it doesn't
look as though the relevant code has changed too much (just been moved a
bit).
It would be really nice to get a patch against 1.3.16.
A patch against 1.3.16 is now
Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am here working, though slowly, on the programable layer mode,
which I proposed when I first joined the list.
It's not such a small change, since adding layer modes breaks the
cross-reading of .xcf files.
So what I need to know now
Hi,
Alastair Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 19 July 2003 7:48 am,
It has lots and lots of features that we did never promise and despite
of 16bit support I don't see what we would be missing (provided we get
the basic CMYK supoprt finished that we started to work on). I
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
This is *extremely* unfair. _You_ are proposing a rather big version
change, and your only argument is soemthing like I told soma
magazine
I sense your reaction as extremly unfair since we discussed the
version number in all details
Hi,
Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You know those slashdot trolls..
Yes I know those slashdot trolls. They troll and flame whatever you
do. So what is your point in mentioning them? Do you believe they
would not troll about 1.4? I stronly doubt that.
What is really hurting GIMP
Christopher W. Curtis wrote:
On 07/19/03 13:10, Carol Spears wrote:
I also will not write any English documentation until I can afford to
buy that book that explains the English rules about
hyphens.
I'm not sure what book or what hyphens you are talking about, but the
Elements of
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problems as I see them are
1) User feedback on the development series is poor
2) Documentation is poor
3) Our release cycle is poor
4) UI is not a priority.
I am very surprised about point (4). We have put a lot of effort into
improving the
Hi,
1) Transform the old help into something that will serve more or less
as help for the new GIMP. This will cost quite some amount of time
since the help browser is not uptodate and most of the content
doesn't exactly fit the 1.3 UI anymore.
What exactly is the problem with the
Carol Spears wrote:
As much as I hate flash usually on the web, I think gimp needs
a flash plugin and some flash demos.
For what purpose? Could you elucidate?
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
That gum you like is going to come back in style.
David Neary wrote:
Just to explain, this is about whether applications which use the
libgimp API to furnish services to the main GIMP app should be
called plug-ins or plugins. Old story - I believe bex insisted on
plug-ins, and eventually won people over - carol prefers plugins.
'Plugins' is
Michael Schumacher wrote:
2) Not enough developers use Bugzilla to find out what bugs need
fixing
3) Not enough developers hear user complaints
Most bug reports I've read are commented by at least one person who I'd
consider to be one of the developers.
Personally there's no WAY I have time to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
One thing (to bring this more on-topic again) to note is that vim doesn't
handle large (gigabytes) files nice, loading it into memory. The same
is probably true for emacs. The only editor I know (I didn't test
millions
of them though), that
On 07/20/03 06:49, Sven Neumann wrote:
A few people expressed that they dislike the version number, other
liked it. We went through all the arguments a few times and finally
decided that we want to go for 2.0.
Firstly, I have no control over the version number and there's no point
arguing
On 07/19/03 20:56, Carol Spears wrote:
Having the ./gimp-1.3/plug-ins is problematic to me. The rest
of gimp names use hyphens as wisely as you can expect, but not
this one area.
Aha ... well, doing a quick search with 'dict,' it knows about plug-in
and refers plugin to plug-in
1) User feedback on the development series is poor
Mozilla has nightly builds. Mozilla gets lots of feedback.
When I asked if there were binaries (RPMs) of the Gimp 1.3.x releases I
was told in no uncertain terms that I should be building from CVS.
Some RPMs of some of the releases were
I was asked to make my opinion known on-list,
there is no need to reply to this message.
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Sven Neumann wrote:
Various Gnome projects decided the move to GTK2 and additional feature
changes were a big enough change to merit a major number revision.
Given the progress,
Am Son, 2003-07-20 um 13.36 schrieb Sven Neumann:
You're quoting out of context without replying to me; if you prefer
to get an answer you'd better fix that because I might miss a mail in
the floods at times.
What exactly is the problem with the help-browser in 1.3? I know that
there are
Hi,
Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is the mapping of content to context, the system is still
based on the 1.2 help which won't get us very far except with the 1.2
help.
This can be easily fixed. We just need to find out what changes we
actually want to do. Mitch seems to
Hi Sven,
On Sunday 20 July 2003 11:44 am, Sven Neumann wrote:
The CVS version does include some naive RGB - CMYK conversion
routines and it has a CMYK color selector. What is still missing is
support for loading and saving CMYK files. I would like to add this
capability to a couple of file
Hi,
Alastair Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sounds like a good start. If you want to investigate better RGB -
CMYK conversion, then the littlecms library is a good choice to do
the heavy lifting; it can do accurate conversions between colour
spaces defined by ICC profiles.
I would like
i would like to thank all of the developers for their help with
mmaybe.gimp.org.
from the one who made me wait for Tommer to come back and get
involved and the two who effectively fired him without letting
me know. also Raphael for sitting on it until Sven could find
a web site that cuts it down.
Hi Sven,
On Monday 21 July 2003 1:43 am, Sven Neumann wrote:
I would like to postpone this until after the release. However we
should probably add a dummy pointer to the conversion functions now so
that we can use it for passing a color profile later.
Yes, that makes sense - you'll need to
At 1:33 AM +0100 7/21/03, Alastair Robinson wrote:
Sounds like a good start. If you want to investigate better RGB - CMYK
conversion, then the littlecms library is a good choice to do the heavy
lifting; it can do accurate conversions between colour spaces defined by ICC
profiles.
Yes, great
24 matches
Mail list logo
