Re: [Gimp-developer] Better grouping of layer modes

2008-11-04 Thread vabijou2


peter sikking wrote:
 
 
 the only thing I would change is to swap the order of Grain merge and
 Grain extract. simply because it is explained as a workflow in that
 order in the manual.
 
 

I would also like to see a dynamically updated list at the top of the list
that shows the last 3-5 used blend modes under a heading of Recent:.  This
may be outside the scope of the OP's original suggestion, but for many users
there are a select few modes that are used frequently, and having to dig
through a long list slows things down.

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Better-grouping-of-layer-modes-tp20279130p20324960.html
Sent from the Gimp Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] merging new Xcursor plug-in

2008-11-04 Thread tks
Hi, sorry for my late replay.

Martin Nordholts wrote:
 Without doubt we shall not steal because just as you say that would
 require us to update the plug-in whenever the lib updates.

 Instead, your patch should add a test for libXcursor to configure.in, in
 the same manner as we test for a lot of other optional libs. Then in the
 Makefile.am you would test if libXcursor was found, and only build if it
 was found.
I did not think of not building!


 Some keywords to google for:
 Autoconf, Automake

 Some files to look in:
 http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gimp/trunk/configure.in?view=markup
 And the various Makefile.am:s under the plug-ins directory.
I appreciate your kindly teaching. It was well worth to ask here.

- tks
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread Brendan
On Monday 03 November 2008, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,

 On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:35 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
  Brendan wrote:
   When dropping two images from GQView to the Gimp Empty Image
   Window...I get two layers in one image...Huh? Is this on purpose?
   Wouldn't it be more rational to open two images, and not combine them
   into an image with two layers? Maybe I'm missing something, or this was
   unintended...
 
  Hi!
 
  Dropping on the Emtpy Image Window opens as layers (just as dropping on
  an already open image).
 
  To open them as separate images, drop on the toolbox instead.

 I am not so sure if this was good decision to make. I don't quite
 remember if Peter suggested that we do it this way. Peter, are you
 listening...?

It's very unintuitive.
I mean, how often do you want to drop a layer into an image vs. dropping a 
bunch of images to be opened? I do zero of the former and thousands of the 
latter.

And also, when the New Image window is the only one visible (when the other 
windows are hidden, etc.)...how would I open two images by dragging and 
dropping?


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread Brendan
On Monday 03 November 2008, Martin Nordholts wrote:
 Brendan wrote:
  When dropping two images from GQView to the Gimp Empty Image Window...I
  get two layers in one image...Huh? Is this on purpose? Wouldn't it be
  more rational to open two images, and not combine them into an image with
  two layers? Maybe I'm missing something, or this was unintended...

 Hi!

 Dropping on the Emtpy Image Window opens as layers (just as dropping on
 an already open image).

 To open them as separate images, drop on the toolbox instead.

Yes, I guess I was asking a leading question, like...Why?

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread Brendan
On Monday 03 November 2008, Alec Burgess wrote:
 Alexandre Prokoudine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote (in part)

 (on 2008-11-03 at 17:39):
Dropping on the Emtpy Image Window opens as layers (just as
 
   dropping on
 
 an already open image).

 To open them as separate images, drop on the toolbox instead.
 
   Doh! This should go to user manual for 2.6+  :-)  Thanks for telling!

 As a Windows user had never heard of Gqview (though I see there is a
 Windows port available)

 Original post appears to be equivalent to dragging multiple files from
 Windows Explorer. If attempting this it is (IMO) important to set
 Preferences-Window Management-Hint for toolbox to [Normal window]. If
 its' hint is set to [Utility window] then nothing appears on the taskbar
 and the Toolbox is likely to be hidden making it AFAICT impossible to
 drag multiple files and have them open as separate images.

Yes, that is what I was hinting at.
Thank you.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread Brendan
On Monday 03 November 2008, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Brendan wrote:
  When dropping two images from GQView to the Gimp Empty Image Window...I
  get two layers in one image...Huh? Is this on purpose? Wouldn't it be
  more rational to open two images, and not combine them into an image with
  two layers?

 Oh, it wouldn't. Both use cases (opening as separate images and
 merging into one) are perfectly valid.

Valid vs. prudent is the question.
Do more people use it to combine layers or open a bunch of images?
When the New Image window is the only one around (for the Utility window -
reason given), how does one easily open two images? 

I have used the Gimp for a long time, and never have I thought Hey, I want a 
layer from another image, let me drag it onto the window If I wanted to 
do that, perhaps dragging to the Layer box/window would be a more obvious 
choice? Dragging two images to the Image Window should treat them like two 
separate Images. Just seems logical. I asked a bunch of people in my 
graphics dept, and they agreed.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread Brendan
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, peter sikking wrote:
 Sven Neumann wrote:
  On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:35 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
  Dropping on the Emtpy Image Window opens as layers (just as
  dropping on
  an already open image).
 
  To open them as separate images, drop on the toolbox instead.
 
  I am not so sure if this was good decision to make. I don't quite
  remember if Peter suggested that we do it this way. Peter, are you
  listening...?

 yes I am and this is an area that was not fully chewed for 2.6.

 to keep the see Wilber, drop files mantra going strong,
 the best thing is to enforce one rule:

 Dropping files on Wilber (==the GIMP app) will open these files
 in GIMP, as separate images

 Wilber is in the toolbox and the no-image-window.

 Combine that with the rule:

 drop files on an image window and you get those files within
 that image as layers

How about If I want this specific action (Adding Layers), I'll drop files on 
the Layer dialog

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread g mohler
i end up doing both.
maybe a keystroke for layer,
or new image?
with a preference for the default action...
dropping on the layer dialog is good
idea as well.

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tuesday 04 November 2008, peter sikking wrote:
  Sven Neumann wrote:
   On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:35 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
   Dropping on the Emtpy Image Window opens as layers (just as
   dropping on
   an already open image).
  
   To open them as separate images, drop on the toolbox instead.
  
   I am not so sure if this was good decision to make. I don't quite
   remember if Peter suggested that we do it this way. Peter, are you
   listening...?
 
  yes I am and this is an area that was not fully chewed for 2.6.
 
  to keep the see Wilber, drop files mantra going strong,
  the best thing is to enforce one rule:
 
  Dropping files on Wilber (==the GIMP app) will open these files
  in GIMP, as separate images
 
  Wilber is in the toolbox and the no-image-window.
 
  Combine that with the rule:
 
  drop files on an image window and you get those files within
  that image as layers

 How about If I want this specific action (Adding Layers), I'll drop files
 on
 the Layer dialog

 ___
 Gimp-developer mailing list
 Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
 https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread Guillermo Espertino
I agree that it's quite confusing to have two different behaviors for
something that looks almost the same.
But I think it is good to have the other functionality available too, so
I guess it is worth to add a modificator key, as Peter suggested.

Something like this, for instance:
- Drop multiple images on Wilber (both in image window or toolbox):
opens each image as separate documents-
- Drop multiple images pressing alt: opens them as layers in the same
document.

The question is how to proceed when there is an image already opened in
the image window. I guess it should open images as layers in that case
(without pressing alt), and work in the same way that it does now, since
there wouldn't be a wilber in the image window.

What do you think?

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread peter sikking
Sven Neumann wrote:

 On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:35 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
 Dropping on the Emtpy Image Window opens as layers (just as  
 dropping on
 an already open image).

 To open them as separate images, drop on the toolbox instead.

 I am not so sure if this was good decision to make. I don't quite
 remember if Peter suggested that we do it this way. Peter, are you
 listening...?


yes I am and this is an area that was not fully chewed for 2.6.

to keep the see Wilber, drop files mantra going strong,
the best thing is to enforce one rule:

Dropping files on Wilber (==the GIMP app) will open these files
in GIMP, as separate images

Wilber is in the toolbox and the no-image-window.

Combine that with the rule:

drop files on an image window and you get those files within
that image as layers

and we got two simple primary 'what you do is what you get' rules.

If there is a need for more power (a big if, actually) then we need to
investigate a modifier key for dropping on Wilber.

 --ps

 founder + principal interaction architect
 man + machine interface works

 http://mmiworks.net/blog : on interaction architecture



___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Problem with Gimp on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-04 Thread Martin Nordholts
Michael Grosberg wrote:
 I just installed a clean Ubuntu 8.10 on my system, and there seems to be
 something wrong with the transient toolbox and docks. Gimp 2.6 is not supposed
 to have taskbar buttons, but as it's currently set up on my system, they do
 appear. I was able to remedy the situation by adding (transient-docks yes) to
 gimprc - but most users won't know about that. Can you contact the Ubuntu
 repository maintainers and send them an updated gimprc so new users will be 
 able
 to enjoy this feature?

I assume you are using compiz as your window manager? It should work
better with metacity.

We can't enable transient-docks by default due to other problems, see
Bug 322577 – Transient dock setting and multiple files
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322577

BR,
Martin
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Problem with Gimp on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-04 Thread Michael Grosberg
I just installed a clean Ubuntu 8.10 on my system, and there seems to be
something wrong with the transient toolbox and docks. Gimp 2.6 is not supposed
to have taskbar buttons, but as it's currently set up on my system, they do
appear. I was able to remedy the situation by adding (transient-docks yes) to
gimprc - but most users won't know about that. Can you contact the Ubuntu
repository maintainers and send them an updated gimprc so new users will be able
to enjoy this feature?

Thanks - Michael

By the way, the new free select tool is AWESOME. 

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 21:06 -0500, Brendan wrote:

 It's very unintuitive.
 I mean, how often do you want to drop a layer into an image vs. dropping a 
 bunch of images to be opened? I do zero of the former and thousands of the 
 latter.

Calm down, please, will you? I am counting five mails from you now about
this topic. The issue was already settled after the first post. Hitting
the nail again and again doesn't make it more fun to actually sit down
and write a patch that implements this change.


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread Brendan
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, g mohler wrote:
 i end up doing both.
 maybe a keystroke for layer,
 or new image?
 with a preference for the default action...
 dropping on the layer dialog is good
 idea as well.

Every person I have asked about it in the office has agreed that they would 
expect dropping on the image window to open both images.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Dropping two images from Gqview -- Gimp

2008-11-04 Thread Brendan
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
 I agree that it's quite confusing to have two different behaviors for
 something that looks almost the same.
 But I think it is good to have the other functionality available too, so
 I guess it is worth to add a modificator key, as Peter suggested.

 Something like this, for instance:
 - Drop multiple images on Wilber (both in image window or toolbox):
 opens each image as separate documents-
 - Drop multiple images pressing alt: opens them as layers in the same
 document.

 The question is how to proceed when there is an image already opened in
 the image window. I guess it should open images as layers in that case
 (without pressing alt), and work in the same way that it does now, since
 there wouldn't be a wilber in the image window.

 What do you think?

I think it's still confusing. Dropping images onto an image window should open 
images...If dragging onto the layers dialog, it should add them as layers. 
It's simple, and honestly, nobody outside of this list really knows or cares 
who Wilbur is or the fact that they have to drag onto eyes.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Better grouping of layer modes

2008-11-04 Thread David Gowers
Hi vabijou,

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:21 AM, vabijou2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 peter sikking wrote:


 the only thing I would change is to swap the order of Grain merge and
 Grain extract. simply because it is explained as a workflow in that
 order in the manual.



 I would also like to see a dynamically updated list at the top of the list
 that shows the last 3-5 used blend modes under a heading of Recent:.  This
 may be outside the scope of the OP's original suggestion, but for many users
 there are a select few modes that are used frequently, and having to dig
 through a long list slows things down.

I am such a user, and I say: This is a change I do not want, it would
reduce my working speed further.
This is because of the way recently-accessed lists work -- the most
recent is at the top. This means unless I am constantly selecting
*the* most recent (instead of eg. 2nd most recent), where I have to
click to achieve the same result changes, because my choice reorders
the list.

In conjunction with locking functionality (so that your later choices
no longer change the order or content of the recent-list), this could
be effective. I would honestly like similar locking functionality for
the recent-filters-list .. the constant disordering is just so
confusing and slow that I usually find it faster to select from the
original menu path.. which defeats the purpose.

David
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Better grouping of layer modes

2008-11-04 Thread Daniel Hornung
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, David Gowers wrote:

 I am such a user, and I say: This is a change I do not want, it would
 reduce my working speed further.
 This is because of the way recently-accessed lists work -- the most
 recent is at the top. This means unless I am constantly selecting
 *the* most recent (instead of eg. 2nd most recent), where I have to
 click to achieve the same result changes, because my choice reorders
 the list.

How about weighted sorting for some uppermost 2-5 flexible entries?  Using a 
certain layer mode adds weight to that mode, and each mode loses some weight 
again for each action.  I think that that's more or less how desktop 
environments manage their most used applications.

Do you think that would be less annoying?

Another problem (imho) would simply be the added length to that list, which is 
longer than what feels good to me now already.

Daniel


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Better grouping of layer modes

2008-11-04 Thread Joao S. O. Bueno
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, David Gowers wrote:
 Hi vabijou,

 On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:21 AM, vabijou2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  peter sikking wrote:
  the only thing I would change is to swap the order of Grain merge and
  Grain extract. simply because it is explained as a workflow in that
  order in the manual.
 
  I would also like to see a dynamically updated list at the top of the
  list that shows the last 3-5 used blend modes under a heading of
  Recent:.  This may be outside the scope of the OP's original
  suggestion, but for many users there are a select few modes that are used
  frequently, and having to dig through a long list slows things down.

 I am such a user, and I say: This is a change I do not want, it would
 reduce my working speed further.
 This is because of the way recently-accessed lists work -- the most
 recent is at the top. This means unless I am constantly selecting
 *the* most recent (instead of eg. 2nd most recent), where I have to
 click to achieve the same result changes, because my choice reorders
 the list.

 In conjunction with locking functionality (so that your later choices
 no longer change the order or content of the recent-list), this could
 be effective. I would honestly like similar locking functionality for
 the recent-filters-list .. the constant disordering is just so
 confusing and slow that I usually find it faster to select from the
 original menu path.. which defeats the purpose.


David, 
as far as filters are concerned, I'd strongly, and that means __strongly__, 
suggest you to use keyboard shrotcuts to get to your filters. 
Yes,  stopping ytour work to configure keyboard shortcuts is a major pita, and 
that is why most people donṫ do it in any software, even knowing it is 
possible. However, GIMP has setup a unique feature that was once available to 
all GTK+ applications: 
dynamic keyboard shortcuts. 
Just enable these once in preferences, and you will never again have to selct 
a single filter in the thrid menu level more than once. The tooltip on the 
edit-preferences-interface option that enable these shortcuts is self 
explanatory.

As for layer combination modes...Martin, is there any clean way of allowiyng 
setting keyboard shortcuts to layer combiantion modes? That ḋ be a nice 
feature to have.


js
--



 David


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Better grouping of layer modes

2008-11-04 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:

 As for layer combination modes...Martin, is there any clean way of allowiyng
 setting keyboard shortcuts to layer combiantion modes?

Or mapping to a USB HID device's action. E.g. using Griffin
PowerMate's wheel to scroll through modes

Alexandre
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Better grouping of layer modes

2008-11-04 Thread Martin Nordholts
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:

   
 As for layer combination modes...Martin, is there any clean way of allowiyng
 setting keyboard shortcuts to layer combiantion modes?
 

 Or mapping to a USB HID device's action. E.g. using Griffin
 PowerMate's wheel to scroll through modes

As with almost all feature requests it can certainly be done, someone
just have to sit down and think a bit and then write the code for it. In
this case that someone is not me I'm afraid.

BR,
Martin
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Better grouping of layer modes

2008-11-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 05:07 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
 
  As for layer combination modes...Martin, is there any clean way of allowiyng
  setting keyboard shortcuts to layer combiantion modes?
 
 Or mapping to a USB HID device's action. E.g. using Griffin
 PowerMate's wheel to scroll through modes

What about using your mouse scroll-wheel? You can already do that (for
all combo-boxes, in all GTK+ applications).


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Better grouping of layer modes

2008-11-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 05:07 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

  As for layer combination modes...Martin, is there any clean way of allowiyng
  setting keyboard shortcuts to layer combiantion modes?
 
 Or mapping to a USB HID device's action. E.g. using Griffin
 PowerMate's wheel to scroll through modes

You can already configure your USB device to do that. The layer modes
can be changed by Input controllers.


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer