Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-10-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, we still need the Script-Fu blurbs reviewed for GIMP 2.4. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283 Might you perhaps find time to finish this task anytime soon? Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-10-05 Thread Saul Goode
we still need the Script-Fu blurbs reviewed for GIMP 2.4. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283 Might you perhaps find time to finish this task anytime soon? I have submitted a patch which hopefully will be close to what you are expecting. It is amazing what

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-09-13 Thread saulgoode
I feel bad for not updating this project but I have been experiencing difficulty getting my CVS to compile owing to some glib-2.0 problems (I have version 2.10.3 but for some reason 'configure' fails to recognize this and the test program fails to compile if I use the --disable-glibtest switch). I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-09-13 Thread saulgoode
I feel bad for not updating this project but I have been experiencing difficulty getting my CVS to compile owing to some glib-2.0 problems (I have version 2.10.3 but for some reason 'configure' fails to recognize this and the test program fails to compile if I use the --disable-glibtest switch). I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-09-13 Thread saulgoode
I feel bad for not updating this project but I have been experiencing difficulty getting my CVS to compile owing to some glib-2.0 problems (I have version 2.10.3 but for some reason 'configure' fails to recognize this and the test program fails to compile if I use the --disable-glibtest switch). I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-31 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I'm talking about http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283 There hasn't been any further progress on this, we are still waiting for a patch that can be applied to CVS. This is really getting urgent now since we want to go into string freeze soon. This thread has pointers to patches

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-14 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I have opened a bug-report for this and I would like to point out that we should not wait too much longer with this. We should give the translators enough time to deal with the new strings. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283 Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-02 Thread saulgoode
Quoting Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: a while ago we went over all plug-ins, reviewed the procedure blurbs and marked them for translation. The blurbs are shown in the image status bar and as menu tooltips. This hasn't happened for Script-Fu yet, even though the script procedure blurbs are

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-02 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 01:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: a while ago we went over all plug-ins, reviewed the procedure blurbs and marked them for translation. The blurbs are shown in the image status bar and as menu tooltips. This hasn't happened

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-02 Thread saulgoode
My apologies for my preceding post which merely quoted Michael Natterer; I was using a new mail editor and it apparently expects me to only TAB between header fields. Quoting Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unfortunatel not. You apparently diffed between modified scripts from 2.3 and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-08-02 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even if I didn't completely screw it up, I imagine there will be some discussion. I have many doubts about my wording myself. Some issues as I see them: 2. In a couple of places I employed the term selection frame in order to differentiate

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-07-05 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 11:59 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: The switch over to Tiny-Fu will result in a certain amount of incompatibilities anyway so it might be a good time to reconsider. We are most likely not going to do the switch to Tiny-Fu until those incompatibilities have been sorted

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-07-01 Thread Alan Horkan
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Sven Neumann wrote: Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:16:33 +0200 From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gimp-devel gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review Hi, On Wed, 2006-06

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-29 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:16 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: Plugins have both a short summary description (blurb) be and a longer more descriptive help. It might be worth making things consistent and doing the same for scripts. As I already explained, we can't easily do that without breaking

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-28 Thread Alan Horkan
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Kevin Cozens wrote: That's nice, but the task is to come up with a short string that must fit into a single line and is oriented towards the user, not towards a script programmer. The string will be visible in the status bar when browsing the menus. Something like

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-28 Thread saulgoode
I agree that it would be desirable to have the help descriptions be more informative but I will focus on the one-line blurbs for now. I am working on the gs now. After I have finished the one-liners, I will look into having Script-fu parse the help text into a 1-line text and a multi-line

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 15:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I estimate that I am about 15% finished on this task and that it will take me another two weeks to complete. Would this be sufficient for your scheduling needs? That would be sufficient but I am afraid that you misunderstood

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread saulgoode
Sven Neumann stated: I am afraid that you misunderstood the task that I am asking you to do. For what it's worth, I did examine the plug-ins but they have two blurb strings available (one for the status line and one for the plugin's Help dialog) whereas Script-fus seem to only have the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:34:52 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review initially set the generated image to clean. It seems unnecessary to prompt

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 05:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what it's worth, I did examine the plug-ins but they have two blurb strings available (one for the status line and one for the plugin's Help dialog) whereas Script-fus seem to only have the one. I had mistakenly

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Kevin Cozens
Sven Neumann wrote: On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 15:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The registration blurb for 3dTruchet script: _This script generates a repeating pattern of Truchet tiles (which are randomly oriented quadrants of a circle). The arcs of the tiles are given a 3-D effect using a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-27 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 01:17 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote: Is there a particular need for these blurbs to be short one liners other than making things easier for the translaters? Yes, they need to fit into the statusbar and should follow the same style that plug-ins use for the blurb. One

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-24 Thread saulgoode
I estimate that I am about 15% finished on this task and that it will take me another two weeks to complete. Would this be sufficient for your scheduling needs? At the end of this message is a sample change of the registration for the 3dTruchet.scm script. I do not know if there is another

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-22 Thread saulgoode
I would be willing to spend some time on this; although I am unfamiliar with what the previous work on other plugins was about. In particular, I do not know what marked them for translation means (if this is referring to some type of foreign language translation then I am most likely a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-22 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 00:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would be willing to spend some time on this; although I am unfamiliar with what the previous work on other plugins was about. In particular, I do not know what marked them for translation means (if this is referring to

[Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-06-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, a while ago we went over all plug-ins, reviewed the procedure blurbs and marked them for translation. The blurbs are shown in the image status bar and as menu tooltips. This hasn't happened for Script-Fu yet, even though the script procedure blurbs are shown in the status bar as well. Thus,