On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 22:43 +0530, Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> Joe Artist comes closest :) I am targeting end-users who are primarily
> using the plugin to get their jobs done and if needed learn some bits
> and pieces to extend the functionality.
KPT or the PaintShop Pro FilterPack come to mind for
On 8/27/07, Amit Kumar Saha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On 8/27/07, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > According to the plan GEGL will replace all code in the GIMP that is
> > accessing and or modifying pixels, some forms of GIMP plug-ins will
> > most likely be entirely
Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> 1. It seems from the documentation that, I can specify the operations
> as a XML file as above instead of creating a DAG. How do i then use
> that file to apply the operations?
Looking again at the API there is the gegl_parse_xml() routine. There is an
example of XML code
Hello all,
On 8/27/07, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the plan GEGL will replace all code in the GIMP that is
> accessing and or modifying pixels, some forms of GIMP plug-ins will
> most likely be entirely replaced by GEGL plug-ins instead. And as
> mentioned elsewhere in
On 8/26/07, Amit Kumar Saha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I would like to know, when GEGL is integrated into the GIMP,
> will it be available for the Plugins to access the GEGL as well?
The plan is that GEGL integration into GIMP will start after 2.4 is released and
the 2.5 development cycle
Hi Kevin
Also, I would like to know, when GEGL is integrated into the GIMP,
will it be available for the Plugins to access the GEGL as well?
Regards
--
Amit Kumar Saha
[URL]:http://amitsaha.in.googlepages.com
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-devel
On 8/26/07, Amit Kumar Saha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> 2. Can I work with the individual pixels of an Image using GEGL? Say I
> want GEGL to work with only certain range of pixels of my Image, is it
> possible?
You mean a certain area of your image, rather than all of it?
You would do that u
Hi Kevin,
On 8/23/07, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That looks similar to the types of things one can do with GEGL which is due to
> be integrated in to GIMP after the 2.4 release.
>
I was just having a look at GEGL gallery
(http://www.gegl.org/gallery/index.html) applications. The c
Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> The link is dead.Any chance you have some docs with you?
The last version of the page (from Feb. 08, 2005) can be found at:
http://web.archive.org/web/20050208090913/http://www.cse.psu.edu/~cg585/cantata-over.html
About half of the images on that page are missing.
--
Ch
Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> The others were about the commercial
> products that uses that concept of "glyphs". Though i got a vague idea
> of what it was, but more information is desired.
Most systems used for creating visual effects for movies are node-based,
and have been for over a decade. Loo
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:19:44 +0200, Amit Kumar Saha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Raphael,
>
>
> On 8/23/07, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:19:30 +0100, David Marrs
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Not only in the music world. Around 1993 or so, I rememb
On 8/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> google
> Khoros Cantata
That is the first thing I did when I got the dead link. One of the
results I got was the dead Link. The others were about the commercial
products that uses that concept of "glyphs". Though i got a vague idea
of what
Hi Raphael,
On 8/23/07, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:19:30 +0100, David Marrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not only in the music world. Around 1993 or so, I remember using a
> program called Khoros Cantata to design some image filters. A quick
> search on t
Hello Kevin,
On 8/23/07, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That looks similar to the types of things one can do with GEGL which is due to
> be integrated in to GIMP after the 2.4 release.
I shall have a look at GEGL.
Thanks
--
Amit Kumar Saha
[URL]:http://amitsaha.in.googlepages.com
Renan Birck wrote:
> Same with me; I would love something like a node-based editor (e.g.
> http://pupuedit.sourceforge.net/screenshots/pihlaja_04_04_2007.png and
> http://imaginit.rand.com/files/water_graph.gif )
>
> This would let non-programmers, or programmers which aren't into image
> processi
On 8/23/07, David Marrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> > Am i thinking in a way that could possibly be implemented? or is the
> > word "extensible" remotely applicable to my idea?
> >
> So what you're talking about here is a graphical interface to the API that a
> user can us
Em Qua, 2007-08-22 às 23:19 +0100, David Marrs escreveu:
> It sounds to me more like a separate companion program that's used to
> construct
> plug-ins than a plug-in itself. I like the idea very much.
Same with me; I would love something like a node-based editor (e.g.
http://pupuedit.sourceforg
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:19:30 +0100, David Marrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> > Am i thinking in a way that could possibly be implemented? or is the
> > word "extensible" remotely applicable to my idea?
> >
> So what you're talking about here is a graphical interface to the
Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> Am i thinking in a way that could possibly be implemented? or is the
> word "extensible" remotely applicable to my idea?
>
So what you're talking about here is a graphical interface to the API that a
user can use to build his own extensions? Essentially, it's a graphical
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:48:15 +0530, "Amit Kumar Saha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to make GIMP plugins themselves extensible. My point
> here is that, can we make a GIMP plugin which allows itself modifiable
> by a end-user to include a new functionality without much of a hassle
>
Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> Here is another way I thought I could give some form of
> "extensibility" to a plugin user. Say, that I want my plugin to be a
> single entry point to all the Image processing operations possible
> with GIMP.
Now your plug-in seems to become something I'd call GIMP. What
Hello all,
Here is another way I thought I could give some form of
"extensibility" to a plugin user. Say, that I want my plugin to be a
single entry point to all the Image processing operations possible
with GIMP. What I do is display all the GIMP functions to the Plugin
user via the Plugin User I
Hello Michael,
On 8/21/07, Michael J. Hammel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The trick here isn't creating an extensible plugin. The trick is
> defining what "without much hassle on the part of the end-user" really
> means. Who's the end user? Joe Artist or Edward Engineer? Sven's
> granny or a
Hello Kevin,
On 8/21/07, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Michael mentioned, using a scripting language such as Perl, Python, or Ruby
> would be to do most things you might want to do. If you want to extend a
> compiled plug-in that is also possible.
>
> Take a look at TinyScheme (us
Hello Michael,
On 8/21/07, Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Von: "Amit Kumar Saha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Should it be more easy than writing e.g. a plug-in in Python?
Yes. I am basically targeting end-users of GIMP,mainly GIMP. So
learning Python for them might be not the best
Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>> Should it be more easy than writing e.g. a plug-in in Python?
> How about having a C++ virutal interface which you only have to fill in with
> your own methods and GUI elements in a set dialog interface...
> I hav
Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
> Is there any way to make GIMP plugins themselves extensible.
[snip]
> I would appreciate even the slightest of insights.
As Michael mentioned, using a scripting language such as Perl, Python, or Ruby
would be to do most things you might want to do. If you want to extend a
> > Von: "Amit Kumar Saha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is there any way to make GIMP plugins themselves extensible. My point
> > here is that, can we make a GIMP plugin which allows itself modifiable
> > by a end-user to include a new functionality without much of a hassle
> > on part of the end-user.
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Should it be more easy than writing e.g. a plug-in in Python?
How about having a C++ virutal interface which you only have to fill in with
your own methods and GUI elements in a set dialog interface...
I have several things that I really woul
> Von: "Amit Kumar Saha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is there any way to make GIMP plugins themselves extensible. My point
> here is that, can we make a GIMP plugin which allows itself modifiable
> by a end-user to include a new functionality without much of a hassle
> on part of the end-user. Does any
30 matches
Mail list logo
