Hi,
We have all the possibilities on gimp.org and we should use them.
But who will do all the necessary work?
Aren't you facing that problem on every server ?
IMHO the whole plugin project should move back to
Well :( Then we will have to find somebody who does it first.
Yep. We need
Hi,
stuff to sourceforge is a bad idea from the very beginning since it is
confusing to the users.
another thing: why is this confusing to users? Has anybody complained
to you? At least on this list (or the sourceforge lists) no sign
of confusion was in sight. The web-pages make it
Hi,
I don't know. Graphics samples don't really fall under my vision of the
plug-in site, but they can go there if they need a home, I guess. I can
add it to the task list, and I'll give access to the web server (at
sourceforge) to anyone who wants to implement it and demonstrates half a
So this might be a false alarm. I really don't think it looks as
bad. Especially if you consider that such a thing as asked for since about
a year, and we _still_ douldn't have even something remotely similar if
there weren't that sourceforge project.
Huh? I'm sure that if a
Hi,
if I'm informed correctly, there is some work underway for a new gimp
website.
Who _is_ working on the new gimp.org site? I think it would be a good idea to
have several people working on seperate bits of the site (i.e. someone sorts
out the downloads, someones else the documentation,
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 11:12:35 +0200
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So this might be a false alarm. I really don't think it looks as
bad. Especially if you consider that such a thing as asked for since about
a year, and we _still_ douldn't
He asked this very mailing list. [See attached] For just
one link. And while only Dr. Bunks can authoritatively
state the response he received, apparently it was zip.
It was never my point to say that the situation is perfect as is.
The only reason why I spoke up was that I wanted to
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 11:18:57AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
gimp.org helixcode.com gtk.org gimp-savvy.com gnome.org berkeley.edu...
It's the wrong solution to a bigger problem. If you think that having all
those different sites is a problem,
Well, actually, I'm not convinced it is a
Kevin wrote:
As long as things remain well-linked both from and to gimp.org,
which implies that someone is actively maintaining the gimp.org site. If
the few people interested and willing to do website design and website
maintainance decide to perform their skills outside the gimp.org
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 10:58:35AM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We have all the possibilities on gimp.org and we should use them.
But who will do all the necessary work?
Aren't you facing that problem on every server ?
On sourceforge, everyone can get access. With gimp.org
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 01:47:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Who did you ask then? Took me a little luck and a few minutes on irc
to get sven.gimp.org and freetype.gimp.org registered under the
It took me two emails to not get anything registered under gimp.org. Maybe
I
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 11:12:35AM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's confusing since the gimp stuff should come from one server not from
a bunch of differently named and hard to find places.
Excuse me, plug-ins.gimp. org is difficult to find, especially when it's
linked from
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 02:13:56PM -0400, Adrian Likins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alternatively, it might be easy to create a source forge page
for it, though I dont see where that would make it easier to upload.
The plug-ins sourceforge project might be a nice place for that. Given
a
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 02:45:01AM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
stuff to sourceforge is a bad idea from the very beginning since it is
confusing to the users.
another thing: why is this confusing to users? Has anybody complained
to you? At least on this list (or the
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 01:57:50AM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 02:13:56PM -0400, Adrian Likins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alternatively, it might be easy to create a source forge page
for it, though I dont see where that would make it easier to upload.
The
15 matches
Mail list logo
