> > stuff to sourceforge is a bad idea from the very beginning since it is
> > confusing to the users.
> another thing: why is this confusing to users? Has anybody complained
> to you?  At least on this list (or the sourceforge lists) no sign
> of confusion was in sight. The web-pages make it quite clear what
> gimp-plug-ins is used for.

It's confusing since the gimp stuff should come from one server not from
a bunch of differently named and hard to find places. 

> So this might be a false alarm. I really don't think it looks as
> bad. Especially if you consider that such a thing as asked for since about
> a year, and we _still_ douldn't have even something remotely similar if
> there weren't that sourceforge project.

Huh? I'm sure that if a group of people volunteers to create something
useful and gimp-related and ask for access to the server, they will be
given that possibility. That's my whole point: Why do you put the effort 
into sourceforge instead of putting it into www.gimp.org where other
parts of the website might benefit from it too?

Salut, Sven

Reply via email to