new stuff for gimprc

2000-04-12 Thread Garrett LeSage
I propose that we make a few changes to the default gimprc (either the system-wide or user one, whichever the options fit best). The main thing is that session management should be turned ON, and there should be a default session w/ the toolbox, layers, option, and brushes dialogs (...and possibl

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Nick Lamb
On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 03:40:49AM +0200, Mattias Engdegård wrote: > I won't fix that right away (maybe later, if I have time). No need, like I said, I only recently checked in the change -- days ago in fact, after 1.1.19 was released. Just wait for 1.1.20, or get the current CVS Gimp, or if you

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Mattias Engdegård
>TGA and XCF both have INDEXED modes, so you can save TGA or XCF from >an INDEXED image, you *should* be able to save INDEXED PNGs with an >alpha channel, but I only recently checked in the functionality to >do that, and doubtless you have an older version of Gimp. Sorry for my earlier message; I

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Mattias Engdegård
>TGA and XCF both have INDEXED modes, so you can save TGA or XCF from >an INDEXED image, you *should* be able to save INDEXED PNGs with an >alpha channel, but I only recently checked in the functionality to >do that, and doubtless you have an older version of Gimp. This is 1.1.19. From png.c:

Re: Problem with CVS?

2000-04-12 Thread Tomas Ogren
On 12 April, 2000 - Pierre Rochefort sent me these 0.5K bytes: > Hi, > > I'm trying to pull the sources from the CVS repository and I'm constantly > getting error messages. Is there a problem with the CVS repository? The > errors I'm getting are: > "no space left on device" (probably remote on

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Nick Lamb
On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 12:18:53AM +0200, Mattias Engdegård wrote: > Perhaps some of the file plug-ins are buggy. I get the complaint: > > ERROR: Procedural database execution failed on invalid input arguments: > (gimp_file_save 1 0 4 "zoop.xpm" "zoop.xpm") > > and nothing was saved. (Running

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
Sven Neumann wrote: > > > I'm using the GIMP (1.1.17; debian unstable) to create some mockups for > > our prepress guys. They want to use some of the things I've done, but I > > don't want to give them a non-flexible image. I realize that I can do > > this already, but I thought it would be a n

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Mattias Engdegård
>> But there seems to be no way to do it from a script. I had to resort to >> duplicating the entire image and delete the unwanted layers, which seemed >> slightly wasteful. > >I don't understand, scripts are supposed to ALWAYS work this way, and >you say that there's no way to do it? If you save

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Nick Lamb
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 11:16:29PM +0200, Mattias Engdegård wrote: > But there seems to be no way to do it from a script. I had to resort to > duplicating the entire image and delete the unwanted layers, which seemed > slightly wasteful. I don't understand, scripts are supposed to ALWAYS work thi

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Mattias Engdegård
>You can already do this. Simply save your image and "Ignore" the export step. >All fileformats that only handle a single layer silently only save that >single >layer. But there seems to be no way to do it from a script. I had to resort to duplicating the entire image and delete the unwanted lay

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 11:28:44AM -0400, "Christopher W. Curtis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > don't want to give them a non-flexible image. I realize that I can do > this already, but I thought it would be a nice feature (that seems like > it would be easy to implement) if you could right-click

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Tom Rathborne
Sven; On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 09:59:17PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: > > I'm using the GIMP (1.1.17; debian unstable) to create some > > mockups for our prepress guys. They want to use some of the > > things I've done, but I don't want to give them a non-flexible > > image. I realize that I can

Re: Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Sven Neumann
> I'm using the GIMP (1.1.17; debian unstable) to create some mockups for > our prepress guys. They want to use some of the things I've done, but I > don't want to give them a non-flexible image. I realize that I can do > this already, but I thought it would be a nice feature (that seems like >

Problem with CVS?

2000-04-12 Thread Pierre Rochefort
Hi, I'm trying to pull the sources from the CVS repository and I'm constantly getting error messages. Is there a problem with the CVS repository? The errors I'm getting are: "no space left on device" (probably remote one since I have 2.6G free), "anonymous: no such user cvs [checkout aborted]:

Re: [gimp-devel] [Fwd: Re: Export behaviour for fully transparent backgrounds]

2000-04-12 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 10:36:06AM +0200, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is fairly trivial to write a plugin to remove the unnecessary > color-information. Either steal code from the semiflatten plugin > or extend the semiflatten plugin to export a second PDB-function > to remove the

Feature Request: Layer Export

2000-04-12 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
Hi all, I'm using the GIMP (1.1.17; debian unstable) to create some mockups for our prepress guys. They want to use some of the things I've done, but I don't want to give them a non-flexible image. I realize that I can do this already, but I thought it would be a nice feature (that seems like i

Re: [gimp-devel] [Fwd: Re: Export behaviour for fully transparent backgrounds]

2000-04-12 Thread Simon Budig
Garry R. Osgood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > (2) I trust the user in choosing between information > content and compression, so long I walk the mile in telling her > that this is a choice to be considered. Then she can write/invoke the > macro or deliberately set R = G = B = A = 0 in all regions

Re: 1.1.19-installation fails

2000-04-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, > The interesting thing is: While I was told that the .gmo files should be > in cvs, I don't see any other .gmo files in the CVS. Huh, who told you this? > So _I_ am utterly confused about the supposed way to do i18n in Gimp (as > opposed to doing i18n in other gnu projects), since the cvs