"Adam D. Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Philip Brown wrote:
> > > BTW, would you try gimp 1.3.7 (or CVS) and try if the problem still
> > > persists there? If they behave different we'd have a hint how to
> > > fix 1.2. If 1.3.7 has the effect too, we have a bug on both branches :(
> >
> >
Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:19:07PM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
> >..
> > > I find it somewhat irritating, for example, that a button3 on my pen will
> > > bring up a menu, that I can do nothing with , with the pen.
> > > Not only can I do nothing with
Hi,
Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > BTW, would you try gimp 1.3.7 (or CVS) and try if the problem still
> > persists there? If they behave different we'd have a hint how to
> > fix 1.2. If 1.3.7 has the effect too, we have a bug on both branches :(
>
> I already tried. I was very d
Hi,
"Adam D. Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I feel your pain.
>
> This is as good a point to ask as any; in following the
> latest incarnation of the crazy dep-chain I ran into a
> dead-end finding the mysterious 'fontconfig' (fontconfig
> is needed by pango is needed by gtk2 is needed by
Hi,
Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> seems that the latest version of pkgconfig is not compatible with the
> latest version of pango.
this is complete nonsense. Please don't say this kind of stuff on
public mailing-lists.
> Which is a really good reason to not do this sort of nonsens
Hi,
Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My problems hit because of 'pangoft2', which is required by gtk1.3.7,
> but is NOT INSTALLED by pango1.0.2, the latest version of pango.
and there is the file INSTALL which you should have read:
3. We require PangoFT2, a Pango backend that uses
Hi,
Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > * If you aren't interested in bleeding-edge Pango developement, you should
> > > be using use the pango-1-0 branch of Pango.
>
> Unfortunately, that isnt very informative for people who are downloading
> tarfiles, rather than using CVS. :-(
Hi,
Jeroen Lamain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After a complete gimp clean (find . -name gimp -exec rm {};)
> on my machine and new cvs get -z3 it still gets the old version
> of the file gimpunits.c. But only that file is old. Other files
> like Changelog are up to date.
I think it's time to
On 6 Jun 2002, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > After a complete gimp clean (find . -name gimp -exec rm {};)
> > on my machine and new cvs get -z3 it still gets the old version
> > of the file gimpunits.c. But only that file is old. Other files
> > like Changelog are up to date.
>
> I think it's time to wr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-06-05 at 1616.39 -0700):
> In addition, I want to use this to print out a screenshot from the xwd
> command. Can I use gimp -b to do this from the command line. By the way
> the screenshot is referenced above as screen.xwd.
I wonder why not convert the xwd to something
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:21:19AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > My problems hit because of 'pangoft2', which is required by gtk1.3.7,
> > but is NOT INSTALLED by pango1.0.2, the latest version of pango.
>
> and there is the file INSTALL which you sh
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 11:08:36AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which is a really good reason to not do this sort of nonsense.
> > Just use autoconfig like always, instead of this silly pkgconfig.
> > It's too redhat, for a software tool that's suppo
Another dependancy issue:
In the INSTALL file, #5, "you MAY want to install other third party..."
stuff, should be reworded to
"we EXPECT the following third-party libraries to be installed".
"may" implies an optional thing, that configure will automatically figure
out and work around.
"expect
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 20:17, Philip Brown wrote:
> Fair enough. But that being the case, please fix the configure script so
> that when "pangoft2" is not found, it prints out a more useful message
Instead of writing these lines (and your other mails), why don't you
submit a patch? I am pretty sur
So after adding the freetype2 lib,and others, i finally managed to get
gimp to compile and link.
But now there's a huge problem - it messes up my X server.
I start it up, the new installation dialog comes up with
[continue] [cancel] at the bottom...
and it has screwed up my mouse. The mouse
Whereas,
1. I recently discovered the Gimp and decided that it's the greatest
thing since sliced bread and just what I need ...
2. ... except that it cannot draw thin lines and curves that look
nice. I'm not the first to discover this, see e.g. bug #69773,
3. Last August there was a threa
Philip Brown writes:
> "pkg-config is a script to make putting together all the build
> flags when compiling/linking a lot easier. "
> Sounds a whole like like autoconf to me.
Umm, no. Autoconf produces a configure script, using large amounts of
m4 code and whatnot. pkg-config only combines s
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 08:02:35AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Philip Brown writes:
> > "pkg-config is a script to make putting together all the build
> > flags when compiling/linking a lot easier. "
>
> > Sounds a whole like like autoconf to me.
>
> Umm, no. Autoconf produces a configure s
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:09:02PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
[...]
> so far, you seem to have described a situation that implies that autoconf
> can work without pkgconfig, but pkgconfig isnt that useful without
> autoconf.
Please, this is quite boring for this list. At least do some research
fi
On 2002-06-06 at 2209.02 -0700, Philip Brown typed this mail:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 08:02:35AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>
> You did not mention, however, why pkgconfig was suddenly added to
> gimp1.3.7, when it was not neccessary for gimp1.2.x
>
probably you should stick with the stable b
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 02:21:39AM -0400, Carol Spears wrote:
> > So far, I just see extra hassle, to what is already a big hassle tracking
> > down umpteen different new packages if you're not running linux or
> > something that has them already.
> >
> you make the best arguement for yourself no
21 matches
Mail list logo
