> Would it be too much of a compromise to just drop the P at the end?
IMO it is too much of a compromise to even consider a name change.
Discussions like these server only one purpose - artificial creation of a
previously non-existant problem to support the position of the one who
started the disc
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:00:24 -0500
> From: Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable
Hi,
I've updated the API docs on http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/ in
preparation of the 2.2.0 release. I will be doing another update when
the release is finally out. If someone wants to look over the docs and
fix/improve them, that would be very much appreciated. The focus
should be on the libg
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, David [iso-8859-15] Gómez wrote:
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:19:26 +0100
> From: "David [iso-8859-15] Gómez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be confi
The bug report in question was
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160890
I got the name wrong in the message body but it was correct in the message
title.
> > On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 11:05, Sven Neumann wrote:
> >> I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being
> >>
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:48:57PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
>
> > i am waiting to hear what the panel decided for the winning splash. Any
> > word on this yet?
>
> It was decided that it was very important to get some input from artists
> namely Jim
hi,
i am waiting to hear what the panel decided for the winning splash. Any
word on this yet?
i ask because someone has asked to borrow the script i used to make the
splash with -- i would like to use it one last time before sharing it --
on this panels decision.
is there a decision or an eta o
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 08:59:08 -0800, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> lets schedule the changing of the name TheGIMP to Boondoggle right after
> it is announced that you can change the name of photoshop to something
> less hyped and media driven also.
Oh, I'm sure with a hex edito
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 06:11:39PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> I do not know if you are a native English speaker but the term gimp is has
> a very similar meaning to "cripple". If you look at the bug report I
> point to some comments where people other than me say they have
> encountered diffic
Hi Alan,
didn't you say you would stop arguing on this stupid subject?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:06:21 -0800
> From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> GIMPDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] panel and winning splash
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:48:57PM +
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:48:57PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> It was decided that it was very important to get some input from artists
> namely Jimmac Tigert and drc.
>
or maybe you await jimmacs approval since all of the splash images that
used his template now have his copyright on it?
ther
Hi Carol,
Carol Spears wrote:
> "make a decision". was their any discussion here of the panel needing
> the approval of these "artists"? the panel was put together to make a
> recommendation to the developers. you need additional handholding? was
> anyone interested in being on this panel who
The suggestion of starting the integration process of GEGL into gimp
with the paint tools came up on irc today.
I have put some thought into the order such a conversion might happen in,
blend
pencil
paintbrush
eraser
dodge
blur
clone
smudge
airbrush
ink
The order lists what
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:52:03PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi Carol,
>
> Carol Spears wrote:
> > "make a decision". was their any discussion here of the panel needing
> > the approval of these "artists"? the panel was put together to make a
> > recommendation to the developers. you need add
Certainly the splash-picking process has been quite chaotic
and somewhat imperfect this time around, but you live and
learn. Nonetheless I'm sure we'll end up with a splash that
not too many people think sucks too enormously, and, well,
there are more things to be discontent about in the world
rig
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:34:13 -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds nice!
>
> Will this take in account recent requests here of archiving changes do
> a drawable by event, instead of by pixel modifications ?
The first thing to do would probably to make the vector b
Hello GIMP developers/users,
I have had some time to think now and it seems that maybe I should not
be incharge of the website. The reasons for this is as follows:
* My work takes a lot of my time, sometimes I am not home until 22:00
swedish time. This makes it hard to actually sit and do somethi
Selecting a splash is a daunting task. However, the weight may seem less
assuming the following tidbits are made readily accessible (say via a "Tip of
the day")
- How one can replace the default splash with a personal one.
- How one can use multiple splashes.
- Download location of splashe
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:52:03PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> Hi Carol,
>
> Carol Spears wrote:
> > "make a decision". was their any discussion here of the panel needing
> > the approval of these "artists"? the panel was put together to make a
> > recommendation to the developers. you need add
Hi Niklas,
Niklas Mattisson wrote:
> I have had some time to think now and it seems that maybe I should not
> be incharge of the website.
Thanks for offering what little time you had, at a time where it
wasn't a job a lot of people wanted to have.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary,
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:26:37 +0100
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> didn't you say you wo
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?
>
> Hi,
>
> Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I
I shouldn't have suggested compromise of the name.
It would be better to have "Deluxe Edition" as an
optional prefix. DE-GIMP appropriately means to cure
from lameness. We could continue to use the GIMP
name and not lose any name-recognition in the process.
Searches for GIMP would continue to t
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:51:44 -0800
> From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: GIMPDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Gimp-developer] panel and winning splash
>
> hi,
>
> i am waiting to hear what the panel decided for the winning splash. Any
> w
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 08:51:34 -0800
> From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> GIMPDev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Why not allow the name to be configurable?
> [was [Bug 160890] Ch
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Joseph Heled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Selecting a splash is a daunting task. However, the weight may seem
less assuming the following tidbits are made readily accessible (say
via a "Tip of the day")
- How one can replace the default splash with a personal one.
It's i
Hi Carol.
[nothing of much interest on this mail for people who are ok with the
panel]
On Monday 13 December 2004 22:25, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:52:03PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > Hi Carol,
> >
> > Carol Spears wrote:
> > > "make a decision". was their any discussion
Hi,
Joseph Heled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Selecting a splash is a daunting task. However, the weight may seem
> less assuming the following tidbits are made readily accessible (say
> via a "Tip of the day")
>
>- How one can replace the default splash with a personal one.
It's in the gim
Hi,
Joseph Heled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I probably was not clear enough. I think "in the man page" might not
> be enough here. How about some mention of this in the "first time
> setup?"
"in the man-page" should actually be good enough. After all it also
means "on the web-site".
Sven
__
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 12:49:35AM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> Hi Carol.
> [nothing of much interest on this mail for people who are ok with the
> panel]
>
i am happy with the panel. please accept everything i said to mean "you
and your opinion means more than anyone you need to
]> ...I think "in the man page" might not
]> be enough here. How about some mention of this in the "first time
]> setup?"
]"in the man-page" should actually be good enough. After all it also
]means "on the web-site".
Then "man-page" should be conspicuously displayed
on the main menu of the web s
32 matches
Mail list logo
