Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Is it planned to provide documentation for script-fu developers to
help them porting their stuff to 2.4, whether the switch to Tiny-Fu
occurs or not? Will there be some updated docs like
http://www.gimp.org/docs/scheme_plugin/ for beginners?
I don't have any current
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 00:29 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:23:38 +0200, "Michael Schumacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Come to think of it, there's probably no reason why anyone should use a
> > gimp.org address for arbitrary messages to the mailing lists. They a
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 20:50 -0600, Esteban Barahona wrote:
> Is there a mailing list to discuss the interface of the GIMP?
Right here is a good place.
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 21:19 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to add some features as a plug-in. As a starting point I
> simply cloned deinterlace.c renamed everything containing "deinterlace".
> So I have a compilable unit with MAIN() query et al.
>
> I reran autgen.sh on gim
Hi,
Sven Neumann said:
> We can't (and shouldn't) stop her from
expressing her opinion (or however you want to call it), but we should
make sure that her words don't appear as being in any way official. If
this means that we all need to stop using our gimp.org email addresses,
then we should co
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:37:02 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The point here is that Carol is continuously abusing her email address.
I have asked her several times not to use it any longer but she ignored
this request and continues to send mails as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm amazed
Today GIMP for Windows is in the fifth place among the most downloaded
applications from sourceforge.net. So Gimp is a real brand name ;).
That way, gimp.org would become an irrelevant historical artifact. And
one of the most common complaints from our American users (for whom the
GIMP means m
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think it is useful to have project adresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> whatever to know you are dealing with core member of the project.
Do I really know this from the mail address? Especially for a large company
like redhat, mail adresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] don
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:10:01 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to iron out some of the anomolies here and there are several
interpolations using a frig factor I dont understand. I'm probably
missing the point but I get the feeling this has been done impirically
to overcome
On Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 11:29:31, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> Today GIMP for Windows is in the fifth place among the most downloaded
> applications from sourceforge.net.
Add to that that it's the most downloaded non-p2p program on sf.net :)
--
< Jernej Simonèiè ><><><><>< http://dee
I can foresee the next situation with the Gimp 2.4 appearing: a good
deal of people asking, why all their scripts do not work anymore. And
most of that poor users took these scripts from the official
registry.gimp.org. Nobody is guilty, but the users suffer.
If there is a strong intent to re
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:06:19 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can foresee the next situation with the Gimp 2.4 appearing: a good
deal of people asking, why all their scripts do not work anymore. And
most of that poor users took these scripts from the official
reg
Huh? Why don't you use gimptool to build and install the plug-in?
Sven
1/ because Dave's article pointed me to gimptool (as you do) when I tried
to run it , it does not exist:
bash-3.1#gimptool --help
bash: gimptool: command not found
bash-3.1#man gimptool
No manual entry for gimptool
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:12:58PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> bash-3.1#gimptool --help
> bash: gimptool: command not found
> bash-3.1#man gimptool
> No manual entry for gimptool
>
if you are using linux, it is obvious that you have not installed
libgimp-dev from your distribution. well,
Hi all,
I just comitted a change that moves all tool error messages that
can happen when clicking the image to the image window's statusbar,
using the new gimp_statusbar_push_temp() API.
While doing so I noticed they are all bad and inconsistent.
Here is the full list, grouped by reason of the e
From: Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>While doing so I noticed they are all bad and inconsistent.
Here is what I think should happen:
>"No brushes available for use with this tool." (brush core)
>"No patterns available for this operation." (clone)
doesn't matter, these will almo
we were discussing a few changes to this on the irc,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:17:34PM -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
> From: Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >While doing so I noticed they are all bad and inconsistent.
>
> >"Indexed images are not currently supported."(heal)
>
> Hea
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Somewhere I came across a reference to gimptool-2.0 and it fails even to
> --build the std issue plug-ins that are already installed.
The tool is called gimptool-2.0. And no, it can't build the plug-ins
from the source tree beca
18 matches
Mail list logo
