/2011 08:50 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Ubuntu 10.10, GIMP 2.6, image mode is SRGB.
That's about it, really. I import a photo, for example, and
sometimes the Levels work and sometimes they don't. Curves
work, so I use them instead
.
On 07/03/2011 10:04, Frank Gore wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Jeremy Nell jeremyn...@gmail.com wrote:
a bunch of things
Way to not answer any questions, send replies to the list that were
never meant to be seen here, hype up your skills on some
Unless I'm doing something wrong, Colour
Levels only work half the time. In fact, right now, I have a
photo open and Levels do absolutely nothing. And this happens
regularly, but I've not figured out the pattern as to when they
work and don't work.
:
Jeremy Nell jeremyn...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless I'm doing something wrong, Colour Levels only work half the time. In
fact, right now, I have a photo open and Levels do absolutely nothing. And
this happens regularly, but I've not figured out the pattern as to when they
work
I've tested working with outlines both on and
off, and there really isn't much of a difference (other than not
knowing my brush size), and I'm using an i7 quad core.
GIMP is great and I'm getting used to it (after moving from
Windows to Ubuntu and
, 2011 at 03:23:51PM +0200, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Simple comparison: An A4 page, 300DPI, open in both applications.nbsp;
Grab a paint brush and and increase its size considerably.nbsp; Paint
across the canvas and watch how much GIMP lags; the rendering
Not very fast at all. Use a brush with a soft
edge (hardness set quite low) and colour in parts of an A4
canvas. Standard colouring in motion (using a stylus), which GIMP
handles poorly.
On 02/03/2011 19:07, Stefan Maerz wrote:
This
What ways or tips will help speed up GIMP and maximise performance?
Obviously, loads of RAM is a start, I guess. And a decent graphics card
(for rendering), yes?
What other tips or tricks does anyone have?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
If I make a selection (using, say, the Select Tool) and I want to flip
it, for example, vertically, then wouldn't it be logical that I simply
click on Layer Transform etc and it does what I want with the current
selection? Currently, I have to make the selection float before being
able to
Is there a difference between tif and TIF (and even tiff)?
I just saved the same file as both tif and TIF and thought that, if
they were the same format, GIMP would correct the case and see them as
the same file, but this didn't happen (it didn't overwrite the file).
Why is this, and what is
Differing names because of lowercase and
uppercase variation?
Ultimately, it doesn't matter, then?
On 17/02/2011 19:13, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Jeremy Nell jeremyn...@gmail.com wrote
Is there a way to remove some of the save as file formats from the
list (when saving a file as...)? After numerous years in my field,
there are a number of file formats I have - and probably never will -
need to save my files as. If I could remove some of them, then it would
speed up my
it automatically?
El 16/02/11 17:13, Jeremy Nell escribi:
Is there a way to remove some of the "save as" file formats from the
list (when saving a file as...)? After numerous years in my field,
there are a number of file formats I have - and prob
17:23, Jeremy Nell escribió:
Because I usually save as the GIMP format until the end, at which point I
save to flattened TIFF and JPG formats too.
On 16/02/2011 18:19, Mikel Garai wrote:
Why don't you just add the file extension to the filename so gimp detects
it automatically
When I click on Image Scale Image, the window pops up with fields in
which I type in the pixel (or whatever) dimensions. Once I've typed it
in, I move my mouse pointer to save or cancel to apply or cancel the
changes.
Isn't there, perhaps, a way to simply apply those changes by simply
1. I create an artwork and save it as a Gimp file.
2. I later open it and make changes to it, saving along the way.
3. I then realise that I want to revert to the original state when I
opened it.
4. Gimp seems to evert only to the last saved state, rather than the
state when I opened it.
Is
be a standard feature.
On 04/02/2011 16:47, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:41:44 +0200, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Is there a way to revert to the original instance?
If you didn't do more edits than the undo system can handle, you can use
that, but otherwise no. Revert just means discard
Now we're talking.
How possible is it for someone to create a script / plugin that solves
this problem? (Sadly, I know nothing about coding.)
On 04/02/2011 17:26, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
Jeremy Nelljeremyn...@gmail.com writes:
That's unfortunate. Sometimes, it is handy to be able
Fair enough, but that's laborious. Why not simply have a history state
that, with one click, reverts everything to how it was when you opened it?
On 04/02/2011 17:41, phanisvara das wrote:
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:00:00 +0530, Jeremy Nelljeremyn...@gmail.com wrote:
How possible is it for
That reverts to the last saved instance; not the original instance.
On 04/02/2011 23:39, Owen wrote:
1. I create an artwork and save it as a Gimp file.
2. I later open it and make changes to it, saving along the way.
3. I then realise that I want to revert to the original state when I
I currently have 6 gigs of DDR3 RAM in my PC. I increased Gimp's
tile-cache size to 3 gigs, and left number of processors at 8 (as well
as everything else).
On 04/02/2011 00:28, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 15:32 +0200, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Speaking of which, I am using an i7
I've asked this before, with no answers. My aim, as a happy Gimp user,
is not to slate the software, but to improve it. I am not a developer,
but rather a digital artist who uses Gimp extensively.
Working on large canvases, I see that Gimp slows down, where rendering
is concerned. For
wrote:
On 02/02/2011 02:32 PM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Will the next release of Gimp be a bit quicker?
I'm afraid not; the next release of GIMP, GIMP 2.8, will not be quicker
in this regard.
The release after that, GIMP 3.0, will focus on running on GTK 3.0 and
bringing high bit depths into the picture
I second this. In fact, I was about to send an almost identical mail.
On 31/01/2011 20:26, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 14:53 +0200, Jeremy Nell wrote:
I've got the appropriate boxes checked, yet, for some reason, Gimp seems
to remember some of my settings inconsistently
How does one go about requesting this as a feature enhancement?
To include this in Gimp would vastly improve usability in this regard,
as well as making logical (and practical) sense.
On 26/01/2011 12:14, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Except that the opacity slider makes it tougher to see the preview
will spend his/her time by writing a
temporary solution.
Abel
On 1/28/2011 9:58 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
How does one go about requesting this as a feature enhancement?
To include this in Gimp would vastly improve usability in this
regard, as well as making logical (and practical) sense
I apologise for any ignorance, but it the new Gimp release going to
include better font management?
For example, if I type something and rotate it, Gimp automatically
rasterises it. It would be great if this didn't happen.
What, if any, updates to Gimp's font management will be coming?
, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Thanks. That does help, but not completely, because the more you
lessen the opacity, the less of the preview you can see. It still
appears on top of all the layers, rather than in the layer where it
was originally positioned (in this case, at the bottom).
On 21/01/2011 12:20
like opacity, etc.
Peter
On 01/26/2011 10:22 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
The more I work in Gimp, the more I realise that this is something that
needs to be looked at by the developers, as it is not very intuitive.
Again, I've found how the focus of the image being rotated / scaled
interferes
in the stack should
remain in its place, rather than suddenly appear at the top of every
layer when being rotated / scaled.
Surely, this is a reasonable request?
On 26/01/2011 12:06, Ofnuts wrote:
On 01/26/2011 09:22 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
The more I work in Gimp, the more I realise
I've got the appropriate boxes checked, yet, for some reason, Gimp seems
to remember some of my settings inconsistently. For example, my save
dialogues don't remember how I saved files the last time Gimp was
running. Specifically, saving as TIFF. I always select LZW
compression, yet almost
I'm not a developer, so please don't slate me. I'm merely querying.
I have six gigs of DDR3 RAM, an i7, and have allocated Gimp three gigs
of RAM. My understand is that Gimp should run pretty smoothly. And it
does.
Except for when my file sizes increase.
Let's say I'm working on an A3
1. I have an illustration with a few layers (lines and colours).
2. I drag and drop, let's say, an image of a TV onto the illustration.
3. I move the TV's layer down to below all the layers, so that it's at
the bottom and appears partly behind, say, a cabinet.
4. I want to scale and rotate it
wrote:
The rotate tool have an opacity slider for the preview in the tool
options dialog.
El 21/01/11 11:16, Jeremy Nell escribió:
1. I have an illustration with a few layers (lines and colours).
2. I drag and drop, let's say, an image of a TV onto the illustration.
3. I move the TV's layer
What is the reason for the colour picker not being able to pick colours
on layers outside of the currently active layer? Is there a script /
plugin that one could install to enable the picker to act more globally?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
I AM blind. Gimp DOES support colour picking across multiple layers.
Sorry about that.
On 20/01/2011 17:22, Jeremy Nell wrote:
Where is that? I must be going blind...
On 20/01/2011 17:15, Szabolcs Hideg wrote:
Enable sample merged in the tool settings window
No, you can't select multiple layers. I'm suggesting that there should
be a way to do so (and delete them).
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 09:16 +0100, Ofnuts wrote:
On 01/19/2011 07:03 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
If I select multiple layers (by, say, ctrl-clicking), I should have
the option to drag
?
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:10 +0100, Ofnuts wrote:
On 01/19/2011 09:19 AM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
No, you can't select multiple layers. I'm suggesting that there
should be a way to do so (and delete them).
The ability to select multiple layers opens a rather large can of
worms. What
.
There is no way to multiselect so there is no way to delete multi
selected layers.
One could use/abuse other layer toggles by having a script delete all:
Linked or not linked layers,
Visible or non visible layers,
Trans locked or not translocked layers.
-Rob A
On 1/19/11, Jeremy Nell
this idea, officially?
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 14:02 +0100, Tőkés Ábel wrote:
The source code of Gimp is available, you are free to do this whenever
you want.
On 1/19/2011 1:36 PM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
So, are you saying that it isn't possible in Gimp? If so, then
Photoshop wins this round
Been working on Gimp for over a month (after working on Photoshop for a
decade) and can say that Gimp is very underrated. Adobe can learn a lot
from Gimp.
Like picking up the Wacom tablet with ease.
One thing, however, that I find very confusing is how to map the Wacom
buttons and zoom-strip to
.
On 1/19/2011 1:36 PM, Jeremy Nell wrote:
So, are you saying that it isn't possible in Gimp? If so, then
Photoshop wins this round (sadly) because such a feature because is
useful and makes working a bit more streamlined and intuitive.
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 07:27 -0500
Is there a way to merge linked layers in Gimp?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
in the non-visible layer becoming visible (but
only after another layer has been clicked on).
I'm not sure whether or not this is a good or bad thing; I'm
undecided...
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 13:31 -0500,
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
Quoting Jeremy Nell jeremyn...@gmail.com
If I select multiple layers (by, say, ctrl-clicking), I should have the
option to drag all of them into the bin.
Unless I've missed it somewhere, is there is a script enabling the
deletion of multiple layers?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
I am new to Gimp (converted from Photoshop because I migrated to
Ubuntu). Gimp is great and I'm enjoying its speed and power. But I am
struggling with a few things, some of which I'll mail to this list and
hopefully get some feedback.
When scaling an image, Gimp keeps the original image
46 matches
Mail list logo
