Hi,
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 18:48 -0400, carol irvin wrote:
I have one technical question about this list. Do I also need to send
this reply to the list or does replying to anyone send it
automatically to the list?
There's no magic going on. Your answer goes to the recipients that your
mail
On Sunday 30 September 2007 20:06:09 Sven Neumann wrote:
We are listening to our users. That's why we have this mailing-
list and actually read about the problems and needs of our
users.
Round of applause, that sentiment. (-:
Now I need to organise my own life better so I can make space
to
Sven,
I have an idea for something which might be fun to do as a group and
educational as well. Each person (who wanted to participate) would take an
art step phase further using GIMP until we had a completed art work. For
example, let's say you'd start it using a brush. Then maybe I'd go into
* gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-29-07 02:00]:
On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
While the absence of a recognised skill transition route
On Saturday 29 September 2007 07:46:37 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-29-07 02:00]:
On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user
On Saturday 29 September 2007 07:46:37 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-29-07 02:00]:
On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user
On Friday 28 September 2007 04:04:03 gimp_user wrote:
On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
--- gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
* gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-28-07 07:20]:
[...]
It means providing tools for non-destructive editing to enable more
than one individual and organisation to contribute to the creation,
manipulation, selection, cataloguing, distribution and promotion of
images.
Though you object to
-- Forwarded message --
From: carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 28, 2007 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP vs Photoshop UI
To: gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This makes total sense to me. If you work for ad agencies, for example,
everyone will want to be using
the same
On Friday 28 September 2007 06:20:05 gimp_user wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 04:04:03 gimp_user wrote:
On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
--- gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
transition
On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
--- gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
FUD your
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e. no skin
similar
to PS) is a serious obstacle affecting the ability of multiple individuals
to collaborate in a supply chain comprising multiple organisations it is far
On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e. no skin
similar to PS) is a serious obstacle affecting the ability of multiple
individuals to collaborate in a
On Friday 28 September 2007, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e.
no skin similar to PS) is a serious obstacle affecting the
ability of multiple individuals to collaborate in a supply
On Saturday 29 September 2007 01:51:59 carol irvin wrote:
I am switching myself to open source programs whenever I
can to save money. It is no more complex than that.
Hi Carol!
Um, I convert people to OpenOffice who basically don't give a
hoot about the $$$. They adopt it because:
* They
On Friday 28 September 2007 14:12:30 David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e. no skin
similar to PS) is a serious obstacle
--- gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
FUD your conclusion is only valid for yourself and not others so your
On Friday 28 September 2007 01:00:45 George Farris wrote:
If you can provide hard data that backs this up with numbers
Unfortunately, this is the Real World(tm), rejection can be
as simple as it looks too different.
However, I would be interested in hard numbers too.
Cheers; Leon
--- gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
I would disagree with this. I use both PS and GIMP and thanks to PH I
had
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Greg wrote:
--- gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
I would disagree with
Greg wrote:
--- gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
I would disagree with this. I use both PS and GIMP
On 9/27/07, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
I would disagree with this.
22 matches
Mail list logo
