I discover:
this function lacks one parameter
(plug-in-edge 1 inImage theNewlayer 10.0 1)
where parameters are:
run_mode image drawable amount wrapmode edgemode
>From: "" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wr
thanks,but a problem using it:
I execute this script in gimp-2.0.4
with following error
(script-fu-wrap-effect 1 2 10 3 3 FALSE)
ERROR: too few arguments (see errobj)
any idea?
ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾Ìáµ½:
>From: Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To:
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Gimp-use
On Monday 13 September 2004 19:48, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
> > continue to be this:
> >-->Image -->Merge Visible Layers (think about those
> > options that you are presented, depe
IhaveNoName wrote:
(B
(B>would you mail me that script, I can't load that page here. Thank you!
(B>
(B>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-La5=(B:
(B>>From: GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(B>>Reply-To:
(B>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B>>Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP
(B>>
(
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 01:39:09PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 02:22:24PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> > So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance. I've got some
> > digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as
> > being 75dpi x72dpi. I
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:22 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance. I've got
> some digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified
> as being 75dpi x72dpi. I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it
>
happy birthday, Sven, btw. are you old enough to drink alcohol in the
united states legally yet?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 12:48:26AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
> > continue to be this
On Monday 13 September 2004 02:22 pm, Geoffrey wrote:
> So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance. I've got
> some digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified
> as being 75dpi x72dpi. I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it
> possible to convert the 75dpi imag
would you mail me that script, I can't load that page here. Thank you!
ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾Ìáµ½:
>From: GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To:
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: photoshop's "plastic wrap" effect in GIMP
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-09-13 at 1539.56 +0200):
> > but I im
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the most reliable "Copy Visible" for me has always been and will
> continue to be this:
>-->Image -->Merge Visible Layers (think about those options
> that you are presented, depending on what you need from this
> special layer each o
Quoting Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The actual image is going to a professional shop to be placed in an ad.
Thanks for your feedback.
A lot of printers (companies, not cheap piece of hardware on your desk)
read the
DPI information out of the file to know what size to print the file at, so it
is
William Skaggs wrote:
Geoffrey wrote:
So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance. I've got some
digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as
being 75dpi x72dpi. I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible
to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi?? I select
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 02:22:24PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance. I've got some
> digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as
> being 75dpi x72dpi. I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible
> to convert the 75d
hello, this was an interesting list.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 01:02:28PM +0200, cedric wrote:
> May be someone has another feeling, but i've found today strange behaviors.
>
> 1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer aspect.
> Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for
Geoffrey wrote:
> So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance. I've got some
> digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as
> being 75dpi x72dpi. I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible
> to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi?? I selected to scale t
So here's a question which will demonstrate my ignorance. I've got some
digital photos I took that, when opened with GIMP are identified as
being 75dpi x72dpi. I need images that are 300 dpi, so is it possible
to convert the 75dpi image to 300 dpi?? I selected to scale the image
and happened
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-09-13 at 1539.56 +0200):
> but I imagine it would be possible. Perhaps someone could come up with a
> script-fu?
http://wingimp.hp.infoseek.co.jp/files/script/wrap-effect.html
GSR
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
Hi,
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> see attach
> 1.jpg is original
> 2.jpg is filtered
Nice effect. I'm afraid I don't know what plug-ins you need to string together,
but I imagine it would be possible. Perhaps someone could come up with a
script-fu?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
Lyon, France
_
Salut Cedric,
Quoting cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've just compiled 2.1.4 (starting as failed but this is nothing), and
> it seems that many GUI labels are not translating into my precious
> french. Is there any help needed for this, and if yes how to do ?
The procedure for helping out with
Hi,
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> How to achieve it?
What does it look like?
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
Lyon, France
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Hi,
cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just compiled 2.1.4 (starting as failed but this is nothing), and
> it seems that many GUI labels are not translating into my precious
> french. Is there any help needed for this, and if yes how to do ?
As explained in README.i18n, the translations a
Hi,
cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer
>aspect. Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for exemple) the
>copy visible picture is the same as if they were all activated. Is
>there any way to overpass that ?
Well, y
May be someone has another feeling, but i've found today strange behaviors.
1. Copy Visible does not copie visible, but the visible of layer aspect.
Explanation : just deactivate a channel (R for exemple) the copy visible
picture is the same as if they were all activated. Is there any way to
ove
Other things,
I've just compiled 2.1.4 (starting as failed but this is nothing), and
it seems that many GUI labels are not translating into my precious
french. Is there any help needed for this, and if yes how to do ?
Cedric
___
Gimp-user mailing list
How to achieve it?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
25 matches
Mail list logo
