Hi,
craniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You're probably right as other file selectors are the same. It takes about
> 2 seconds before the selector opens. Changing the tile cache size appears
> not to affect this. Not a big issue really, just something I had noticed.
> This might even not be
Sven Neumann wrote:
> I don't think GIMP does anything special before opening the
> file selector. It might be the file selector itself that
> causes the delay. Do you observe similar problems with other
> file selectors (for example when exporting a path or loading
> curves presets)?
You're p
hi Sven,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 07:45:26PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > GSR from this mail list wrote an excellent document on how to set the
> > tile cache size:
> > http://mmmaybe.gimp.org/unix/howtos/tile_cache.html
> >
> > the weird thi
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GSR from this mail list wrote an excellent document on how to set the
> tile cache size:
> http://mmmaybe.gimp.org/unix/howtos/tile_cache.html
>
> the weird thing is, while it was written for linux, it seems to work
> for any computer i have had the
good morning,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:54:19PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Friday 23 January 2004 14:29, Marc Dver wrote:
> > >Can someone recommend ways of speeding up Gimp on a WinXP Pro
> > > machine? I'm using GTK+ 2.0 and the stabl
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:57:56PM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:47:47PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Please ignore Carol's ramblings. She is talking mainly bullshit here.
> > Albeit the fact that she has a gimp.org email address she is not
> > talking on the behalf of th
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I don't think GIMP does anything special before opening the file
> selector. It might be the file selector itself that causes the
> delay. Do you observe similar problems with other file selectors
> (for example when exporting a path o
Hi,
Steve Crane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am not at all unhappy with GIMP's performance (using default settings)
> on Windows XP other than the fact that I have noticed a lag before the
> file chooser opens when using File|Save As. I am a developer myself and
> work on Windows, so I have G
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:47:47PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Please ignore Carol's ramblings. She is talking mainly bullshit here.
> Albeit the fact that she has a gimp.org email address she is not
> talking on the behalf of the GIMP developers. At least when she's in
> this particular mood.
Th
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> TheGIMP -- being built on linux and the defaults set for the excellent
> way that linux handles all the different little memory devises that
> these computers have -- might need for you to consider your resources
> while setting TheGIMP up. More
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 12:04:37AM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:16:13PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> > if you are working on a reasonable size image, i think that TheGIMP will
> > render the effect quicker doing things its way with reasonably the same
> > number of keystro
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:16:13PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> if you are working on a reasonable size image, i think that TheGIMP will
> render the effect quicker doing things its way with reasonably the same
> number of keystrokes as photoshop.
Some performance issues seem not to have anything
hi Marc,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:29:52PM -0500, Marc Dver wrote:
> Can someone recommend ways of speeding up Gimp on a WinXP Pro machine?
> I'm using GTK+ 2.0 and the stable version of Gimp (the development
> version won't install on my machine because it has a AMD K6-2 450
> processor). Whe
13 matches
Mail list logo
