On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:08:08AM +, Kent Tong wrote:
Carol Spears carol at gimp.org writes:
-- Compare to PhotoShop, managing the layers is not that easy. You can
define
layers to groups in Photoshop. You can even target an action to a group.
No
group idea in GIMP.
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 09:38 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:28:48AM +, Kent Tong wrote:
Thanks for all who have replied. Yes, the Chinese problem is bogus. It works
as long as the LANG env variable is set.
it is interesting that the one time i saw anyone use this
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 21:59 -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
j Mak wrote:
Using them you
can experiment with various settings without changing
the set up of your layer structure. In addition, you
can edit your artwork, even months or years after
finishing it, simply by altering the Adjustment
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 21:59 -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
If I add a drop shadow to something in Gimp, the drop shadow is in a layer an
I
show or hide. How is that different from the Adjustment layer you
describe?
I'm sure it is but I don't know how it differs. :)
The drop shadow, I
: Thursday, May 05, 2005 4:43 AM
To: gimp user
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Disadvantage of GIMP when compared to
Photoshop
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 21:59 -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
If I add a drop shadow to something in Gimp, the drop shadow is in a layer an
I
show or hide. How
Gezim Hoxha wrote:
The drop shadow, I think, was just an example. What if, instead, I
wanted to make a bevel depth of a button deeper? The layers wouldn't
help me out, would they? In photoshop however, all I'd have to do is
drag a slider!
Gotcha. :)
Peace...
Tom
On Thursday 05 May 2005 06.16, j Mak wrote:
--- Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:28:48AM +, Kent Tong
wrote:
Thanks for all who have replied. Yes, the Chinese
problem is bogus. It works
as long as the LANG env variable is set.
it is
Thats one of the problems here:
Gimp which is fairly young is compared to an OLDtimer as Photoshop who's been
around for ages!
Of course graphic artists use photoshop. Its was the only thing available a
few years back with any kind of usefullness.
Its the same situation as with GNU/Linux
In a nutshell, adjustment layers or layer effects are
not real layers but something like virtual layers.
When you modify an art object using, say an adjustment
layer the original artwork remain intact at all time.
The adjustments layer doesn't alter the artwork, only
simulates the changes. Better,
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:26:22PM +0800, Joe Ngo wrote:
Comparing TheGIMP with Photoshop is natural, we are looking at the
best of open-source vs the best of closed-source (some might suggest
PSP or otherwise). People do this all the time. How is this bad? This
gives the developers more
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:28:48AM +, Kent Tong wrote:
Thanks for all who have replied. Yes, the Chinese problem is bogus. It works
as long as the LANG env variable is set.
it is interesting that the one time i saw anyone use this photoshop
layers effect stuff, i was able to get TheGIMP to
--- Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:28:48AM +, Kent Tong
wrote:
Thanks for all who have replied. Yes, the Chinese
problem is bogus. It works
as long as the LANG env variable is set.
it is interesting that the one time i saw anyone use
this
j Mak wrote:
Using them you
can experiment with various settings without changing
the set up of your layer structure. In addition, you
can edit your artwork, even months or years after
finishing it, simply by altering the Adjustment layer
or changing the layer effects parameters. For
instance, if
13 matches
Mail list logo
