On 01/21/2013 05:19 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:57:56 +0100
Von: Ofnuts
An: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
As GIMP
On 01/22/2013 11:19 AM, Donald Miller wrote:
> Hello Experts
>
> Because I started this thread, I should comment.
>
> I once spent a year of intense image editing in photoshop. Now I
> only occasionally use PS or GIMP, so esoteric capabilities
> are far less important than ease of getting back in
On 01/22/13 07:59, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
>> Floats "belong to" whatever layer or mask was current when the clipboard
>> content was pasted in.
>> You can only do two things with a float: Make it a new layer by
>> using the 'add layer' command, or use the 'anchor' command to merge
>> it down in
Hello Experts
Because I started this thread, I should comment.
I once spent a year of intense image editing in photoshop. Now I
only occasionally use PS or GIMP, so esoteric capabilities
are far less important than ease of getting back into harness.
Simply combining image snippets is now easier i
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 20:21 -0500, Steve Kinney wrote:
[...]
> You can only do two things with a float: Make it a new layer by
> using the 'add layer' command, or use the 'anchor' command to merge
> it down into whatever layer or mask was already selected when the
> float was pasted into the imag
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:21:43 -0500
> From: ad...@pilobilus.net
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
>
>
> Floats "belong to" whatever layer or mask was current when the clipboard
> content was
On 01/21/2013 06:54 PM, bgw wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 03:10 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
[...]
>> I can -- perhaps not changing the actual functionality but the
>> manner in which it is displayed in the layer list. For example,
>> say my layer stack is:
>>
>> - C
>> - B
>> - A
>>
>> Say I make/floa
On 01/21/2013 03:10 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:06:41 -0500
> From: ad...@pilobilus.net
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
>
> Right now I can't think of a way to improve on the exi
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:06:41 -0500
> From: ad...@pilobilus.net
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
>
> Right now I can't think of a way to improve on the existing
> "floating layer" workflow.
&
On 01/21/2013 11:06 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
On 01/21/2013 03:57 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in
GIMP and they really are something that needs to be killed off
with fire because of how big a stumb
On 01/21/2013 03:57 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
>>
>> As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in
>> GIMP and they really are something that needs to be killed off
>> with fire because of how big a stumbling block they are to new users.
the whole truth.
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:17:14 +0100
> From: schum...@gmx.de
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
>
> > Von: Richard Gitschlag
>
> > Sometimes I really miss the fact that GIMP has no &q
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> > Von: Richard Gitschlag
>
> > Sometimes I really miss the fact that GIMP has no "paste in place"
> command
> > like Inkscape does. Feature request?
>
> You should add a description of how this works in Inkscape, and how you
> expect
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:57:56 +0100
> Von: Ofnuts
> An: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
> On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
> >
> > As GIMP concepts g
> Von: Richard Gitschlag
> Sometimes I really miss the fact that GIMP has no "paste in place" command
> like Inkscape does. Feature request?
You should add a description of how this works in Inkscape, and how you expect
this to be handled in GIMP - e.g. what is the "place" if you paste to an i
On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in GIMP
and they really are something that needs to be killed off with fire
because of how big a stumbling block they are to new users.
*applauds*
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:41:15 -0800
> From: w...@ieee.org
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
>
> On 01/20/2013 04:30 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
> > Now, if you know in advance you are going to be m
On 01/20/2013 04:30 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
Now, if you know in advance you are going to be making a new layer out of what
you're pasting, you can save yourself time and headaches by selecting "Paste
As > New Layer" from the Edit menu, instead of the normal Paste.
Although if you do that, b
Hello Steve
Thanks much.
Regards,
Don Miller damill...@gmail.com
==
Sunday, January 20, 2013, 6:39:36 PM, you wrote:
> On 01/20/2013 03:21 PM, Donald Miller wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Seems that manual setup is same HTML as on web.
>> Is there a searchable doc
On 01/20/2013 03:21 PM, Donald Miller wrote:
> Hello
>
> Seems that manual setup is same HTML as on web.
> Is there a searchable doc in a Windows format?
Quick and dirty solution: Use google. Add this to the end of your
search terms when looking for GIMP help files:
site:http://docs.gimp.org/2
Title: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
Hello Richard
Thanks for a very thorough answer. I hope your "kill off" happens.
Also that the manual is made to include your explanation.
In my frustration, I re-installed photoshop CS2, which now is easier.
And now gimp
umbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 14:17:01 -0700
> From: damill...@gmail.com
> To: schum...@gmx.de; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
>
> Hello
>
> I started wi
Hello
I started with new file, created a new layer and pasted one half image,
repeated with other half image. Still can't get from one layer to another.
Layer> Stack > Reverse Layer Order
puts white over the subimages; repeat restores the color.
I un-/re-installed gimp, no difference.
Last week,
Hello
Seems that manual setup is same HTML as on web.
Is there a searchable doc in a Windows format?
Regards,
Don Miller damill...@gmail.com
==
Sunday, January 20, 2013, 1:18:07 PM, you wrote:
> Hello
> Update, I found and ran gimp-help-2-2.8.0-en-setup.ex
Hello
Update, I found and ran gimp-help-2-2.8.0-en-setup.exe
but gimp HELP still only connects to web version.
Regards,
Don Miller damill...@gmail.com
==
Sunday, January 20, 2013, 1:08:16 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Michael
> I meant new problem with method I p
Hello Michael
I meant new problem with method I previously used.
So how do I regain control of my image layers?
Copy & paste is something I did a lot before
abandoning photoshop CS2 for misbehavior.
On-line manual in HTML is not as friendly to searching
as would a PDF or ebook version (which I
> Von: Donald Miller
> I resized two images, made a new page canvas, copied and pasted both,
> opened grid. I can only move one image, can't toggle to other. Layer
> stack commands are all grayed out, except "reverse layer order" which
> does nothing. Pg-up/dn keys do nothing. "Align" does nothin
Hello Gimp-user-list
I resized two images, made a new page canvas, copied and pasted both,
opened grid. I can only move one image, can't toggle to other. Layer
stack commands are all grayed out, except "reverse layer order" which
does nothing. Pg-up/dn keys do nothing. "Align" does nothing.
Regar
28 matches
Mail list logo