On 01/21/2013 07:26 PM, Greg Chapman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21 Jan 13 23:49 RogueRanger said:
>> I have an option by right clicking on my selection and choosing
>> 'feather'...Does anyone know how to achieve the same result with
>> Gimp?
>
> Make your selection, right-click anywhwere on the image,
thank you both. I thought it would be similar and I did try that. But the lasso
arc was still active and I wasn't able to end it. What am I doing wrong?
--
RogueRanger (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.o
On 01/21/2013 03:49 PM, RogueRanger wrote:
When I make these, taking stock photographs and using the lasso selection tool
in CS4, I have an option by right clicking on my selection and choosing
'feather' which softens the edges of the selection and makes it look less like a
simple cut out. Does a
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:34:45 +0530, phani wrote:
i've got a strange problem: when zooming images in the GIMP (2.8.2,
installed from archlinux [extra]), viewing them larger than the size
they are being automatically zoomed to by default, they break up into
unconnected, rectangular tiles.
On 01/21/2013 06:54 PM, bgw wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 03:10 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
[...]
>> I can -- perhaps not changing the actual functionality but the
>> manner in which it is displayed in the layer list. For example,
>> say my layer stack is:
>>
>> - C
>> - B
>> - A
>>
>> Say I make/floa
Hi,
On 21 Jan 13 23:49 RogueRanger said:
> I have an option by right clicking on my selection and choosing
> 'feather'...Does anyone know how to achieve the same result with
> Gimp?
Make your selection, right-click anywhwere on the image, choose
"Select" then "Feather", choose the feathering op
On 01/21/2013 03:49 PM, RogueRanger wrote:
When I make these, taking stock photographs and using the lasso selection tool
in CS4, I have an option by right clicking on my selection and choosing
'feather' which softens the edges of the selection and makes it look less like a
simple cut out. Does a
On 01/21/2013 03:10 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:06:41 -0500
> From: ad...@pilobilus.net
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
>
> Right now I can't think of a way to improve on the existing
> "floating layer" wo
Hi everyone.
I have just uploaded Gimp2 onto my computer after having a massive crash a few
weeks ago. I had Photoshop CS4 on it previously, but I no longer have a useable
software disk for it and in all honesty I cannot justify the cost of getting it
again for what I do. So my question for now w
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:06:41 -0500
> From: ad...@pilobilus.net
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
>
> Right now I can't think of a way to improve on the existing
> "floating layer" workflow.
>
I can -- perhaps not changing the act
On 01/21/2013 11:06 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
On 01/21/2013 03:57 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in
GIMP and they really are something that needs to be killed off
with fire because of how big a stumb
Hey folks,
I put it off for a while but I'm finally using GIMP 2.8. So far so
good, but here's a question for the group: Is it just me, or has
the brush editor's behavior changed radically?
In 2.6, I kept the brush editor open in a dock and used it to tweak
the current brush on demand. That, p
On 01/21/2013 03:57 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
>>
>> As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in
>> GIMP and they really are something that needs to be killed off
>> with fire because of how big a stumbling block they are to new users.
In a nutshell, when the selection is copied it includes the (x,y) offset from
the upper-left corner of the image canvas, and it utilizes this offset when
pasting back into the image. Image zoom is irrelevant and so is canvas size
(mostly).
For now, the quickest workaround we have to paste at a
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> > Von: Richard Gitschlag
>
> > Sometimes I really miss the fact that GIMP has no "paste in place"
> command
> > like Inkscape does. Feature request?
>
> You should add a description of how this works in Inkscape, and how you
> expect
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:57:56 +0100
> Von: Ofnuts
> An: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] layers, new problem with old methods
> On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
> >
> > As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have alwa
> Von: Richard Gitschlag
> Sometimes I really miss the fact that GIMP has no "paste in place" command
> like Inkscape does. Feature request?
You should add a description of how this works in Inkscape, and how you expect
this to be handled in GIMP - e.g. what is the "place" if you paste to an i
On 01/21/2013 01:30 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
As GIMP concepts go, floating selections have always existed in GIMP
and they really are something that needs to be killed off with fire
because of how big a stumbling block they are to new users.
*applauds*
i've got a strange problem: when zooming images in the GIMP (2.8.2,
installed from archlinux [extra]), viewing them larger than the size they
are being automatically zoomed to by default, they break up into
unconnected, rectangular tiles.
moving (panning) them around with the mouse so that
19 matches
Mail list logo