?
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
?
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
e desktops aren't expanded by default.
I find this shell extension helpful:
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/503/always-zoom-workspaces/
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gi
keep layers. This is why the new 2.8 version of Gimp
doesn't consider files saved as jpegs to be actually saved.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome
eystrokes in the menu,
> > their original function should be disabled.
> Maybe :)
Wouldn't it make most sense to unify the two, so that the menu selectors are
configurable in the normal key shortcut dialog?
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mat
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:32:04AM -0800, Loi Duong wrote:
> If I were to use GIMP in a business, do I have to pay any licensing fees?
Absolutely not. Gimp is open source software, and there are no restrictions
on use.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://matt
ce code for any changes you make).
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
ial
treatment. Instead, it's that with most Linux distributions, it's *built
in*.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
; binaries, Ubuntu users (particularly 11.10) do not. Why?
Because that's the version of Gimp that's tested and built with that
version of the operating system. If you want a newer version of Gimp, use a
newer Ubuntu or a faster-moving Linux.
Or, if you're feeling adventurous, you
91/1943
as fairly as possible. (If there's anything missing or which should be
corrected, let me know.) This is aimed squarely at photography, though;
graphic design or image creation and related features aren't considered.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org
t a sample photo somewhere?
(Also, what's the fedora bug #?)
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
sizes varying between about 5 and 50 pixels, with relatively high precision.
The new dialog devotes the left 5% of the slider to this range. I know there
was some talk about changing this slider to be logarithmic. Is there any
progress on that?
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org
screen. (Better if
I don't maximize the window, but that's silly.) The best approach I've found
is to use a brush with a native size of around 5, and then aways start by
hitting the reset size button and adjusting up from there using the
fine-tuning. That's pretty silly but is l
RAW, and Gimp doesn't handle RAW files. There is a
UFRaw plugin for gimp (as just discussed on the gimp-developer list), but
you may be better served by a dedicated RAW converter such as RawTherapee,
DarkTable, or LightZone.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <
onversion are generally lossless operations; you can go back and do
them differently with no destruction of data. If you start from a file
converted in a certain way, you've already lost a lot of flexibility.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@m
> original
> raw data and never modifies it. You don't need to do anything with the ufraw
Let me clarify: it's a downside of doing a simple RAW conversion without
"too many options" and taking the result into Gimp to do the bulk of the
work.
--
Matthew Miller
hat anymore, but here's how to
remap keys in a supported way which will get you want you want
?
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
htt
ze that what you're asking isn't like the broken spacebar
comic. You have options a and b now, and we're thinking about some even
better approaches in the future."
That's not a sign of weakness.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/&
ery much want it to do. And Overwrite
is pretty close, but it doesn't mark images as clean, so I get confused
about what I've saved already. I can live with those things, but I hate to
have to explain them to other people.
So, sure. I'd also like to hear more about th
early.
That doesn't appear to have been the case here. I brought this up during the
2.7.x development series, and was told that it had already been decided.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gin, but you may
be better served by a dedicated RAW converter such as RawTherapee,
DarkTable, or LightZone. (These are all free and open source.)
If you need to do touch-up work after raw conversion, you can export a TIFF
file and import that into Gimp.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm
un the
program for any purpose.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
this is still not an exception to commercial use.
--
Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
ine, or at the bottom after
trimming the message to leave only the part you are specifically replying to.
Don't cut out too much context, but don't force people to scroll through the
entire previous conversation. I have (and/or the online archives have) the
previous messages if I need to ref
24 matches
Mail list logo
