-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Evening GIMPers,
Gimp is going to COMDEX. I just found out that I would be able to go
tonight. Now I am kinda panicing about the kind of things I should
present. Here are some quick ideas, before I go to sleep. If anyone
has anything in particular
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 08:13, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> cl0kd already sent me a screenshot of gimp 1.3.x running on macos 10.3!
One of the cool thing about The GIMP is that it is cross-platform. The
exact same source code can be built on a variety of platforms. I often
meet people who think The GIMP i
Hi,
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 08:13, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> > cl0kd already sent me a screenshot of gimp 1.3.x running on macos 10.3!
>
> One of the cool thing about The GIMP is that it is cross-platform. The
> exact same source code can be built on a variety of platform
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Rogers wrote:
> Gimp demos. Show off some of our killer features. Any ideas as to what
> these might be? (layers, brushes, plugins, script-fu)
He might not forgive me for this, but here's jimmac's list of
user visible changes in 2.0 when compared to 1.2:
http://jimmac.musicha
Dynamic keys assignment.
Don't forget to show that extensively. IMHO, it is THE feature that
allows for a fast work flow in The GIMP.
Paths..the new paths drawing and lib-art stroking is great too, as is
the fact that they save to .svg.
Regards,
JS
-><-
___
I'm trying to take a photo and have it gradually pixelate from small boxes
to big boxes. Can't figure it out except for doing it manually (ugh).
Any ideas? Thanks for reading!
Eric Pierce
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.b
On Thursday 13 November 2003 1:04 pm, Eric Pierce wrote:
> I'm trying to take a photo and have it gradually pixelate from
> small boxes to big boxes. Can't figure it out except for doing it
> manually (ugh).
>
> Any ideas? Thanks for reading!
> Eric Pierce
>
->filter->filter all layers,
apply v
Hi,
"Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dynamic keys assignment.
>
> Don't forget to show that extensively. IMHO, it is THE feature that
> allows for a fast work flow in The GIMP.
That's not even a GIMP feature but implemented on the GTK+ level
(except some parts like saving the ch
Hi...
On Thursday 13 November 2003 2:15 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
> "Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dynamic keys assignment.
> >
> > Don't forget to show that extensively. IMHO, it is THE feature
> > that allows for a fast work flow in The GIMP.
>
> That's not even a GIMP feature
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know if there is a way to 'batch resize'? - I have about
1000 images that all need to be 20% of the original size...
Many thanks!
--
Nick W
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/lis
Hi,
"Joao S. O. Bueno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> there was enough noise here (on gimp-devel, at least) when it was
> disabled by default.
we didn't disable it. The GTK+ developer decided that the feature is
more harmful than useful and I tend to agree. You outlined the major
drawback yourse
Nick Wilson wrote:
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know if there is a way to 'batch resize'? - I have about
1000 images that all need to be 20% of the original size...
Many thanks!
In ksh and I think it works in bash too:
for fn in $(
convert -resize 20% $fn 20-${fn}
done
listoffiles is a file
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 15:00, Nick Wilson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Does anyone know if there is a way to 'batch resize'? - I have about
> 1000 images that all need to be 20% of the original size...
>
> Many thanks!
man ImageMagick
man convert
man mogrify
etc.
ImageMagick is your friend for th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-11-13 at 1715.33 +0100):
> That's not even a GIMP feature but implemented on the GTK+ level
> (except some parts like saving the changed keybindings across
> sessions). Apart from that it's a lousy hack, it's disabled by
> default, very unintuitive and should be replaced by
Hi,
Nick Wilson wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a way to 'batch resize'? - I have about
> 1000 images that all need to be 20% of the original size...
for i in ; do
convert -scale 20% $i small_$i
done
(in other words, I'd use ImageMagick).
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary,
Lyo
JB,
Hmm... that didn't seem to work. Maybe I screwed something up. Was that
supposed to gradually pixelate each layer more than the next? I'm using
Gimp-win (I'm at work). Each layer was equally pixelized the same amount.
Anyway, I'm not working on several layers. Just one layer - a photo of
HI there.
My "filter all layers" on GIMP 1.2.5 here has two action buttons at
the bottom "apply constant" and "apply varying". You are describing
the effects of Apply Constant. Wit apply varying it pops up the
window of the desired filter (pixelate, in this case), perform it on
the bottom la
Hi,
GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-11-13 at 1715.33 +0100):
> > That's not even a GIMP feature but implemented on the GTK+ level
> > (except some parts like saving the changed keybindings across
> > sessions). Apart from that it's a lousy hack, it's disabled by
> >
Hi,
David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> He might not forgive me for this, but here's jimmac's list of
> user visible changes in 2.0 when compared to 1.2:
> http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/private/gimp-2/html/index.xhtml
That's a nice draft (not sure though if Jimmac will be happy about
se
19 matches
Mail list logo
