Dear All,
I have just uploaded to the Gimp plug-in repository a plug-in that enables
you to modify the color temperature of a photo. I can be used to correct
the bluish cast in overcast photos, or even (to some extent) the red cast in
photos taken under incandescent light with the camera set to
I think the danger in a simplification is this: there are many users that
are "advanced" in the sense that they are advanced in their processing of
photos or graphical arts, but that are not "advanced" in the sense of
computer users. If you hide things in the module manager, they may never be
abl
g-in seems to work! I have only one problem with it now - it
doesn't define a place to be put in the register procedure.
I added /Script-Fu/Enhance/ before the Convert Color Temperature
and could find it :). I use GIMP 2.3.12 on Windows.
Luca de Alfaro wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I hav
ander Rabtchevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ok, it appears exactly where you said. I simply wasn't able to find it
there.
Luca de Alfaro wrote:
> This is strange - I defined it so that it goes under "Tools/Color Tools"
> for version 1.2 (It used to be Layer/Colors). That&
Hi,
I took Sven's advice, and moved the plug-in to Filters/Colors/Convert Color
Temperature.
Indeed Sven is right, that is a more logical place, and since the new model
going forward is to
have plugins register to the appropriate area, rather than "script-fu", I
went ahead with that.
BTW, I like
Ok, I made two plugins (available from the repository):
- colortemp: converts the color temperature of an image. You can specify
the source temperature in K, or as the temperatue at which a black-body
color best matches the selected foreground color.
- whitebalance: converts the foreground colo
very good paradigm. As a
user, I am much more likely to tinker with simple, self-contained scheme
scripts, than with .c stuff that needs a whole build environment to compile.
Luca
On 12/13/06, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:02 -0800, Luca de A
I often open photos to do color balancing, etc, and I am annoyed that Gimp
selects, as the first tool, something as dangerous as a brush. An errant
click of the mouse, and splat! - a black dot on my photo. Sure, I can undo
it - *if* I realize that I did it (with many windows open, an errant clic
Not as a script. It does not depend on the script, but on how Gimp calls
the script. Unfortunately, the script is called only when you press OK, and
not when you modify a control.
It's a pity, and I wonder if scripts could be called differently - at each
change of some control - in some future v
For a class, I don't know, but for serious photo work, Photoshop is
incredibly more advanced.
Some exampes:
Color:
- support for more than 8 bits/color/pixel (my scanners have 16)
- support for color profiles (.icc profiles - how are you going to
profile a printer otherwise?)
- support for color s
I, for one, don't believe that open source projects should necessarily
avoid slang words. "Gimp" is a relatively obscure slang word. Let me
define this: most English speakers speak English as a second language,
and i bet 99% of them are not familiar with the unofficial uses of the
word "Gimp". F
I wholeheartedly agree.
It is an absurdity that some print drivers ship with separate .icc profiles.
I am not quite sure why the situation evolved, but I suspect that
professional users started to wish to have a way to calibrate their
output for their specific printer (even now, people who care ab
Trapper wrote:
> 5. The Gimp's GUI, unfortunately, is in direct opposition to human logic
> and our normal thought patterns. I have no other way to describe it. I
> know of no one under any OS that emulates The Gimp's GUI strategy.
> There's probably good reason for that.
I don't find Gimp to be
Correct. However, there is no reason why these .icc profiles should
go in photoshop rather than in the printer driver. Especially as I
have anyway to tell my printer driver (I am not sure why) which kind
of paper I am using.
Luca
On 12/21/06, Bob Ewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should be
For several days, the Gimp plugin registry has been refusing all log-ins.
If asked for a password reminder, it sends back the correct password
(unencrypted!), but then it does not let log in.
The problem is, of course, that people cannot upload new plug-ins, nor
update the information for existing
15 matches
Mail list logo
