On Thursday 11 January 2007 13:46, Steve Thompson wrote:
> I guess that about says it all, right? We listen to our users, but
> adjustment layers is a pointless discussion.
You're not listening.
It's pointless because adjustment layer support is already in the roadmap.
Need heard. Need underst
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 13:46 -0700, Steve Thompson wrote:
> I guess that about says it all, right? We listen to our users, but
> adjustment layers is a pointless discussion.
I think we have made it very clear, several times even, that adjustment
layers are very hight up on our priority list.
Simon Budig wrote:
> Steve Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I guess that about says it all, right? We listen to our users, but
>> adjustment layers is a pointless discussion.
>
> I really sometimes get the impression that my mails simply get ignored.
> Why is that? Are they too reasonable?
Steve Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I guess that about says it all, right? We listen to our users, but
> adjustment layers is a pointless discussion.
I really sometimes get the impression that my mails simply get ignored.
Why is that? Are they too reasonable? Not flame-provoking enough?
Sven -
On 1/11/07, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> your mail clearly shows that you worked too long in corporate
> programming environments in order to understand how free software
> development works.
Well, you got me there. Having only worked on about a half dozen open
source project
Steve,
your mail clearly shows that you worked too long in corporate
programming environments in order to understand how free software
development works. But rest assured that we have a roadmap (guess what
we are doing on our annual developer meetings) and that we care about
our users. Now instead
On 1/11/07, jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> > Adjustment layers have to be in a future implementation of Gimp if we
> > expect the tool to remain in any way competitive.
> Okay, Steve. Your reality check just bounced. Maybe you're unclear on
> the word "volunteer" and h
Steve Thompson wrote:
> Adjustment layers have to be in a future implementation of Gimp if we
> expect the tool to remain in any way competitive.
Okay, Steve. Your reality check just bounced. Maybe you're unclear on
the word "volunteer" and how most FOSS works. It's generally just a
bunch of pe
Steve Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Still, I am passionate about the Gimp, and its raw potential leaves me
> optimistic enough to think that with enough people requesting
> features, someone might decide to make them priorities.
Please also consider, that the GIMP project is not as big as
On 1/10/07, Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Adjustment layers have to be in a future implementation of Gimp if we
> > expect the tool to remain in any way competitive. Both Krita and
>
> You must be new. The devs running this list do not care about moving the
> Gimp forward to compete or ab
Geoffrey -
On 1/9/07, lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven Woody wrote:
> > thanks for all the information, but i still expect the adjustment
> > layer to be available in the future releases. anyway, adjustment layer
> > is not wholly in function equal to duplicate a layer.
>
> So, if you 'ex
Steven Woody wrote:
> On 1/9/07, Shawn Willden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Monday 08 January 2007 23:10, Steven Woody wrote:
>>> in Photoshop, there is a tool 'adjustment layer', what's the
>>> equivalent in Gimp? thanks.
>> GIMP doesn't have any equivalent. I believe it's in the plan for fut
On 1/9/07, Shawn Willden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 08 January 2007 23:10, Steven Woody wrote:
> > in Photoshop, there is a tool 'adjustment layer', what's the
> > equivalent in Gimp? thanks.
>
> GIMP doesn't have any equivalent. I believe it's in the plan for future
> releases. I kno
On Monday 08 January 2007 23:10, Steven Woody wrote:
> in Photoshop, there is a tool 'adjustment layer', what's the
> equivalent in Gimp? thanks.
GIMP doesn't have any equivalent. I believe it's in the plan for future
releases. I know the new graphics engine will make adjustment layers very
si
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 14:10 +0800, Steven Woody wrote:
> in Photoshop, there is a tool 'adjustment layer', what's the
> equivalent in Gimp? thanks.
Hi.
There isn't an interface to have non-destructive adjustment layers as
found in Photoshop.
You can work around this in many situations however. I
in Photoshop, there is a tool 'adjustment layer', what's the
equivalent in Gimp? thanks.
--
woody
then sun rose thinly from the sea and the old man could see the other
boats, low on the water and well in toward the shore, spread out
across the current.
__
16 matches
Mail list logo
