On 13 Jan 2004, Sven == Sven Neumann wrote:
Sven Is there a particular reason you are running such an outdated version?
I see this statement a lot - i.e. users using really old versions of Gimp.
Would it be reasonable/feasible to add a hook into gimp that checks it's age
and gives a
On 13 Jan 2004, Sven == Sven Neumann wrote:
Sven Is there a particular reason you are running such an outdated
version?
I see this statement a lot - i.e. users using really old versions of Gimp.
Would it be reasonable/feasible to add a hook into gimp that checks it's
age and gives
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 11:53, Timothy E. Jedlicka - wrk wrote:
On 13 Jan 2004, Sven == Sven Neumann wrote:
Sven Is there a particular reason you are running such an outdated version?
I see this statement a lot - i.e. users using really old versions of Gimp.
Would it be
misfit-x wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 11:53, Timothy E. Jedlicka - wrk wrote:
On 13 Jan 2004, Sven == Sven Neumann wrote:
Sven Is there a particular reason you are running such an outdated version?
I see this statement a lot - i.e. users using really old versions of Gimp.
Would it be
Bill Lee wrote:
Right on! I just moved to FC1 and 1.2.5 is what's there.
SuSE 9.0 Pro, 1.2.5 as well.
--
Until later, Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Building secure systems inspite of Microsoft
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
misfit-x [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would it possibly be that at gimp.org the latest stable version is
1.2.5 and that is what might be included in most distros (not sure
what distros all include, but my RH9 I got was 1.2.something)? And
maybe other folks would not want to risk using an
Hi,
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here I would modfiy that because I use the gimp for all my image
printing, so the 2.0 release needs to be able to link up with the
newer gimp-print too. So far, that hasn't happened. I assume it will
by the time gimp-print is out in 5.0 final,
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 15:26, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here I would modfiy that because I use the gimp for all my image
printing, so the 2.0 release needs to be able to link up with the
newer gimp-print too. So far, that hasn't happened. I assume it
Hi,
Gene Heskett wrote:
Support for the newer gimp-print API will be added. If it doesn't
make it into 2.0.0, there's nothing that keeps it from being done
for the 2.0.1 release.
Chuckle, that old adage about never downloading version x.0.0 of
anything comes to mind. :)
The only reason
Sorry to quote Sven out of context, this was regarding a user on 1.2.2 - two
years out of date. My point was that I've noticed several
notes from users on really old versions - 1. is this a problem? 2. is it worth
fixing?
I assume anyone using developer versions knows to check for recent
Hi,
Timothy E. Jedlicka - wrk wrote:
Sorry to quote Sven out of context, this was regarding a user on 1.2.2 - two
years out of date. My point was that I've noticed several
notes from users on really old versions - 1. is this a problem? 2. is it worth
fixing?
Not really a problem. If he
11 matches
Mail list logo
