From: Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Holiday fantasies
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:53:10 +0100
Jozsef Mak wrote:
My idea was not to get rid of that space but to populate it with useful
information, which are presently sca
Jozsef Mak wrote:
My idea was not to get rid of that space but to populate it with useful
information, which are presently scattered in the various transformation
windows (degree of rotation, width, height and so on). If that
information would be in plain view at all times, transforming objects
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jozsef Mak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Holiday fantasies
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 19:56:27 +0100
Hi,
"Jozsef Mak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One of the
Hi,
"Jozsef Mak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One of the things I was talking about in my previous email will be
> clearer if you look at this screenshot I made of Gimp.
>
> http://jozmak.heydo.com/wallpapers/screensavers.htm
>
> Look at all the wasted space underneath the tool icons.
I suggest
Hi,
One of the things I was talking about in my previous email will be clearer
if you look at this screenshot I made of Gimp.
http://jozmak.heydo.com/wallpapers/screensavers.htm
Look at all the wasted space underneath the tool icons. That area offers
itself for all kinds of useful option dialog
s/KAM
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Neary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kevin Myers"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Holiday fantasies
>
> Hi Kevin
Hi Kevin,
Selon Kevin Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I *completely* disagree with Jozsef regarding elimination of the
> transformation dialogues that allow numeric input. While these dialog boxes
> may not be very useful in Jozsef's workflow, they are *extremely* useful in
> mine, where graphics o
From: Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Holiday fantasies
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 22:33:01 +0100
Jozsef Mak wrote:
Now that Gimp 2.2 is out, we can start fantasizing about the changes we
would like to see in the next r
From: Andreas Waechter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jozsef Mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Holiday fantasies
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:11:15 +0100
To begin with, I would do away with all transformation dialog boxes
(scale, shear, rotation and so on). This is because most
Kevin Myers wrote:
I *completely* disagree with Jozsef regarding elimination of the
transformation dialogues that allow numeric input. While these dialog boxes
may not be very useful in Jozsef's workflow, they are *extremely* useful in
mine, where graphics objects and images must be sized to exact
Jozsef Mak wrote:
Now that Gimp 2.2 is out, we can start fantasizing about the changes we
would like to see in the next release.
These are my fantasies.
To begin with, I would do away with all transformation dialog boxes
(scale, shear, rotation and so on).
Already planned, iirc.
Next, I would s
"Jozsef Mak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in part:
> To begin with, I would do away with all transformation dialog boxes
(scale,
> shear, rotation and so on). This is because most of the time, the data
> displayed in these dialog boxes I have little use. Most of the time I
> transform objects intera
Now that Gimp 2.2 is out, we can start fantasizing about the changes we
would like to see in the next release.
These are my fantasies.
To begin with, I would do away with all transformation dialog boxes (scale,
shear, rotation and so on). This is because most of the time, the data
displayed in
13 matches
Mail list logo
