2010/1/29 Paul Hartman :
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Deniz Dogan
> wrote:
>> 2010/1/29 Paul Hartman :
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Nathan Lane
>>> wrote:
W3C does only go over the very basics of everything they offer. Which may
make it silly.
>>>
>>> You mean w3schools?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Paul Hartman :
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Nathan Lane wrote:
>>> W3C does only go over the very basics of everything they offer. Which may
>>> make it silly.
>>
>> You mean w3schools? :) The names are confusing...
>>
>> Anyw
2010/1/29 Paul Hartman :
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Nathan Lane wrote:
>> W3C does only go over the very basics of everything they offer. Which may
>> make it silly.
>
> You mean w3schools? :) The names are confusing...
>
> Anyway when I need a HTML or CSS reference I go straight to the so
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Nathan Lane wrote:
> W3C does only go over the very basics of everything they offer. Which may
> make it silly.
You mean w3schools? :) The names are confusing...
Anyway when I need a HTML or CSS reference I go straight to the source:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/RE
Sorry, you are right. W3C does not own W3Schools. Thanks for that. W3C does
only go over the very basics of everything they offer. Which may make it
silly. At any rate it is a good starting point and utilizes the W3C
standards as a workbench. That was the point I was trying to make. Crap I
feel bad
Nathan Lane wrote:
I have not hear that. Why would "professional developers"
ridicule the body of computer scientists who work hard to make it
possible for them to develop more easily. W3C is the only reason that
HTML works on every browser on every operating system. It's the reason
we have CSS
Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2010, 17:13 +0100 schrieb Deniz Dogan:
> 2010/1/27 Nathan Lane :
> > I have not hear that. Why would "professional developers" ridicule the body
> > of computer scientists who work hard to make it possible for them to develop
> > more easily. W3C is the only reason that HTML
2010/1/27 Claus Cyrny :
> Deniz Dogan wrote:
>
> 2010/1/27 Nathan Lane :
>
>
> http://www.W3Schools.com has the most up-to-date tutorials on HTML and CSS,
> which are the two technologies you need to learn to achieve the creation of
> a decent website, even if it is simple.
> Nathan
>
>
> My "At le
Deniz Dogan wrote:
2010/1/27 Nathan Lane :
http://www.W3Schools.com has the most up-to-date tutorials on HTML and CSS,
which are the two technologies you need to learn to achieve the creation of
a decent website, even if it is simple.
Nathan
My "At least I fail to understand that" was
Nathan Lane wrote:
... Marquee and Font tags are no longer fully supported, and Framesets
are a bad idea
I absolutely second that! ;-)
(although iframes for certain things are a good idea). Also never use
tables to lay your website out. A lot of people still do, but I would
not even consider
Hi Nathan,
On 27 Jan 10 16:05 Nathan Lane said:
> W3Schools is a W3C website.
I cannot see any evidence that the company Refsnes Data, which owns
w3schools.com is related to the W3C.
Greg Chapman
http://www.gregtutor.plus.com
Helping new users of KompoZer and The GIMP
_
2010/1/27 Nathan Lane :
> I have not hear that. Why would "professional developers" ridicule the body
> of computer scientists who work hard to make it possible for them to develop
> more easily. W3C is the only reason that HTML works on every browser on
> every operating system. It's the reason we
I have not hear that. Why would "professional developers" ridicule the body
of computer scientists who work hard to make it possible for them to develop
more easily. W3C is the only reason that HTML works on every browser on
every operating system. It's the reason we have CSS. Without the W3C
JavaS
2010/1/27 Nathan Lane :
> http://www.W3Schools.com has the most up-to-date tutorials on HTML and CSS,
> which are the two technologies you need to learn to achieve the creation of
> a decent website, even if it is simple.
> Nathan
>
Lots of professional web developers ridicule W3 Schools often, bu
Just adding my two cents. I just glanced at the TOC of that doc and noticed
that a lot of it is out of date. Marquee and Font tags are no longer fully
supported, and Framesets are a bad idea (although iframes for certain things
are a good idea). Also never use tables to lay your website out. A lot
Claus Cyrny wrote:
bigsk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/26/2010 11:56 AM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
2010/1/26 Programmer In Training:
I use a plain text editor. If you're going to be doing any sort of even
half-serious web design, I highly recommend several methods of learning
HTML:
Read the
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Claus Cyrny wrote:
> In the very beginning, I used this document as a reference:
>
> http://www.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/chinese/INTERNET/HTML/Table/html_design.html
Oh wow, that brings back memories... you just made me feel real old.
--
Frank Gore
Project Manager
w
bigsk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/26/2010 11:56 AM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
2010/1/26 Programmer In Training:
I use a plain text editor. If you're going to be doing any sort of even
half-serious web design, I highly recommend several methods of learning
HTML:
Read the standard available a
Programmer In Training wrote:
On 1/26/2010 10:56 AM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
2010/1/26 Programmer In Training :
I use a plain text editor.
I also write all of the code myself, but I would at least
recommend a text editor which had syntax highlighting.
Under Linux, this is really no problem,
Programmer In Training wrote:
On 1/26/2010 10:56 AM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
2010/1/26 Programmer In Training :
I use a plain text editor. If you're going to be doing any sort of even
half-serious web design, I highly recommend several methods of learning
HTML:
Read the standard available a
Deniz Dogan wrote:
> It is not a good idea to just jump in and start reading standards and
> specifications. I suggest reading a good book about basic modern web
> design instead.
>
Ah, different learning styles. Please understand that for some people,
like me, for example this is exactly the
On 1/26/2010 11:42 AM, bigsk...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm just a computer user with little or no interest in something other
> than making a simple web site. No flashy stuff (yet), just simple
> things. But, I do want the flexibility of making the page look the way
> I want it to lookin that
On 1/26/2010 10:56 AM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
> 2010/1/26 Programmer In Training :
>> I use a plain text editor. If you're going to be doing any sort of even
>> half-serious web design, I highly recommend several methods of learning
>> HTML:
>>
>> Read the standard available at:
>> www.w3.org
>>
>
> I
On 01/26/2010 11:56 AM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
> 2010/1/26 Programmer In Training:
>
>> I use a plain text editor. If you're going to be doing any sort of even
>> half-serious web design, I highly recommend several methods of learning
>> HTML:
>>
>> Read the standard available at:
>> www.w3.org
>>
2010/1/26 Programmer In Training :
> I use a plain text editor. If you're going to be doing any sort of even
> half-serious web design, I highly recommend several methods of learning
> HTML:
>
> Read the standard available at:
> www.w3.org
>
It is not a good idea to just jump in and start reading
On 1/26/2010 6:56 AM, RSA wrote:
> Just going by what I read on a "tutorial".
>
> http://gimp-tutorials.net/websitetutorial
>
>
> I use OpenOffice Writer and create web pages that wayit's much
> easier for a novice like myself than Kompozer and can do more with
> less html knowledge.
I use
Just going by what I read on a "tutorial".
http://gimp-tutorials.net/websitetutorial
I use OpenOffice Writer and create web pages that wayit's much
easier for a novice like myself than Kompozer and can do more with less
html knowledge.
On 10-01-26 04:19 AM, Andre Anckaert wrote:
> Readin
On 26 Jan 10 09:19 "Andre Anckaert" said:
> Reading:
> http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/introduction.html#introduction-gimp
>
> I do not believe GIMP expects to be used for making WEB-pages. Nor
> for making coffee. It will certainly be glad to make images fit for
> use on the WEB.
>
> A well kno
On 1/25/2010 9:46 PM, RSA wrote:
> Can anyone recommend good tutorial for making a web page with GIMP?
I recommend you don't. It might be good to use for general layout and
such, but I recommend learning HTML and designing a site that way.
--
PIT
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever
29 matches
Mail list logo
