Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2012 17:09:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Andreas Ericsson venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2012 10:38:
On 11/01/2012 02:46 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
Also, and I'm sure you didn't know that, Jedem das
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2012 19:01:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:08:52AM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Turns out msysgit's
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2012 17:09:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Andreas Ericsson venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2012 10:38:
On 11/01/2012
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2012 19:01:
I talked with some people in #mercurial, and apparently there is a
concept of a 'changelog' that is supposed to store these changes, but
since the format
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
As a rule, I don't see much value in writing a framework that works
only for one case, that smells more like over-engineering.
On 11/01/2012 02:46 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
Also, and I'm sure you didn't know that, Jedem das Seine (to each
his own) was the slogan of the Buchenwald concentration camp. For
that reason some (including me) hear the unspoken cynical
half-sentence and some people just have to be sent to the
Andreas Ericsson venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2012 10:38:
On 11/01/2012 02:46 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
Also, and I'm sure you didn't know that, Jedem das Seine (to each
his own) was the slogan of the Buchenwald concentration camp. For
that reason some (including me) hear the unspoken cynical
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:11:39PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
As a patch
submitter, you (generic you) want the attention of others as
reviewers. It's in your own (again generic you) interest not to put
them off, in the same way as it's up to the submitter to argue why a
patch is
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:08:52AM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Turns out msysgit's remote-hg is not exporting the whole repository,
that's why it's faster =/
It seems the reason is that it would only export to the point where
the branch is checked out. After updating the to the tip I
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Andreas Ericsson venit, vidit, dixit 02.11.2012 10:38:
On 11/01/2012 02:46 PM, René Scharfe wrote:
Also, and I'm sure you didn't know that, Jedem das Seine (to each
his own) was the slogan of the Buchenwald
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:08:52AM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Turns out msysgit's remote-hg is not exporting the whole repository,
that's why it's faster =/
It seems the reason is that it would only export to the point
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 05:08:52AM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Turns out msysgit's remote-hg is not exporting the whole repository,
that's why
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:11:39PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
As a patch
submitter, you (generic you) want the attention of others as
reviewers. It's in your own (again generic you) interest not to put
them off, in the
On 2 November 2012 18:39, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. The open source process works not by making favors to each
other, but by everyone sharing and improving the code, by
*collaborating*. I review your code if you review mine, or if you
by me a bear in the
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org wrote:
On 2 November 2012 18:39, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. The open source process works not by making favors to each
other, but by everyone sharing and improving the code, by
*collaborating*. I
Am 01.11.2012 03:58, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.
In my
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:46 PM, René Scharfe
rene.scha...@lsrfire.ath.cx wrote:
Also, and I'm sure you didn't know that, Jedem das Seine (to each his own)
was the slogan of the Buchenwald concentration camp. For that reason some
(including me) hear the unspoken cynical half-sentence and some
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:46 AM, René Scharfe
rene.scha...@lsrfire.ath.cx wrote:
You probably didn't intend it, but your sentences at the top can be read
more like: This is a logical consequence. If you don't understand that,
your mental capabilities must be lacking.. That's obviously (ha!) a
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:46 PM, René Scharfe
rene.scha...@lsrfire.ath.cx wrote:
Am 01.11.2012 03:58, schrieb Felipe Contreras:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras
Felipe,
I'll invite you to reread some of your words:
That being said, I did wonder what must be going through his mind to
not see that as obvious,
(...)
Following the guideline of always assuming good faith
So perhaps it does apply that you could try to assume good
intellectual faith in
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe,
I'll invite you to reread some of your words:
That being said, I did wonder what must be going through his mind to
not see that as obvious,
(...)
Following the guideline of always assuming good faith
Junio C Hamano wrote:
We've been hoping we can do without a rigid code of conduct written
down to maintain cordial community focused on technical merits, and
instead relied on people's common sense, but sense may not be so
common, unfortunately, so we may have to have one.
I think that
[quotes heavily cut down by me]
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 30.10.2012 21:15:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
But you mentioned something about cooperation, and I've yet to see
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:30:50AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
For the record, Johannes is not the only one being kept from looking at
this series (further) by the tone of this discussion. Per hominem
attacks are neither professional nor helpful. We prefer to discuss code
here, just code.
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
[quotes heavily cut down by me]
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 30.10.2012 21:15:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Felipe
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 31.10.2012 16:39:
This is precisely ad hominem; you are ignoring the code, not because
of the code, because of the person. This is as ad hominem as it gets.
I am not rejecting your code (I reviewed an early series) but reject the
communication style and
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:30:50AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
For the record, Johannes is not the only one being kept from looking at
this series (further) by the tone of this discussion. Per hominem
attacks are neither
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 31.10.2012 16:39:
This is precisely ad hominem; you are ignoring the code, not because
of the code, because of the person. This is as ad hominem as it gets.
I am not
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 31.10.2012 16:39:
Didn't think so. The truth of the matter is that it doesn't matter
what I do code-wise.
Just try, seriously.
All right.
First of all, I clone the
Hi Peff,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Jeff King wrote:
I really like some of the directions the series is taking, and as the
maintainer, I'd like to pick it up.
Code-wise, I agree.
But there is a big question mark for me still about how it relates to
the work in msysgit, especially:
- What
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
- What disadvantages? If this implementation goes into git.git,
the msysgit one is likely to wane in popularity. What will we be
losing by doing so? If the answer is not nothing, how hard
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
I just tested this with junio/next and it seems this issue is still
unfixed: instead of
reset refs/heads/blub
from e7510461b7db54b181d07acced0ed3b1ada072c8
I get
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
I just tested this with junio/next and it seems this issue is still
unfixed: instead of
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
How about performance?
174.038642915 seconds time elapsed
Compared to;
340.976843750 seconds time elapsed
Looks like there's something to improve in this area, but I wouldn't
be surprised if
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.
In my opinion, Jonathan does not deserve any of such condescending words.
But maybe the Git maintainers are okay with such a tone on this list?
Hth,
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.
In my opinion, Jonathan does not deserve any of such condescending words.
But maybe the
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
I just tested this with junio/next and it seems
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
And finally, what do more do you expect me to do? About the code, and
only the code.
The analysis that does in the log messages is an important part of code in
this project, so that may be a good place to start. Both Jonathan and J6t asked
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.
In my opinion, Jonathan does not deserve any of such condescending
words.
But maybe the Git maintainers are okay with such a tone
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Junio wanted a more general solution, adding infrastructure to the
rev-list engine that I did not need -- and did not see the need for,
either -- and given the amount of time I had invested in a working
remote-hg and given that I needed it
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Daniel Barkalow barka...@iabervon.org wrote:
I think that may be true where you have next in both places, but I
think:
$ git checkout -b new-branch master
$ git fast-export ^master new-branch
ought to emit no commit lines, but needs to emit a reset line.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
And finally, what do more do you expect me to do? About the code, and
only the code.
The analysis that does in the log messages is an important part of code in
this
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
Junio wanted a more general solution, adding infrastructure to the
rev-list engine that I did not need -- and did not see the need for,
either -- and given the amount
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own.
In my opinion, Jonathan does not deserve any of such
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
How about performance?
174.038642915 seconds time elapsed
Compared to;
340.976843750 seconds time elapsed
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:02:31PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
If remote-hg is going to live in contrib, it probably makes sense to
have its tests live there, too, like subtree.
Probably, I'll check that option.
But
Hi all,
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Jeff King wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:47:04PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Yeah, the test script is not ready for merging, it needs to check
for python, hg, and hg-git.
Do you have hg-git installed?
No. But it's important that it fail
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
P.S.: I would still recommend to have a detailed look at the 'devel'
branch, in particular the commits starting with fast-export: do not refer
to non-existing marks and ending with t5801: skip without hg. My
Hi Felipe,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
But you mentioned something about cooperation, and I've yet to see how
is it that you are planning to cooperate. If you say you don't have time
to spend on this, I don't see why I should worry about testing this
series of patches.
It
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Johannes Schindelin
johannes.schinde...@gmx.de wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
But you mentioned something about cooperation, and I've yet to see how
is it that you are planning to cooperate. If you say you don't have time
to spend on
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:56:39PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
I've ported the tests from hg-git and made sure that the output from
remote-hg
matches the output of hg-git. With these extensive tests I would consider
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:47:04PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Yeah, the test script is not ready for merging, it needs to check for
python, hg, and hg-git.
Do you have hg-git installed?
No. But it's important that it fail gracefully; I can't even take it in
pu if I can't run the
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:47:04PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Yeah, the test script is not ready for merging, it needs to check for
python, hg, and hg-git.
Do you have hg-git installed?
No. But it's important that
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:02:31PM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
If remote-hg is going to live in contrib, it probably makes sense to
have its tests live there, too, like subtree.
Probably, I'll check that option.
But eventually I think it should be installed by default, unless
54 matches
Mail list logo
