Thanks for the reply Rob. I did try the piece of code you have pasted
even previously but it did not work. Even a simple rule like a color
change or a bg-color change within all the parenthesis don't work.
This technique doesn't work if I put it in the ui.xml nor does it work
in a .css file
Even I have tried a lot to get GWT Designer working. Can anybody suggest the
right usage of GWT Designer?
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Noor baken...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Ubuntu , Eclipse 3.5 with GWT designer. But when I placing
a control on the my interface, the whole
Forget about it, the new update on the Designers beta Version fixed the
problem. It now runs like a charm
2011/7/6 Sebastian open.sebast...@gmail.com
Hello Vrto,
may I ask which Ubuntu Version do you use? Is it 32 or 64 Bit? I am
using 11.04 with AMD64 and can´t get the Designer running at
The same here with Ubuntu 11.04 x64 and Eclipse Indigo. My installed
libWebKit Versions are libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.0.6.0 and
libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0.6.0.
Tried the workaround but had no luck with it.
2011/7/7 Alexander Mitin alexander.mi...@gmail.com
Try this workaround:
1. Open terminal and
Is anyone doing some open source work on gwt + touch ui?
This demo is totally incredible
http://dev.sencha.com/deploy/touch/examples/kitchensink/
We must have this implemented with gwt
--
Guit: Elegant, beautiful, modular and *production ready* gwt applications.
http://code.google.com/p/guit/
gwt4air 2.2 will actually have a Gwt Touch module
Stay tuned :)
2011/7/8 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com
Is anyone doing some open source work on gwt + touch ui?
This demo is totally incredible
http://dev.sencha.com/deploy/touch/examples/kitchensink/
We must have this implemented with gwt
Here is what I did to test this:
!DOCTYPE ui:UiBinder SYSTEM http://dl.google.com/gwt/DTD/xhtml.ent;
ui:UiBinder xmlns:ui=urn:ui:com.google.gwt.uibinder
xmlns:g=urn:import:com.google.gwt.user.client.ui
xmlns:p1=urn:import:com.google.gwt.user.datepicker.client
g:HTMLPanel
p1:DatePicker/
What framework are you using to connect to the datastore?
I've not used JDO or JPA, but in Objectify you can set an offset and a
limit on a query. In onRangeChanged you can get them like this:
Range range = display.getVisibleRange();
Integer offset = range.getStart();
Integer limit =
Hi Alain,
touch support with flash? do you mean only for android devices?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@googlemail.comwrote:
gwt4air 2.2 will actually have a Gwt Touch module
Stay tuned :)
2011/7/8 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com
Is anyone doing some open
Not Flash.
Pure Gwt based solution
2011/7/8 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com
Hi Alain,
touch support with flash? do you mean only for android devices?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Alain Ekambi
jazzmatad...@googlemail.comwrote:
gwt4air 2.2 will actually have a Gwt Touch module
Stay
great news! thanks Alain
On Friday, July 8, 2011, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@googlemail.com wrote:
Not Flash.Pure Gwt based solution
2011/7/8 Gal Dolber gal.dol...@gmail.com
Hi Alain,touch support with flash? do you mean only for android devices?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Alain Ekambi
You need a *subeditor* for the foos. I.e. have FooEditor (implements
EditorFoo) contain a subeditor for @Path(foos), of type
CompositeEditorListFoo, Foo, FooEditor (or ListEditorFoo, FooEditor).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
ServiceLocator is the only mean you can use instance methods in your
service, instead of static methods. It's up to you to choose. I believe both
will continue to be supported (I can't see any reason it wouldn't be)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Thursday, July 7, 2011 5:46:44 PM UTC+2, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
Yes, I am aware that if I don't include the tokenizer in the mapping, it
works fine. The problem with that is that it's an all or nothing solution,
whereas I'm looking for a programatic way of choosing when the navigation
Hi Ioan, thank you for your reply.
Indeed I use objectify and to be honest I have not used the offset ever,
however, when I was looking what's the best feature to use I stamped upon
this
thread
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/objectify-appengine/tkC103e2ILQ/discussion
and so I have only
you said:first abc:null and then, automatically abc:1. That messes with the
history completely - back now clearly won't work (will go to abc:null). this
is because of ur ABCActivity is not singlton, if it is singlton it wont call
the method(probably initial method) which will
On Jul 8, 10:42 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
ServiceLocator is the only mean you can use instance methods in your
service, instead of static methods. It's up to you to choose. I believe both
I'm rather interested in what's the more elegant way to manage
persistence via RF.
-Alex
All things 'static' are generally seen as not elegant in Java, so using a
ServiceLocator would make more elegant. YMMV.
Also, elegant doesn't necessarily match with pragmatic, so there might
be additional costs to making things elegant.
If you ask me, I'd go with instance methods and a
Okay, I have found that the ScrollPanel implements already touch events and
do a scroll event on mobile devices.
However, I have found that on IPhone4, the scrolling is smooth, fast,
whereas on Android Froyo and Android Gingerbread, the scrolling isn't fast,
it just slides vertically or
So you want to have a single app (your dashboard, but independently develop
each game as a totally separated gwt app, is that right? Total flexibility,
no?
First, there have been countless questions about how to communicate between
2 (supposedly) independent GWT apps.
Secondly, this design,
Hi
Ok, I managed to locate and fix the problem, which I suspect is a GWT
bug.
What it had was something like this:
public final static MyRpcServiceAsync rpc =
GWT.create(MyRpcService.class);
public void onModuleLoad() {
rpc.bootstrap(new AsyncCallbackBootstrap() { ...
I get where you're coming from with this, but consider this scenario:
I now have the following entities in the list: 1, 2, 3, so the first element
in the list would be 1. When going to the list, I would go to abc:1 which is
fine - 1 will be selected and nothing else will happen (a place changed
That is true. In my case however, making the activity a singleton introduces
a degree of complexity into the system, and I would rather not deal with
that complexity unless I have to. If your use case is such that you need the
client-side caching and you have done proper profiling and reached this
On Friday, July 8, 2011 12:57:01 PM UTC+2, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
I get where you're coming from with this, but consider this scenario:
I now have the following entities in the list: 1, 2, 3, so the first
element in the list would be 1. When going to the list, I would go to abc:1
which
Am Freitag, 8. Juli 2011 12:57:01 UTC+2 schrieb Eugen Paraschiv:
Perhaps the solution is to consider abc:null as a place where no element is
selected and then let the user select the element.
Thats what I do when a user visits a place the first time after a fresh app
start. Once the user
And what about user experience? If the user actually bookmarks abc:null and
the app treats abc:null as select the first entry in the list then the
selection may change over time if some editing is done (adding/removing
items). If the user is unexperienced and is not interested in the url
thing
Good point about the user experience - it does have a potentially high
degree of inconsistency if I make abc:null select the first entry, same as
abc:1 this time and abc:2 the next. I will do as you suggest, abc:null will
select nothing, and it will be up to the user to actually select something
To answer some of your feedback - there is a single Activity for the entire
page. About the calculation of the URL, the reason behind URL recalculation
each time was to be able to navigate to abc:id directly and bypass the
entire problem with first going to abc:null and handling that scenario.
Hi Kevin, thanks for your answer.
I tried to do it on the interface my server-side code uses as the
implementation contract but I was using a JSR-250 annotation @RolesAllowed,
which wasn't on my client scope.
I just tried the @PreAuthorize annotation and it seems to work on the
client-side. Do I
On Jul 8, 11:51 am, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
If you ask me, I'd go with instance methods and a ServiceLocator (and
dependency injection),
Is there anywhere a concrete code sample for this pattern? I'm
considering to use Dep. Injection too.
Thx again for the info!
-Alex
--
You
Ioan it works fine, thank you!
-George
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/UtFKujFHj4kJ.
To post to this group, send email to
See http://wanderingcanadian.posterous.com/guiced-up-gwt-requestfactory and
https://github.com/mgenov/injecting-request-factory
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hello.
The problem is a missing XML file where the configuration database,
and so gives
an error of IO.
bye
Fabricio
2011/6/28 Geraldo Lopes geraldo...@gmail.com
Gwt is persistent agnostic.
It looks like your client code is referencing server code.
When you compile the client code it gets
You'll need to have your service invoked as a Spring Bean somehow to
make the annotations take effect. It won't work as just a servlet
entry in your web.xml. DispatcherServlet is one of the easiest way to
make it do that.
On Jul 8, 7:11 am, Renato Beserra renatobese...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
You just solved my doubt. The DispatcherServlet looks very simple with your
explanation and I will try to use it.
Thank you very much!
Best Regards,
2011/7/8 Kevin Jordan ke...@kjordan.net
You'll need to have your service invoked as a Spring Bean somehow to
make the annotations take effect.
looks to me like a dead end for developing security sensitive UI with
GWT.
thank you Robert.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
Presumably you're using Internet Explorer...which has issues showing
HTML elements over other objects on the page that are rendered
natively by the OS (iframes, flash, select boxes, etc).
To get around this limitation, GWT utilizes a hack where you put an
iframe shim behind the popup panel's
In order to write a secure rich Web app, you need to think in terms of
protecting the data, not the UI itself. This is true for any JS
application, not just GWT.
/dmc
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Alberto Sarubbi asaru...@gmail.com wrote:
looks to me like a dead end for developing security
Thanks Thomas and Gal. Now I'm getting.
[ERROR] [editorsampleproject] - Cycle detected in editor graph. Editor type
com.google.gwt.editor.client.adapters.ListEditor at path foos can be reached
again at path foos..foos
I'm probably just going to abandon this and just manually get/set the
On 7/7/2011 8:38 PM, Jim Douglas wrote:
With 328 stars, it's the most popular open issue:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=603
Thanks, but I'm asking about a GWT binding for the Google Calendar API,
not j.u.Calendar.
Cheers,
jec
--
You received this message
Agreed. What the client sends to the server can be the wild west. Never
trust it.
My recipe, YMMV, but my apps hide display of access limited objects on the
client side(all are there in the js) but more to avoid confusion to users
than as a security measure. The real security is on the
Hmm, ok. Well, I see that the request was closed as not planned:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-google-apis/issues/detail?id=157
And this response from 2008 suggests working with the Java API on the
server or the JavaScript API on the client:
On 7/8/2011 7:47 AM, Jim Douglas wrote:
Hmm, ok. Well, I see that the request was closed as not planned:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-google-apis/issues/detail?id=157
And this response from 2008 suggests working with the Java API on the
server or the JavaScript API on the client:
In protecting the data as David rightly suggests, you can protect the UI by
returning SC_UNAUTHORIZED if an unauthenticated user attempts to access any
remote service. I've overridden the RequestFactory onResponseReceived
function which redirects to a login page if the response is
There is a third party binding to the GData api for calendar:
http://code.google.com/p/gwt-gdata/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
I'm using round-trip validation for my entities - i.e. I pick up any
violations from RequestContext.onViolation then populate errors in the UI
via an EditorVisitor.
This mostly works well except I can't figure out how to get absolute paths
of sub-editors from a violation.
In my EditorVisitor
By default flash will display on top of everything else, regardless of
any z-index Try adding ?wmode=Opaque to the end of you iFrame src
URL.
On Jul 7, 7:16 am, tobirius t.herrm...@alkacon.com wrote:
I am struggling to put UI elements above an embedded youtube iframe.
No z-index seems large
Thanks for the comments Alex and Robert,
I'm aware that this decoupling is against GWT's philosophy.
The reason I'm still trying to keep it separate is because these are
actually separate projects (each game) with different developers
working on each part with separate svn code repos.
Making some progress but still having the same problem. If i change my
onClick event to onMouseDown it works.
Why it works on the mousedown and not the onclick im not sure. It
seems to be something to do with the order that events are being
triggered. If i call the add function to add a tab to
Hi,
When i deployed a project created with smartGWT, i got this following error
Unable to update app: Error posting to URL:
https://appengine.google.com/api/appversion/clonefiles?app_id=pojomarketversion=1;
500 Internal Server Error
htmlhead
meta http-equiv=content-type
we actually protect EVERY call to our server validating the user
rights before proceeding to the service execution.
it just doesn't seem right to show a user a button that he can't click
because he don't have the permission to do.
it sounds more logical not showing the button at all.
of course,
You don't need JSNI, there's a
JsDatehttp://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/latest/com/google/gwt/core/client/JsDate.htmlclass.
Also, have a look at GodaTime, or JodaTime-GWT. The JodaTime is much cleaner
and easier to use, and close to what's coming to Java 8 (JSR-310, alpha code
Glad to hear that!
On Jul 8, 2:21 am, Sebastian open.sebast...@gmail.com wrote:
Forget about it, the new update on the Designers beta Version fixed the
problem. It now runs like a charm
2011/7/6 Sebastian open.sebast...@gmail.com
Hello Vrto,
may I ask which Ubuntu Version do you
Why aren't you using
RequestFactoryEditorDriver#setViolationshttp://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/latest/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/client/RequestFactoryEditorDriver.html#setViolations(java.lang.Iterable)
?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Agreed! Don't show the button if the user doesn't have permissions. But also
check perms on the server to protect against hackers.
/dmc
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Alberto Sarubbi asaru...@gmail.com wrote:
we actually protect EVERY call to our server validating the user
rights before
Great, success. Thanks.
So I conclude it is impossible to pass a Java object from one GWT
application client space, through JSNI to another GWT application
client space even with the XS linker option.
It only appears possible using JavaScriptObject subclasses, i.e.
JScript overlays.
I might
Should anybody else search for something similar and stumbles across
this thread there is a working example at
git://github.com/manstis/gwt-plugins.git
On Jul 8, 8:50 pm, manstis michael.ans...@gmail.com wrote:
Great, success. Thanks.
So I conclude it is impossible to pass a Java object from
Hi people,
I am using GWT 2.3 and Spring Security 3. To explain my application
structure a little bit. My WebContent folder contains:
WebContent/
-WEB-INF/
-login.html
-logout.html
-secure/
---index.html
Starting my application and trying to
The idea behind security is simple, trust no one and trust nothing... only
when who ever tries to access and authenticates them self and
is authorized to access what ever it is the are attempting to access allow
this action.
So try and hide anything that a user should not have access to. This
I guess because I was using SimpleBeanEditorDriver which doesn't have that
method (until 2.4 is released I now see). Thanks for pointing it out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
I know I'm missing something obvious here, but what's the current
correct approach to catching a keyboard event to close a DialogBox or
do something similar (i.e., simulate clicking the Save or OK
button)?
I found an older example that uses onNativePreviewEvent() that seems
to be unsupported now,
The subject says it all: why are symbolMaps files not gzipped?
Each permutation produces, for our project, a 41Mb file. Fortunately we're
only producing 2 permutations, but it still makes more than 80M that we
don't (yet?) use, and there's no switch to turn them off.
Gzipping brings the file
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447821/diff/6053/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GenerateJavaAST.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GenerateJavaAST.java
(right):
I'm not sure why the JsNamer classes (e.g. JsPrettyNamer) don't already
do the right thing (don't they?). They definitely do have naming
disambiguation logic, etc. Is there something more fundamental here?
Revision: 10423
Author: cod...@google.com
Date: Thu Jul 7 08:33:00 2011
Log: Updating npapi plugin to remove gwtId from Jso objects (idenity
fix),
adds a second map in LocalObjects.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1469803
I've deleted that comment (it was incorrect). The issue turns out to be
an interaction between the JsInliner and JsObfuscateNamer. The issue is
with how JsInliner manages the scope for names that are hoisted to new
scopes via inlining. This fix solves the test-cases provided in the
original
Revision: 10424
Author: cod...@google.com
Date: Thu Jul 7 10:09:23 2011
Log: Un-breaking the code due to failed test case with htmlunit
Review by: con...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10424
Deleted:
/trunk/plugins/npapi/NPVariantUtil.h
Revision: 10425
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Thu Jul 7 10:26:33 2011
Log: Integrating r3302 from GWT 1.5 back into trunk. The change fixes
a bug in Tree where opening a TreeItem while another node is selected
causes the Tree to scroll to scroll to the selected node (opening
committed as r10425
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1467813/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1466809/diff/3020/user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/client/AbstractUiRenderer.java
File user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/client/AbstractUiRenderer.java
(right):
Revision: 10427
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Jul 8 07:03:55 2011
Log: Update bootstrap requestfactory-apt.jar to r10426.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10427
Modified:
/tools/lib/requestfactory/requestfactory-apt.jar
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1466809/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: pquitslund,
Description:
Use erasure to handle wildcard types in RfValidator.
Restore FindRequest to 2.4 parameterization.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: pquitslund
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1467814/
Affected files:
M
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1466809/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2011/07/08 15:40:34, bobv wrote:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1467814/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1466809/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
lgtm
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1472803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Any other sentiments?
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Jeff Larsen larse...@gmail.com wrote:
Good riddance. I wish it was possible to do the same with IE versions 9.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
--
Eric Ayers | Software Engineer | zun...@google.com
Reviewers: rchandia,
Description:
Bypass RfValidatorTest when no JDK is available.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rchandia
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1465810/
Affected files:
M user/test/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/apt/RfValidatorTest.java
Index:
On 2011/07/08 17:35:42, bobv wrote:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1465810/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 10428
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Jul 8 07:22:32 2011
Log: Use erasure to handle wildcard types in RfValidator.
Restore FindRequest to 2.4 parameterization.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rchandia
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1467814
Revision: 10429
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Jul 8 10:51:57 2011
Log: Update bootstrap requestfactory-apt.jar to r10428.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10429
Modified:
/tools/lib/requestfactory/requestfactory-apt.jar
Revision: 10430
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Fri Jul 8 07:56:17 2011
Log: Update 2.4 branch with selective build fixes from trunk.
Review by: mrruss...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10430
Modified:
If you do not use Cell Widgets, you can ignore this email.
*
We recently introduced a new ElementBuilder
APIhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=10412
for
building elements using either DOM manipulation or string concatenation with
innerHTML. It allows us to optimize for
On 2011/07/07 19:40:35, jlabanca wrote:
LGTM. Did not check *all* methods and classes, though.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1463812/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447821/diff/6053/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GenerateJavaAST.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GenerateJavaAST.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447821/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447821/diff/20001/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GenerateJavaAST.java
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GenerateJavaAST.java
(right):
Revision: 10432
Author: jbrosenb...@google.com
Date: Fri Jul 8 10:47:24 2011
Log: Fix JsInliner, to properly handle name scope tracking after
multi-level inlining. Was causing local variable name collisions after
obfuscation.
Fixes issue 5936.
Review at
Reviewers: cromwellian, scottb, zundel,
Description:
After an enum is ordinalized, any static methods generated as
staticImpl's should no longer be considered as such, since there is no
longer an instantated instance being passed as the first arg to the
method (this instance has been transformed
LGTM, needs test?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1467815/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Is it okay to make that public?
I think it is OK. We usually publish them in the Wiki, but Docs is
getting so good that I wanted to try it this way.
Using docs makes sense. Will it eventually be made public? Perhaps
copy/pasted over into the wiki for posterity?
92 matches
Mail list logo
