Folks, I'm curious what may have made connecting to a Google SMTP server
different (not work before) compared to any other. What do you sense have
changed? It's not something I've heard mentioned specifically anywhere (as
either now possible or even still not). Just curious.
/charlie
_
Mark, here are a couple thoughts: that FTP client is running on your
workstation, I imagine. Is the CF Server as well? If not, there could be an
issue in running it from the CF server that's different from running it from
your local workstation. If they are different, you could either try running
And don't forget to check those logs. :-)
/charlie
-Original Message-
From: houcfug@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:42 PM
To: Houston ColdFusion Users' Group
Subject: [houcfug] Re: Scheduled Tasks In CF8
You don't say if you're on 6, 7, or 8 (just CFMX). You may have a few
choices.
Since you're on Windows, you can use CF's integration with COM. In fact,
there's a specific page in the CF docs showing how to do what seems just
what you want:
Using the FileSystem object
If I may, while Don's list is indeed useful, I'd like to point out a still
larger list:
http://carehart.org/resourcelists/tools_to_consider/
It now has over 700 tools/resources in over 100 categories, all designed to
answer those common questions, where can I find CF resources about .? or
and check out some of the preso's Charlie Arehart has
graciously arranged and
organized from his ColdFusion meetup group http://tinyurl.com/2dbdnk :
(Charlie, if you're reading this, you rock - your backpack has jets
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsryQOMcDy4 .)
5/01/08 - CFInterface, with Robin
Mike and company, going back to this discussion of file upload tools from a
few weeks ago, I wanted to point out that I list still more alternatives,
including some of those mentioned here, at my CF411 site:
File Upload Tools
http://www.cf411.com/#upload
It offers Flex, Ajax, and other tools,
Ramon (and others who might ever face such a challenge), while all the
suggestions so far are good ones, still one more that may suit your needs
would be to change CF's validation to happen when the user leaves the field,
rather than waiting until they submit the form.
That's now an option, as
for one page for any user who still maintains some level of sanity.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:52 AM, charlie arehart
charlie_li...@carehart.org wrote:
Ramon (and others who might ever face such a challenge), while all the
suggestions so far are good ones, still one more that may suit your needs
I enjoy helping wherever I can. :-) Thanks for the other kind regard, too.
/charlie
From: houcfug@googlegroups.com [mailto:houc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Ajas Mohammed
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 8:47 PM
To: houcfug@googlegroups.com
Subject: [houcfug] Re: CFFORM Question
Just to clarify, that code compatibility analyzer isn't new for 7. It's been
there since CF4, if I recall correctly. There was also a problem for a
couple of releases where you had to know to choose options in advanced
settings to get it to really do anything, otherwise it defaults to doing
Yeah, the author is showing some age-ism. :-) He wrote, in my experience
most average or poor programmers start programming at university, for their
Computer Science course. Most good programmers started programming long
before, and the degree was just a natural continuation of their hobby.
Ken's hit the nail on the head (in terms of cert prep), and to be clear, the
official Adobe CF classes (Fast Track and Advanced) are NOT intended to be
cert prep classes at all. As Aaron said though, they should likely get you
close to passing. The Forta study guide book is highly recommended, but
a recommendation for a file comparison tool? Preferably FOSS. I
know Charlie Arehart has several listed on his cf411.com site. Any of them
have better features than others?
Thanks.
--
James Husum
The Quixote Project - one guy's quest to make the world a better place -
http://www.thequixoteproject.org
Mark asked:
Every time I try this, the try/catch around my upload takes over due to
violating the accept list. I can't even get to the IsImageFile()
check.
Even if I take a file, change the extension and how it is saved (Save
as
type...), it won't get past the try catch.
What you can do
Speaking of CF-based POI solutions, I'll note that I have a category of such
tools (for integration of CF with Excel and other spreadsheet tools), within
the category of my CF411 site:
http://www.cf411.com/#excel
POI-based options (including the very thing at Ben's site you noted) are
discussed
Hey Mark, client variables are indeed tied to applications. If one uses a
database for the client variable storage, you can see in the cdata table
that app is a key.
So only if those two cfapplication tags had the same name (or no name) would
they be shared this way.
/charlie
From:
As has been said, there are different web stats analysis tools for different
purposes. I'll add one not mentioned yet: Microsoft's Log Parser. It's a
free command line tool that lets you use SQL against any kind of log file.
Being a command-line tool, it's not as pretty (though it can produce
If anyone may be awaiting a review of the book in the meantime, I posted one
(fairly comprehensive) today:
http://www.carehart.org/blog/client/index.cfm/2012/2/28/New_book_review_Rail
o_3_Beginners_Guide
Of course, if you are thinking of reviewing it, then you may want to hold
off reading that
Hi James, thanks for the update.
I think you'll see we came out about the same place with respect to the
book, both clarifying for readers who it seems the book is best oriented to
(which is to say, not so much for CF folks looking to get into Railo, but
instead folks coming to CFML for whom
On top of all the great suggestions so far, I'll share two more.
First, it could well be that you're having problems of contention over
resources. But it may not be as obvious (or as easy to spot) as it may seem.
John mentions using FR (or you could use the CF Enterprise Server Monitor,
Shirley.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:33 PM, charlie arehart charlie_li...@carehart.org
wrote:
Shirley I could insert a bad Leslie Nielsen Airplane pun here, but I
wonder how many people are old enough to get the joke. :-)
/charlie
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hey folks, hope the move to meetup.com goes well for you. That has been a
challenge for some groups, especially when as you say here you won't be
auto-importing the members, so people have to join themselves. And it's all
the more a challenge when mention of the move is in a note like this,
Oh good to hear, at least in that I do feel that google groups are much
better as mailing lists than the meetup.com list feature. That said, it can
be confusing to people to know about both, and even to know which is to be
used for communications. What we did in the Atlanta CFUG was post a pinned
:-) I feel like this is us just all talking around the water cooler, so
hopefully no offense taken by anyone. I certainly wouldn't ever think you'd
never intend that, and I suspect John feels the same way.
We were just chiming in to give perspectives as authors to the original
comment. Think of
But is that an affinity for eating it? Or perhaps cooking it? I can enjoy
those too, especially the former, when done at a great barbeque place. :-)
But as for really making sausage, especially from scratch-if you know what
I mean-well, if you do that, you're a stronger man than I. :-)
And with
Hey Billy, two things.
First, sorry, but I clicked the link before seeing your request in the fine
print :-) not to do it if not in the houston area. If you put the link
first, I suspect many will click it before reading the rest (especially
since you say it takes only 5 seconds). Just sayin'.
Thanks. And to be clear, my not hatin'quip was in my jokingly saying you'd
know which engine I chose. Didn't mean to assert you had any such feeling
toward anything at all. :-)
/charlie
From: houcfug@googlegroups.com [mailto:houcfug@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Billy Cravens
Sent: Wednesday,
Here, but no need to enter me into the draw, thanks.
/charlie
From: houcfug@googlegroups.com [mailto:houcfug@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Billy Cravens
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 1:33 PM
To: Houston ColdFusion Users' Group
Subject: [houcfug] Creative Cloud raffle: reply to enter!
Since
Kier, I haven't seen or heard of anyone trying this, so I don't know if it's
even possible, but if you want to know what might be causing your problem,
have you tried dumping the value of the session struct, to see what the
sessionids are in these requests you're saying aren't working. If the
But let's be clear: I didn't ask for confirmation of session replication. I
was just talking about what seemed was a more potentially fundamental
problem of whether sessions were being kept at all. So I was being more
specific in my question : what do you see when you dump the session struct?
A)
Ok, but I would not conclude from your experience that it doesn't work.
You may feel you have adequately tested it, but you've not offered enough
proof of things in reply here.
But I hear that you feel that it's a moot point and you've moved on. Fair
enough. I just would want to counter the
Hey guys, sorry for the delay in responding, myself.
So bottom line, you have confirmed that replication was not working as
expected. That was what I was trying to drive at in my original notes, as
it seemed Kier was not leaning toward what seemed was a websockets session
persistence problem).
@mparks, you say you put the file in the opt\ColdFusion10\cfusion\lib. There
are indeed jars there, but those are ones that come with CF. For you to add
your own, you ought instead to put it in
opt\ColdFusion10\cfusion\wwwroot\WEB-INF\lib. That's indeed the documented,
at:
OK, I think the key may be in your response to the code I offered, to find
out from what jar your class was being loaded. You say it was in the
itext.jar that comes with CF10.
So now, what about if you run that code on the other server where things
were working?
a) It could be that on that
I think you would find that if you moved the itext.jar from cf8 to the
web-inf/lib in cf10, it would cause it to override that in CF10's own
internal lib directory. Again, I think that's the point of that alternative
lib where you are to put your own.
Now, while that may allow your own code
Glad you may have finally resolved things. You conclude wondering how you
should be able to include LIBRARY files that exist today without worrying
about someone else using your method name in the future.
Well, the problem here is that your code is calling a library that someone
else wrote
it with Microsoft giving away server software for free.
I think the Coldfusion era still has a lot of life left as well J
-James
From: houcfug@googlegroups.com [mailto:houcfug@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Charlie Arehart
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:40 PM
To: houcfug@googlegroups.com
It’s interesting you say that, James. I, too, had been a mainframer (system
administrator) for about 15 years before getting into CF in about late ’96 (CF
3.0).
I transitioned to it because everyone said the mainframe was dying, and of
course it still thrives. Complex enterprise apps just
ferent
environments we are using.
-Jermaine
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Charlie Arehart <charlie_li...@carehart.org>
wrote:
Mark, while on the surface you have always been able to run more than one
version of CF on a single machine, there is a problem with putting both CF9 or
earl
Well, that would indeed solve your need of having multiple instances (on CF10).
And yep, it’s a bit more elegant in CF10 (in not having a different install
mode. That said, the Enterprise Manager you see is indeed the same as you would
have seen if you’d run CF9 in its multiserver mode.
OK. (And to be clear, the offer of consulting help was secondary. My focus was
to give you the info you needed to try on your own if you still wanted to.)
So about installing multiple instances, if you mean you have CF9 installed now,
the “normal way” (called “Server” mode, but some call it
the issue here is I
don't understand classes and methods in .net, so I'm not sure if what I'm doing
is correct or not.
I can post code examples and links to dtSearch's API, which is impressive if I
understood it
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:16 PM Charlie Arehart <charlie_li...@carehart.
Mark, besides the CF job-hunting resources offered so far, I have several more
listed at cf411.com/cfjobs. And note with those you can both find jobs offered
or offer yourself, generally for free, and they are only CF-focused job
resources.
/charlie
From: houcfug@googlegroups.com
Hey Mike, if you’re open to online ones (your first note seemed to suggest
otherwise), I would highly recommend the one I’ve used for a few years, Harvest
(getharvest.com).
There are others, of course, and I keep a list of them—some online, some
downloadable, including two CFML-based ones—in
Mark, I know you have “solved” the problem, but in case it may help anyone
following along, here are things that may have helped you or may help others in
the future:
- yep, this is referring to the new PDF Generating feature added in CF11, which
can be used by using the CFHTMLTOPODF tag (as
Yep, local groups can be great. (And thanks for the shout outs, Billy and
James.)
And funny that Billy complained that your group soon became him talking all the
time. I’ve avoided that with the online CF Meetup, but its been like pulling
teeth to get speakers—which makes no sense to me. There
se too. Some
more communication sure could go a long way here, the current level makes it
feel like they have zero interest in the product and just treat it as a cash
cow until the cow finally kills over and dies.
--
Admiral Aaron Rouse
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:37 PM, charlie arehart <c
As for the lack of comms from Adobe, again I don’t deny that, but I would add
that they are VERY careful about sending out email. And that means that even
the CF team can have a hard time getting email out. Another challenge is for
Adobe to distinguish who really is an active user vs who just
I don’t know if you’re saying that in jest, Aaron, but I would have been that
“certain Charlie”. :-)
Yep, I worked for New Atlanta from 2003-2006 (hard to believe it’s been over 10
years since I left). And yep, as we were needing to persuade people about the
value it brought (especially for
And Gary, as for google results often being old ones, well, consider first that
some answers from back then may be as good now as then. Indeed, google ranks a
result based on (among many other things of course) how often people open it
and then don’t proceed to open another in the given search
“The very leaders” of CF user groups (all of them, as you seem to imply) have
not “moved away”, Aaron. You have cited one, and I’m sure you could name more.
Individuals can of course go where they will, and user group leaders especially
may be more inclined than most to move on because they
to know we
are just "average" now in their eyes, but then again I think we long since
figured that out anyway.
--
Admiral Aaron Rouse
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 7:38 PM, charlie arehart <charlie_li...@carehart.org
<mailto:charlie_li...@carehart.org> > wrote:
I don’t kn
Thanks, Billy. Yep, I recommend all CFers watch this session, whether fans, or
“just doing it for a living”, or even those “headed out the door” to another
tech. At least hear what Adobe has to say about the past, present, and future
of CF, in terms of myths that need busting.
I’ve seen him
information overload, it can be overwhelming, but
Charlie Arehart has some excellent free videos on the YouTube showing how to
get started with the tool.
Take Care,
Seth
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Houston ColdFusion
Users' Group" discussio
Glad to help. I do understand that different people have different resources to
turn to, so I try to offer a range of options for folks to consider. :-) Hope
you can solve it via Sophos.
/charlie
From: houcfug@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Mike G
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 01:23 PM
Perhaps someone will offer that, but there are other thoughts to consider
(including whether you should be doing that job yourself at all).
So first, how about if instead of blocking them in the Windows firewall, you
blocked them in IIS? You can do that if you have added the “ip and domain
Try putting that content not between the cfhttp tags but in a cfhttpparam with
type="body". /CharlieSent from my mobile device. Please pardon typos.
Original message From: Shane Heasley
Date: 3/26/21 8:17 PM (GMT-06:00) To: houcfug@googlegroups.com Subject: Re:
[houcfug]
58 matches
Mail list logo
