[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

2009-10-07 Thread Oskar Sander
annoying, one workaround seems to be to: add one image, save, exit, open project, add one image, exite, etc 2009/10/7 allard a...@allardkatan.net I experience the same problem as Oskar. Running binaries straight from the unzipped package. Load one image, all still fine. Load one more image,

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download

2009-10-07 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi all OS X users, 2009/10/6 grow george...@gmail.com: With this new Beta I quite quickly achieved a wonderful stitch at 5,000 x 2500 pixels. I was very pleased with that ... but then I set it running at maximum resolution about 12,000 x 6,000 and had the usual - out of memory crash when

[hugin-ptx] Re: Oups, I've added two strings!

2009-10-07 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Tuesday 06 October 2009 schrieb Bruno Postle: On Mon 05-Oct-2009 at 19:00 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Bruno Postle wrote: I haven't played with this, but does this really need to generate an error message? the fast preview dragging not. but the error can be produced by entering illegal

[hugin-ptx] Re: [OSX] hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download

2009-10-07 Thread grow
Allan, Thanks. I tried the JPEGs on my machine and just as you had found ... Auto-pano-sift created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32 of them that were on the clouds. So then I created two 8-bit TIFF files and again Auto-pano-sift created 35 control points and Celeste removed the 32

[hugin-ptx] replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hello, I've got a quite sound idea. Just to put a bug in your head (czech saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports which are caused by using some forbidden characters inside makefile (and some strange bugs too). Sometimes they can be escaped but sometimes it doesn't

[hugin-ptx] possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-07 Thread Harry van der Wolf
2009/10/7 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com I'm not Mac user (although I find it really cool but very expensive) but I may found solution for out of memory problem. I had a discussion about memory and I mentioned these fragmentation problems on OS. And get interesting advice – use TLSF

[hugin-ptx] Re: [OSX] hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download

2009-10-07 Thread Allan Seidel
Does a change to the Celeste parameters in preferences result in better performance for these images without removing desirable points? There are also people in these images. Sometimes they are also like clouds. By the way, from my perspective I am struck by the total absence of litter and excess

[hugin-ptx] Re: windows binary release

2009-10-07 Thread Jim Watters
allard wrote: I'm trying to build libpano from svn 1096 but MSVC is giving me some errors. I run into something that is beyond my extremely limited coding abilities. Here's the output from MSVC that keeps showing up: 12pano13.lib(PTcommon.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol

[hugin-ptx] Re: Oups, I've added two strings!

2009-10-07 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 02:07:12AM -0700, Bart van Andel wrote: Anyway, instead of a pop up error message box, couldn't we change the color of the text box (into red for example) and add an exclamation mark in front with a tooltip text when entering too high / too low values? Just a

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download

2009-10-07 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 11:39:59AM -0700, grow wrote: Perhaps I will finally get around to installing that extra RAM and see if that helps. :-) It will not help. I guarantee you. enblend: info: loading next image: FoyleDays_M2_040007.tif 1/1 enblend: info: creating blend mask:

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-07 Thread Stefan Peter
Hi I'd be interested in doing some tests, too. I remember having had memory issues as well, but I was never able to reproduce them reliably here on Linux / Linux_64 and Windows. Is there someplace one could get the project in question? Cheers Stefan Peter

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-07 Thread Harry van der Wolf
To answer my own mail. :-) I just compiled cppcheck on OSX and did a standard run on the enblend trunk. It displays the following [./vigra_impex/jpeg.cxx:132]: (error) Class JPEGCodecImpl which is inherited by class JPEGDecoderImplBase does not have a virtual destructor

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-07 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi Harry, 2009/10/7 Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com: 2009/10/7 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com I'm not Mac user (although I find it really cool but very expensive) but I may found solution for out of memory problem. I had a discussion about memory and I mentioned these

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-07 Thread Harry van der Wolf
I did another run from the Gui (took a few minutes to find how to compile that one). That gave more results: [assemble.h:308]: (possible style) Pre-Incrementing variable 'i' is preferred to Post-Incrementing [assemble.h:308]: (possible style) Pre-Incrementing variable 'i' is preferred to

[hugin-ptx] Re: Celeste and 16bit photos

2009-10-07 Thread Tim Nugent
Hmmm that's strange. Could someone send me a link to the 16-bit tiffs and I'll have a look tonight. Tim Bruno Postle wrote: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 04:55 -0700, grow wrote: So it seems that Celeste is not as good at removing control points on 16-bit TIFF images. This is odd, according to

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Gerry Patterson
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I've got a quite sound idea. Just to put a bug in your head (czech saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports which are caused by using some forbidden characters inside makefile

[hugin-ptx] Re: Celeste and 16bit photos

2009-10-07 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Hi Tim, you can download the jpeg images and use ImageMagick's convert or graphicsmagick gm to convert to 16 bit tiff. I did that and celeste works. Next to that: I still have Georges hotel village 16bit images (from the other topic). If I use them, celeste works also. This almost looks like

[hugin-ptx] Re: Celeste and 16bit photos

2009-10-07 Thread rew
On Oct 7, 7:17 pm, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote: you can download the jpeg images and use ImageMagick's convert or graphicsmagick gm to convert to 16 bit tiff. George's dataset is quite large, but you need only about 3 images from his dataset to trigger the enblend bug. Roger.

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-07 Thread Stefan Peter
Hi Lukáš instead of changing the RAM on your PC, you could use a virtual machine like vmware or virtualbox. There, you can limit the resources at your will. Regards Stefan Peter --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Bruno Postle
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 15:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. Although I'm not a huge XML fan (in fact I think it's overused) it could bring some improvements to the current workflow. I've two ideas how it could help. First it

[hugin-ptx] Re: windows binary release

2009-10-07 Thread Yuval Levy
allard wrote: Until this is solved I'll take panomatic out of the install script and update. Herbert Bay, the inventor of SURF, was a GSoC-Mentor for Hugin/Panotools in 2007. I recall he mentioned a patent. I've pinged him as well. Independent on wether SURF is patented or not, I repeat that

[hugin-ptx] Language Translation Patch, second attempt

2009-10-07 Thread Yuval Levy
Hi all attached is my second attempt at patching the source tree so that also strings outside of wxWidgets can be translated. This one should work on Windows (or at least not break anything) within the SDK. Please test on OSX too. If somebody wants to improve FindGettextLibs.cmake to better

[hugin-ptx] Re: windows binary release

2009-10-07 Thread Bruno Postle
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Perl is required for Bruno's Panotools-Scripts which are part of the panotools distribution. I don't know the exact detail of the CMake build, but I think it should also work without perl (and simply not install the perl scripts).

[hugin-ptx] Re: Glut error while building hugin 2009.9.2 in Ubuntu Jaunty

2009-10-07 Thread Essi
Thanks, installing libxmu-dev and libxi-dev solved the problem, everything is fine now. On 6 Oct, 04:49, Tduell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote: Hullo Essi, On Oct 6, 10:34 am, Essi sennai...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks for the suggestions but nothing works and still the same message. I've

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Bruno Postle
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included). This all sounds like

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Gerry Patterson
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Yuval Levy
Bruno Postle wrote: Isn't there enough stuff that really needs fixing in Hugin? yes there is. but the topic seems to itch Lukáš. Other topics may not be of interest to him. What can you do with XML that we can't already do with the current .pto format? it's extensible without conflicts,

[hugin-ptx] Re: windows binary release

2009-10-07 Thread Yuval Levy
Bruno Postle wrote: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Perl is required for Bruno's Panotools-Scripts which are part of the panotools distribution. I don't know the exact detail of the CMake build, but I think it should also work without perl (and simply not install the

[hugin-ptx] Re: windows binary release

2009-10-07 Thread Yuval Levy
Jim Watters wrote: Lets get the current release out first. I wont be checking any of this into trunk soon. I'm looking forward for the updated Photoshop plugins. I'm currently stuck with Photoshop CS2 because Photoshop CS3 crashes on my box when I use the plugins there. How about a

[hugin-ptx] Re: windows binary release

2009-10-07 Thread Pablo d'Angelo
allard schrieb: no panomatic is definitely not in the SDK. and it adds short term problems - until the patent (SURF) expires. I think we need to follow the lead of the Mac OSX builds and make separate installers for the CP generators. But I also think that this should come after the