There is also Upstream from Innovation (the FDR company).
Kees.
Pope, Lynette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]..
.
Cross-posted to MVS-OE and IBM-Main
We're looking at products comparable to IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for
USS
For backup and restore of data
Ken,
as you can see, I have more scratch tapes with D SMS than counted in the
LM.
I can change libraryentry in volcat to the right value, but after oam
restart this count is changed back to the wrong value.
Question: From where has oam his information? IMO oam talks with the LM.
But this
Ed Gould wrote:
On Aug 9, 2005, at 1:35 AM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
Just a quick apology to the BCP (and ancillary product) support teams.
Went back and checked my holddata - *ALL* the holds that referred
back to
PTFs were from ...
...
...
tada ...
...
yep, you quessed it - DB2 .
Shane
thanks I m getting trace entry for this after entry to issue messages.
Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:$GETBLK is a JES2 macro.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of mary george
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:00
From: Paul Gillis
5 - Always DB2 in its own zone. MVS in another.
Then it depends on the site as to who applies maintenance. My previous
site, we did all maintenance into product separate CSIs and then let the
DBAs perform their post-apply magic. At my current site, the DBAs do it
all, which
On 8/9/2005 9:11 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
I'm working on an ACF2 to RACF conversion. Getting SDSF to work under
RACF is a royal PITA because all it gives you is an ISPF message NOT
AUTHORIZED FOR xxx. The underlying ICH408I is suppressed, so I can't
see the real failure. Is there any way to
Hi Bruce,
DEL VVR doesn't work (RC 08)!
How to force de deletion of theses entries in catalog ?
Regards/Cordialement.
M. Mustafa
-Message d'origine-
De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part
de Bruce Black
Envoyé : mercredi 3 août 2005 14:39
À :
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/09/2005
at 03:55 PM, Matthew Stitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Your computer has always been made up of multiple processors
650/MP ;-)
You know that a Coupling Facility has nothing to do with the
railroad
Bordello?
You remember HIPO and know that it's not a zoo
Did you check the manual(s) ???.
IIRC there are RACF profile requirements - most likely
FACILITY/STGADMIN.summit-or-other.
Shane ...
- Original Message -
From: Moussadak, Mustafa
...
DEL VVR doesn't work (RC 08)!
How to force de deletion of theses entries in catalog ?
Many moons ago I got a script off someone on IBM-MAIN to transfer
Shopz files that had been downloaded to my pc up to z/OS HFS for SMP/E
processing. That someone may have been Ed Jaffe, I can't exactly
remember. Anyhow my pc has been replaced and I have lost said script
and I can't even remember
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of tony babonas
Thanks for the clarification, FY, that's what I get for
reading the list from home without my trusty office PC at hand
Based on the limited snippet of sample records, this is
theoretically
- Original Message -
From: Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: Any way to get SDSF to cough up ICH408I?
On 8/9/2005 9:11 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
I'm working on an ACF2 to RACF conversion. Getting SDSF
Thomas Conley said (amongst other more relevant stuff);
...
I've got a concussion from the bricks.
Tom, you're too short to go head-butting brick walls mate.
Stop it before you disappear :o)
Shane ...
--
For
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 15:55 -0500, Matthew Stitt wrote:
[... the perfect Friday thread, albeit a few days early]
Also:
You know what NPRO means
Your primary performance measurement tool was once a wait light
You've ever eagerly anticipated letters from M. Kloomok
You've ever referred to
Tom,
I imagine that the RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH for the commands has got the
LOG=NONE option - I imagine the reason for this is that you would be
flooded with ICH408I's just during SDSF startup as SDSF determines which
commands you are authorized to see on the SDSF Primary Option Menu.
Maybe there
Are there any generic XCF packages available?
Regards,
John Kalinich
Computer Sciences Corp
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
You might be a mainframer if you've ever played ring toss in the tape pool
out of boredom.
Ever showed up for a, cable pull, just to get free pizza.
Gotten a sick feeling while sitting at your desk outside the raised floor,
just after lunch, when all the lights flickered and things got real
I have to admit, though, that the ones I have read were not page
turners.
sure they were, you had to keep turning the pages to get past the
incomprensible CEspeak to find the few nuggets of useful info
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing
I can't remember the exact machine now, but we had just replaced a 3081 with a
new, single frame box, so the computer room was empty, with the single frame
standing in the center (kind of like the IBM server ad). The building's power
failed, and I went into the computer room to await power and
On 8/10/2005 8:24 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
I found the PROFILE WTPMSG suggestion in the SDSF online help. That
fixed the NOT AUTHORIZED FOR JOB, but the NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CMD is
still giving us ZIP. IRRADU00 does not show any INSAUTH records, and
SAFTRACE is empty. I've got a concussion
Dear Listers,
We are considering what the security impact of putting a WAS on mainframe in
the DMZ would be. I was wondering: did any of you already do that? What
impact does this have on the operational organization? Do you have special
procedures for application and system maintenance? Do you
I have a DATA INDEX entries of one KSDS in a catalog without a entrie of a
CLUSTER. There's no relevant info in the VVDS.
Sorry, I misread your message. I thought the entries were in the VTOC
but not in the catalog.
The command to delete hanging component names from the catalog when the
There is also Upstream from Innovation (the FDR company).
True. please see
http://www.innovationdp.fdr.com/products/upstream/upsunix.cfm
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And you read a lot of neverending or offtopic threads on your popular
mailing list
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Thomas Conley wrote:
snip
Please pass along to
the SDSF designer that it would be a whole lot easier if SDSF would just
issue the @#$%^* ICH408I, without jumping through the PROFILE WTPMSG
hoop. NOWTPMSG is the default for a new TSO user, so debugging these
errors is a huge PITA.
snip
Hi,
The ACS routines that are currently active are missing the source. Is there a
way to retrieve it ? I need to look at the filterlists.
TIA
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse Service of New York
(212) 609 - 5596
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Rob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 8:48 AM
Subject: RE: Any way to get SDSF to cough up ICH408I?
Tom,
I imagine that the RACROUTE REQUEST=AUTH for the commands has got the
LOG=NONE option - I
In a message dated 8/10/2005 6:38:49 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DEL VVR doesn't work (RC 08)!
//FILE1 DD UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=badvol,DISP=SHR
//SYSIN DD *
del bad_name NVR FILE(FILE1) CAT('MCAT_Name')
Hello all,
We modified our ACS routines so that our production VSAM files will be
defined as extended format VSAM, after months of testing with test VSAM
files and having no issues.
Early this morning, a production program that is in a job that runs every
day issued an OPEN I-O on a data set and
Thanks guys! We'll check it out.
Lynette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 7:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BrightStor CA-Disk Backup Restore for UNIX System
Services
- Original Message -
From: Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Any way to get SDSF to cough up ICH408I?
On 8/10/2005 8:24 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
I found the PROFILE WTPMSG suggestion in the SDSF
If you are at z/OS R6 or higher
SAVE ACDS as SCDS
A new operand on the SETSMS command, SAVESCDS is available as shown in
Figure 1-1.
Figure 1-1 SETSMS SAVESCDS command
Where scds_dsname is the name of the SCDS into which the current ACDS will
be copied. You
can use this new SCDS to work with as
Hmm. Sounds like the start of a really neat and interesting SHARE technical
session in the HLASM track to me... complete with take-home examples of
working code! :)
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005
- Original Message -
From: John Eells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Any way to get SDSF to cough up ICH408I?
Thomas Conley wrote:
snip
Sorry if I missed it earlier in the thread, but...there's nothing (i.e.,
I wish I was attending. Budget disallows it this time around. I look
forward to seeing the conference proceedings, though.
Thanks, Sam.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 10:27 AM
To:
Wel ... we're talking about Jaffe and Craddock here.
Find a comfortable bar Peter - they'll be more than expansive :o)
Shane ...
From: Farley, Peter
Hmm. Sounds like the start of a really neat and interesting SHARE technical
session in the HLASM track to me...
Tom,
A quick skip thru the SDSF code reveals quite a few LOG=NOSTAT style
invocations of ISFSAF (the SDSF SAF interface code).
Obviously without full knowledge of the code it is hard to judge if
these are being executed - but it looks suspicious.
I would love to be at Share - but family
Hi Jantje
We're running a zOS DMZ with a WAS for about 3 years now. It is in a
dedicated LPAR whithin one of our CECs. Since the application running in the
DMZ is read-only, the setup and the protection of the production environment
was quite simple. No worries about saving the data or
All reasonable answers, Frank, but the awk script proposed in one of the
replies to the OP's question will do it right now with no fuss, no muss,
problem solved already. Floating fields like the OP gave as an example are
perfect targets for regular expression pattern matching.
What you could
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:58:53 -0400, Thomas Conley wrote:
From: Walt Farrell
On 8/10/2005 8:24 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
I found the PROFILE WTPMSG suggestion in the SDSF online help. That
fixed the NOT AUTHORIZED FOR JOB, but the NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CMD is
still giving us ZIP. IRRADU00 does
Darren must still be on vacation.
**
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally
privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of the
addressee(s). If
Wel ... we're talking about Jaffe and Craddock here.
Find a comfortable bar Peter - they'll be more than expansive
:o)
Shane ...
Hey I resemble that remark! So does Ed - and as you know, he's really
the bad influence. In Annaheim, he almost had to hold poor young Rob
Scott down to
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:51:25 -0500, Craddock, Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wel ... we're talking about Jaffe and Craddock here.
Find a comfortable bar Peter - they'll be more than expansive
:o)
Shane ...
Hey I resemble that remark! So does Ed - and as you know, he's really
the bad
Craddock, Chris wrote:
Hey I resemble that remark! So does Ed - and as you know, he's really
the bad influence. In Annaheim, he almost had to hold poor young Rob
Scott down to pour a beer into him. I helped, but only because Ed is
such a bad influence. Warning to young share attendees; don't go
I do not believe SDSF would be able to generate RACF messages since SDSF
uses SAPI. This has to be from JES2 and JES2 RACF error can only be
initiated by setting the $TDEBUG,SECURITY=YES. Care should be taken
since there is a possibility of generating too many WTO messages,
depends on spool access
We are considering what the security impact of putting a WAS on mainframe in
the DMZ would be.
It is always frustrating for me when someone posts a question using
acronyms assuming that everyone on the list understands them.
I vaguely knew that WAS refers to Websphere but DMZ?
I knew the
Hi, all. I have been asked so many times What is a systems programmer?
And What is it they do? that I'm not sure anymore. Especially in
today's environment. Can any of you point me to an article or articles
the would explain what we are and what we do?
Thanks.
From: Edward E. Jaffe
When it
comes to drinking beer, consider for a moment that Chris was born and
raised in Australia. Need I say more?
Careful fella - that could be (mis-)interpreted as a general reference to
all us Aussies.
Shane ...
Tom,
I seem to recall that the last time we set up a new LPAR, we were getting
similar messages until we issued $S to JES2. Don't know if that's
applicable...
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
Does anyone have Cheryl Watson's address so I can contact her ?
Thank you.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
In a message dated 8/10/2005 10:54:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone have Cheryl Watson's address so I can contact her ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bill Fairchild
Try http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=cheryl+watson
The first hit is Cheryl's web site.
Brian
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:25:36 -0400, Raymond J. Slisz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have Cheryl Watson's address so I can contact her ?
Thank you.
Mike,
Check out Introduction to the New Mainframe: z/OS Basics, SG24-6366,
Section 1.8.1, Who is the Systems Programmer.
Lock Lyon
Compuware Corp
Ward, Mike S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
08/10/2005 11:30 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
See the contact list on her web site...
http://www.watsonwalker.com/contact.html
Jeffrey Deaver, Senior Analyst, Systems Engineering
651-665-4231
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
ibm-main wrote:
From: Edward E. Jaffe
When it
comes to drinking beer, consider for a moment that Chris was born and
raised in Australia. Need I say more?
Careful fella - that could be (mis-)interpreted as a general reference to
all us Aussies.
I never met an Aussie yet that
Start at http://www.watsonwalker.com/contact.html - try Cheryl
Does anyone have Cheryl Watson's address so I can contact her ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gawd, I'll hate me in the morning. Go to Google Groups
http://groups.google.com/group/bit.listserv.ibm-main?lnk=lrhl=en, search
within group for 'Ken Dubbo sprog'
Sorry, Darren.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steve Conway
Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703.921.6432
We're the janitor's of IT. Remember why they call him Dirty Harry?
That's pretty much us. In most shops that title still commands
professional respect because our experience and what we know how to do. In
other shops, it only means they know how to type A:INSTALL without help
from spell check.
The IBM Redbook The ABCs of z/OS System Programming Volume 1, Section
1.24, titled z/OS operating system: the role of a system programmer
has a good description.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246981.pdf
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
I haven't come up with a good definition for Systems Programmer but here's a
test to see if you are one (no offense meant to anyone):
Are You Qualified To Be a Systems Programmer?
The following test will determine that without any questions. Read
carefully. Answer all questions. Time limit:
ITYM Section 16.1 here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/zoslib/pdf/zosbasic.pdf
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 12:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What is a Systems Programmer
Mike,
I added 5 PTS spill datasets to the system because of the large amount of
sysmods which had to be received.
Prior to doing that I had one PTS dataset and when I went to do an apply check
for fmid HOS1110 I received a number of hits which is why I had to order all
the above sysmods.
Now when
Thanks Ned,
By the way, why quiche-eating?
Rob.
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is: are those four special tasks STCs, or just threads
inside the CAS?
...
They are TCB's within the CAS.
They are not quiche-eating 'threads', forks, spawns, or
DMZ, which stands for demilitarized zone, is the logical area in a Web
application's architecture that separates the untrusted Internet from
the trusted Intranet.
...
Now, if somebody could explain the explanation?
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
Can any of you point me to an article or articles
the would explain what we are and what we do?
...
I do what my boss tells me to do.
As long as it's: legal; ethical; moral;
withing company policy!
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
Firewall
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 8:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AW: Mainframe in the DMZ -- organization of operations
DMZ, which stands for
Thanks Ned,
By the way, why quiche-eating?
...
It's 'Ted'.
Have you seen how their implemented?
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Firewall
Well! Why didn't they say so?
I know what that is!
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
I would just like to solicit any experiences / horror/war stories with
running LPARS in the same Parallel Sysplex, some 31 bit and some 64 bit.
Actually I would like to hear from you with good and/or bad, or any
experiences.
All lpars are at z/OS 1.4. Running DB2 V7. I would like input from
We ran that way for about 16 months during 2002-2003 as we rolled out
z/OS 1.3 across the LPARs. There were no issues - good or bad.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Rob W Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005
Can you show us the JCL submitted and any DDDEFs in the target zone for
the PTS data sets?
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 1:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
I would just like to solicit any experiences / horror/war stories with
running LPARS in the same Parallel Sysplex, some 31 bit and some 64 bit.
...
As long as you're within 'N-3', and your software is current, there should be
no issue.
I've done it twice (2 different shops), with no issues.
I get NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CMD trying to purge my own output from the HOLD
queue. Another system programmer here gets NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CMD when
trying to add an initiator class from the INIT panel.
That sure sounds like an issue with ISFPRM. Maybe you can post the contents
of your segments in
Rob, we have this environment (31 bit and 64 bit LPARs in the same Sysplex,
z/OS 1.4 and DB2 v7). No problem.
You have to take care about Assembler code if you use it for
exits/programs/SVC. The new 64 bit instructions are not supported in 31
bit so it's necessary to keep different versions
Ted Now, if somebody could explain the explanation?
Oh Grasshopper,
What part you mean?
DMZ to mean Firewall is a cheap usurpation of a term deriving from a human
tragedy that technically is not finished.
Korean War ended with an armistice, and the Imjin River to the South and the
Military
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
As long as you're within 'N-3', and your software is current, there should be
no issue.
Remember, 'N-3' was from the old OS/390 coexistence rules. For z/OS,
supported releases coexist.
--
-
| Edward E.
Hi All,
and special thanks to Norman
I'd like to explain our problem.
Our problem has nothing to do with slow allocation.
What makes us worried is unpredictable, very low data xfer rates from time
to time.
Before migration to VTS we used STK/Timberline ESCON devices.
Most of the devices had a
In a message dated 8/10/2005 12:27:34 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
added 5 PTS spill datasets to the system because of the large amount of
sysmods which had to be received.
Look at the REPORTs at the bottom of the RECEIVE. It shows
the datasets opened during
Remember, 'N-3' was from the old OS/390 coexistence rules. For z/OS,
supported releases coexist.
...
Semantically null.
(8-{]}
1.4 through 1.7 are supported.
1.4 is N-3 from 1.7.
Until 1.8 is released, we won't know for sure.
I have found nothing that refutes 'N-3', nor supports your
On 3/31/2007, 1.4 goes off support. At that time, N-3, relative to 1.7,
no longer applies.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 8:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Walt,
Thanks to Dennis Trojak and Tom Schmidt, I turned on the SDSF trace facility
for 0080 SAF events and viola! I saw an OPERCMDS call for
JES2.CANCEL.somethingorother. You may remember about 2 months ago that we
had to disable OPERCMDS in order to prevent those unsightly 483 FRACINT
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:02:33 -0400, Thomas Conley wrote:
Thanks to Dennis Trojak and Tom Schmidt, I turned on the SDSF trace
facility for 0080 SAF events and viola! I saw an OPERCMDS call for
JES2.CANCEL.somethingorother. You may remember about 2 months ago that we
had to disable OPERCMDS in
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 04:36:27 -0700, mary george [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
ISSR978DB522
MODID RACKW
...
Looks like module ISTRACKW ssued the message, but I don't know if that
helps much. Does the message text help any?
Pat O'Keefe
The authorization checking in this case is not done by SDSF and
consequently issuing an ICH408I is not under its control. If you're a
RACF shop, list the resource profiles defined to the OPERCMDS class and
make sure the relevant profiles have the necessary users/groups in their
access list.
Salah Balboul wrote:
How can you tell if the FICON Express2 is operating at 2Gbit/Sec speed?
They are connected to a 2105 device type.
Nobody answered, so I jump in :-)
AFAIK FiconE2 is compatible with equal/slower speeds of other Ficon-Adapters
because it uses auto negotiation for speed.
So
In a recent note, Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) said:
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:01:52 -0400
On 3/31/2007, 1.4 goes off support. At that time, N-3, relative to 1.7,
no longer applies.
Unless, perchance, 1.8 were to be released in Fall, 2006. Then
N-3 might still be applicable.
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Remember, 'N-3' was from the old OS/390 coexistence rules. For z/OS,
supported releases coexist.
...
Semantically null.
(8-{]}
1.4 through 1.7 are supported.
1.4 is N-3 from 1.7.
Until 1.8 is released, we won't know for sure.
I have found nothing that refutes 'N-3',
No. Release of 1.8 won't affect it at all. It's N-3 relative to 1.7,
not 1.8 or any other then existing releases after 1.7.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 3:28 PM
SK wrote:
But even without the using the NewStringPlatform JNI call, the code
runs out of memory in the manner as mentioned earlier. I had tried to
find some kind of information related to this but in vain.
Well, like USS stuff Java integration is not documented very well :-)
AFAIK it is
- Original Message -
From: Tom Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: SDSF finally coughs up the ICH408I (sort of)
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:02:33 -0400, Thomas Conley wrote:
Thanks to Dennis Trojak and Tom
You need to define your Spill SMPPTS data sets in each zone. The DDDEFs in
the GLOBAL zone apply to RECEIVE and REJECT processing, while DDDEFs in
your target zone apply to APPLY processing.
Brian
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:57:34 -0700, Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ed, thanks I got
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
As I struggle to count on my fingers: it appears that with the
release of release N, release N-3 nears its third anniversary
at which it ends support. So, typically, support (and thus
coexistence) will extend only through N-2. Or did I miss a
finger? Should I try again
In a message dated 8/10/2005 3:04:06 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
while DDDEFs in
your target zone apply to APPLY processing.
And Distribution Zone DDDEFSs for ACCEPT. Failure to follow these
patterns can lead to one ugly, mismatched set of librarys and
System.
I was just tidying up my desk and filed the foils from a session at SHARE in
New York you might find useful.
FTP Analysis via SMF Records, FTP
Server Exits and Logging, and CTRACE
SHARE Session 3961
August 16, 2004
David Cheng
Applied Expert Systems, Inc.
You should be able to locate it in the
No missing fingers that I can tell. With the new annual release
schedule and 3 years service for any given release, N-2 is about all
we'll see. Essentially N-3, N-2, or N-whatever are no longer relevant.
It's any-supported-release can coexist-migrate-fallback with
any-other-supported release.
Currently, The City of Phoenix is recruiting for a senior-level Systems
Programmer. The following URL describes the basic qualifications, salary
range, etc.
http://phoenix.gov/jobs/techno/09570D.html
David R. DeBevec
Senior Info Tech Systems Specialist
City of Phoenix, Information Technology
Why can't I purge my jobs, change INIT classes, change SRVCLASS?
...
There's only one on that list I would allow.
Purging my jobs.
Who in their right mind allows users to do the latter?
Your performance capacity people set up a config for a good reason!
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others
We can't even fill our SysProg position here in San Antonio.
-Original Message-
From: David DeBervec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Job Opening - Sr Systems Programmer
Currently, The City of Phoenix is recruiting
Really...
While here on the East coast, you can't even get the hiring companies to
return telephone calls...
Go figure...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Desi de la Garza
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 4:31 PM
To:
On 8/10/2005 3:02 PM, Thomas Conley wrote:
Thanks to Dennis Trojak and Tom Schmidt, I turned on the SDSF trace
facility for 0080 SAF events and viola! I saw an OPERCMDS call for
JES2.CANCEL.somethingorother. You may remember about 2 months ago that
we had to disable OPERCMDS in order to
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
