Gil,
The trouble with omitting the address statement is that you are
ASSUMING that no statement in the previous logic has changed the
environment during execution (not compilation).
If the REXX exec is of a reasonable size and more than one person could
be changing the code - this is a BIG
Hi to all.
Does somebody know how to read a particular member of PDS using MVS address
or Storage function only?
I mean: I've a Rexx program compiled with STUB MULTI that at the moment run
in background mode and in
its jcl has within some member of the same partitioned dataset that, for the
Putting the address (env) in front of each call will prevent
situations such as these - and yes it adds an extra few characters to
each line - but so do comments
Well, we'll agree to disagree.
As for comments:
Real programmers don't do comments.
If it was hard to write, it should be hard to
In the heady days of pre-Y2K, I spent a few years as a freelance
sysprog.
At one site - this involved going through hundreds of in-house assembler
programs - finding the source, bringing them under Endevor control and
making sure that they were ready for Y2K.
I think it was during this time that
Hi,
As a beginner,it's interesting to find that there is also a 'unix'
on Z/os.However,I know nothing about it.Before doing some
research,I would like to raise two simple questions about '
What can USS do'.
1,The only way at this time I know to access USS is issuing
'OMVS' in a TSO session.Is
Someone asked in comp.lang.asm370 about SSP, the Scientific
Subroutine Package that used to exist in both PL/I and Fortran.
As well as I remember, it was release as source and freely
available. Does it still exist?
-- glen
I have the manual for the FORTRAN SSP and it might be 2 volumes. It
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Marshall
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SSP in PL/I or Fortran
Someone asked in comp.lang.asm370 about SSP, the Scientific
In a recent note, Johnny Luo said:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:15:47 +0800
As a beginner,it's interesting to find that there is also a 'unix'
on Z/os.However,I know nothing about it.Before doing some
research,I would like to raise two simple questions about '
What can USS do'.
Johnny,
there is port name called otelnet in file /etc/services which points to the
port of the uss telnet. Of course either the otelnetd daemon or the
configured inetd must be running. The port of otelnet must be different from
the normal telnet port for tso. You must also have defined an omvs
I record Type 99 write them out during daily dump to a separate GDG and
retain them for 5 days. If you have a problem with WLM it is easier to
have the 99's than not. If I have this type of problem I expect to know
about it soon enough to preserve the data. I equate them to data from a
flight
Thanks a lot for your kind help.Tomorrow I'll take a look at USS
configuration
.After that,I'll give the feedback.
Perhaps another question,is there a command in OMVS to see whether
or not 'the otelnetd daemon or the configured inetd' is running?Because at
the
beginning stage I just want to use
If you have SAS MXG there is ANALSMF with MXG which provides a very useful
analysis of SMF data contents and SMF data set buffer utilization.
http://www.sas.com/
http://www.mxg.com/
THIS PROGRAM ANALYZES YOUR SMF DATA TO REPORT THE OPTIMUM VSAM
CISIZE TO MINIMIZE THE SIZE OF YOUR VSAM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SSP in PL/I or Fortran
In a message dated 1/18/2006 7:55:42 A.M. Central Standard Time,
just as every unix, go into omvs and enter ps -ef ! grep xxx. Pay attention,
the sign behind the ps -ef is an exclamation mark.
- Original Message -
From: Johnny Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:26 PM
In a recent note, Johnny Luo said:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:26:39 +0800
Perhaps another question,is there a command in OMVS to see whether
or not 'the otelnetd daemon or the configured inetd' is running?Because at
With JES2, I'd use SDSF's DA option. Does JES3 have an equivalent?
Hi all,
I received the following message when trying to dump a PDSE:
ADR793E (ttt)-m(yy), DATA SET dsname ON VOLUME volume_serial_number
IS
AN INCONSISTENT PDSE AND CANNOT BE COPIED | DUMPED | RESTORED
Explanation: The data set's PDSE indicators in the VTOC and VVDS do not
match.
In a recent note, Pohlen Mailinglist said:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:50:47 +0100
just as every unix, go into omvs and enter ps -ef ! grep xxx. Pay attention,
My experience is that the options for ps are not the same for every unix.
Is ps standardized by POSIX?
the sign behind the
I thought the copyright was only good for seventeen years?
I think it depends on the country.
As a member of the Copyright Convention, you are protected in other countries
as well as you protect in your country.
IIRC, patent protection is 17 years.
Copyright is for life +25 years.
-teD
Me? A
On 1/17/2006 2:38 AM, Víctor de la Fuente wrote:
Our problem is also SMF starts losing data before all files are full:
IEE979W SMF DATA LOST - NO BUFFER SPACE AVAILABLE TIME=08:19:30
...
D SMF
IEE974I 08.20.04 SMF DATA SETS 177
NAMEVOLSER SIZE(BLKS) %FULL STATUS
I'm not certain I understand. You would like to read a member of a PDS from
a batch Rexx program without
- Pre-allocating the member in JCL; or
- Doing dynamic allocation from within the Rexx.
Is that right? I assume you might like to allocate the ENTIRE PDS with JCL
(like the SYSLIB DD in a
I agree, BLSR is a useful critter. I am, in fact, pretty familiar with it,
having introduced its use into production jobs in my group to help
performance.
As to why I need to remove it, there may be a storage overlay issue in my
massively multitasking assembler application code, OR there may be
in omvs you use the exclamation mark instead of the pipe symbol. I know that
this is a difference to normal unix systems, therefore I have mentioned it.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday,
I don't know if ps is standardized by posix, but the command I have told you
works for omvs
- Original Message -
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Two silly
That might be true on your system, but on mine, the vertical bar works just
fine.
For a simple test, I tried ls ! more, and got FSUM6785 File or directory !
is not found
If you use !, I think that it's local to your box.
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
RO-OC-1-13 200
In a message dated 1/18/2006 9:17:07 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it depends on the country.
As a member of the Copyright Convention, you are protected in other
countries as well as you protect in your country.
IIRC, patent protection is 17 years.
It's been a long time since I played with Intertest, so I wouldn't be of
much help without RTFM. I would suggest cross-posting this request to
CICS-L.
Brian Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
01/18/2006 02:57 AM
Please respond to
IBM
In a message dated 1/18/2006 9:41:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you use !, I think that it's local to your box.
Or emulator code page?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
There's no comparable product to SDSF available for JES3 from IBM.
There is a product named EJES that seems to provide most all the SDSF
functionality for JES3 that I need - and there're EJES functions I haven't
had the need to use. I think Ed Jaffe might be a good person to ask for
detailed
In a message dated 1/18/2006 9:17:07 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
It looks like RIM fixed their server bug.
Now the times on my messages won't confuse people.
-teD
Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof!
in omvs you use the exclamation mark instead of the pipe symbol.
I know that this is a difference to normal unix systems, therefore
I have mentioned it.
You are being fooled by the code page problem. The pipe symbol IS the
usual pipe symbol but this just happens to map to the explamation
point
In
!!AAAYAJ/6KggGInlFs/[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/16/2006
at 12:55 PM, Ray Mullins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Actually, I'll throw a little nit out there. There is one feature
of z/Arch that is EBCDIC specific - and that is the decimal
instruction set, with emphasis on UNPK, ED and
There is a product named EJES that seems to provide most
all the SDSF functionality for JES3
...and I gladly learnt that some kind soul was thinking of us
poor g guys that have to move from JES2/SDSF to JES3/EJES:
Most of the SDSF commands are implemented in EJES as synonyms
to the native
Heh. Pohlen Mailinglist. I like that.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Pohlen Mailinglist
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Two silly questions about USS or OMVS on Z/OS
. . .
Hi list,
I know that SMTP provides an exit to validate the jobs and STC's that can
send mail via the SPOOL interface.
Is there a way to do the same for the TCPIP interface to SMTP?
In other words I want to use the TCPIP interface from CICS but only CICSA
and CICSB can send mail to SMTP1 and
Walt Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On 1/17/2006 2:38 AM, Víctor de la Fuente wrote:
Our problem is also SMF starts losing data before all files are full:
IEE979W SMF DATA LOST - NO BUFFER SPACE AVAILABLE TIME=08:19:30
...
D SMF
IEE974I 08.20.04
???
Hi Mr Charles, thanks for you reply and apologize my bad english.
**
you wrote:
- Pre-allocating the member in JCL; or
- Doing dynamic allocation from within the Rexx.
Yes, I want to specify in my jcl the name of partitioned without
membername
having so a dynamic selection of its
Barbara Nitz wrote on 01/18/2006 01:20:07 AM:
snip it will always
tell you the storage key, even for summary dump data (that AFAIR SDUMP
doesn't collect storage keys for).
While the provision remains for SADMP and SDUMP to indicate I don't know
the storage key in dump records, storage keys
Excuse me but I've some problem with gmail
Hi Mr Charles, thanks for you reply and apologize my bad english.
you wrote:
- Pre-allocating the member in JCL; or
- Doing dynamic allocation from within the Rexx.
Yes, I want to specify in my jcl the name of partitioned without membername
having
At 03:58 PM 01/17/2006, you wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/16/2006
at 05:20 PM, Stephen M. Wiegand [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
OK I admit I'm old and my brain sometimes goes out to lunch. Today
is one of those times. I have this error in a REXX macro that I use
in TSO that I just can't
Craig,
take a look at IDCAMS DIAGNOSE and its options. That should give you some more
information.
Perhaps something like this, changed to your site's needs:
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//PRD88A DD UNIT=SYSDA,VOL=SER=PRD88A,DISP=SHR,
//
Hi Victor,
Best answer is get to z/OS R6 where the SMF buffering just works better and is
easily expanded. Since you said you were currently on R4 though you can do
this with a USERMOD. As Walt suggested get yourself some more buffers. Paul
Gillis kindly shared his on the MXG-L list a while
There used to be a nice article at
http://www.objectz.com/cobolreport/archives/TCR_jcl.htm
which talked about the AVGREC parameter and IF-THEN-ELSE-ENDIF
Condition Code processing. I printed a copy of it, but it appears to
be gone.
Googling, I found
One thing you can do which is incredibly easy is to set an OUTTRAP.
Then do a LISTDS to get the members of the PDS into a stem variable.
Then you can step through the stem variable and process one PDS member at a
time.
HTH,
Brendan
Also be sure to exclude type 69 records. See APAR OW45020 or the SMF
manual for details.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Bruce Hewson
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 12:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
I think it's still wrong
Brian
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/18/2006 9:17:07 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
It looks like RIM fixed their server bug.
Now the times on my messages won't confuse people.
-teD
Hi Brendan, thanks for your reply but: neither LISTDS or OUTTRAP are
internal function of Rexx(or MVS).
LISTDS is a tso command
OUTTRAP is an external function that run only in the TSO/E address space.
So I can't use them running out of TSO.
Appreciate your idea but.. I can't.
Regards
I'm trying to find and zap a constant in IEANUC01(IEAANIP0) on OS/360. To do
so, I need to understand how scatter format modules are laid out on disk.
Anyone know where I can find out how that's structured? I'm trying to avoid
reassembling and relinking the entire MVT nucleus.
--
Jay Maynard,
Is an assembler helper an acceptable option? I suspect many people have
written Rexx-helpers for PDSes in assembler and some might be willing to
share it with you. Such subroutines would normally be pure MVS and
independent of TSO.
I've written one but it is too complex - has too much specialized
Hi Don,
We currently exclude type 69 but I browsed the APARs to see if there was
anything new and surprise...
COMMENTS:
The MVS Allocation and SMF components have agreed to accept
this situation as a SUGgestion to be implemented through future
development.
The solution to this
If you specify the dataset name in your JCL and you know the DDNAME, you
can use the LM (Library Access) functions of ISPF to dynamically retrieve
member names
The sequence would be something like LMINIT, LMOPEN, LMFIND or LMMLIST and
LMFREE
Marco Gianfranco Indaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
Some info for your consideration:
1. I think I have found a copy of the Fortran version of this tape.
2. The tape is from the old Contributed Program Library
3. The date in the data on the tape is 1-16-73.
4. I *think* that I also have at least one of the manuals that goes with
the tape, but
Mike Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
We are unable to locate the following message, any help would really be
appreciated.
DGTLM003 RTC=30 RSN=62 MOD=F8
This appears to be a return code from Catalog. Please look up RC30 RSN62
under message IDC3009I. I'll
I believe he has managed to place a non-SMS dataset on an SMS managed
volume. I wonder if the ADRDSSU CONVERTV command would fix him up.
Since it is a SMP/E SMPLTS file, he would be safe in deleting it and
allocate a new one.
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:19:27 -0800, Ulrich Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Mr Charles, many thanks again.
I suppose that something near the assembler is de facto the only way to do
this.
If your tool is too complex is, for me, enough a good advice that will
direct me on
the right way.
My actual idea, that can be wrong, is to reach two target:
1) find a way to list
In a recent note, Pohlen Mailinglist said:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:34:06 +0100
in omvs you use the exclamation mark instead of the pipe symbol. I know that
this is a difference to normal unix systems, therefore I have mentioned it.
Ahem. I tried before I posted:
[EMAIL
In a recent note, jim harrison said:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:16:19 -0500
If you specify the dataset name in your JCL and you know the DDNAME, you
can use the LM (Library Access) functions of ISPF to dynamically retrieve
member names
The sequence would be something like LMINIT,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:08:06 EST, Clark Kidd wrote:
For many years the MVS operating systems (OS/390 and now z/OS) have
maintained separate reporting structures for processor time consumed in
task mode (TCB time) versus processor time consumed while running under an
authorized subtask (SRB time).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Billing for SRB Time
snip
a) SRB CPU time can vary from run to run too much, based on
Ed Jaffe wrote :
Just out of curiosity, is there a performance impact either way?
I was told that there was no difference when I attended my REXX for
Dummies course way back when we still used 3420s..
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/17/2006
at 06:07 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Environment is z/OS 1.6. The Fine Manual specifically says that
SUBSYS=? Overrides DDNAME=?, but makes no mention of whether DDNAME=?
overrides SUBSYS=?. Also no mention for DSN=?.
DDNAME=x
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
01/17/2006
at 09:44 PM, David Alcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You really need a S99RBX any time SMS might be involved in DYNALLOC
because of the additonal error fields there with extended information
on the problem.
Are you saying that the messages produced by an SVC99
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/17/2006
at 05:27 PM, Rob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maybe not - but I think it is good practice
We'll have to agree to disagree; it is both inefficient and confusing.
Maybe not - but I think it is good practice - it protects you from
problems if you happen to
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
01/17/2006
at 09:03 PM, Marian Gasparovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Thank you, nice thing
I really didn't know it was in System/360 when 8bit were first used
for byte
And, in fact, it wasn't. Older I/O gear used 8-bit bytes.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/17/2006
at 09:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Subroutine linkage within a procedure? I'm confused.
In REXX there is a disconnect between internal routines and external
routines, even though the invocation syntax is the same. Even though
much of REXX
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/18/2006
at 04:03 AM, Rob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
and yes it adds an extra few characters to
each line - but so do comments
Extraneous comments are also bad. The rule of comments is to make the
program easier to understand and to modify, not just to take
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/18/2006
at 08:47 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KRDO 4)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I seems to me you want to replace the -strings in the JCL, so the
shall not denote a variable dereference.
No being a fluent edit macro writer I suggest you try to set the scan
mode off before
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/18/2006
at 07:08 AM, Jim Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have the manual for the FORTRAN SSP and it might be 2 volumes. It
contains all the routines along with the printed source code for each
routine. I do not remember seeing any PL/I in their although it is
Rob Scott wrote:
Putting the address (env) in front of each call will prevent
situations such as these - and yes it adds an extra few characters to
each line - but so do comments
Just out of curiosity, is there a performance impact either way?
--
On 1/18/06, Johnny Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps another question,is there a command in OMVS to see whether
or not 'the otelnetd daemon or the configured inetd' is running?Because at
the
beginning stage I just want to use it.If it's alredy running,I can save a
lot time
Assuming INET
McKown, John wrote:
I sincerely doubt that an SRB can be dispatched on a zAAP. From what
little I know of them, they are for JAVA code only. SRBs often execute
supervisor instructions. I cannot prove it, but I don't think that zAAPs
can execute supervisor code. I know that it is documented that
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:35:26PM -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Aren't both the FORTRAN and the PL/I SSP included in OS/360? Are they
on the turnkey CD?
Not that I'm aware of. OTOH, hopefully, we can correct that for Turnkey 4.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC
I don't see how cluttering yp the code makes it easier on the eye, and
the practice actually makes the code harder to maintain.
I agree.
Especially if you are indenting and have to start continuing TSO/ISPF/ISREDIT
commands.
I find these difficult to read.
I have a couple of EDIT macros that
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/18/2006
at 10:27 AM, Marco Gianfranco Indaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Does somebody know how to read a particular member of PDS using MVS
address or Storage function only?
No.
I used swareq sequence in different program to retrieve allocated
dataset
No; you can
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
01/18/2006
at 09:15 PM, Johnny Luo [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As a beginner,it's interesting to find that there is also a 'unix' on
Z/os.However,I know nothing about it.Before doing some research,I
would like to raise two simple questions about ' What can USS do'.
ITYM
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/18/2006
at 08:44 AM, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hum, good question. I don't know. I think that I'm a bit sensitive
about copyright due to the fact that I'm a Linux user at home and
many commercial software vendors (and others) raise such a hew and
cry
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
01/17/2006
at 05:05 PM, Ale Eba [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
1. REVEIVEd with HOLDDATA (downloaded from Enhnaced HOLDDATA).
RECEIVE (sic) HOLDDATA early and often. If it's been a while, download
and RECEIVE a fresh set before doing another APPLY.
2. Apply check
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/18/2006
at 03:50 PM, Pohlen Mailinglist [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
just as every unix, go into omvs and enter ps -ef ! grep xxx.
Every Unix uses the vertical bar (ASCII 7C) as a pipe symbol, not the
bang (ASCII 21).
Pay attention, the sign behind the ps -ef is an
Tested and proven correct. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Does DDNAME=? override SUBSYS=?
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/17/2006
at 06:07 PM,
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:16:40 +0100, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
Once you do find the SysRq key, you can enter logoff without the
quotation
marks* and VTAM, performing its SSCP role, will terminate the session
between the application and the TELNET logical unit (LU) managed by the
Pat,
Thanks for clearing this up.
I'm afraid this was a failure of newsgroup technique. I initially thought I
had nothing to contribute here and I had deleted all posts in my
mailchecker. Then I reviewed the thread in Google groups and spotted the
possible BNJ confusion. Not having a suitable -
Hello all. I was wondering if anyone could explain to me what Clear Key
Encryption VS None clear Encryption is. I looked in the archives, but
only found a reference that clear key could run on the T-REX. I thought
that clear key encryption was purely SSL and the other was DES/3DES
where the 3des
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:06:03 -0500
DDNAME=x overrides everything not consistent with the target DD
statement. Also, overriding is symmetric.
And, if you believe that, you'd be astonished (but I know such
things rarely astonish
Seymour wrote :
it is both inefficient and confusing.
Please can you point me to some documentation that says that this is
inefficient?
How is it confusing to have a way of knowing exactly where you command
buffer is going?
A usage note on using address (env) on every call is that on return
I'm obliged to do some fancy copy and paste here. Is there a technique for
replying to a non-e-mail post with an e-mail?
Bruce,
snip
I'm concerned about side effects. Does anyone know of any other products,
IBM or otherwise, that rely on BNJMTERM even if NetView is not used?
end snip
By virtue
Hi!
I readed quickly all your answers!Thanks to all!
My problem with the CLOSE PENDING is the file is not going DUMP REQUIRED
forever...until it wants! I mean we don't know when it is going to change
its status. Sometimes we waited for 20 minutes or more! So we need to
know why it's not
Aren't enclaves doing work on behalf of a user, but using a new type
of
preemptible SRB rather than a TCB? Disclaimer: I know very little
about
the internals of z/OS, but remember reading this when I was trying to
figure out what an enclave is.
No. In this context, an enclave is a way of
What do you mean with None clear encryption? Are you talking about ICSF?
2006/1/18, Ward, Mike S [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello all. I was wondering if anyone could explain to me what Clear Key
Encryption VS None clear Encryption is. I looked in the archives, but
only found a reference that clear
In a recent note, Rob Scott said:
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:02:36 -0500
Please can you point me to some documentation that says that this is
inefficient?
How is it confusing to have a way of knowing exactly where you command
buffer is going?
A few questions, by analogy:
In
You are touching on the real issue of encryption: key management. Some
suggest that encryption keys are more sensitive and valuable than the
data they protect. And a lot harder to manage.
AFAIK, 'clear key encryption' means that secret encryption keys flow
over networks 'in the clear'. This can
We are currently running z/OS 1.4 with two LPARS that are using 3174-1L
3274-1L controllers that have 3270 terminals attached for IPL'ing our
two systems.
What can we do to upgrade this old hardware to something a little more
current?
We also will be moving to 1.7 within the next 6-8 months. Can
Pat,
A VTAM application, in effect, has access to the SSCP-LU session by means of
the TERMSESS macro. Here's some text from the CS SNA Programming manual:
The TERMSESS macroinstruction terminates sessions in which the application
program acts as the SLU.
The RPL OPTCD operand specifies the type
TSO PREFIX, JCL MSGCLASS and ASM equated symbols+lengths
All of the items you allude to here are constants 99.9% of the time (OK
you can change your prefix in TSO/REXX - but it is not often done)
The address environment can be changed by logic paths in executable code
at run-time.
I think
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Tuesday January 17 2006 13:06
In
!!AAAYAJ/6KggGInlFs/2GBOkJFIDCgAAAEPNVYp
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/16/2006
at 12:55 PM, Ray
|
Depends on what you mean by a real difference. z/OS uses at least
one
instruction which is not implemented on an IFL as it is on a GP
processor. That's why you will get a check stop condition if you IPL
z/OS in an LPAR which is defined as using an IFL.
But I will
You didn't mention your processor. But offhand I can think of:
1) Integrated Console Controller (ICC) with OSA Express
2) IBM 2074
3) Visara SCON and ICON products
Number 1 can replace 2 and 3 if you have the hardware. I'm not sure if
a Cisco router with CIPs and running TN3270 server will
Solution to S0C4 at CLOSE SVC found: Always code STRNO=(# I/O subtasks)+1 in
your JCL and you'll avoid the problem. Dynamically acquired strings
(default is STRNO=2) get freed at subtask termination, leading to S0C4 at
CLOSE.
Thanks to all for help on SUBSYS override.
Peter
-Original
On 1/18/2006 3:48 PM, Ward, Mike S wrote:
Hello all. I was wondering if anyone could explain to me what Clear Key
Encryption VS None clear Encryption is. I looked in the archives, but
only found a reference that clear key could run on the T-REX. I thought
that clear key encryption was purely SSL
Are you using any SMF exits such as IEFU29?
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Víctor de la Fuente
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 4:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How SMFDUMP works?
Hi!
I readed
On 18 Jan 2006 13:34:13 -0800,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Mason) wrote:
I'm obliged to do some fancy copy and paste here. Is there a technique for
replying to a non-e-mail post with an e-mail?
That may depend on your news reader. I'm using Forte Agent; *all* of my
posts are e-mail responses to the
You might want to post you question to the IBMTCP-L mailing list.
--
For IBMTCP-L subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO IBMTCP-L
- Original Message
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
