As a small, really small, system supporter, I think a PARMLIB driven
option with a fail by JCL error (YES/NO) option if execution system is
different than resolving system would permit most of the requested
function (It's almost always time/date in dataset names) without
introducing the feared
According to the manual each SMS candidate (or just secondary) volume
takes additional 4 bytes in the TIOT, so default TIOT of 32kB can hold
129 multi-vol (multi=59) DD's.
However the manual does not mention DVC. Do DVC candidate volumes take
4 bytes as well ?
Is it documented anywhere ?
Gibney, Dave wrote:
As a small, really small, system supporter, I think a PARMLIB driven
option with a fail by JCL error (YES/NO) option if execution system is
different than resolving system would permit most of the requested
function (It's almost always time/date in dataset names) without
- Original Message
From: Cox, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Works quite well here where we get JES2 down ( we forget about Z EOD
here - I was shocked that they did not do it here, but have gotten used
to it ), and follow steps 1 through 4 manually. It doesn't take me any
time at all to
Sorry guys,
my reply had obviously nothing to do with PDSE and LNKLST ... wrong subject.
Walter Marguccio
- Original Message
From: Cox, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Works quite well here where we get JES2 down ( we forget about Z EOD
here - I was shocked that they did not do it here, but
On 4/19/2006 1:13 PM, Joel Ivey wrote:
This is the racf listing for this user with omvs segment...
USER=XXXMM NAME=D S XXXMOND OWNER=ACCTPROG CREATED=99.274
DEFAULT-GROUP=ACCTPROG PASSDATE=06.081 PASS-INTERVAL=N/A
ATTRIBUTES=NONE
-Original Message-
From: Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:30:58
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Static Symbols in JCL
snip
Here are a couple scenarios:
1. Pick execution system. The JCL has already been parsed and
tokenised. How do you
If this is a brand new install via ServerPac, check out OA11753.
BK Kosmach
US Steel
From: Joel Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: hfs ishell owner field blank
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:02:37 -0500
I imagine
On 4/19/2006 2:44 PM, Paul Dineen wrote:
I'm wondering if others have had difficulty with PDSE's which are included
in LNKLST at IPL time, specifically deletion of them?
There have been times where a LNKLST'd PDS needs expansion: the dataset can
be 'dequeued' via SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE,
Hi
Thank you for your help.
Just to inform:
It is a XEROX 92C DOCUPRINT, with TCP/IP IPDS .
Now the XEROX is checking why don't send back the DOCUPRINT software
the proper response to the PSF
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I get very frustrated when I continue to read posts about deleting
libraries from the LNKLST. Anything that intends to delete a library from
the LNKLST should be prepared for unpredictable errors and immediate
re-IPL. This should be done as a last resort only.
The LNKLST UNALLOCATE command is NOT
Did you at least reassemble it with the 1.6 libraries?
Dave
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:12:04 -0500, Mark Zelden
wrote:
Not an issue for PDSE. It always counts as one extent, and
if it takes
an extent during update the module is accessable
I don't think it's mostly about dates and times in the dataset names (at
least my original post wasn't), but dates and times should be a separate
discussion.
Since date and time of dataset creation are not system-dependent, the OS
could supply variables and code to substitute for values in
Is there somebody who has a step-by-step document of how to install SSL on
OMVS z/OS 1.4?
Thanks,
Dan
System Engineer
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can set it up in RACF
Project Leader - MVS HIP
32 Old Slip
New York N.Y. 10005
212-806-4054
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dan Ponta
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SSL on OMVS
i remember seeing this APAR, as i was prepping my 1.4
with all tolerant fixes, readying for 1.7
anyway, i had about close to 300 PTFs applied, and several
of the HOLDACTIONS mentioned re-creating the IPL text, as
well as the SADump.
had no problems with that - IPLed smoothly 2 weeks ago.
did
Eric,
Unfortunately, this installation has to be done on OMVS, thanks.
Thanks,
Dan Ponta
System Engineer
-Original Message-
From: Mendelson, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SSL on OMVS
You can set it up in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Ponta
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SSL on OMVS
Is there somebody who has a step-by-step document of how to
install SSL on
OMVS z/OS
Yes, a vague request. Do you really mean how to set up hardware
encryption/ICSF? Do you want to set up a webserver? Are we talking
OpenSSH/SSL?
I personally don't remember what was done. For setting up a webserver
using software encryption, one of the first things that the HTTP Server
(Darren pre-approved this post.)
PTF UK90007 for z/OS DFSORT V1R5 and PTF UK90006 for DFSORT R14 (April,
2006) provide important enhancements to DFSORT and DFSORT's ICETOOL for
extracting variable position/length fields (e.g. CSV, delimited fields,
keyword separated fields, etc) into fixed
Jim,
Thanks for the reminder about program objects requiring PDSEs, something
not when considering the possiblity of converting PDSE's to PDS.
Paul
3) Converting IBM PDSEs back to PDS (with each version - annually
here).
You cannot do this. IBM PDSEs may contain members which use
Walt,
Regarding the concern of stopping MIM, the LPAR where MIM is stopped is a
SYSPROG only environment and MIM is not stopped in test or prod LPARs.
Anyone taking the risk of stopping MIM understands the risk, is working
alone in the LPAR and the stoppage is for a very short period. Don't
If I recall one of the Communication Server TCP/IP manuals has a
step-by-step list of what to do to set up SSL in an appendix, and if I'm
not mistaken, discussed both ways to handle the key rings: via gskyyman
as a USS command, or via RACF's support for digital certificates (and I'm
sure CA
Frank - are there any presentation materials available to help educate
applications folks on all the new capabilities (and I mean, from way back
like when ICETOOL was invented and OUTFIL came around, to the present)?
Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
Tim Hare wrote:
Frank - are there any presentation materials available to help educate
applications folks on all the new capabilities (and I mean, from way back
like when ICETOOL was invented and OUTFIL came around, to the present)?
Tim,
The best way to educate application folks on the new
I don't really know which APAR that might have caused my problem. For
sure I init the volume from the correct SAMPLIB because I used the same
JCL to reformat the volume after the init. This problem is really no
big deal, but it is a problem. I can append a reformat step in the
build IPL volume
We had this problem and we solved it changing the configuration of the OSA-
ICC card. Using the HMC console, under Single Object = Advanced
Facilities = Channels = Card Specific Advanced = Session Configurator,
we changed Response Mode to DISABLE.
Here is the explanation from book SA22-7990
I hope I don't sound too stupid here, but I am trying to define an AS400 to
the mainframe (a z/os system). Previously this AS400 was defined using a
SWNET definition which pointed to a TIC off a 3745. Now the AS400 has been
replaced and only has an IP address to identify it. Someone been this
Dave,
I believe writing a new IPL TEXT from the target during the clone
process is a standard. But my problem is I have to reformat the cloned
pack after the process, even though the cloned pack has been initialized
with IPL TEXT from the target.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Yesterday (4/19) I stumbled on a problem with virtual storage in High
Level Assembler. The problem surfaced in 1.5 because SYSUT1 was
eliminated, presumably in the interest of performance. Unfortunately, some
gigantic programs require gigantic region sizes to assemble entirely in
memory. The
John, could you please post this question or suitable variant on
IBM-Main:
Any suggestions, comments or directions on alternatives to
9037-002 Sysplex Timers for keeping time synchronized between two
Z-boxes before migrating from z/OS 1.5 to z/OS 1.7 and STP?
I'm rewriting an exit4 as exit54 and trying to replace $scan with $stmttab and
calls to rcardscn. The call to rcardscn is only finding the first keyword on a
card instead of finding them all. My processing routines for the 2nd and 3rd
values on the control card don't get called (based on
On Apr 19, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Tom Schmidt wrote:
--SNIP--
Ed,
Chris' very recent post reminded me of the other issue(s). There's a
fundamental difference between the started task use of static
symbols and
the batch job use of static
I checked my 1.7 macro libs, and there are no apparent changes in the
parm lists passed to the ACS exit routines for many releases, probably
no imcompatible changes ever.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas,
Normally this would be for the IBMTCP-L list/group but you've started it
here so we'll continue here. In any case I get the impression that most who
are active on IBMTCP-L are active here also.
It's implied that you run SNA applications on your AS/400 so the first thing
we need to know
On Thursday 20 April 2006 12:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... I began tracking open APAR PK09700, which suggested that IBM
might reinstate SYSUT1. Lo and behold, PK09700 closed today.
There's a new parm to control use of SYSUT1 and some new messages.
What goes around comes around . . .
Perhaps I need to explain further. To put your fears at rest, our 3745 is
alive and well. We have several other AS400's defined and still functioning
through the 3745. They are all defined as SWNET type applications. Even the
AS400 which is being replaced is still defined there, however it is/has
Thanks to all who've offered their thoughts.
To Peter Relson, let me apologize if I've added to your frustration level
in any way, shape or form. This is/was not my intent, I'm just trying to
understand why a new and improved DSORG prohibits actions allowed with an
older DSORG. I'm hoping
Thomas,
I thought we were making progress - until I got to the last paragraph. This
looks as if it might be a PC user who is trying to access an SNA application
on the AS/400 (and need to access the AS/400 through the mainframe?) - or -
who is trying to access a mainframe application using the
Are you trying to configure the AS/400 with an IP host address that can
talk to a z/OS IP stack? What do want to do? FTP?
Disclaimer: The information contained in this communication is confidential and
only for the use of the intended addressee(s). If you have received this
communication in
The question does not compute.
We still don't know what the business mission(s) might be. We know there
was some sort of connectivity, but here is nothing to say the connection
was actually used for anything: it was just there.
Perhaps you are talking nothing more than 3270 green screen. In
I think everyone so far is overlooking a possibility: that this new
AS/400 is configured to support Enterprise Extender. In that case, the IP
address is sufficient to connect to it, as long as you have EE running in
your Communication Server. You will also need to make sure that UDP ports
What is 128M virtual memory in these days?
SHOWzOS V713 and STRING64 will save some storage.
I always use REGION=0M for my assembly.
Tnx will keep an eye on PK09700.
Roland
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Skip Robinson
Skip Robinson wrote:
Yesterday (4/19) I stumbled on a problem with virtual storage in High
Level Assembler. The problem surfaced in 1.5 because SYSUT1 was
eliminated, presumably in the interest of performance. Unfortunately, some
gigantic programs require gigantic region sizes to assemble
Below is some information about the Wisconsin Linux for zSeries User
Group Meeting being held in the Milwaukee area on May 16. Its free,
and the ones I have gone to are
very good. If you are at all interested in running Linux on the
mainframe, this is a good meeting to come to if you are in
Dear List:
On my z/OS 1.6 system I am trying to create a new esoteric name using
the HCD.
On the Assign/Unassign Devices to Esoteric HCD panel, I am given a
list of devices by device groups.
Is there any way to have this HCD panel display only single device
numbers similar to the I/O Device
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:25:34 +0200, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is 128M virtual memory in these days?
...
I always use REGION=0M for my assembly.
...
While I agree that 128M is not significant these days, I wouldn't
recommend REGION=0 (as if anybody cares
John:
Did you ever get anywhere on this?
(It is fairly far down on my list of things to do with my 1.7 conversion...
I am still trying to make sense of the reader exit mess.)
Thanks, -jack
- Original Message -
From: John Hamlet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups:
The only thing I can think of is that the sysres cloning step is not
picking up Track 0. We use DFDSS with this control statement:
COPY FULL INDDNAME(FROM) OUTDDNAME(TO) ALLEXCP PURGE
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
Aha! This has nothing to do with the AS/400. Rather, you are asking how
to acquire/install/activate/configure Enterprise Extender. EE appears to
be a suite of products offered by Cisco and IBM that do SNA over IP
networks.
I would start here:
i'd suppose you would have:
1. cloned SYSRES (which contained old IPL text)
2. applied fixes to new target libraries in cloned volume
3. rebuilt IPL text onto cloned volume from newly updated
target libraries
- ravi.
Kok, Howi wrote:
Dave,
I believe writing
It can be done when the devices are added if the esoteric(s) is(are)
defined. Following the addition on the Define Device to Operating
System Configuration panel select the appropriate Config. On the
Actions on selected operating systems popup Select (connect,
change). Go past the Define Device
Cat skinning has always been more about result than process, but some
techniques are more trouble than others. We never rebuild IPL text on a
'live' sysres, that is, one that will actually be LOADed from. All
maintenance is installed on an SMPE-only target volume. IPL text is
rebuilt there,
Another reason not to do 0M - not having below-the-line LSQA for RTM to do
its magic in a runaway situation (S40D/S whatever the other one is (S0F
something I think)? ).
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
http://www.catherdersoftware.com/
http://www.mrmullins.big-bear-city.ca.us/
I've never understood why a wait-stated system needs to be system reset.
It reminds me of the story about the hunter whose buddy is accidentally
shot. (No partisan aspersions intended.) The guy is distraught and calls
911 in a panic. 'My friend just got killed in a hunting accident!'
'First'
What happens if the IEASYM parm in LOADxx specifies an used sufix; that
is, specifies (00,XY) but IEASYMXY does not exist? Is there just an
error message? A WTOR? Something worse?
What if IEASYMXY exists but is empty or contains just comments?
I've just asked for a new IEASYMxx member, and
Tim,
I know my posts tend to be rather long, particularly so when I need to guess
many possibilities from sparse input.
However, if you read them fully you'll see that on both my responses to this
query I managed to find an excuse to mention Enterprise Extender.
We all await clarifications from
In a recent note, john gilmore said:
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:47:02 +
STCKCONV and CONVTOD both use a table, the current instance of which can be
examined on page 7-189 of the z/Architecture principles of operation
publ.ication, SA-227632-04. (Worth noting is that this manual,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:09:22 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions, comments or directions on alternatives to
9037-002 Sysplex Timers for keeping time synchronized between two
Z-boxes before migrating from z/OS 1.5 to z/OS 1.7 and STP? I've read
some information on
Lately, on a z/OS 1.5 system, I needed to do an HLIST command.
The most convenient session I had was a z/OS Unix shell session,
linemode, via RLOGIN.
So, I typed tso hlist both. Long pause; many seconds; command
completed. No output displayed. OK. Plan B. I brought up an
x3270 window in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just like it when people do not focus on a specific question on
mine...Now...ONCE AGAIN...
PLEASE answer this question for me?
1. Suppose I were to install Linux or FreeBSD again and during the
installation it
will ask me if I want to set my Hardware Clock to UTC or
Was SMPE usermod. So should be correct matching level.
Regards
Bruce
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Hello Skip,
A System Reset Normal will get the processor to close all channels for
that lpar.
Some years back I had a discussion here about StandAlone dump process, and
this was discussed then
Regards
Bruce Hewson
--
For
I've never understood why a wait-stated system needs to be system reset.
I can't see any harm in a system reset, but really, does anyone know why
it's done? If so, we need to retrain all our operators. ;-)
System reset needs to be done to get rid of possibly hung RESERVES that
were/are not
65 matches
Mail list logo