Sorry if you've already done all the work...
http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article360919.ece
Tough, post-Enron company rules in the US may have to be relaxed to stem a
flow of listings
from New York to London, an American diplomat said yesterday.
Rushed through in 2002, following
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/28/2006
at 03:09 PM, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think you misunderstood my point.
No, you just didn't think it through. The Devil is in the details.
The Finite State Machines in your FAP describe what programs have to
do - programs written in
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 04/28/2006
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It requires re-allocation.
No, although I'd recommend a backup prior to an expand in place.
There are tools that can expand PDS directories, but I have not had
great success with them.
FIXPDS has worked
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/28/2006
at 10:04 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Actually I believe MFT predated MVT. Don't know by years (or less).
That gets complicated. SSS, MSS and MPS were announced concurrently,
but there were significant redesigns in the evolutions SSS-PCP,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
04/28/2006
at 01:18 PM, Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I used FDRReorg to get some additional space but not all that I need
Doesn't FDRREORG have options to use IEBCOPY as the data mover and to
expand the directory on the output side?
1. What would be the
Customers asked IBM for more capacity increments, which is why the System
z9 BC has so many. Just that simple.
As mentioned upthread, many customers wanted additional hardware
granularity, especially on the System z9 EC. Also, while it would be nice
if all software were available on a
//S2C9011 JOB (S2C9,XX,TI),'',
// MSGCLASS=T,
// NOTIFY=SYSUID,
//*TYPRUN=SCAN,
// CLASS=X
//*
//PROCLIB JCLLIB ORDER=(PROD.PROC.LIB,PROD.PROC.LIB)
//*
//JOBLIB DD DSN=POITS.BATPROD.LOAD,DISP=SHR
// DD
It requires re-allocation.
No, although I'd recommend a backup prior to an expand in place.
I said that for safety's sake.
All the IBM doc says they cannot be expanded.
Yet, the OP asked how to do it with IBM tools/utilities.
I have always used re-allocation, and I always will.
I have had no
Laurence,
I guess the question is what specifically do you want redirected to syslog
and why. Also need to know operating system level and which JES you are
running. Are you z/OS 1.4 with JES2 or JES3 or something like it?
The system log is used for many things and I personally would not put
Rashmi,
I haven't been keeping up with the latest developments in JCL for, well,
about 10 years or so now so I just assumed someone at the coal face would
find the answer to this thread quite quickly. However this issue has been
raging since Wednesday and still no resolution has been provided.
Make certain that the operands in the second and subsequent lines of the JOB
statement start IN OR BEFORE column 16. If theyn start after column 16, they are
treated as comments. That's also why the NOTIFY fails, as well.
The job looks something like this:
//S2C9011 JOB (S2C9,XX,TI),'',
//
The PDS 8.4 tool from the CBT site does a beautiful job of expanding a PDS
directory. I recommend it HIGHLY! You'll use the EXPANDDIR(nnn) to add nnn
directory blocks. If you're nervous about it, by all means take a FDR backup,
but I've never had it fail, in all the years I've used it. And PDS is
You're running out of CPU time. You'd probably be well advised to set up a
IEBCOPY batch job for the copy.
snip
Subject: ISPF Abend during a 3.3 copy
I'm trying to do an ISPF 3.3 copy of a very large PDS from one volume to
Rick,
An even better tool is the PDS 8.5 tool from the CBT site.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original Message -
From: Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PDS Directory Question
The PDS 8.4 tool from the CBT site does a
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:32:42 -0500 Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:You're running out of CPU time. You'd probably be well advised to set up a
:IEBCOPY batch job for the copy.
622 is not CPU time.
It is VTAM/TCAM thinking that the session is idle too long.
On Apr 29, 2006, at 9:57 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Of course, before IEBCOPY you had IEHMOVE. Don't ask, don't tell.
Seymour:
I can attest to that. When I was handed the keys to the kingdom I
found out that the entire library (source,load,procs) system was
based on IEHMOVE
On Saturday 29 April 2006 23:53, Tsai Laurence wrote:
Looking for any alternative to redirect the joblog to mvs syslog
when job abend , Is it doable ?
It should be doable, but probably not easy. Why don't you tell us
exactly what you want to do?
On a similar subject: I'd like to write
In a recent public radio news discussion about the ongoing Enron criminal
trials, the question was posed: if Enron were in business today, how would
the company measure up against the SOX standard? This whole agony and
ecstasy was conjured up, after all, to prevent another Enron catastrophe.
Hi,
I have made the changes to SYZCMDZ to have the IF nesting levels default to
8 levels (instead of 4) and I have added the ability to specify an amount of
time that a task had to be running in order to qualify as running. This
was the only request from anyone at IBMMAIN and it made a lot of
How come this thread is still active? The response below is the same
solution that I have encountered the past. You can not have special
characters that the File Tailoring will try to process like .
Sean
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20 matches
Mail list logo
